Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Kuo Transformation in Linear and Nonlinear Chiral-Symmetry Theories

Susumu Okubo

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627

Phys. Rev. D 2, 3005 – Published 15 December, 1970

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.3005

Abstract

Model Hamiltonians with (3, 3*) ⊕ (3*, 3)-violating interaction in the theory of Gell-Mann, Oakes, and Renner have been investigated for both cases of linear and nonlinear realizations of the SW(3) theory in connection with the Kuo transformation. For the linear case, all mass formulas remain unchanged under the transformation, but not for the nonlinear case. Also, scattering amplitudes are found not to be invariant in general under the Kuo transformation for the nonlinear case. Physical interpretations of these puzzling facts are discussed in detail.

References (21)

  1. T. K. Kuo, Nuovo Cimento Letters 3, 803 (1970) Phys. Rev. D 2, 342 (1970)
  2. M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakes, and B. Renner, Phys. Rev. 175, 2195 (1968) S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 224 (1968)
  3. S. Okubo and V. S. Mathur, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 1412 (1969) Phys. Rev. D 1, 2046 (1970)
  4. S. Okubo and V. S. Mathur, Phys. Rev. D 2, 394 (1970)
  5. Omitted endnote

  6. S. Okubo and V. S. Mathur, [3] V. S. Mathur, S. Okubo, and J. Subba Rao, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2058 (1970)
  7. V. S. Mathur and S. Okubo, Phys. Rev. D 1, 3468 (1970)
  8. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961) ibid.124, 246 (1961)
  9. R. E. Marshak, N. Mukunda, and S. Okubo, Phys. Rev. 137, B698 (1965) R. E. Marshak, S. Okubo, and J. Wojtaszek, Phys. Rev. Letters 15, 463 (1965) Y. Hara, Phys. Rev. 139, B134 (1965)
  10. Omitted endnote

  11. S. Matsuda and S. Oneda, Phys. Rev. 179, 1301 (1969)
  12. J. A. Cronin, Phys. Rev. 161, 1483 (1967)
  13. A. Salam and J. Strathdee, Phys. Rev. D 1, 3296 (1970) R. Delbourgo, A. Salam, and J. Strathdee, Phys. Rev. 187, 1999 (1969)
  14. Omitted endnote

  15. L. Van Hove, Physica 18, 145 (1952) R. Haag, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat.-Fys. Medd. 29, No. 12 (1955) K. Friedricks, Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Theory of Fields (Interscience, New York, 1953)
  16. L. Bessler, T. Muta, H. Umezawa, and D. Welling, Phys. Rev. D 2, 349 (1970)
  17. A. Salam and J. Strathdee, Phys. Rev. 184, 1750 (1969)
  18. [12] T. K. Kuo and M. Sugawara, Phys. Rev. 151, 1181 (1966)
  19. S. Kamefuchi, S. L. O'Raifeartaigh, and S. Salam, Nucl. Phys. 28, 529 (1961) H. J. Borchers, Nuovo Cimento 15, 784 (1960)
  20. P. T. Mathews, Nuovo Cimento 6, 642 (1957)
  21. Y. M. P. Lam and Y. Y. Lee, Phys. Rev. D (to be published) Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 734 (1969)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation