- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Investigating the XENON1T low-energy electronic recoil excess using NEST

M. Szydagis*, C. Levy†, G. M. Blockinger, A. Kamaha, N. Parveen, and G. R. C. Rischbieter

  • Department of Physics, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany 12222-0100, New York, USA

  • *mszydagis@albany.edu
  • †clevy@albany.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 103, 012002 – Published 7 January, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.012002

Abstract

The search for dark matter, the missing mass of the Universe, is one of the most active fields of study within particle physics. The XENON1T experiment recently observed a 3.5σ excess potentially consistent with dark matter, or with solar axions. Here, we will use the Noble Element Simulation Technique (NEST) software to simulate the XENON1T detector, reproducing the excess. We utilize different detector efficiency and energy reconstruction models, but they primarily impact sub-keV energies and cannot explain the XENON1T excess. However, using NEST, we can reproduce their excess in multiple, unique ways, most easily via the addition of 31±11 Ar37 decays. Furthermore, this results in new, modified background models, reducing the significance of the excess to ≤2.2σ at least using non-Profile Likelihood Ratio (PLR) methods. This is independent confirmation that the excess is a real effect, but potentially explicable by known physics. Many cross-checks of our Ar37 hypothesis are presented.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. V. C. Rubin, One hundred years of rotating galaxies, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 112, 747 (2000).
  2. Y. Akrami et al. (PLANCK Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A1 (2020).
  3. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
  4. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Excess electronic recoil events in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. D 102, 072004 (2020).
  5. M. Szydagis et al., Open-access noble element simulation technique, https://zenodo.org/record/3905382#.XvlEAZNKjv1.
  6. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENON1T dark matter data analysis: Signal and background models and statistical inference, Phys. Rev. D 99, 112009 (2019).
  7. M. Szydagis, N. Barry, K. Kazkaz, J. Mock, D. Stolp, M. Sweany, M. Tripathi, S. Uvarov, N. Walsh, and M. Woods, NEST: A comprehensive model for scintillation yield in liquid xenon, J. Instrum. 6, P10002 2011.
  8. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), First Results from the LUX Dark Matter Experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 091303 (2014).
  9. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX-ZEPLIN Collaboration), Projected WIMP sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101, 052002 (2020).
  10. X. Ren et al. (PandaX-II Collaboration), Constraining Dark Matter Models with a Light Mediator at the PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 021304 (2018).
  11. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Low-mass dark matter search using ionization signals in XENON100, Phys. Rev. D 94, 092001 (2016).
  12. B. Lenardo, K. Kazkaz, A. Manalaysay, J. Mock, M. Szydagis, and M. Tripathi, A global analysis of light and charge yields in liquid xenon, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62, 3387 (2015).
  13. J. Cutter, The Noble Element Simulation Technique v2 (NorCal HEP-EXchange, 2017), https://indico.physics.lbl.gov/event/560/contributions/1332/attachments/1209/1341/cutter_nest_norcal_2017.pdf.
  14. G. Anton et al. (EXO-200 Collaboration), Measurement of the scintillation and ionization response of liquid xenon at MeV energies in the EXO-200 experiment, Phys. Rev. C 101, 065501 (2020).
  15. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Calibration, event reconstruction, data analysis, and limit calculation for the LUX dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. D 97, 102008 (2018).
  16. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Signal yields of keV electronic recoils and their discrimination from nuclear recoils in liquid xenon, Phys. Rev. D 97, 092007 (2018).
  17. D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Improved measurements of the β-decay response of liquid xenon with the LUX detector, Phys. Rev. D 100, 022002 (2019).
  18. E. Boulton et al., Calibration of a two-phase xenon time projection chamber with a Ar37 source, J. Instrum. 12, P08004 (2017).
  19. C. Faham, V. Gehman, A. Currie, A. Dobi, P. Sorensen, and R. Gaitskell, Measurements of wavelength-dependent double photoelectron emission from single photons in VUV-sensitive photomultiplier tubes, J. Instrum. 10, P09010 (2015).
  20. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Improved Limits on Scattering of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles from Reanalysis of 2013 LUX Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 161301 (2016).
  21. E. Shockley, Search for new physics with electronic recoil events in XENON1T, LNGS Seminar, 2020, https://agenda.infn.it/event/23228/.
  22. A. Behrens, Light detectors for the XENON100 and XENON1T dark matter search experiments, Ph.D. Thesis, Universitaet Zurich, 2014.
  23. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  24. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The XENON1T dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 881 (2017).
  25. B. L. Paredes, H. Araújo, F. Froborg, N. Marangou, I. Olcina, T. Sumner, R. Taylor, A. Tomás, and A. Vacheret, Response of photomultiplier tubes to xenon scintillation light, Astropart. Phys. 102, 56 (2018).
  26. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 181301 (2017).
  27. D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Improved modeling of β electronic recoils in liquid xenon using LUX calibration data, J. Instrum. 15, T02007 2020.
  28. B. Edwards et al., Extraction efficiency of drifting electrons in a two-phase xenon time projection chamber, J. Instrum. 13, P01005 2018.
  29. J. Xu, S. Pereverzev, B. Lenardo, J. Kingston, D. Naim, A. Bernstein, K. Kazkaz, and M. Tripathi, Electron extraction efficiency study for dual-phase xenon dark matter experiments, Phys. Rev. D 99, 103024 (2019).
  30. C. E. Dahl, The physics of background discrimination in liquid xenon, and first results from XENON10 in the hunt for WIMP dark matter, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, 2009.
  31. L. Goetzke, E. Aprile, M. Anthony, G. Plante, and M. Weber, Measurement of light and charge yield of low-energy electronic recoils in liquid xenon, Phys. Rev. D 96, 103007 (2017).
  32. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Energy resolution and linearity of XENON1T in the MeV energy range, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 785 (2020).
  33. E. Aprile et al. (XENON1T Collaboration), Observation of two-neutrino double electron capture in Xe124 with XENON1T, Nature (London) 568, 532 (2019).
  34. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Signal yields, energy resolution, and recombination fluctuations in liquid xenon, Phys. Rev. D 95, 012008 (2017).
  35. R. F. Lang, A. Brown, E. Brown, M. Cervantes, S. Macmullin, D. Masson, J. Schreiner, and H. Simgen, A Rn220 source for the calibration of low-background experiments, J. Instrum. 11, P04004 (2016).
  36. M. Szydagis, A. Fyhrie, D. Thorngren, and M. Tripathi, Enhancement of NEST capabilities for simulating low-energy recoils in liquid xenon, J. Instrum. 8, C10003 2013.
  37. G. Rischbieter, Background modeling in the LUX detector for an effective field theory dark matter search, April 2020 APS Meeting.
  38. E. Aprile et al. (XENON1T Collaboration), XENON1T dark matter data analysis: Signal reconstruction, calibration and event selection, Phys. Rev. D 100, 052014 (2019).
  39. A. Dobi, Measurement of the electron recoil band of the LUX dark matter detector with a tritium calibration source, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland College Park, 2014.
  40. D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Search for annual and diurnal rate modulations in the LUX experiment, Phys. Rev. D 98, 062005 (2018).
  41. D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Discrimination of electronic recoils from nuclear recoils in two-phase xenon time projection chambers, Phys. Rev. D 102, 112002 (2020).
  42. E. Boulton, Applications of two-phase xenon time projection chambers: Searching for dark matter and special nuclear materials, Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University, 2019.
  43. N. Priel, L. Rauch, H. Landsman, A. Manfredini, and R. Budnik, A model independent safeguard against background mismodeling for statistical inference, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2017) 013.
  44. D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Results from a Search for Dark Matter in the Complete LUX Exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 021303 (2017).
  45. H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, New limits on dark photons from solar emission and keV scale dark matter, arXiv:2006.13929.
  46. I. M. Bloch, A. Caputo, R. Essig, D. Redigolo, M. Sholapurkar, and T. Volansky, Exploring new physics with O(keV) electron recoils in direct detection experiments, arXiv:2006.14521.
  47. H.-J. He, Y.-C. Wang, and J. Zheng, EFT analysis of inelastic dark matter for xenon electron recoil detection, arXiv:2007.04963.
  48. G. Alonso-Álvarez, F. Ertas, J. Jaeckel, F. Kahlhoefer, and L. J. Thormaehlen, Hidden photon dark matter in the light of XENON1T and stellar cooling, arXiv:2006.11243.
  49. L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli, and D. Lust, Anomalous U(1) gauge bosons as light dark matter in string theory, Phys. Lett. B 810, 135838 (2020).
  50. D. Akimov et al., Experimental study of ionization yield of liquid xenon for electron recoils in the energy range 2.8–80 keV, J. Instrum. 9, P11014 (2014).
  51. B. Bhattacherjee and R. Sengupta, XENON1T excess: Some possible backgrounds, arXiv:2006.16172.
  52. V. N. Lebedenko et al. (ZEPLIN-III Collaboration), Results from the first science run of the ZEPLIN-III dark matter search experiment, Phys. Rev. D 80, 052010 (2009).
  53. C. Aalseth et al. (CoGeNT Collaboration), Results from a Search for Light-Mass Dark Matter with a P-type Point Contact Germanium Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 131301 (2011).
  54. L. Baudis, H. Dujmovic, C. Geis, A. James, A. Kish, A. Manalaysay, T. M. Undagoitia, and M. Schumann, Response of liquid xenon to Compton electrons down to 1.5 keV, Phys. Rev. D 87, 115015 (2013).
  55. A. Manalaysay, T. M. Undagoitia, A. Askin, L. Baudis, A. Behrens, A. Ferella, A. Kish, O. Lebeda, R. Santorelli, D. Venos, and A. Vollhardt, Spatially uniform calibration of a liquid xenon detector at low energies using Kr83m, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81, 073303 (2010).
  56. I. Obodovskii and K. Ospanov, Scintillation output of liquid xenon for low-energy γ-quanta, Pribory I Tekhnika Eksperimenta (USSR) 26, 42 (1994), https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:26045323.
  57. D. Temples, Understanding neutrino background implications in LXe-TPC dark matter searches using Xe127 electron captures (TAUP 2019), http://www-kam2.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/indico/event/3/session/10/contribution/414/material/slides/0.pdf.
  58. E. Aprile et al. (XENON100 Collaboration), First axion results from the XENON100 experiment, Phys. Rev. D 90, 062009 (2014).
  59. C. Adams et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Calibration of the charge and energy loss per unit length of the MicroBooNE liquid argon time projection chamber using muons and protons, J. Instrum. 15, P03022 (2020).
  60. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Light Dark Matter Search with Ionization Signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  61. D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Tritium calibration of the LUX dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. D 93, 072009 (2016).
  62. J. Balajthy, Purity monitoring techniques and electronic energy deposition properties in liquid xenon time projection chambers, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland College Park, 2018.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 103, 012002– Published 7 January, 2021
  • Received 2 July 2020
  • Accepted 3 November 2020
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation