Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Glueballs, constituent gluons, and instantons

Edward Shuryak* and Ismail Zahed

  • Center for Nuclear Theory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-3800, USA

  • *Contact author: edward.shuryak@stonybrook.edu
  • Contact author: ismail.zahed@stonybrook.edu

Phys. Rev. D 114, 054026 – Published 14 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8rdr-ymbp

Abstract

We present a constituent two-gluon description of the lowest-lying glueball states in pure Yang-Mills theory, calibrated against quenched lattice results. The framework incorporates an instanton-induced dynamical gluon mass, Casimir-scaled adjoint confinement, the short-distance adjoint Coulomb interaction, and instanton-induced central and tensor forces. The scalar 0++ glueball is found to be exceptionally compact, with a radius of order the instanton size, ρ13fm, consistent with lattice indications. By contrast, the tensor 2++ state remains spatially extended due to the centrifugal barrier. We also discuss the role of SD mixing. A semiclassical analysis further supports Regge behavior for excited states, in agreement with lattice results.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. C. J. Morningstar and M. J. Peardon, Phys. Rev. D 60, 034509 (1999).
  2. H. B. Meyer and M. J. Teper, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 129, 200 (2004).
  3. Y. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. D 73, 014516 (2006).
  4. A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 172.
  5. C. A. Meyer and Y. Van Haarlem, Phys. Rev. C 82, 025208 (2010).
  6. R. Abbott, D. C. Hackett, D. A. Pefkou, F. Romero-López, and P. Shanahan, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2024 (2025) 459. [arXiv:2410.02706].
  7. C. Morningstar, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2024 (2024) 004. [arXiv:2502.02547].
  8. T. Schäfer and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1707 (1995).
  9. T. Schafer and E. V. Shuryak, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 323 (1998).
  10. S. Janowski, F. Giacosa, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 90, 114005 (2014).
  11. A. Vereijken, S. Jafarzade, M. Piotrowska, and F. Giacosa, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014023 (2023).
  12. W. I. Eshraim, S. Janowski, F. Giacosa, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054036 (2013).
  13. U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 032.
  14. I. Iatrakis, A. Ramamurti, and E. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. D 92, 014011 (2015).
  15. F. Giacosa, S. Jafarzade, and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D 109, L071502 (2024).
  16. X. Jiang, W. Sun, F. Chen, Y. Chen, M. Gong, Z. Liu, and R. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 094510 (2023).
  17. R. Alkofer and L. von Smekal, Phys. Rep. 353, 281 (2001).
  18. C. S. Fischer, AIP Conf. Proc. 1418, 72 (2011).
  19. A. Holl, A. Krassnigg, and R. Alkofer, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 85 (2015).
  20. J. M. Cornwall and A. Soni, Phys. Lett. B 120, 431 (1983).
  21. N. Isgur and J. E. Paton, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2910 (1985).
  22. K. Johnson and C. B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D 13, 1934 (1976).
  23. F. Brunner, D. Parganlija, and A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D 91, 106002 (2015).
  24. W.-S. Hou, C.-S. Luo, and G.-G. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 64, 014028 (2001).
  25. V. Mathieu, N. Kochelev, and V. Vento, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 18, 1 (2009).
  26. A. P. Szczepaniak and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Lett. B 577, 61 (2003).
  27. M. M. Musakhanov and O. Egamberdiev, Phys. Lett. B 779, 206 (2018).
  28. E. Shuryak and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114030 (2021).
  29. J. M. Cornwall and A. Soni, Phys. Lett. 120B, 431 (1983).
  30. W.-Y. Liu, E. Shuryak, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054005 (2024).
  31. E. Shuryak and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034023 (2023).
  32. H. B. Meyer, Glueball regge trajectories, Other thesis, 2004, arXiv:hep-lat/0508002.
  33. R. Abbott, D. C. Hackett, D. A. Pefkou, F. Romero-López, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 041901 (2026).
  34. H. Sanchis-Alepuz, C. S. Fischer, C. Kellermann, and L. von Smekal, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034001 (2015).
  35. E. V. Shuryak, Nucl. Phys. B203, 93 (1982).
  36. E. V. Shuryak and I. Zahed, The hadron-parton bridge, from the QCD vacuum to partons, arXiv:2601.15085.
  37. E. Shuryak and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034025 (2023).
  38. S. J. Brodsky, T. Huang, and G. P. Lepage, Conf. Proc. C 810816, 143 (1981).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation