Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Gravitational decoherence: A general nonrelativistic model

L. Asprea1,2,*, G. Gasbarri3,2,†, and A. Bassi1,2

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Strada Costiera 11, 34151 Trieste, Italy
  • 2Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trieste Section, Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, Highfield Campus, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom

  • *lorenzo.asprea@phd.units.it
  • g.gasbarri@uab.cat

Phys. Rev. D 103, 104041 – Published 19 May, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104041

Abstract

We derive a general quantum master equation for the dynamics of a scalar bosonic particle interacting with a weak, stochastic and classical external gravitational field. The dynamics predicts decoherence in position, momentum and energy. We show how our master equation reproduces the results present in the literature by taking appropriate limits, thus explaining the apparent contradiction in their dynamical description. Our result is relevant in light of the increasing interest in the low energy quantum-gravity regime.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Gravitational Decoherence and the Possibility of Its Interferometric Detection

L. Asprea, A. Bassi, H. Ulbricht, and G. Gasbarri
Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 200403 (2021)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Theory and Experiments (Oxford University Press, New York, 2007).
  2. J. Wheeler, C. Misner, and K. Thorne, Gravitation (Freeman, New York, 1973).
  3. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972).
  4. S. Carrol, Spacetime and Geometry An Introduction to General Relativity (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2004).
  5. The LIGO and the Virgo Collaborations, Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  6. J. Luo et al., TianQin: A space-borne gravitational wave detector, Classical Quant. Grav. 33, 035010 (2016).
  7. S. Kawamura et al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna—DECIGO, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 122, 012006 (2008).
  8. M. Punturo et al., The Einstein telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical Quant. Grav. 27, 194002 (2010).
  9. The KAGRA Collaboration, Construction of KAGRA: An underground gravitational-wave observatory, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2018, 01 (2018).
  10. K. Danzmann and the LISA Study Team, LISA: Laser interferometer space antenna for gravitational wave measurements, Classical Quant. Grav. 13, A247 (1996).
  11. B. Allen, The stochastic gravity-wave background: Sources and detection, relativistic gravitation and gravitational radiation, in Proceedings of the Les Houches School of Physics, edited by J. A. March and J. P. Lasota (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1997), p. 373.
  12. N. Christensen, Stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 016903 (2019).
  13. A. Stern, Y. Imry, and Y. Aharonov, Phase uncertainty and loss of interference: A general picture, Phys. Rev. A 41, 3436 (1990).
  14. B. Linet and P. Tourrenc, Changement de phase dans un champ de gravitation-possibilité de détection interférentielle, Can. J. Phys. 54, 1129 (1976).
  15. R. Colella, A. W. Overhauser, and S. A. Werner, Observation of Gravitationally Induced Quantum Interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1472 (1975).
  16. C. Sabín, D. E. Bruschi, M. Ahmadi, and I. Fuentes, Phonon creation by gravitational waves, New J. Phys. 16, 085003 (2014).
  17. J. R. Kellogg, N. Yu, J. M. Kohel, and L. Maleki, Development of an atom-interferometer gravity gradiometer for gravity measurement from space, Appl. Phys. B 84, 647 (2006).
  18. E. Göklü and C. Lämmerzahl, Metric fluctuations and the weak equivalence principle, Classical Quant. Grav. 25, 105012 (2008).
  19. H. P. Breuer, C. Lämmerzahl, and E. Göklü, Metric fluctuations and decoherence, Classical Quant. Grav. 26, 105012 (2009).
  20. J. L. Sanchez Gomez, in Decoherence Through Stochastic Fluctuations of the Gravitational Field, edited by L. Diosi and B. Lukacs (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), Vol. 456, pp. 88–93.
  21. W. L. Power and I. C. Percival, Decoherence of quantum wave packets due to interaction with conformal space-time fluctuations, Proc. R. Soc. 456, 955 (2000).
  22. M. P. Blencowe, Effective Field Theory Approach to Gravitationally Induced Decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 021302 (2013).
  23. B. L. Hu and C. Anastopoulos, A master equation for gravitational decoherence: Probing the textures of spacetime, Classical Quant. Grav. 30, 165007 (2013).
  24. B. Lamine, S. Reynaud, and M. T. Jaekel, Gravitational decoherence of atomic interferometers, Eur. Phys. J. D 20, 165 (2002).
  25. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  26. The harmonic gauge implies translational invariance of the infinitesimal volume in the chosen coordinate system as e.g., in Cartesian coordinates.

  27. H. Feshbach and F. Villars, Elementary relativistic wave mechanics of spin 0 and spin 1/2 particles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 24 (1958).
  28. L. L. Foldy and S. A. Wouthuysen, On the Dirac theory of spin 1/2 particles and its nonrelativistic limit, Phys. Rev. 78, 29 (1950).
  29. A. Watcher, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer, New York, 2011).
  30. Under the assumption that the rigid body consists in an ensemble of a large number N of particles, the density operator can be defined as m^(x)=imi(2π)3dqei(xx^i)·q, where mi and x^i are the mass and the position operator of the ith particle.

  31. G. Gasbarri, M. Toroš, S. Donadi, and A. Bassi, Gravity induced wave function collapse, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104013 (2017).
  32. E. Verdaguer and B. L. Hu, Stochastic gravity: Theory and applications, Living Rev. Relativity 11, 3 (2008).
  33. R. Martın and E. Verdaguer, On the semiclassical Einstein-Langevin equation, Phys. Lett. B 465, 113 (1999).
  34. We note that that of state vectors (and Schrödinger equation) is not the most appropriate formalism to adopt for the description of a quantum stochastic process in most experimental situation, as it does not allow one to describe statistical mixtures of quantum states.

  35. N. G. Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, North Holland Personal Library (Elsevier, New York, 1981).
  36. Our choice for the Fourier transform is f(x)=1(2π)3d3qf˜(q)eiq·x/.

  37. G. N. Fleming and M. R. Gallis, Environmental and spontaneous localization, Phys. Rev. A 42, 38 (1990).
  38. In the work of Breuer et al. the symbol used for the spatially averaged correlation time is τc. It was here changed to Tc in order to avoid any confusion with our own notation.

  39. L. Koopmans, The Spectral Analysis of Time Series (Academic Press, New York, 1995).
  40. R. P. Feynman, An operator calculus having applications in quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 84, 108 (1951).
  41. N. G. Van Kampen, A cumulant expansion for stochastic linear differential equations. I, Physica (Amsterdam) 74, 215 (1974).
  42. A more physically meaningful result can be obtained by taking the correlation function as an exponential decay.

  43. Note that we have safely replaced the upper limit of integration t with , as the integrand vanishes anyway [35].

  44. L. Asprea, A. Bassi, H. Ulbricht, and G. Gasbarri, companion Letter, Gravitational Decoherence and the Possibility of Its Interferometric Detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 200403 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation