- Open Access
- Access by Xinjiang University
Three- and four-point functions in -even Lorentz-violating scalar QED
Phys. Rev. D 107, 045005 – Published 13 February, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.045005
Abstract
The renormalization of quantum field theories usually assumes Lorentz and gauge symmetries, besides the general restrictions imposed by unitarity and causality. However, the set of renormalizable theories can be enlarged by relaxing some of these assumptions. In this work, we consider the particular case of a -preserving but Lorentz-breaking extension of scalar QED. For this theory, we calculate the one-loop radiative corrections to the three- and four-point scalar-vector vertex functions, at the lowest order in the Lorentz-violation parameters, and we explicitly verify that the resulting low-energy effective action is compatible with the usual gauge invariance requirements. With these results, we complete the one-loop renormalization of the model at the leading order in the Lorentz-violating parameters.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (29)
- D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997).
- D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998).
- V. A. Kostelecky, C. D. Lane, and A. G. M. Pickering, Phys. Rev. D 65, 056006 (2002).
- T. Mariz, J. R. Nascimento, and A. Yu. Petrov, Lorentz Symmetry Breaking—Classical and Quantum Aspects (Springer, Cham, 2022).
- B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 86, 045008 (2012).
- L. C. T. Brito, H. G. Fargnoli, and A. P. Baêta Scarpelli, Phys. Rev. D 87, 125023 (2013).
- B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 87, 045012 (2013).
- J. R. Nascimento, A. Yu. Petrov, and C. M. Reyes, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 541 (2018).
- J. Furtado, R. M. M. C. Filho, and J. F. Assunção, arXiv:2004.05680.
- A. P. Baeta Scarpelli, L. C. T. Brito, J. C. C. Felipe, J. R. Nascimento, and A. Yu. Petrov, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 850 (2017).
- V. A. Kostelecký and N. Russell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011); updated as arXiv:0801.0287v15.
- V. A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes, Phys. Lett. B 757, 510 (2016).
- V. A. Kostelecký, A. C. Melissinos, and M. Mewes, Phys. Lett. B 761, 1 (2016).
- M. Schreck, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 135009 (2017).
- B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 78, 085018 (2008).
- V. A. Kostelecký and J. D. Tasson, Phys. Lett. B 749, 551 (2015).
- O. Bertolami and C. S. Carvalho, Phys. Rev. D 61, 103002 (2000).
- A. Addazi et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103948 (2022).
- S. M. Carroll and H. Tam, Phys. Rev. D 78, 044047 (2008).
- A. P. Baeta Scarpelli, J. C. C. Felipe, L. C. T. Brito, and A. Yu. Petrov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 37, 2250100 (2022).
- R. Mertig and M. Bahm, and A. Denne, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991).
- T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001).
- A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
- O. A. Battistel, A. L. Mota, and M. C. Nemes, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13, 1597 (1998).
- O. A. Battistel and M. C. Nemes, Phys. Rev. D 59, 055010 (1999).
- A. L Cherchiglia, M. Sampaio, and M. C. Nemes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26, 2591 (2011).
- V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 69, 105009 (2004).
- L. C. T. Brito, H. G. Fargnoli, A. P. Baeta Scarpelli, M. Sampaio, and M. C. Nemes, Phys. Lett. B 673, 220 (2009).
- T. Mariz, R. Martinez, J. R. Nascimento, and A. Yu. Petrov, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 974 (2021).