Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Global signals of the first molecules from the dark ages in the presence of primordial magnetic fields

Yu. Kulinich1,*, B. Novosyadlyj1,2, M. Tsizh1,3, and N. Fortuna1

  • 1Astronomical Observatory of Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Kyryla i Methodia Street, 8, Lviv, 79005, Ukraine
  • 2International Center of Future Science and College of Physics of Jilin University, 2699 Qianjin Street, 130012, Changchun, People’s Republic of China
  • 3Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universitá di Bologna, Via Gobetti 92/3, 40121, Bologna, Italy

  • *Contact author: yuriy.kulinich@lnu.edu.ua

Phys. Rev. D 112, 123522 – Published 12 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/92bl-7pcx

Abstract

We investigate how primordial magnetic fields (PMFs) affect the formation kinetics of the first molecules, H2, HD, and HeH+, as well as the populations of rovibrational levels and the global signals in the rovibrational transitions of H2 and HD. For this purpose, we numerically solve a system of differential equations that describes the gas energy balance, the kinetics of the formation of the first molecules, and the populations of their rovibrational levels, taking into account the PMF energy dissipation through ambipolar diffusion and decaying turbulence. We show that PMFs can significantly speed up the formation and destruction of the first molecules, leading to an increase in the number density of H2 and HD molecules and a decrease in the number density of HeH+ ion molecules compared to the case without PMFs. We demonstrate that more frequent collisions of the gas particles in such models alter the ortho-to-para ratio of hydrogen molecules, making it a potential probe of the thermal history of gas in the early Universe. In contrast to the standard cosmological model, where the global signal from the first molecules appears as an absorption feature in the cosmic microwave background spectrum, cosmological models with PMFs can produce an emission signal. Specifically, for nonhelical PMFs with nB=2.9 and a strength of 1nG, the signal transforms into emission with an amplitude of about 0.5Jy/sr. This signal is comparable in magnitude to other known cosmic microwave background spectral distortions and falls within the detection capabilities of several proposed missions, including Super-PIXIE, Multi-SIMBAD (four units), and Voyage2050. We show that both the amplitude and the spectral range of the global signals from the first molecules are highly sensitive to the spectral index nB, the strength B0, and the helicity of the PMFs. Therefore, the global signals from the first molecules can serve as a potential probe of PMFs.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (74)

  1. A. Neronov and I. Vovk, Science 328, 73 (2010).
  2. F. Tavecchio, G. Ghisellini, L. Foschini, G. Bonnoli, G. Ghirlanda, and P. Coppi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 406, L70 (2010).
  3. F. Tavecchio, G. Ghisellini, G. Bonnoli, and L. Foschini, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 3566 (2011).
  4. H. Huan, T. Weisgarber, T. Arlen, and S. P. Wakely, Astrophys. J. Lett. 735, L28 (2011).
  5. A. M. Taylor, I. Vovk, and A. Neronov, Astron. Astrophys. 529, A144 (2011).
  6. K. Dolag, M. Kachelriess, S. Ostapchenko, and R. Tomàs, Astrophys. J. Lett. 727, L4 (2011).
  7. I. Vovk, A. M. Taylor, D. Semikoz, and A. Neronov, Astrophys. J. Lett. 747, L14 (2012).
  8. W. Chen, J. H. Buckley, and F. Ferrer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 211103 (2015).
  9. R. Alves Batista and A. Saveliev, Universe 7, 223 (2021).
  10. S. K. Sethi and K. Subramanian, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 356, 778 (2005).
  11. J. Chluba, D. Paoletti, F. Finelli, and J. A. Rubiño-Martín, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 2244 (2015).
  12. S. K. Sethi, B. B. Nath, and K. Subramanian, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 387, 1589 (2008).
  13. Planck Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  14. A. Peimbert, M. Peimbert, and V. Luridiana, Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis. 52, 419 (2016), https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S0185-11012016000200419&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en.
  15. R. J. Cooke, M. Pettini, and C. C. Steidel, Astrophys. J. 855, 102 (2018).
  16. L. Pogosian, T. Vachaspati, and S. Winitzki, Phys. Rev. D 65, 083502 (2002).
  17. K. E. Kunze, Phys. Rev. D 83, 023006 (2011).
  18. A. Brandenburg and K. Subramanian, Phys. Rep. 417, 1 (2005).
  19. A. Brandenburg, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 51, 124043 (2009).
  20. K. E. Kunze, Phys. Rev. D 85, 083004 (2012).
  21. T. Kahniashvili, Y. Maravin, G. Lavrelashvili, and A. Kosowsky, Phys. Rev. D 90, 083004 (2014).
  22. M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, and D. Paoletti, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2015) 031.
  23. K. Subramanian and J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. D 58, 083502 (1998).
  24. K. Subramanian, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 076901 (2016).
  25. K. E. Kunze and E. Komatsu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2014) 009.
  26. W. Hu and N. Sugiyama, Astrophys. J. 471, 542 (1996).
  27. B. Novosyadlyj, Y. Kulinich, N. Fortuna, and A. Rudakovskyi, arXiv:2506.19436.
  28. Planck Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A19 (2016).
  29. M. Pavičević, V. Iršič, M. Viel, J. S. Bolton, M. G. Haehnelt, S. Martin-Alvarez, E. Puchwein, and P. Ralegankar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 071001 (2025).
  30. D. Paoletti, J. Chluba, F. Finelli, and J. A. Rubiño-Martín, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 3916 (2022).
  31. K. Jedamzik, V. Katalinić, and A. V. Olinto, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3264 (1998).
  32. R. Durrer and A. Neronov, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 62 (2013).
  33. K. Subramanian and J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3575 (1998).
  34. R. Banerjee and K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. D 70, 123003 (2004).
  35. P. Padoan, E. Zweibel, and A. Nordlund, Astrophys. J. 540, 332 (2000).
  36. B. T. Draine, Astrophys. J. 241, 1021 (1980).
  37. H. Shang, A. E. Glassgold, F. H. Shu, and S. Lizano, Astrophys. J. 564, 853 (2002).
  38. D. R. G. Schleicher, R. Banerjee, and R. S. Klessen, Phys. Rev. D 78, 083005 (2008).
  39. J. Masson, R. Teyssier, C. Mulet-Marquis, P. Hennebelle, and G. Chabrier, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 201, 24 (2012).
  40. E. Ntormousi, P. Hennebelle, P. André, and J. Masson, Astron. Astrophys. 589, A24 (2016).
  41. A. Brandenburg and T. Kahniashvili, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 055102 (2017).
  42. M. Christensson, M. Hindmarsh, and A. Brandenburg, Phys. Rev. E 64, 056405 (2001).
  43. T. Kahniashvili, A. G. Tevzadze, A. Brandenburg, and A. Neronov, Phys. Rev. D 87, 083007 (2013).
  44. T. Minoda, H. Tashiro, and T. Takahashi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 488, 2001 (2019).
  45. S. Jagannathan, R. Sharma, and T. R. Seshadri, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30, 2050122 (2021).
  46. C. D. Gay, P. C. Stancil, S. Lepp, and A. Dalgarno, Astrophys. J. 737, 44 (2011).
  47. Y. Kulinich and B. Novosyadlyj, Astron. Astrophys. 698, A32 (2025).
  48. F. Grussie et al., Astron. Astrophys. 699, L12 (2025).
  49. W. B. Latter and J. H. Black, Astrophys. J. 372, 161 (1991).
  50. S. Lepp, P. C. Stancil, and A. Dalgarno, J. Phys. B 35, R57 (2002).
  51. C. M. Coppola, S. Longo, M. Capitelli, F. Palla, and D. Galli, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 193, 7 (2011).
  52. S. Longo, C. M. Coppola, D. Galli, F. Palla, and M. Capitelli, Rend. Lincei 22, 119 (2011).
  53. S. C. O. Glover and T. Abel, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 388, 1627 (2008).
  54. D. R. G. Schleicher, D. Galli, F. Palla, M. Camenzind, R. S. Klessen, M. Bartelmann, and S. C. O. Glover, Astron. Astrophys. 490, 521 (2008).
  55. S. Bovino, M. Tacconi, F. A. Gianturco, and D. Galli, Astron. Astrophys. 529, A140 (2011).
  56. D. Puy, G. Alecian, J. Le Bourlot, J. Leorat, and G. Pineau Des Forets, Astron. Astrophys. 267, 337 (1993), https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1993A%26A...267..337P.
  57. D. Galli and F. Palla, Astron. Astrophys. 335, 403 (1998), https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1998A%26A...335..403G.
  58. B. Novosyadlyj, V. Shulga, W. Han, Y. Kulinich, and M. Tsizh, Astrophys. J. 865, 38 (2018).
  59. B. Novosyadlyj, V. Shulga, Y. Kulinich, and W. Han, Astrophys. J. 888, 27 (2020).
  60. E. Roueff, H. Abgrall, P. Czachorowski, K. Pachucki, M. Puchalski, and J. Komasa, Astron. Astrophys. 630, A58 (2019).
  61. P. H. R. Amaral, L. G. Diniz, K. A. Jones, M. Stanke, A. Alijah, L. Adamowicz, and J. R. Mohallem, Astrophys. J. 878, 95 (2019).
  62. F. Lique, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 453, 810 (2015).
  63. B. Desrousseaux, C. M. Coppola, and F. Lique, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, 900 (2022).
  64. J. L. Nolte, P. C. Stancil, T.-G. Lee, N. Balakrishnan, and R. C. Forrey, Astrophys. J. 744, 62 (2011).
  65. D. Flower and E. Roueff, J. Phys. B 31, L955 (1998).
  66. H. Jóźwiak, F. Thibault, A. Viel, P. Wcisło, and F. Lique, Astron. Astrophys. 685, A113 (2024).
  67. D. Gerlich, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 2377 (1990).
  68. J. Chluba, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460, 227 (2016).
  69. J. Chluba et al., Exp. Astron. 51, 1515 (2021).
  70. J.-P. Maillard, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 379, 20200212 (2020).
  71. J. Chluba and Y. Ali-Haïmoud, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 456, 3494 (2016).
  72. A. Kogut et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. (2025) 020.
  73. https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/voyage-2050.
  74. https://github.com/yuriy-kulinich/Data_PRD_DK14033.git.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation