- Access by Xinjiang University
Meson-Baryon Scattering in the Quark Model
Phys. Rev. D 1, 166 – Published 1 January, 1970
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.1.166
Abstract
We obtain many sum rules for meson-baryon scattering amplitudes considering the quark-quark and the quark-antiquark amplitudes, for the appropriate meson and baryon states. The main differences from earlier work are that mesons are consistently treated as quark-antiquark pairs and not as elementary fields, and that the usual symmetry representation of the states has been taken into account. Further, the assumption that the real part of the amplitude is dominated by quark-quark forces and the imaginary part by quark-antiquark forces yields sum rules connecting these real and imaginary parts for different processes, in consonance with duality requirements.
References (20)
- M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Letters 8, 214 (1964) G. Zweig, CERN Report (unpublished)
- H. J. Lipkin and F. Scheck, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 71 (1966) R. H. Dalitz, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on High-Energy Physics, Berkeley, 1966 (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1967), p. 215 H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 1015 (1966) J. J. Kokkedee and L. Van Hove, Nuovo Cimento 43, 711 (1966) C. Becchi and G. Morpurgo, Phys. Rev. 140, B687 (1965) R. Van Royen and V. F. Weisskopf, Nuovo Cimento 50A, 617 (1967) P. A. Cook, ibid. 48A, 570 (1967) A. N. Mitra and M. Ross, Phys. Rev. 158, 1630 (1967) S. P. Misra and C. V. Sastry, ibid. 172, 1402 (1968)
- H. Harari, in High Energy Physics and Elementary Particles (International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, 1965), p. 353
- S. P. Misra and C. V. Sastry, Phys. Rev. 172, 1402 (1968)
- C. V. Sastry and C. Subrahmanyam, Phys. Rev. 185, 2027 (1969)
- S. D. Gupta and L. K. Pande, Phys. Rev. 143, 1190 (1966)
- C. Becchi and G. Morpurgo, Phys. Rev. 140, B687 (1965) R. Van Royan and V. F. Weisskopf, Nuovo Cimento 50A, 617 (1967) A. N. Mitra and M. Ross, Phys. Rev. 158, 1630 (1967)
- G. C. Joshi, V. S. Bhasin, and A. N. Mitra, Phys. Rev. 156, 1572 (1967)
- S. D. Gupta and A. N. Mitra, Phys. Rev. 159, 1285 (1967)
- K. Johnson and S. B. Treiman, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 189 (1965) A. Pais, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 215 (1966)
- H. J. Lipkin and F. Scheck, Phys. Letters 16, 73 (1966)
- H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 1015 (1966)
- V. Barger and D. Cline, Phys. Rev. 156, 1522 (1966)
- H. J. Lipkin, F. Scheck, and H. Stern, Phys. Rev. 152, 1375 (1965)
- G. Alexander, H. J. Lipkin, and F. Scheck, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 412 (1966)
- R. Dolen, D. Horn, and C. Schmid, Phys. Rev. 166, 1768 (1968) D. P. Roy and M. Suzuki, Phys. Letters 28B, 558 (1969)
- H. Harari, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 562 (1969)
- J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 689 (1969)
- A. Ahmadzadeh and C. H. Chan, Phys. Letters 22, 692 (1966)
- V. Barger and L. Durand III, Phys. Rev. 156, 1525 (1967)