Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Radiation reaction in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics

E. J. Moniz

D. H. Sharp

  • Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 and Theoretical Division, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, University of California, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

  • Theoretical Division, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, University of California, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

Phys. Rev. D 15, 2850 – Published 15 May, 1977

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2850

Abstract

We derive the Heisenberg operator equation of motion for a nonrelativistic point electron coupled to the quantized electromagnetic field, including radiation reaction. The derivation proceeds in close analogy with the classical theory of extended charges (with the Compton wavelength formally playing the role of a size parameter), and we give a systematic treatment of the classical problem, showing explicitly from the equation of motion that the classical theory shows no runaway solutions or preacceleration when the electron size exceeds the classical electron radius. In the quantum-mechanical case, we show that the electrostatic self-energy of a point electron is zero and that, for values of the fine-structure constant α1, the equation of motion admits neither runaway solutions nor noncausal motion. Furthermore, the correspondence limit of the solutions to the quantum-mechanical equation of motion agrees with that of the Lorentz-Dirac theory in the classical regime, but without the imposition of additional conditions and with no possibility of observable noncausality. Thus, a consistent picture of a classical point electron emerges in the correspondence limit of the quantum-mechanical theory.

References (22)

  1. Kramers, Oppenheimer, and Peierls, in Rapports du Huitieme Conseil Solvay, 1948, edited by R. Stoops (Brussels, 1950)
  2. J. Schwinger, Quantum Electrodynamics (Dover, New York, 1958)
  3. H. A. Lorentz, Theory of Electrons, 2nd ed. (Dover, New York, 1952)
  4. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. London A167, 148 (1938)
  5. T. Erber, Fortschr. Phys. 9, 343 (1961) J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1962) F. Rohrlich, Classical Charged Particles—Foundations of Their Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1965)
  6. D. Iwanenko and A. Sokolov, Klassiche Feldtheorie (Akademie, Berlin, 1953) R. Haag, Z. Naturforsch. 10A, 752 (1955) G. N. Plass, Rev. Mod. Phys. 33, 37 (1961) F. Rohrlich, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 13, 93 (1961)
  7. J. Fröhlich, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 19, 1 (1973) P. Blanchard, Commun. Math. Phys. 15, 156 (1969)
  8. W. Pauli and M. Fierz, Nuovo Cimento 15, 157 (1938)
  9. E. J. Moniz and D. H. Sharp, Phys. Rev. D 10, 1133 (1974)
  10. A. Sommerfeld, in Proceedings of the Third International Mathematics Congress, Heidelberg, 1904, p. 27 Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Goettingen, Math.—Phys. Kl. 99 (1904) 201 (1905) L. Page, Phys. Rev. 11, 376 (1918) ibid.24, 296 (1924) G. A. Schott, Proc. R. Soc. London A156, 471 (1936) ibid.A156, 487 (1936) ibid.A159, 548 (1937) ibid.A159, 570 (1937) T. Erber and S. M. Prastein, Acta Phys. Austriaca 32, 224 (1970) J. Daboul and J. H. D. Jensen, Z. Phys. 265, 455 (1973) G. Herglotz, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Goettingen, Math.—Phys. Kl. 357 (1903) D. Bohm and M. Weinstein, Phys. Rev. 74, 1789 (1948) D. J. Kaup, ibid. 152, 1130 (1966) T. Erber, [3] F. Henin, in High Energy Electromagnetic Interactions and Field Theory, edited by M. Lévy (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1967)
  11. N. G. van Kampen, Kgl. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk., Mat.—Fys. Medd. 26, No. 15 (1951)
  12. K. Wildemuth and K. Baumann, Nucl. Phys. 3, 612 (1957)
  13. R. Norton and W. K. R. Watson, Phys. Rev. 116, 1597 (1959)
  14. S. Coleman and R. Norton, Phys. Rev. 125, 1422 (1962)
  15. R. Bellman and K. L. Cooke, Differential-Difference Equations (Academic, New York, 1963)
  16. H. Levine, E. J. Moniz, and D. H. Sharp, Am. J. Phys. 45, 75 (1977)
  17. Omitted endnote

  18. F. Rohrlich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 375 (1964)
  19. F. Rohrlich, Acta. Phys. Austriaca 41, 375 (1975)
  20. Omitted endnote

  21. J. R. Ackerhalt, J. H. Eberly, J. R. Ackerhalt and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. D 10, 3350 (1974)
  22. S. L. Trubatch, Phys. Rev. 174, 1555 (1968)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation