Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Coulomb corrections in rare decays of neutral B mesons with a final state + pair

S. I. Manukhov1,2,* and N. V. Nikitin1,2,3,4

  • *Contact author: manuhov2000akk@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 114, 053003 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/78yr-pjnm

Abstract

We present a systematic analysis of Coulomb corrections for leptonic (Bd,s0+), semileptonic (Bd,s0h0+, Bd,s0V0+) and radiative leptonic (Bd,s0γ+) decays of neutral B-mesons. The relativization of the Coulomb factor was performed by comparing the Gamow-Sommerfeld-Sakharov factor, the exact relativistic approach of Crater-Alstine-Sazdjian applied by us to scalar systems, and well-known one-loop QED calculations. Coulomb corrections are calculated for differential, angular, and double-differential distributions, as well as for partial decay widths. We also discuss the role of the Coulomb factor among other QED corrections, in particular, the contribution of soft-photon radiation, which is effectively simulated in experiments by tools such as photos. For the Bs0μ+μ channel, Coulomb corrections improve the prediction of the partial width to δ=|B(exp)B(theory)|/B(exp)=2%. This improvement brings the prediction closer to the LHCb/CMS experimental results within the current experimental (11%) and theoretical (5% lattice QCD) errors. In the decays B0K0μ+μ and B0K0*μ+μ, Coulomb effects also reduce the discrepancies between theoretical predictions and experimental data (from δ=2% to less than δ=1% and from δ=11% to δ=4% respectively). Finally, for the decays involving τ-leptons, the Coulomb correction reaches 4%. While currently smaller than the dominant form-factor uncertainties and experimental errors, the Coulomb correction represents a non-negligible systematic effect. It should be accounted for in the high-precision era of B-physics, where such effects may become significant for the interpretation of potential new physics signals.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 026.
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 101.
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051803 (2023).
  4. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 18, 277 (2022).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 041801 (2022).
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 012010 (2022).
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 191801 (2017).
  8. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 142.
  9. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 133.
  10. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151801 (2021).
  11. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 864, 139406 (2025).
  12. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 077802 (2024).
  13. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 842, 137955 (2023).
  14. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 098.
  15. I. Adachi et al. (Belle and Belle-II Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 101804 (2024).
  16. L. Aggarwal et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051804 (2023).
  17. F. Abudin et al. (Belle-II), arXiv:2206.05946.
  18. A. J. Buras, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 368, 1 (1995).
  19. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  20. A. J. Buras, Subnucl. Ser. 38, 200 (2002).
  21. M. Beneke, C. Bobeth, and R. Szafron, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 232.
  22. D. Melikhov, N. Nikitin, and S. Simula, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6814 (1998).
  23. D. Melikhov and N. Nikitin, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114028 (2004).
  24. A. Danilina, N. Nikitin, and K. Toms, Phys. Rev. D 101, 096007 (2020).
  25. M. Beneke, C. Bobeth, and R. Szafron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 011801 (2018).
  26. Y.-K. Huang, Y.-L. Shen, X.-C. Zhao, and S.-H. Zhou, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 073.
  27. C. Cornella, M. König, and M. Neubert, Phys. Rev. D 108, L031502 (2023).
  28. G. Isidori, S. Nabeebaccus, and R. Zwicky, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 104.
  29. A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach, D. Guadagnoli, and G. Isidori, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2172 (2012).
  30. S. Calí, S. Klaver, M. Rotondo, and B. Sciascia, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 744 (2019).
  31. D. Bigi, M. Bordone, P. Gambino, U. Haisch, and A. Piccione, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 163; 03 (2025) 078(E).
  32. G. Isidori, D. Lancierini, S. Nabeebaccus, and R. Zwicky, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 146.
  33. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 084.
  34. E. Barberio and Z. Was, Comput. Phys. Commun. 79, 291 (1994).
  35. P. Golonka and Z. Was, Eur. Phys. J. C 45, 97 (2006),
  36. G. Gamow, Zeitschrift für Physik 51, 204 (1928).
  37. A. Sommerfeld, Atombau und Spektrallinien (F. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig, Germany, 1921).
  38. A. D. Sakharov, Sov. Phys. Usp. 34, 375 (1991).
  39. H. W. Crater and P. V. Alstine, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 148, 57 (1983).
  40. H. W. Crater and P. V. Alstine, Found. Phys. 24, 297 (1994).
  41. H. Sazdjian, Phys. Rev. D 33, 3401 (1986).
  42. G. Isidori, Eur. Phys. J. C 53, 567 (2008).
  43. A. B. Arbuzov and T. V. Kopylova, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 009.
  44. A. H. Hoang, Phys. Rev. D 56, 7276 (1997).
  45. O. P. Solovtsova and Y. D. Chernichenko, Phys. At. Nucl. 73, 1612 (2010).
  46. I. T. Todorov, Phys. Rev. D 3, 2351 (1971).
  47. A. B. Arbuzov, Nuovo Cimento A 107, 1263 (1994).
  48. J.-H. Yoon and C.-Y. Wong, J. Phys. G 31, 149 (2005).
  49. A. J. Buras and M. Münz, Phys. Rev. D 52, 186 (1995).
  50. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  51. D. Melikhov, N. Nikitin, and S. Simula, Phys. Lett. B 430, 332 (1998).
  52. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 113, 014508 (2026).
  53. D. Melikhov and B. Stech, Phys. Rev. D 62, 014006 (2000).
  54. N. Gubernari, A. Kokulu, and D. van Dyk, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 150.
  55. A. Kozachuk, D. Melikhov, and N. Nikitin, Phys. Rev. D 97, 053007 (2018).
  56. https://github.com/ManukhovStepan2/Coulomb_Corr_in_B_decays.
  57. W. Greiner, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: Wave Equations. 3rd Edition (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation