Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Measurement of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background using SPT-3G 2018 data

Z. Pan1,2,3,*, F. Bianchini4,5,6,†, W. L. K. Wu4,6, P. A. R. Ade7, Z. Ahmed4,6, E. Anderes8, A. J. Anderson9,2, B. Ansarinejad10, M. Archipley11,12 et al.

K. Aylor13, L. Balkenhol10,14, P. S. Barry7, R. Basu Thakur2,15, K. Benabed14, A. N. Bender1,2,16, B. A. Benson9,2,16, L. E. Bleem1,2, F. R. Bouchet14, L. Bryant17, K. Byrum1, E. Camphuis14, J. E. Carlstrom2,17,3,1,16, F. W. Carter1,2, T. W. Cecil1, C. L. Chang1,2,16, P. Chaubal10, G. Chen18, P. M. Chichura3,2, H.-M. Cho6, T.-L. Chou3,2, J.-F. Cliche19, A. Coerver20, T. M. Crawford2,16, A. Cukierman4,6,5, C. Daley11, T. de Haan21, E. V. Denison22, K. R. Dibert16,2, J. Ding23, M. A. Dobbs19,24, A. Doussot14, D. Dutcher3,2, W. Everett25, C. Feng26, K. R. Ferguson27, K. Fichman3,2, A. Foster28, J. Fu11, S. Galli14, A. E. Gambrel2, R. W. Gardner17, F. Ge13, N. Goeckner-Wald5,4, R. Gualtieri1, F. Guidi14, S. Guns20, N. Gupta10,29, N. W. Halverson25,30, A. H. Harke-Hosemann1,11, N. L. Harrington20, J. W. Henning1,2, G. C. Hilton22, E. Hivon14, G. P. Holder26, W. L. Holzapfel20, J. C. Hood2, D. Howe18, N. Huang20, K. D. Irwin4,5,6, O. Jeong20, M. Jonas9, A. Jones18, F. Kéruzoré1, T. S. Khaire23, L. Knox13, A. M. Kofman11,31, M. Korman28, D. L. Kubik9, S. Kuhlmann1, C.-L. Kuo4,5,6, A. T. Lee20,32, E. M. Leitch2,16, K. Levy10, A. E. Lowitz2, C. Lu26, A. Maniyar4,5,6, F. Menanteau11,12, S. S. Meyer2,17,3,16, D. Michalik18, M. Millea20, J. Montgomery19, A. Nadolski11, Y. Nakato5, T. Natoli2, H. Nguyen9, G. I. Noble33,34, V. Novosad23, Y. Omori2,16, S. Padin2,15, P. Paschos17, J. Pearson23, C. M. Posada23, K. Prabhu13, W. Quan3,2, S. Raghunathan12, M. Rahimi10, A. Rahlin9,2, C. L. Reichardt10, D. Riebel18, B. Riedel17, J. E. Ruhl28, J. T. Sayre25, E. Schiappucci10, E. Shirokoff2,16, G. Smecher35, J. A. Sobrin9,2, A. A. Stark36, J. Stephen17, K. T. Story4,5, A. Suzuki32, S. Takakura37,30, C. Tandoi11, K. L. Thompson4,5,6, B. Thorne13, C. Trendafilova12, C. Tucker7, C. Umilta26, L. R. Vale22, K. Vanderlinde33,34, J. D. Vieira11,26,12, G. Wang1, N. Whitehorn38, V. Yefremenko1, K. W. Yoon4,5,6, M. R. Young9,2, and J. A. Zebrowski2,16,9

  • 1High-Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue., Lemont, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 2Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 4Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, 452 Lomita Mall, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • 5Department of Physics, Stanford University, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • 6SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
  • 7School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3YB, United Kingdom
  • 8Department of Statistics, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA
  • 9Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, MS209, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
  • 10School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • 11Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 1002 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
  • 12Center for AstroPhysical Surveys, National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
  • 13Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA
  • 14Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR 7095, CNRS and Sorbonne Université, 98 bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France
  • 15California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard., Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 16Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 17Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 18University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 19Department of Physics and McGill Space Institute, McGill University, 3600 Rue University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2T8, Canada
  • 20Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 21High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan
  • 22NIST Quantum Devices Group, 325 Broadway Mailcode 817.03, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
  • 23Materials Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Lemont, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 24Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, CIFAR Program in Gravity and the Extreme Universe, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8, Canada
  • 25CASA, Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 26Department of Physics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
  • 27Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
  • 28Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
  • 29CSIRO Space and Astronomy, PO Box 1130, Bentley, Western Australia 6102, Australia
  • 30Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 31Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, 209 S. 33rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19064, USA
  • 32Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 33Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H4, Canada
  • 34David A. Dunlap Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H4, Canada
  • 35Three-Speed Logic, Inc., Victoria, British Columbia V8S 3Z5, Canada
  • 36Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 37Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 38Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA

  • *panz@anl.gov
  • fbianc@slac.stanford.edu

Phys. Rev. D 108, 122005 – Published 12 December, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.122005

Abstract

We present a measurement of gravitational lensing over 1500deg2 of the Southern sky using SPT-3G temperature data at 95 GHz and 150 GHz taken in 2018. The lensing amplitude relative to a fiducial Planck 2018 Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmology is found to be 1.020±0.060, excluding instrumental and astrophysical systematic uncertainties. We conduct extensive systematic and null tests to check the robustness of the lensing measurements, and report a minimum-variance combined lensing power spectrum over angular multipoles of 50<L<2000, which we use to constrain cosmological models. When analyzed alone and jointly with primary cosmic microwave background (CMB) spectra within the ΛCDM model, our lensing amplitude measurements are consistent with measurements from SPT-SZ, SPTpol, ACT, and Planck. Incorporating loose priors on the baryon density and other parameters including uncertainties on a foreground bias template, we obtain a 1σ constraint on σ8Ωm0.25=0.595±0.026 using the SPT-3G 2018 lensing data alone, where σ8 is a common measure of the amplitude of structure today and Ωm is the matter density parameter. Combining SPT-3G 2018 lensing measurements with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data, we derive parameter constraints of σ8=0.810±0.033, S8σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.836±0.039, and Hubble constant H0=68.81.6+1.3kms1Mpc1. Our preferred S8 value is higher by 1.6 to 1.8σ compared to cosmic shear measurements from DES-Y3, HSC-Y3, and KiDS-1000 at lower redshift and smaller scales. We combine our lensing data with CMB anisotropy measurements from both SPT-3G and Planck to constrain extensions of ΛCDM. Using CMB anisotropy and lensing measurements from SPT-3G only, we provide independent constraints on the spatial curvature of ΩK=0.0140.026+0.023 (95% C.L.) and the dark energy density of ΩΛ=0.7220.026+0.031 (68% C.L.). When combining SPT-3G lensing data with SPT-3G CMB anisotropy and BAO data, we find an upper limit on the sum of the neutrino masses of mν<0.30eV (95% C.L.). Due to the different combination of angular scales and sky area, this lensing analysis provides an independent check on lensing measurements by ACT and Planck.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (117)

  1. A. Lewis and A. Challinor, Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB, Phys. Rep. 429, 1 (2006).
  2. F. Bianchini, W. L. K. Wu, P. A. R. Ade et al., Constraints on cosmological parameters from the 500deg2 SPTPOL lensing power spectrum, Astrophys. J. 888, 119 (2020).
  3. F. J. Qu, B. D. Sherwin, M. S. Madhavacheril et al., The atacama cosmology telescope: A measurement of the DR6 CMB lensing power spectrum and its implications for structure growth, arXiv:2304.05202.
  4. M. Kaplinghat, L. Knox, and Y.-S. Song, Determining neutrino mass from the cosmic microwave background alone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 241301 (2003).
  5. J. Lesgourgues, L. Perotto, S. Pastor, and M. Piat, Probing neutrino masses with CMB lensing extraction, Phys. Rev. D 73, 045021 (2006).
  6. J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor, Massive neutrinos and cosmology, Phys. Rep. 429, 307 (2006).
  7. R. de Putter, O. Zahn, and E. V. Linder, CMB lensing constraints on neutrinos and dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 79, 065033 (2009).
  8. Z. Pan and L. Knox, Constraints on neutrino mass from cosmic microwave background and large-scale structure, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 3200 (2015).
  9. B. D. Sherwin, J. Dunkley, S. Das et al., Evidence for dark energy from the cosmic microwave background alone using the atacama cosmology telescope lensing measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 021302 (2011).
  10. E. Calabrese, A. Cooray, M. Martinelli, A. Melchiorri, L. Pagano, A. Slosar, and G. F. Smoot, CMB lensing constraints on dark energy and modified gravity scenarios, Phys. Rev. D 80, 103516 (2009).
  11. T. Namikawa, F. R. Bouchet, and A. Taruya, CMB lensing bispectrum as a probe of modified gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 98, 043530 (2018).
  12. S. Singh, S. Alam, R. Mandelbaum, U. Seljak, S. Rodriguez-Torres, and S. Ho, Probing gravity with a joint analysis of galaxy and CMB lensing and SDSS spectroscopy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 482, 785 (2018).
  13. Y. Zhang, A. R. Pullen, S. Alam, S. Singh, E. Burtin, C.-H. Chuang, J. Hou, B. W. Lyke, A. D. Myers, R. Neveux, A. J. Ross, G. Rossi, and C. Zhao, Testing general relativity on cosmological scales at redshift z1.5 with quasar and CMB lensing, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 1013 (2020).
  14. S. Das, B. D. Sherwin, P. Aguirre et al., Detection of the power spectrum of cosmic microwave background lensing by the atacama cosmology telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 021301 (2011).
  15. B. D. Sherwin, A. van Engelen, N. Sehgal et al., Two-season atacama cosmology telescope polarimeter lensing power spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 95, 123529 (2017).
  16. O. Darwish, M. S. Madhavacheril, B. D. Sherwin et al., The atacama cosmology telescope: A CMB lensing mass map over 2100 square degrees of sky and its cross-correlation with BOSS-CMASS galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500, 2250 (2020).
  17. P. A. R. Ade et al. (BICEP2 Collaboration and Keck Array Collaboration), BICEP2/Keck Array VIII: Measurement of gravitational lensing from large-scale B-mode polarization, Astrophys. J. 833, 228 (2016).
  18. P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, M. Amiri et al., BICEP/Keck. XVII. Line-of-sight distortion analysis: Estimates of gravitational lensing, anisotropic cosmic birefringence, patchy reionization, and systematic errors, Astrophys. J. 949, 43 (2023).
  19. P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2013 results. XVII. Gravitational lensing by large-scale structure, Astron. Astrophys. 571, A17 (2014).
  20. P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2015 results. XV. Gravitational lensing, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A15 (2016).
  21. N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A8 (2020).
  22. J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein, and A. Lewis, CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 039.
  23. P. A. R. Ade, Y. Akiba et al. (POLARBEAR Collaboration), Measurement of the cosmic microwave background polarization lensing power spectrum with the POLARBEAR experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 021301 (2014).
  24. M. Andr’es Osvaldo Aguilar Fa’undez, K. Arnold, C. Baccigalupi et al., Measurement of the cosmic microwave background polarization lensing power spectrum from two years of POLARBEAR data, Astrophys. J. 893, 85 (2020).
  25. A. van Engelen, R. Keisler, O. Zahn et al., A measurement of gravitational lensing of the microwave background using south pole telescope data, Astrophys. J. 756, 142 (2012).
  26. K. T. Story, D. Hanson, P. A. R. Ade et al., A measurement of the cosmic microwave background gravitational lensing potential from 100 square degrees of SPTpol data, Astrophys. J. 810, 50 (2015).
  27. Y. Omori, R. Chown, G. Simard et al., A 2500deg2 CMB lensing map from combined south pole telescope and Planck data, Astrophys. J. 849, 124 (2017).
  28. W. L. K. Wu, L. M. Mocanu, P. A. R. Ade et al., A measurement of the cosmic microwave background lensing potential and power spectrum from 500deg2 of SPTpol temperature and polarization data, Astrophys. J. 884, 70 (2019).
  29. M. Millea, C. M. Daley, T.-L. Chou et al., Optimal cosmic microwave background lensing reconstruction and parameter estimation with SPTpol data, Astrophys. J. 922, 259 (2021).
  30. Y. Omori, E. J. Baxter, C. Chang et al., Joint analysis of dark energy survey year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck. I. Construction of CMB lensing maps and modeling choices, Phys. Rev. D 107, 023529 (2023).
  31. D. Dutcher, L. Balkenhol, P. A. R. Ade et al., Measurements of the E -mode polarization and temperature-E -mode correlation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 data, Phys. Rev. D 104, 022003 (2021).
  32. L. Balkenhol, D. Dutcher, P. A. R. Ade et al., Constraints on ΛCDM extensions from the SPT-3G 2018 E E and T E power spectra, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083509 (2021).
  33. L. Balkenhol, D. Dutcher, A. Spurio Mancini et al., Measurement of the CMB temperature power spectrum and constraints on cosmology from the SPT-3G 2018 TT, TE, and EE dataset, Phys. Rev. D 108, 023510 (2023).
  34. N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  35. W. L. Freedman, Measurements of the Hubble constant: Tensions in perspective, Astrophys. J. 919, 16 (2021).
  36. A. G. Riess, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri et al., A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the Hubble constant with 1kms1Mpc1 uncertainty from the Hubble space telescope and the SH0ES team, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L7 (2022).
  37. Y. S. Murakami, A. G. Riess, B. E. Stahl, W. D. Kenworthy, D.-M. A. Pluck, A. Macoretta, D. Brout, D. O. Jones, D. M. Scolnic, and A. V. Filippenko, Leveraging SN Ia spectroscopic similarity to improve the measurement of H0, arXiv:2306.00070.
  38. M. Asgari, C.-A. Lin, B. Joachimi et al., KiDS-1000 cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics, Astron. Astrophys. 645, A104 (2021).
  39. S. Joudaki, H. Hildebrandt, D. Traykova, N. E. Chisari, C. Heymans, A. Kannawadi, K. Kuijken, A. H. Wright, M. Asgari, T. Erben, H. Hoekstra, B. Joachimi, L. Miller, T. Tröster, and J. L. van den Busch, KiDS+VIKING-450 and DES-Y1 combined: Cosmology with cosmic shear, Astron. Astrophys. 638, L1 (2020).
  40. T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon et al., Dark energy survey year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023520 (2022).
  41. J. E. Carlstrom, P. A. R. Ade, K. A. Aird et al., The 10 meter south pole telescope, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 123, 568 (2011).
  42. J. A. Sobrin, A. J. Anderson, A. N. Bender et al., The design and integrated performance of SPT-3G, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 258, 42 (2022).
  43. R. Keisler, C. L. Reichardt, K. A. Aird et al., A measurement of the damping tail of the cosmic microwave background power spectrum with the south pole telescope, Astrophys. J. 743, 28 (2011).
  44. Y. Hoffman and E. Ribak, Constrained realizations of Gaussian fields—A simple algorithm, Astrophys. J. Lett. 380, L5 (1991).
  45. A. Benoit-Lévy, T. Déchelette, K. Benabed, J.-F. Cardoso, D. Hanson, and S. Prunet, Full-sky CMB lensing reconstruction in presence of sky-cuts, Astron. Astrophys. 555, A37 (2013).
  46. S. Raghunathan, G. P. Holder, J. G. Bartlett, S. Patil, C. L. Reichardt, and N. Whitehorn, An inpainting approach to tackle the kinematic and thermal SZ induced biases in CMB-cluster lensing estimators, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2019) 037.
  47. L. E. Bleem, B. Stalder, T. de Haan et al., Galaxy clusters discovered via the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect in the 2500-square-degree SPT-SZ survey, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 216, 27 (2015).
  48. M. Lembo, G. Fabbian, J. Carron, and A. Lewis, CMB lensing reconstruction biases from masking extragalactic sources, Phys. Rev. D 106, 023525 (2022).
  49. Planck Collaboration, Planck Legacy Archive (2018), https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/planck/pla.
  50. A. Lewis and A. Challinor, CAMB: Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background, Astrophysics Source Code Library (2011), record ascl:1102.026, http://ascl.net/1102.026.
  51. K. M. Górski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wandelt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelmann, healpix: A framework for high-resolution discretization and fast analysis of data distributed on the sphere, Astrophys. J. 622, 759 (2005).
  52. A. Lewis, Lensed CMB simulation and parameter estimation, Phys. Rev. D 71, 083008 (2005).
  53. C. L. Reichardt, S. Patil, P. A. R. Ade et al., An improved measurement of the secondary cosmic microwave background anisotropies from the SPT-SZ + SPTpol surveys, Astrophys. J. 908, 199 (2021).
  54. M. P. Viero, L. Wang, M. Zemcov et al., HerMES: Cosmic infrared background anisotropies and the clustering of dusty star-forming galaxies, Astrophys. J. 772, 77 (2013).
  55. L. D. Shaw, D. Nagai, S. Bhattacharya, and E. T. Lau, Impact of cluster physics on the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich power spectrum, Astrophys. J. 725, 1452 (2010).
  56. L. D. Shaw, D. H. Rudd, and D. Nagai, Deconstructing the kinetic SZ power spectrum, Astrophys. J. 756, 15 (2012).
  57. O. Zahn, C. L. Reichardt, L. Shaw et al., Cosmic microwave background constraints on the duration and timing of reionization from the south pole telescope, Astrophys. J. 756, 65 (2012).
  58. A. van Engelen, S. Bhattacharya, N. Sehgal, G. P. Holder, O. Zahn, and D. Nagai, CMB lensing power spectrum biases from galaxies and clusters using high-angular resolution temperature maps, Astrophys. J. 786, 13 (2014).
  59. Y. Omori, agora: Multi-component simulation for cross-survey science, arXiv:2212.07420.
  60. W. B. Everett, L. Zhang, T. M. Crawford et al., Millimeter-wave point sources from the 2500 square degree SPT-SZ survey: Catalog and population statistics, Astrophys. J. 900, 55 (2020).
  61. A. Cavaliere and R. Fusco-Femiano, The distribution of hot gas in clusters of galaxies, Astron. Astrophys. 70, 677 (1978).
  62. W. Hu and T. Okamoto, Mass reconstruction with cosmic microwave background polarization, Astrophys. J. 574, 566 (2002).
  63. G. Fabbian, A. Lewis, and D. Beck, CMB lensing reconstruction biases in cross-correlation with large-scale structure probes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2019) 057.
  64. T. Namikawa, D. Hanson, and R. Takahashi, Bias-hardened CMB lensing, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 431, 609 (2013).
  65. L. M. Mocanu, T. M. Crawford, K. Aylor et al., Consistency of cosmic microwave background temperature measurements in three frequency bands in the 2500-square-degree SPT-SZ survey, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2019) 038.
  66. N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, N. Bartolo et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A11 (2016).
  67. O. J. Dunn, Multiple comparisons among means, American Statistical Association 56, 52 (1961).
  68. T. Namikawa, D. Yamauchi, and A. Taruya, Full-sky lensing reconstruction of gradient and curl modes from CMB maps, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2012) 007.
  69. M. Robertson and A. Lewis, How to detect lensing rotation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2023) 048.
  70. P. Peebles, The Large Scale Structure of the Universe (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1980).
  71. A. J. Mead, T. Tröster, C. Heymans, L. Van Waerbeke, and I. G. McCarthy, A hydrodynamical halo model for weak-lensing cross correlations, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A130 (2020).
  72. M. S. Madhavacheril, F. J. Qu, B. D. Sherwin et al., The atacama cosmology telescope: DR6 gravitational lensing map and cosmological parameters, arXiv:2304.05203.
  73. M. M. Schmittfull, A. Challinor, D. Hanson, and A. Lewis, Joint analysis of CMB temperature and lensing-reconstruction power spectra, Phys. Rev. D 88, 063012 (2013).
  74. P. Motloch, W. Hu, and A. Benoit-Lévy, CMB lens sample covariance and consistency relations, Phys. Rev. D 95, 043518 (2017).
  75. J. Peloton, M. Schmittfull, A. Lewis, J. Carron, and O. Zahn, Full covariance of CMB and lensing reconstruction power spectra, Phys. Rev. D 95, 043508 (2017).
  76. C. Trendafilova, The impact of cross-covariances between the CMB and reconstructed lensing power, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2023) 071.
  77. J. Hartlap, P. Simon, and P. Schneider, Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix, Astron. Astrophys. 464, 399 (2007).
  78. G. Simard, Y. Omori, K. Aylor et al., Constraints on cosmological parameters from the angular power spectrum of a combined 2500deg2 SPT-SZ and Planck gravitational lensing map, Astrophys. J. 860, 137 (2018).
  79. S. Alam, M. Ata, S. Bailey et al., The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: Cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 470, 2617 (2017).
  80. A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W. J. Percival, A. Burden, and M. Manera, The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample—I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z=0.15, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 449, 835 (2015).
  81. F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, L. Campbell, Q. Parker, W. Saunders, and F. Watson, The 6dF galaxy survey: Baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 3017 (2011).
  82. S. Alam, M. Aubert, S. Avila et al., Completed SDSS-IV extended baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the apache point observatory, Phys. Rev. D 103, 083533 (2021).
  83. N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A5 (2020).
  84. R. J. Cooke, M. Pettini, and C. C. Steidel, One percent determination of the primordial deuterium abundance, Astrophys. J. 855, 102 (2018).
  85. V. Mossa, K. Stöckel, F. Cavanna et al., The baryon density of the Universe from an improved rate of deuterium burning, Nature (London) 587, 210 (2020).
  86. Z. Pan, L. Knox, and M. White, Dependence of the cosmic microwave background lensing power spectrum on the matter density, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 2941 (2014).
  87. E. J. Baxter and B. D. Sherwin, Determining the Hubble constant without the sound horizon scale: Measurements from CMB lensing, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 1823 (2021).
  88. W. L. Freedman, B. F. Madore, D. Hatt, T. J. Hoyt, I.-S. Jang, R. L. Beaton, C. R. Burns, M. G. Lee, A. J. Monson, J. R. Neeley, M. M. Phillips, J. A. Rich, and M. Seibert, The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble program. VIII. An independent determination of the Hubble constant based on the tip of the red giant branch, Astrophys. J. 882, 34 (2019).
  89. W. L. K. Wu, P. Motloch, W. Hu, and M. Raveri, Hubble constant difference between CMB lensing and BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D 102, 023510 (2020).
  90. E. Abdalla et al., Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies, J. High Energy Astrophys. 34, 49 (2022).
  91. A. Amon, D. Gruen, M. A. Troxel et al., Dark energy survey year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data calibration, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023514 (2022).
  92. L. F. Secco, S. Samuroff, E. Krause et al., Dark energy survey year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023515 (2022).
  93. X. Li, T. Zhang, S. Sugiyama et al., Hyper suprime-cam year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear two-point correlation functions, arXiv:2304.00702.
  94. R. Dalal, X. Li, A. Nicola et al., Hyper suprime-cam year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra, arXiv:2304.00701.
  95. T. M. C. Abbott et al., DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys, Open J. Astrophys. 6, 2305.(2023).
  96. P. Motloch and W. Hu, Lensinglike tensions in the Planck legacy release, Phys. Rev. D 101, 083515 (2020).
  97. P. Lemos and A. Lewis, CMB constraints on the early Universe independent of late-time cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 107, 103505 (2023).
  98. E. Rosenberg, S. Gratton, and G. Efstathiou, CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 4620 (2022).
  99. S. Aiola, E. Calabrese, L. Maurin et al., The atacama cosmology telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2020) 047.
  100. E. Calabrese, A. Slosar, A. Melchiorri, G. F. Smoot, and O. Zahn, Cosmic microwave weak lensing data as a test for the dark universe, Phys. Rev. D 77, 123531 (2008).
  101. K. M. Smith, A. Cooray, S. Das, O. Doré, D. Hanson, C. Hirata, M. Kaplinghat, B. Keating, M. Loverde, N. Miller, G. Rocha, M. Shimon, and O. Zahn, Gravitational lensing, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1141, American Institute of Physics Conference Series (2009), pp. 121–178, 10.1063/1.3160886.
  102. K. N. Abazajian, K. Arnold, J. Austermann et al., Neutrino physics from the cosmic microwave background and large scale structure, Astropart. Phys. 63, 66 (2015).
  103. Y. Fukuda, T. Hayakawa, E. Ichihara et al., Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
  104. Q. R. Ahmad, R. C. Allen, T. C. Andersen et al., Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral-current interactions in the sudbury neutrino observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002).
  105. M. Aker et al., Direct neutrino-mass measurement with sub-electronvolt sensitivity, Nat. Phys. 18, 160 (2022).
  106. K. Abazajian, G. Addison, P. Adshead, Z. Ahmed, S. W. Allen, D. Alonso, M. Alvarez, A. Anderson, K. S. Arnold, C. Baccigalupi et al. (CMB-S4 Collaboration), CMB-S4 science case, reference design, and project plan, arXiv:1907.04473.
  107. M. Gerbino, E. Grohs, M. Lattanzi et al., Synergy between cosmological and laboratory searches in neutrino physics, Phys. Dark Universe 42, 101333 (2023).
  108. R. Stompor and G. Efstathiou, Gravitational lensing of cosmic microwave background anisotropies and cosmological parameter estimation, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 302, 735 (1999).
  109. W. Handley, Curvature tension: Evidence for a closed universe, Phys. Rev. D 103, L041301 (2021).
  110. E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, and J. Silk, Planck evidence for a closed Universe and a possible crisis for cosmology, Nat. Astron. 4, 196 (2019).
  111. M. Millea and U. c. v. Seljak, Marginal unbiased score expansion and application to CMB lensing, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103531 (2022).
  112. L. Legrand and J. Carron, Lensing power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background with deep polarization experiments, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123519 (2022).
  113. F. Bianchini and M. Millea, Inference of gravitational lensing and patchy reionization with future CMB data, Phys. Rev. D 107, 043521 (2023).
  114. H. Hui, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed et al., BICEP array: A multi-frequency degree-scale CMB polarimeter, in Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 10708, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series (2018), p. 1070807, 10.1117/12.2311725.
  115. P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, M. Amiri et al., Improved constraints on primordial gravitational waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck observations through the 2018 observing season, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151301 (2021).
  116. R. Pordes et al., The open science grid, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 78, 012057 (2007).
  117. I. Sfiligoi, D. C. Bradley, B. Holzman, P. Mhashilkar, S. Padhi, and F. Wurthwein, The pilot way to grid resources using glideinWMS, in 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering (2009), Vol. 2, pp. 428–432, 10.1109/CSIE.2009.950.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation