- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Odderon as a Regge spin-3 oddball in pp and pp¯ elastic scattering

Jingle B. Magallanes1,†, Prin Sawasdipol2,‡, Chakrit Pongkitivanichkul2,§, and Daris Samart2,*

  • 1Department of Physics, Mindanao State University—Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, 9200, Philippines
  • 2Khon Kaen Particle Physics and Cosmology Theory Group (KKPaCT), Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, 123 Mitraphap Road, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand

  • *Corresponding author: darisa@kku.ac.th
  • †jingle.magallanes@g.msuiit.edu.ph
  • ‡p.namwongsa@kkumail.com
  • §chakpo@kku.ac.th
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 109, 034007 – Published 6 February, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.034007

Abstract

In this work, we propose that the odderon is a Regge spin-3 odd-glueball tensor. To demonstrate the proposal, we study the pp and pp¯ elastic scattering by including the contributions of the spin-3 odderon and spin-2 pomeron exchange in the processes. The phenomenological effective Lagrangian approach is used to calculate the pp and pp¯ elastic scattering amplitudes at the tree level. Additionally, the Donnachie-Landschoff ansatz of the odderon and pomeron propagators was used in further analysis. We fit the theoretical results with the various experimental data of the pp and pp¯ scattering at the TeV scale to determine the model parameters in the present work. By using the model parameters, the Chew-Frautschi plot of the tensor odderon Regge trajectory is evaluated. As a result, the odderon spin-3 mass is predicted to be 3.2 GeV. In addition, a phase rotation is applied to the amplitude of our model in order to satisfy the geometric scaling at a very low t region. Moreover, the total cross section of our model is compatible with the results from TOTEM and its extrapolation from D0 collaboration. It was found that the total cross section also satisfies the Friossart bound at the Regge limit.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (105)

  1. R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshoff, D. I. Olive, and J. C. Polkinghorne, The Analytic S-Matrix (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1966).
  2. V. N. Gribov, The Theory of Complex Angular Momenta: Gribov Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  3. P. D. B. Collins, An Introduction to Regge Theory and High-Energy Physics, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009).
  4. R. J. Eden, Rep. Prog. Phys. 34, 995 (1971).
  5. P. D. B. Collins, Phys. Rep. 1, 103 (1971).
  6. C. B. Chiu, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 22, 255 (1972).
  7. A. C. Irving and R. P. Worden, Phys. Rep. 34, 117 (1977).
  8. G. F. Chew and S. C. Frautschi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 394 (1961).
  9. V. N. Gribov, JETP Lett. 41, 667 (1961).
  10. S. Donnachie, H. G. Dosch, O. Nachtmann, and P. Landshoff, Pomeron Physics and QCD (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004), Vol. 19.
  11. J. R. Forshaw and D. A. Ross, Quantum Chromodynamics and the Pomeron, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 9 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2022).
  12. P. D. B. Collins, F. D. Gault, and A. D. Martin, Nucl. Phys. B80, 135 (1974).
  13. A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Nucl. Phys. B244, 322 (1984).
  14. A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. B 296, 227 (1992).
  15. L. Lukaszuk and B. Nicolescu, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 8, 405 (1973).
  16. S. V. Akkelin and E. S. Martynov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 53, 1007 (1991).
  17. E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 199 (1977).
  18. I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28, 822 (1978).
  19. E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, Sov. Phys. JETP 44, 443 (1976).
  20. L. N. Lipatov, Phys. Lett. B 251, 284 (1990).
  21. S. Narison, Z. Phys. C 26, 209 (1984).
  22. S. Narison, Nucl. Phys. B509, 312 (1998).
  23. L. Tang and C.-F. Qiao, Nucl. Phys. B904, 282 (2016).
  24. H. B. Meyer and M. J. Teper, Phys. Lett. B 605, 344 (2005).
  25. C. J. Morningstar and M. J. Peardon, Phys. Rev. D 60, 034509 (1999).
  26. W. Ochs, J. Phys. G 40, 043001 (2013).
  27. S. R. Cotanch, I. J. General, and P. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 656 (2007).
  28. A. B. Kaidalov and Y. A. Simonov, Phys. Lett. B 636, 101 (2006).
  29. A. B. Kaidalov and Y. A. Simonov, Phys. Lett. B 477, 163 (2000).
  30. A. B. Kaidalov and Y. A. Simonov, Phys. At. Nucl. 63, 1428 (2000).
  31. F. J. Llanes-Estrada, S. R. Cotanch, P. J. de A. Bicudo, J. E. F. T. Ribeiro, and A. P. Szczepaniak, Nucl. Phys. A710, 45 (2002).
  32. R. C. Brower, J. Polchinski, M. J. Strassler, and C.-I. Tan, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2007) 005.
  33. R. C. Brower, M. Djuric, and C.-I. Tan, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2009) 063.
  34. H. Boschi-Filho and N. R. F. Braga, Eur. Phys. J. C 32, 529 (2004).
  35. H. Boschi-Filho, N. R. F. Braga, and H. L. Carrion, Phys. Rev. D 73, 047901 (2006).
  36. P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, F. Jugeau, and S. Nicotri, Phys. Lett. B 652, 73 (2007).
  37. D. Li and M. Huang, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 088.
  38. R. C. Brower, M. S. Costa, M. Djurić, T. Raben, and C.-I. Tan, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 104.
  39. A. Ballon-Bayona, R. Carcassés Quevedo, M. S. Costa, and M. Djurić, Phys. Rev. D 93, 035005 (2016).
  40. E. Folco Capossoli and H. Boschi-Filho, Phys. Lett. B 753, 419 (2016).
  41. E. Folco Capossoli, D. Li, and H. Boschi-Filho, Phys. Lett. B 760, 101 (2016).
  42. A. Dymarsky and D. Melnikov, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 164.
  43. H. B. Meyer, D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2004.
  44. E. Gregory, A. Irving, B. Lucini, C. McNeile, A. Rago, C. Richards, and E. Rinaldi, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 170.
  45. Y. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. D 73, 014516 (2006).
  46. F. J. Llanes-Estrada, P. Bicudo, and S. R. Cotanch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 081601 (2006).
  47. V. Mathieu, N. Kochelev, and V. Vento, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 18, 1 (2009).
  48. C. Ewerz, M. Maniatis, and O. Nachtmann, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 342, 31 (2014).
  49. C. Ewerz, P. Lebiedowicz, O. Nachtmann, and A. Szczurek, Phys. Lett. B 763, 382 (2016).
  50. R. J. M. Covolan, J. Montanha, and K. A. Goulianos, Phys. Lett. B 389, 176 (1996).
  51. M. M. Block and F. Halzen, Phys. Rev. D 86, 051504 (2012).
  52. I. Szanyi, L. Jenkovszky, R. Schicker, and V. Svintozelskyi, Nucl. Phys. A998, 121728 (2020).
  53. L. Jenkovszky, Symmetry 12, 1784 (2020).
  54. W. Broniowski, L. Jenkovszky, E. Ruiz Arriola, and I. Szanyi, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074012 (2018).
  55. T. Csorgo and I. Szanyi, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 611 (2021).
  56. T. Csörgő, T. Novak, R. Pasechnik, A. Ster, and I. Szanyi, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 180 (2021).
  57. T. Csörgő, R. Pasechnik, and A. Ster, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 62 (2019).
  58. A. Ster, L. Jenkovszky, and T. Csorgo, Phys. Rev. D 91, 074018 (2015).
  59. M. M. Block and R. N. Cahn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 563 (1985).
  60. V. A. Khoze, A. D. Martin, and M. G. Ryskin, Phys. Lett. B 780, 352 (2018).
  61. F. Halzen, G. I. Krein, and A. A. Natale, Phys. Rev. D 47, 295 (1993).
  62. A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. 123B, 345 (1983).
  63. W.-X. Ma, A. W. Thomas, P.-N. Shen, and L.-J. Zhou, Commun. Theor. Phys. 36, 577 (2001).
  64. Z.-H. Hu, L.-J. Zhou, W.-X. Ma, J. Zhang, and J.-F. Liu, Commun. Theor. Phys. 38, 65 (2002).
  65. X.-R. He, L.-J. Zhou, and W.-X. Ma, Commun. Theor. Phys. 39, 78 (2003).
  66. Z.-H. Hu, L.-J. Zhou, and W.-X. Ma, Commun. Theor. Phys. 49, 729 (2008).
  67. L.-J. Zhou, Z.-H. Hu, and W.-X. Ma, Commun. Theor. Phys. 45, 1069 (2006).
  68. J. Lu, L.-J. Zhou, and Z.-J. Fang, Chin. Phys. C 44, 024105 (2020).
  69. J. Bartels, L. N. Lipatov, and G. P. Vacca, Phys. Lett. B 477, 178 (2000).
  70. S. K. Domokos, J. A. Harvey, and N. Mann, Phys. Rev. D 80, 126015 (2009).
  71. S. K. Domokos, J. A. Harvey, and N. Mann, Phys. Rev. D 82, 106007 (2010).
  72. E. Avsar, Y. Hatta, and T. Matsuo, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 037.
  73. Z. Hu, B. Maddock, and N. Mann, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 093.
  74. W. Xie, A. Watanabe, and M. Huang, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 053.
  75. P. Burikham and D. Samart, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 452 (2019).
  76. Z. Liu, W. Xie, and A. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014018 (2023).
  77. Z. Liu, W. Xie, F. Sun, S. Li, and A. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054025 (2022).
  78. A. Ballon-Bayona, R. Carcassés Quevedo, and M. S. Costa, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 085.
  79. I. Iatrakis, A. Ramamurti, and E. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. D 94, 045005 (2016).
  80. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 012009 (2012).
  81. V. M. Abazov et al. (TOTEM, D0 Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 062003 (2021).
  82. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094050 (2021).
  83. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 103, L091503 (2021).
  84. L. Zhang, C. Chen, Y. Chen, and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 105, 026020 (2022).
  85. N. Bence, A. Lengyel, Z. Tarics, E. Martynov, and G. Tersimonov, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 265 (2021).
  86. E. F. Capossoli, J. P. M. Graça, and H. Boschi-Filho, Phys. Rev. D 105, 026026 (2022).
  87. P. Lebiedowicz, SciPost Phys. Proc. 6, 010 (2022).
  88. C. Baldenegro, C. Royon, and A. M. Stasto, Phys. Lett. B 830, 137141 (2022).
  89. Z.-F. Cui, D. Binosi, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, and D. N. Triantafyllopoulos, Phys. Lett. B 839, 137826 (2023).
  90. P. Lebiedowicz, O. Nachtmann, and A. Szczurek, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034023 (2022).
  91. C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia, B. Lucini, and D. Vadacchino, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2022 (2023) 392.
  92. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995).
  93. F. Close, S. Donnachie, and G. Shaw, eds., Electromagnetic Interactions and Hadronic Structure (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2009), Vol. 25.
  94. F. A. Berends and J. C. J. M. van Reisen, Nucl. Phys. B164, 286 (1980).
  95. C. Avila et al. (E811 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 445, 419 (1999).
  96. G. Antchev et al. (TOTEM Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 91 (2020).
  97. G. Antchev et al. (TOTEM Collaboration), Europhys. Lett. 101, 21002 (2013).
  98. G. Antchev et al. (TOTEM Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 103 (2019).
  99. H. Dembinski et al. (2020), 10.5281/zenodo.3949207.
  100. F. James and M. Roos, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10, 343 (1975).
  101. G. Antchev et al. (TOTEM Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 785 (2019).
  102. G. Pancheri, S. Pacetti, and Y. Srivastava, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034014 (2019).
  103. A. Martin, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 7, 811 (1973).
  104. A. Martin, Phys. Lett. B 404, 137 (1997).
  105. www.e-science.in.th.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 109, 034007– Published 6 February, 2024
  • Received 11 September 2023
  • Accepted 11 January 2024
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation