- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Assessing the detectability of the secondary spin in extreme mass-ratio inspirals with fully relativistic numerical waveforms

Gabriel Andres Piovano1, Richard Brito1, Andrea Maselli2,3, and Paolo Pani1

  • 1Dipartimento di Fisica, “Sapienza” Università di Roma & Sezione INFN Roma1, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy
  • 2Gran Sasso Science Institute (GSSI), I-67100 L’Aquila, Italy
  • 3INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, I-67100 Assergi, Italy

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 104, 124019 – Published 3 December, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.124019

Abstract

Extreme mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs) detectable by the Laser Inteferometric Space Antenna (LISA) are unique probes of astrophysics and fundamental physics. Parameter estimation for these sources is challenging, especially because the waveforms are long, complicated, known only numerically, and slow to compute in the most relevant regime, where the dynamics is relativistic. We perform a time-consuming Fisher-matrix error analysis of the EMRI parameters using fully relativistic numerical waveforms to leading order in an adiabatic expansion on a Kerr background, taking into account the motion of the LISA constellation, higher harmonics, and also including the leading correction from the spin of the secondary in the postadiabatic approximation. We pay particular attention to the convergence of the numerical derivatives in the Fisher matrix and to the numerical stability of the covariance matrix, which for some systems requires computing the numerical waveforms with approximately 90-digit precision. Our analysis confirms previous results (obtained with approximated but much more computationally efficient waveforms) for the measurement errors on the binary’s parameters. We also show that the inclusion of higher harmonics improves the errors on the luminosity distance and on the orbital angular momentum angles by one order and two orders of magnitude, respectively, which might be useful to identify the environments where EMRIs live. We particularly focus on the measurability of the spin of the secondary, confirming that, for spin-aligned EMRIs on quasicircular orbits, it cannot be measured with sufficient accuracy. However, due to correlations, its inclusion in the waveform model can deteriorate the accuracy on the measurements of other parameters by orders of magnitude, unless a physically motivated prior on the secondary spin is imposed.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (79)

  1. P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA Collaboration), Laser interferometer space antenna, arXiv:1702.00786.
  2. S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V. Extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 95, 103012 (2017).
  3. J. R. Gair, M. Vallisneri, S. L. Larson, and J. G. Baker, Testing general relativity with low-frequency, space-based gravitational-wave detectors, Living Rev. Relativity 16, 7 (2013).
  4. E. Barausse et al., Prospects for fundamental physics with LISA, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 52, 81 (2020).
  5. A. Pound, Motion of small objects in curved spacetimes: An introduction to gravitational self-force, Fund. Theor. Phys. 179, 399 (2015).
  6. L. Barack and A. Pound, Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 016904 (2019).
  7. A. Pound and B. Wardell, Black hole perturbation theory and gravitational self-force, arXiv:2101.04592.
  8. T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, Two timescale analysis of extreme mass ratio inspirals in Kerr. I. Orbital Motion, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064028 (2008).
  9. M. D. Hartl, Dynamics of spinning test particles in Kerr space-time, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024005 (2003).
  10. L. M. Burko, Orbital evolution of a particle around a black hole. 2. Comparison of contributions of spin orbit coupling and the self-force, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044011 (2004).
  11. L. M. Burko and G. Khanna, Self-force gravitational waveforms for extreme and intermediate mass ratio inspirals. III. Spin-orbit coupling revisited, Phys. Rev. D 91, 104017 (2015).
  12. N. Warburton, T. Osburn, and C. R. Evans, Evolution of small-mass-ratio binaries with a spinning secondary, Phys. Rev. D 96, 084057 (2017).
  13. S. Akcay, S. R. Dolan, C. Kavanagh, J. Moxon, N. Warburton, and B. Wardell, Dissipation in extreme-mass ratio binaries with a spinning secondary, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064013 (2020).
  14. S. Akcay, Self-force correction to geodetic spin precession in Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044024 (2017).
  15. Y. Mino, M. Shibata, and T. Tanaka, Gravitational waves induced by a spinning particle falling into a rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D 53, 622 (1996); Erratum, 59, 047502 (1999).
  16. T. Tanaka, Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and M. Shibata, Gravitational waves from a spinning particle in circular orbits around a rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3762 (1996).
  17. M. Saijo, K.-I. Maeda, M. Shibata, and Y. Mino, Gravitational waves from a spinning particle plunging into a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D 58, 064005 (1998).
  18. N. Yunes, A. Buonanno, S. A. Hughes, Y. Pan, E. Barausse, M. Miller, and W. Throwe, Extreme mass-ratio inspirals in the effective-one-body approach: Quasicircular, equatorial orbits around a spinning black hole, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044044 (2011); Erratum, 88, 109904 (2013).
  19. S. R. Dolan, N. Warburton, A. I. Harte, A. Le Tiec, B. Wardell, and L. Barack, Gravitational self-torque and spin precession in compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064011 (2014).
  20. E. Harms, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Nagar, Asymptotic gravitational wave fluxes from a spinning particle in circular equatorial orbits around a rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044015 (2016); 100, 129901(A) (2019).
  21. E. Harms, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Nagar, Spinning test body orbiting around a Schwarzschild black hole: Circular dynamics and gravitational-wave fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 94, 104010 (2016).
  22. G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, E. Harms, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Nagar, Spinning test-body orbiting around a Kerr black hole: Circular dynamics and gravitational-wave fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 96, 064051 (2017).
  23. A. Nagar, F. Messina, C. Kavanagh, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, N. Warburton, S. Bernuzzi, and E. Harms, Factorization and resummation: A new paradigm to improve gravitational wave amplitudes. III. The spinning test-body terms, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104056 (2019).
  24. B. Chen, G. Compre, Y. Liu, J. Long, and X. Zhang, Spin and quadrupole couplings for high spin equatorial intermediate mass-ratio coalescences, Classical Quant. Grav. 36, 245011 (2019).
  25. S. Akcay, D. Dempsey, and S. R. Dolan, Spin-orbit precession for eccentric black hole binaries at first order in the mass ratio, Classical Quant. Grav. 34, 084001 (2017).
  26. G. A. Piovano, A. Maselli, and P. Pani, Model independent tests of the Kerr bound with extreme mass ratio inspirals, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135860 (2020).
  27. G. A. Piovano, A. Maselli, and P. Pani, Extreme mass ratio inspirals with spinning secondary: A detailed study of equatorial circular motion, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024041 (2020).
  28. V. Skoupý and G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Spinning test body orbiting around a Kerr black hole: Eccentric equatorial orbits and their asymptotic gravitational-wave fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104045 (2021) .
  29. V. Skoupý and G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Gravitational wave templates from extreme mass ratio inspirals, arXiv:2101.04533.
  30. E. Barausse, A. Buonanno, S. A. Hughes, G. Khanna, S. O’Sullivan, and Y. Pan, Modeling multipolar gravitational-wave emission from small mass-ratio mergers, Phys. Rev. D 85, 024046 (2012).
  31. S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, and A. Zenginoglu, Binary black hole coalescence in the extreme-mass-ratio limit: Testing and improving the effective-one-body multipolar waveform, Phys. Rev. D 83, 064010 (2011).
  32. S. Albanesi, A. Nagar, and S. Bernuzzi, Effective one-body model for extreme-mass-ratio spinning binaries on eccentric equatorial orbits: Testing radiation reaction and waveform, Phys. Rev. D 104, 024067 (2021).
  33. L. Barack and C. Cutler, LISA capture sources: Approximate waveforms, signal-to-noise ratios, and parameter estimation accuracy, Phys. Rev. D 69, 082005 (2004).
  34. E. Huerta and J. R. Gair, Importance of including small body spin effects in the modelling of extreme and intermediate mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 84, 064023 (2011).
  35. E. A. Huerta, J. R. Gair, and D. A. Brown, Importance of including small body spin effects in the modelling of intermediate mass-ratio inspirals. II Accurate parameter extraction of strong sources using higher-order spin effects, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064023 (2012).
  36. L. Speri and J. R. Gair, Assessing the impact of transient orbital resonances, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124032 (2021).
  37. S. Babak, H. Fang, J. R. Gair, K. Glampedakis, and S. A. Hughes, ‘Kludge’ gravitational waveforms for a test-body orbiting a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D 75, 024005 (2007); Erratum, 77, 049902 (2008).
  38. A. J. K. Chua, C. J. Moore, and J. R. Gair, Augmented kludge waveforms for detecting extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044005 (2017).
  39. A. J. K. Chua, M. L. Katz, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, Rapid Generation of Fully Relativistic Extreme-Mass-Ratio-Inspiral Waveform Templates for LISA Data Analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 051102 (2021).
  40. S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, G. Khanna, A. J. K. Chua, and M. L. Katz, Adiabatic waveforms for extreme mass-ratio inspirals via multivoice decomposition in time and frequency, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104014 (2021).
  41. M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, FastEMRIWaveforms: New tools for millihertz gravitational-wave data analysis, Phys. Rev. D 104, 064047 (2021).
  42. M. Van De Meent and N. Warburton, Fast self-forced inspirals, Classical Quant. Grav. 35, 144003 (2018).
  43. O. Burke, J. R. Gair, J. Simón, and M. C. Edwards, Constraining the spin parameter of near-extremal black holes using LISA, Phys. Rev. D 102, 124054 (2020).
  44. W. Dixon, A covariant multipole formalism for extended test bodies in general relativity, Nuovo Cimento (1955–1965) 34, 317 (1964).
  45. W. Dixon, Extended bodies in general relativity; their description and motion, in Isolated Gravitating Systems in General Relativity, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1978).
  46. O. Semerak, Spinning test particles in a Kerr field. 1., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 308, 863 (1999).
  47. J. Ehlers and E. Rudolph, Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity center-of-mass description and quasirigidity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 8, 197 (1977).
  48. P. I. Jefremov, O. Yu. Tsupko, and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Innermost stable circular orbits of spinning test particles in Schwarzschild and Kerr space-times, Phys. Rev. D 91, 124030 (2015).
  49. D. Kennefick, Stability under radiation reaction of circular equatorial orbits around Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D 58, 064012 (1998).
  50. D. Bini and A. Geralico, Deviation of quadrupolar bodies from geodesic motion in a Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 89, 044013 (2014).
  51. D. Bini and A. Geralico, Spin-geodesic deviations in the Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 84, 104012 (2011).
  52. B. Mashhoon and D. Singh, Dynamics of extended spinning masses in a gravitational field, Phys. Rev. D 74, 124006 (2006).
  53. S. A. Hughes, The evolution of circular, nonequatorial orbits of Kerr black holes due to gravitational wave emission, Phys. Rev. D 61, 084004 (2000); Erratum, 63, 049902 (2001); Erratum, 65, 069902 (2002); Erratum, 67, 089901 (2003); Erratum, 78, 109902 (2008); Erratum, 90, 109904 (2014).
  54. Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit, http://bhptoolkit.org/.
  55. R. Fujita, W. Hikida, and H. Tagoshi, An efficient numerical method for computing gravitational waves induced by a particle moving on eccentric inclined orbits around a Kerr black hole, Prog. Theor. Phys. 121, 843 (2009).
  56. R. Fujita and H. Tagoshi, New numerical methods to evaluate homogeneous solutions of the Teukolsky equation, Prog. Theor. Phys. 112, 415 (2004).
  57. M. Sasaki and T. Nakamura, Gravitational radiation from a Kerr black hole. 1. Formulation and a method for numerical analysis, Prog. Theor. Phys. 67, 1788 (1982).
  58. A. Zenginoglu, A geometric framework for black hole perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 83, 127502 (2011).
  59. E. Harms, S. Bernuzzi, and B. Brügmann, Numerical solution of the 2+1 Teukolsky equation on a hyperboloidal and horizon penetrating foliation of Kerr and application to late-time decays, Classical Quant. Grav. 30, 115013 (2013).
  60. E. Harms, S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, and A. Zenginoglu, A new gravitational wave generation algorithm for particle perturbations of the Kerr spacetime, Classical Quant. Grav. 31, 245004 (2014).
  61. E. Gourgoulhon, A. Le Tiec, F. H. Vincent, and N. Warburton, Gravitational waves from bodies orbiting the Galactic Center black hole and their detectability by LISA, Astron. Astrophys. 627, A92 (2019).
  62. T. Robson, N. J. Cornish, and C. Liu, The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves, Classical Quant. Grav. 36, 105011 (2019).
  63. L. Barack and C. Cutler, Using LISA EMRI sources to test off-Kerr deviations in the geometry of massive black holes, Phys. Rev. D 75, 042003 (2007).
  64. A. Ori and K. S. Thorne, The transition from inspiral to plunge for a compact body in a circular equatorial orbit around a massive, spinning black hole, Phys. Rev. D 62, 124022 (2000).
  65. E. Poisson and C. M. Will, Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Parameter estimation using second post-Newtonian wave forms, Phys. Rev. D 52, 848 (1995).
  66. M. Vallisneri, Use and abuse of the Fisher information matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects, Phys. Rev. D 77, 042001 (2008).
  67. P. Amaro-Seoane, J. R. Gair, M. Freitag, M. Coleman Miller, I. Mandel, C. J. Cutler, and S. Babak, Astrophysics, detection and science applications of intermediate- and extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Classical Quant. Grav. 24, R113 (2007).
  68. Z. Pan, Z. Lyu, and H. Yang, Wet extreme mass ratio inspirals may be more common for spaceborne gravitational wave detection, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063007 (2021).
  69. S. McGee, A. Sesana, and A. Vecchio, Linking gravitational waves and X-ray phenomena with joint LISA and Athena observations, Nat. Astron. 4, 26 (2020).
  70. D. Laghi, N. Tamanini, W. Del Pozzo, A. Sesana, J. Gair, and S. Babak, Gravitational wave cosmology with extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 4512 (2021).
  71. G. A. Piovano, Data and relevant codes are publicly (2021) available at https://web.uniroma1.it/gmunu.
  72. F. W. J. Olver, Asymptotic expansions of the coefficients in asymptotic series solutions of linear differential equations, Methods Appl. Anal. 1, 113 (1994).
  73. F. W. J. Olver, Asymptotic solutions of linear ordinary differential equations at an irregular singularity of rank unity, Methods Appl. Anal. 4, 375403 (1997).
  74. F. Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions, Computer Science and Applied Mathematics: A Series of Monographs and Textbooks (Academic Press, New York, 1974).
  75. E. W. Leaver, An analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of Kerr black holes, Proc. R. Soc. A 402, 285 (1985).
  76. E. W. Leaver, Solutions to a generalized spheroidal wave equation: Teukolsk’s equations in general relativity, and the two-center problem in molecular quantum mechanics, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 27, 1238 (1986).
  77. R. S. Borissov and P. P. Fiziev, Exact solutions of Teukolsky master equation with continuous spectrum, Bulgarian Journal of Physics 37, 065 (2010).
  78. J. Stewart, On the stability of Kerr’s space-time, Proc. R. Soc. A 344, 65 (1975).
  79. J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2010).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 104, 124019– Published 3 December, 2021
  • Received 20 May 2021
  • Accepted 26 October 2021
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2021 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation