- Access by Xinjiang University
Production rates of long-lived radionuclides and under direct muon-induced spallation in granite quartz and its implications for past high-energy cosmic ray fluxes
Phys. Rev. D 109, 102005 – Published 9 May, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.102005
Abstract
This study measured the and production cross sections of muon-induced long-lived radionuclides to investigate the long-term variations in high-energy cosmic ray muon yields and high-energy galactic cosmic rays over a few million years. We exposed targets consisting of synthetic silica plates and quartz samples in a 1-m-long granite core to a beam containing positive muons over with an energy of 160 GeV extracted at the COMPASS experiment line at CERN-SPS. The experiment revealed the and production rates in the synthetic silica plates as and , respectively. In addition, we obtained the production rates in the granite core as approximately and for and , respectively, although those rates varied with location. Furthermore, we performed full muon exposure simulations for the identical experimental setup using two simulators, phits and fluka, to examine the and production rates obtained in the muon beam experiment. The experimental rates are approximately 2–3 times higher than the simulated ones. Although the simulations are complex and depend on many models. Additionally, the phits and fluka analysis of the particle contributions to the and production rates indicated that the positive muons and secondary particles produce those nuclides at a constant rate and an increasing rate with respect to granite core location, respectively, suggesting direct muon-induced spallation and secondary particle-induced spallation. The experimental production ratio also exhibited characteristics of both spallation types. We conclude that the production cross sections of and for the target atoms of oxygen and silicon were and via direct muon-induced spallation in the synthetic silica, and and including secondary particle-induced spallation in the granite quartz, respectively. Additionally, the depth profiles of and concentrations in rocks estimated from the known total muon flux deep underground and this study’s cross sections were comparable to those of the concentrations measured at depths greater than . Overall, our study showed that these cross sections revealed by the high-energy muon beam experiment are a valuable tool for estimating variations in high-energy galactic cosmic rays over a few million years using in situ rocks and simulators.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
- Galactic disks
- High-energy accelerators & colliders
- Interstellar medium
- Normal galaxies
- Particle accelerators
- Particle-beam sources
- Solar system & its planets
- Supernova remnants
- 20 ≤ A ≤ 38
- A ≤ 5
- Interplanetary magnetic field
- Nuclear mass ranges
- Cosmic ray & astroparticle detectors
- Cosmic rays & astroparticles
- Particle sources & targets
Article Text
References (30)
- M. Garcia-Munoz, G. M. Mason, and J. A. Simpson, Astrophys. J. 217, 859 (1977).
- N. E. Yanasak, M. E. Wiedenbeck, R. A. Mewaldt, A. J. Davis, A. C. Cummings, J. S. George, R. A. Leske et al., Astrophys. J. 563, 768 (2001).
- F. J. Kerr and D. Lynden-Bell, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 221, 1023 (1986).
- K. Knie, G. Korschinek, T. Faestermann, E. A. Dorfi, G. Rugel, and A. Wallner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171103 (2004).
- A. Wallner, J. Feige, N. Kinoshita, M. Paul, L. K. Fifield, R. Golser, M. Honda et al., Nature (London) 532, 69 (2016).
- M. Amenomori, S. Ayabe, X. J. Bi, D. Chen, S. W. Cui, Danzengluobu, L. K. Ding et al., Science 314, 439 (2006).
- D.-M. Mei and A. Hime, Phys. Rev. D 73, 053004 (2006).
- T. Gaisser, Cosmic Rays and Particle Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1990).
- R. Braucher, E. T. Brown, D. L. Bourlès, and F. Colin, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 211, 251 (2003).
- K. J. Kim and P. A. J. Englert, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 223, 113 (2004).
- G. Balco, Quat. Geochronol. 39, 150 (2017).
- Y.-F. Wang, V. Balic, G. Gratta, A. Fassò, S. Roesler, and A. Ferrari, Phys. Rev. D 64, 013012 (2001).
- B. Heisinger, D. Lal, A. J. T. Jull, P. Kubik, S. Ivy-Ochs, K. Knie, and E. Nolte, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 200, 345 (2002).
- P. Abbon, E. Albrecht, V. Yu Alexakhin, Y. Alexandrov, G. D. Alexeev, M. G. Alekseev, A. Amoroso et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 577, 455 (2007).
- C. Ahdida et al., Front. Phys. 9, 788253 (2022).
- S. Abe and T. Sato, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 53, 451 (2016).
- L. B. Bezrukov and E. V. Bugaev, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 33, 635 (1981).
- T. K. Minorikawa, T. Kitamura, and K. Kobayakawa, Nuovo. Cimento 4, 471 (1981).
- D. E. Groom, N. V. Mokhov, and S. I. Striganov, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78, 183 (2001).
- ShinEtsukagakukogyo Ltd. VIOSIL.
- T. Yuguchi et al., Ganseki. Kobutsu. Kagaku. 39, 50 (2010) (in Japanese).
- The Nilaco Corporation NI, 313551.
- Y. Kurebayashi, H. Sakurai, Y. Takahashi, N. Doshita, S. Kikuchi, F. Tokanai, K. Horiuchi et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 799, 54 (2015).
- H. Matsuzaki, C. Nakano, H. Yamashita, Y. Maejima, Y. Miyairi, S. Wakasa, and K. Horiuchi, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 223–224, 92 (2004).
- H. Matsuzaki, C. Nakano, Y. S. Tsuchiya, S. Ito, A. Morita, H. Kusuno, Y. Miyake et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 361, 63 (2015).
- C. P. Kohl and K. Nishiizumi, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 3583 (1992).
- Horiuchi Laboratory, at http://www.st.hirosaki-u.ac.jp/∼kh/.
- K. Horiuchi, A. Ohta, T. Uchida, H. Matsuzaki, Y. Shibata, and H. Motoyama, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 259, 584 (2007).
- K. Horiuchi and H. Matsuzaki, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 361, 423 (2015).
- R. C. Reedy, K. Nishiizumi, D. Lal, J. R. Arnold, P. A. J. Englert, J. Klein, R. Middleton, A. J. T. Jull, and D. J. Donahue, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 92, 297 (1994).