Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Quantum Ising model on (2+1)-dimensional anti–de Sitter space using tensor networks

Abhishek Samlodia1,*, Simon Catterall1,†, Alexander F. Kemper2,‡, Yannick Meurice3,§, and Goksu Can Toga2,∥

  • *Contact author: asamlodi@syr.edu
  • Contact author: smcatter@syr.edu
  • Contact author: akemper@ncsu.edu
  • §Contact author: yannick-meurice@uiowa.edu
  • Contact author: gctoga@ncsu.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 114507 – Published 10 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9rtx-95s6

Abstract

We study the quantum Ising model on (2+1)-dimensional anti-de Sitter space using matrix product states (MPS) and matrix product operators (MPOs). We explore the bulk phase diagram of the theory on regular tessellations of hyperbolic space with coordination number seven and find disordered and ordered phases separated by a phase transition. We find that the boundary-boundary spin correlation function exhibits power law scaling deep in the disordered phase of the Ising model consistent with holography. At the critical point, we find the boundary entanglement entropy scales logarithmically with subsystem size but away from this, we see a linear scaling. In comparison, the full system exhibits a volume law scaling, which is expected in chaotic and/or highly connected systems. We also measure out of time ordered correlators (OTOCs) to explore the scrambling behavior of the theory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 36, 6377 (1995).
  2. R. Bousso, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 825 (2002).
  3. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  4. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  5. U. Schollwöck, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 326, 96 (2011).
  6. B. Swingle, Phys. Rev. D 86, 065007 (2012).
  7. K. Okunishi and T. Nishino, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 093A02 (2024).
  8. T. Oshima and T. Nishino, arXiv:2403.15829.
  9. B. Swingle, arXiv:1209.3304.
  10. S. Singh, N. A. McMahon, and G. K. Brennen, Phys. Rev. D 97, 026013 (2018).
  11. S. Dey, A. Chen, P. Basteiro, A. Fritzsche, M. Greiter, M. Kaminski, P. M. Lenggenhager, R. Meyer, R. Sorbello, A. Stegmaier, R. Thomale, J. Erdmenger, and I. Boettcher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 061603 (2024).
  12. M. Asaduzzaman, S. Catterall, Y. Meurice, and G. C. Toga, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054513 (2024).
  13. G. C. Toga, A. Samlodia, and A. F. Kemper, arXiv:2503.00114.
  14. A. J. Kollár, M. Fitzpatrick, and A. A. Houck, Nature (London) 571, 45 (2019).
  15. I. Boettcher, P. Bienias, R. Belyansky, A. J. Kollár, and A. V. Gorshkov, Phys. Rev. A 102, 032208 (2020).
  16. Y.-Y. Li, M. O. Sajid, and J. Unmuth-Yockey, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034507 (2024).
  17. P. M. Lenggenhager, A. Stegmaier, L. K. Upreti, T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, A. Vollhardt, M. Greiter, C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, H. Brand et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 4373 (2022).
  18. A. Jahn, M. Gluza, C. Verhoeven, S. Singh, and J. Eisert, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 111.
  19. A. Jahn, M. Gluza, F. Pastawski, and J. Eisert, Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0092 (2019).
  20. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  21. U. Schollwöck, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 326, 96 (2011).
  22. Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008) 065.
  23. J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 106.
  24. B. Swingle, G. Bentsen, M. Schleier-Smith, and P. Hayden, Phys. Rev. A 94, 040302 (2016).
  25. S. Xu and B. Swingle, Nat. Phys. 16, 199 (2020).
  26. B. Swingle, Nat. Phys. 14, 988 (2018).
  27. S. Xu and B. Swingle, PRX Quantum 5, 010201 (2024).
  28. M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 4 (2022).
  29. J. Jordan, R. Orús, G. Vidal, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 250602 (2008).
  30. M. Asaduzzaman, S. Catterall, J. Hubisz, R. Nelson, and J. Unmuth-Yockey, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034511 (2020).
  31. M. Asaduzzaman, S. Catterall, J. Hubisz, R. Nelson, and J. Unmuth-Yockey, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054506 (2022).
  32. M. Asaduzzaman, S. Catterall, and A. Samlodia, Phys. Rev. D 109, 106010 (2024).
  33. R. Levy, itensorentropytools.jl, https://github.com/ryanlevy/ITensorEntropyTools.jl?tab=readme-ov-file.
  34. R. Sahay, M. D. Lukin, and J. Cotler, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021078 (2025).
  35. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010).
  36. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003).
  37. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004).
  38. A. J. Daley, C. Kollath, U. Schollwöck, and G. Vidal, J. Stat. Mech. (2004) P04005.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation