Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Schwinger Terms in Fermion Electrodynamics

Michael S. Chanowitz*

  • Laboratory of Nuclear Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850

  • *NSF Predoctoral Fellow.

Phys. Rev. D 2, 3016 – Published 15 December, 1970

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.3016

Abstract

We investigate the c-number Schwinger term and a possible operator Schwinger term in fermion electrodynamics, to the lowest nontrivial orders in perturbation theory. The results of our direct method of calculation agree with results previously obtained from the Bjorken-Johnson-Low high-energy limit. In particular, we find no evidence for the existence of an operator Schwinger term. The structure of our results helps us to understand the calculations by the split-point method of Schwinger, according to which there seems to be an operator Schwinger term. In the examples considered, we discover an analogy between our direct perturbation-theory calculations, which are performed in momentum space, and the split-point calculations, which are performed in coordinate space. Interchanging the equal-time limit with the phase-space integration is analogous to interchanging the equal-time limit with the split-point limit. Pursuing the analogy, we conclude that the split-point definition of the current probably is consistent with perturbation theory, and that the apparent discrepancies are due to the improper interchange of the equal-time limit with the split-point limit in previous calculations by the split-point method.

References (17)

  1. S. L. Adler and R. F. Dashen, Current Algebras (Benjamin, New York, 1968)
  2. R. A. Brandt, Phys. Rev. 166, 1795 (1968)
  3. T. Goto and T. Imamura, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 14, 396 (1955) J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. Letters 3, 296 (1959)
  4. D. G. Boulware and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. 186, 1442 (1969)
  5. J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. 148, 1467 (1966) K. Johnson and F. E. Low, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) Suppl. 37-38, 74 (1966)
  6. T. Nagylaki, Phys. Rev. 158, 1534 (1967) D. Boulware and J. Herbert, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1055 (1970)
  7. R. Jackiw and G. Preparata, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 975 (1969) S. L. Adler and W. K. Tung, ibid. 22, 978 (1969)
  8. R. A. Brandt and Y. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. 161, 1473 (1967)
  9. Omitted endnote

  10. Omitted endnote

  11. Omitted endnote

  12. M. J. Lighthill, Fourier Analysis and Generalized Functions (Cambridge U. P., London, 1958)
  13. K. Wilson, Phys. Rev. 179, 1499 (1969)
  14. Appendix C of [1], M. Chanowitz, Phys. Letters 31B, 374 (1970)
  15. Omitted endnote

  16. [2] Brandt
  17. P. Otterson, J. Math. Phys. 10, 1525 (1969)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation