Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Production rates of long-lived radionuclides Be10 and Al26 under direct muon-induced spallation in granite quartz and its implications for past high-energy cosmic ray fluxes

H. Sakurai1,*,†, Y. Kurebayashi1, S. Suzuki1, K. Horiuchi2, Y. Takahashi1, N. Doshita1, S. Kikuchi1, F. Tokanai1, N. Iwata1 et al.

Y. Tajima1,3, S. Gunji1, E. Inui4, K. Kondo1, T. Oe1, N. Sasaki2, S. Abe5, T. Sato5, H. Matsuzaki6, and V. Vlachoudis7

  • 1Faculty of Science, Yamagata University, 1-4-12 Kojirakawa, Yamagata 990-8560, Japan
  • 2Graduate School of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, 3, Bunkyo-chou, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8561, Japan
  • 3Institute of Arts and Sciences, Yamagata University, 1-4-12 Kojirakawa, Yamagata 990-8560, Japan
  • 4Radio-isotopes Laboratory, Yamagata University, 1-4-12 Kojirakawa, Yamagata 990-8560, Japan
  • 5Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan
  • 6Micro-analysis Laboratory, Tandem Accelerator (MALT), The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, 2-11-16, Yayoi, Bunkyou-Ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
  • 7CERN, Geneva-23 CH-1211 Switzerland

  • *Corresponding author: sakurai@sci.kj.yamagata-u.ac.jp
  • Present address: Faculty of Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata 990-8560, Japan.

Phys. Rev. D 109, 102005 – Published 9 May, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.102005

Abstract

This study measured the Be10 and Al26 production cross sections of muon-induced long-lived radionuclides to investigate the long-term variations in high-energy cosmic ray muon yields and high-energy galactic cosmic rays over a few million years. We exposed targets consisting of synthetic silica plates and quartz samples in a 1-m-long granite core to a beam containing 8.79×1012 positive muons over 120days with an energy of 160 GeV extracted at the COMPASS experiment line at CERN-SPS. The experiment revealed the Be10 and Al26 production rates in the synthetic silica plates as (1.8±0.1)×107 and (1.3±0.08)×106atoms/muon/(gSiO2/cm2), respectively. In addition, we obtained the production rates in the granite core as approximately (4.1±0.2)×107 and (4.0±0.3)×106atoms/muon/(gquartz/cm2) for Be10 and Al26, respectively, although those rates varied with location. Furthermore, we performed full muon exposure simulations for the identical experimental setup using two simulators, phits and fluka, to examine the Be10 and Al26 production rates obtained in the muon beam experiment. The experimental rates are approximately 2–3 times higher than the simulated ones. Although the simulations are complex and depend on many models. Additionally, the phits and fluka analysis of the particle contributions to the Be10 and Al26 production rates indicated that the positive muons and secondary particles produce those nuclides at a constant rate and an increasing rate with respect to granite core location, respectively, suggesting direct muon-induced spallation and secondary particle-induced spallation. The experimental production ratio A26l/B10e also exhibited characteristics of both spallation types. We conclude that the production cross sections of Be10 and Al26 for the target atoms of oxygen and silicon were 9.2±0.6μb and 132.3±7.7μb via direct muon-induced spallation in the synthetic silica, and 27.2±1.9μb and 486±44μb including secondary particle-induced spallation in the granite quartz, respectively. Additionally, the depth profiles of Be10 and Al26 concentrations in rocks estimated from the known total muon flux deep underground and this study’s cross sections were comparable to those of the concentrations measured at depths greater than 5000g/cm2. Overall, our study showed that these cross sections revealed by the high-energy muon beam experiment are a valuable tool for estimating variations in high-energy galactic cosmic rays over a few million years using in situ rocks and simulators.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. M. Garcia-Munoz, G. M. Mason, and J. A. Simpson, Astrophys. J. 217, 859 (1977).
  2. N. E. Yanasak, M. E. Wiedenbeck, R. A. Mewaldt, A. J. Davis, A. C. Cummings, J. S. George, R. A. Leske et al., Astrophys. J. 563, 768 (2001).
  3. F. J. Kerr and D. Lynden-Bell, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 221, 1023 (1986).
  4. K. Knie, G. Korschinek, T. Faestermann, E. A. Dorfi, G. Rugel, and A. Wallner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171103 (2004).
  5. A. Wallner, J. Feige, N. Kinoshita, M. Paul, L. K. Fifield, R. Golser, M. Honda et al., Nature (London) 532, 69 (2016).
  6. M. Amenomori, S. Ayabe, X. J. Bi, D. Chen, S. W. Cui, Danzengluobu, L. K. Ding et al., Science 314, 439 (2006).
  7. D.-M. Mei and A. Hime, Phys. Rev. D 73, 053004 (2006).
  8. T. Gaisser, Cosmic Rays and Particle Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1990).
  9. R. Braucher, E. T. Brown, D. L. Bourlès, and F. Colin, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 211, 251 (2003).
  10. K. J. Kim and P. A. J. Englert, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 223, 113 (2004).
  11. G. Balco, Quat. Geochronol. 39, 150 (2017).
  12. Y.-F. Wang, V. Balic, G. Gratta, A. Fassò, S. Roesler, and A. Ferrari, Phys. Rev. D 64, 013012 (2001).
  13. B. Heisinger, D. Lal, A. J. T. Jull, P. Kubik, S. Ivy-Ochs, K. Knie, and E. Nolte, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 200, 345 (2002).
  14. P. Abbon, E. Albrecht, V. Yu Alexakhin, Y. Alexandrov, G. D. Alexeev, M. G. Alekseev, A. Amoroso et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 577, 455 (2007).
  15. C. Ahdida et al., Front. Phys. 9, 788253 (2022).
  16. S. Abe and T. Sato, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 53, 451 (2016).
  17. L. B. Bezrukov and E. V. Bugaev, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 33, 635 (1981).
  18. T. K. Minorikawa, T. Kitamura, and K. Kobayakawa, Nuovo. Cimento 4, 471 (1981).
  19. D. E. Groom, N. V. Mokhov, and S. I. Striganov, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78, 183 (2001).
  20. ShinEtsukagakukogyo Ltd. VIOSIL.
  21. T. Yuguchi et al., Ganseki. Kobutsu. Kagaku. 39, 50 (2010) (in Japanese).
  22. The Nilaco Corporation NI, 313551.
  23. Y. Kurebayashi, H. Sakurai, Y. Takahashi, N. Doshita, S. Kikuchi, F. Tokanai, K. Horiuchi et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 799, 54 (2015).
  24. H. Matsuzaki, C. Nakano, H. Yamashita, Y. Maejima, Y. Miyairi, S. Wakasa, and K. Horiuchi, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 223–224, 92 (2004).
  25. H. Matsuzaki, C. Nakano, Y. S. Tsuchiya, S. Ito, A. Morita, H. Kusuno, Y. Miyake et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 361, 63 (2015).
  26. C. P. Kohl and K. Nishiizumi, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 3583 (1992).
  27. Horiuchi Laboratory, at http://www.st.hirosaki-u.ac.jp/∼kh/.
  28. K. Horiuchi, A. Ohta, T. Uchida, H. Matsuzaki, Y. Shibata, and H. Motoyama, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 259, 584 (2007).
  29. K. Horiuchi and H. Matsuzaki, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 361, 423 (2015).
  30. R. C. Reedy, K. Nishiizumi, D. Lal, J. R. Arnold, P. A. J. Englert, J. Klein, R. Middleton, A. J. T. Jull, and D. J. Donahue, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 92, 297 (1994).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation