Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Study of ω production near threshold in the reaction πpωn

J. Keyne, D. M. Binnie, J. Carr, N. C. Debenham, A. Duane, D. A. Garbutt, W. G. Jones, and I. Siotis

J. G. McEwen

  • Department of Physics, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

  • Department of Physics, Southampton University, Southampton, United Kingdom

Phys. Rev. D 14, 28 – Published 1 July, 1976

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.14.28

Abstract

We have investigated ω production in the reaction πpωn very close to threshold. The dependence of the mass, width, branching ratio, and cross section upon the final-state c.m. momentum, P*, were studied. The mass and width were independent of P* with values of 782.4 ± 0.5 and 10.22 ± 0.43 MeV, respectively. The branching ratio Γ(ωπ0γ)Γ(ωπ+ππ0) was also constant, having a value of 0.084 ± 0.013. An upper limit of 0.18 was set on the branching ratio Γ(ωπ0π0γ)Γ(ωπ0γ). We observed a rapid fall in the cross section below P*=100 MeV/c. This could not be explained in terms of S-wave production alone, but could be fitted by a resonant P wave plus a noninterfering S wave.

References (26)

  1. D. M. Binnie et al., Phys. Rev. D 8, 2789 (1973)
  2. N. R. Stanton, Ohio State Univ. Report No. C00-1545-92, 1971 (unpublished)
  3. D. G. Crabb, J. G. McEwen, E. G. Auld, and A. Langsford, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 48, 87 (1967)
  4. M. A. Abolins et al., paper presented to the International Conference on High Energy Physics, Heidelberg, 1967 (unpublished) J. S. Danburg et al., Phys. Rev. D 2, 2564 (1970)
  5. R. Kraemer et al., Phys. Rev. 136, 496 (1964)
  6. E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 73, 1002 (1948)
  7. Particle Data Group, Phys. Lett. 50B, 1 (1974)
  8. C. Baltay, J. C. Severiens, N. Yeh, and D. Zanello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 93 (1967)
  9. R. Bizzari et al., Nucl. Phys. B14, 169 (1969)
  10. H. W. Atherton et al., Nucl. Phys. B18, 221 (1970)
  11. R. Bizzari et al. Nucl. Phys. 827, 140 (1971)
  12. D. G. Coyne, W. R. Butler, G. Fang-Landau, and J. MacNaughton, Nucl. Phys. B32, 333 (1971)
  13. M. Aguilar-Benitez, S. U. Chung, R. L. Eisner, and N. P. Samios, Phys. Rev. D 6, 29 (1972)
  14. D. Benaksas et al. Phys. Lett. 42B, 507 (1972) ibid.42B, 511 (1972)
  15. R. M. Brown et al. Phys. Lett. 42B, 117 (1972)
  16. M. Roos and J. Rousku, Helsinki Univ. Report No. ISBN 951-45-0326-0, 1974 (unpublished)
  17. A. Duane et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 425 (1974)
  18. W. D. Apel et al. Phys. Lett. 41B, 234 (1972)
  19. V. V. Barmin et al. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 45, 1879 (1963) [Sov. Phys.—JETP 18, 1289 (1964)]
  20. A. B. Baldin et al. Yad. Fiz. 13, 758 (1971) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 13, 431 (1971)]
  21. S. M. Flatté et al. Phys. Rev. 145, 1050 (1966)
  22. D. V. Bugg, Nucl. Phys. B88, 381 (1975)
  23. Omitted endnote

  24. J. M. Blatt and V. F. Weisskopf, Theoretical Nuclear Physics (Wiley, New York, 1956)
  25. R. J. Cashmore, A. J. G. Hey, and P. J. Litchfield, Nucl. Phys. B98, 237 (1975)
  26. A. Brandstetter, S. M. Deen, and P. J. Litchfield, Rutherford Laboratory Report No. RHEL/R 224, 1971 (unpublished)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation