- Access by Xinjiang University
Hyperfine splitting of ground-state charmonium
Phys. Rev. D 13, 74 – Published 1 January, 1976
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.13.74
Abstract
The mass splitting of and its pseudoscalar partner is examined within the context of nonrelativistic linear-potential models for bound charmed quarks. If the Coulomb-type short-range gluon interaction is the sole contribution to this hyperfine splitting, then a mass splitting of 15-25 MeV is obtained. However, if the long-range forces that confine quarks also produce shorter-range spin-spin interactions, then the mass splitting is predicted to be in the range 40-80 MeV. If one abandons the assignment of as the first radial excitation of , then the is predicted to lie 150-300 MeV below . This possibility has the consequence that the rate predicted for the yet-unobserved decay is uncomfortably large.
References (25)
- T. Appelquist and H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 43 (1975) A. De Rújula and S. L. Glashow, ibid. 34, 46 (1975) T. Appelquist et al., ibid. 34, 365 (1975) S. Borchardt et al., ibid. 34, 38 (1975)
- J. J. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1404 (1974) J.-E. Augustin et al., ibid. 33, 1406 (1974) C. Bacci et al., ibid. 33, 1408 (1974)
- G. S. Abrams et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1453 (1975)
- J.-E. Augustin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 764 (1975)
- V. Teplitz and P. Tarjanne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 447 (1963) J. D. Bjorken and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Lett. 11, 255 (1964) D. Amati et al., Nuovo Cimento 34, 1732 (1964) Phys. Lett. 11, 190 (1964) Y. Hara, Phys. Rev. 134, B701 (1964) L. B. Okun, Phys. Lett. 12, 250 (1964) Z. Maki and Y. Ohnuki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 32, 144 (1964) M. Nauenberg (unpublished)
- S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970)
- H. Schnitzer, Brandeis University report, 1974 (unpublished) E. Eichten et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 369 (1975) J. F. Gunion and R. S. Willey, Phys. Rev. D 12, 174 (1975) K. Jhung, K. H. Chung, and R. S. Willey, ibid. 12, 1999 (1975) T. P. Cheng and P. B. James, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 917 (1975) B. J. Harrington et al., ibid. 34, 168 (1975) ibid.34, 706 (1975) J. Kogut and L. Susskind, ibid. 34, 706 (1975) ibid. 34, 767 (1975) Phys. Rev. D 12, 2821 (1975) J. S. Kang and H. J. Schnitzer, ibid. 12, 841 (1975) ibid.12, 2791 (1975)
- M. K. Gaillard, B. W. Lee, and J. L. Rosner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 277 (1975)
- B. W. Lee and C. Quigg, Fermilab Report No. 74/110-THY, 1974 (unpublished)
- A. De Rújula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D 12, 147 (1975)
- S. Coleman and H. J. Schnitzer, Phys. Rev. 134, B863 (1964)
- K. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974) R. Balian, J. M. Drouffe, and C. Itzykson, ibid. 10, 3376 (1974) J. Kogut and L. Susskind, ibid. 11, 395 (1975)
- [10]
- T. Appelquist, Caltech. Report No. CALT 68-499 (unpublished)
- S. Blaha, Phys. Rev. D 10, 4268 (1974) S. Kauffmann, Caltech. Phys. report, 1974 (unpublished) J. E. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2178 (1975)
- J. Schwinger, Particles, Sources, and Fields (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1973), Vol. II
- J. Borenstein, Harvard University thesis, 1975 (unpublished)
- G. 't Hooft (unpublished) H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346 (1973) D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, ibid. 30, 1343 (1973)
- Harrington et al., [3]
- T. Appelquist and H. D. Politzer, [1]
- J. S. Kang and H. J. Schnitzer, Phys. Rev. D 12, 841 (1975)
- C. G. Callan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 52 (1975)
- T. Appelquist, [14]
- H. Harari, Phys. Lett. 57B, 265 (1975) SLAC Report No. SLAC-PUB-1589 (unpublished)
- J. S. Kang and H. J. Schnitzer, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2791 (1975)