- Access by Xinjiang University
Logarithmic Love number of black holes beyond general relativity
Phys. Rev. D 114, 024037 – Published 14 July, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/66gk-nh35
Abstract
Tidal Love numbers and other response coefficients of black holes sometimes exhibit a logarithmic dependence on scale, or “running.” We clarify that this coefficient is directly calculable from the structure of the equation obeyed by the field perturbation, and requires no knowledge of the full solution. The derived formula allows us to establish some general results on the existence of logarithmic running. In particular, we show that any static and spherically symmetric spacetime that modifies the Schwarzschild or Reissner-Nordström solutions in a perturbative way must have nonzero logarithmic Love numbers. This applies for instance to all regular black hole metrics. On the other hand, our analysis highlights the importance of the perturbativity assumption; without it, we find explicit black hole solutions beyond general relativity with exactly zero running. We also illustrate the advantage of our method by recovering and extending the known results for the Hayward metric.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (82)
- Tanja Hinderer, Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars, Astrophys. J. 677, 1216 (2008); 697, 964(E) (2009).
- Thibault Damour and Alessandro Nagar, Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084035 (2009).
- Taylor Binnington and Eric Poisson, Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084018 (2009).
- Eanna E. Flanagan and Tanja Hinderer, Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 77, 021502 (2008).
- Vitor Cardoso, Edgardo Franzin, Andrea Maselli, Paolo Pani, and Guilherme Raposo, Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D 95, 084014 (2017); 95, 089901(A) (2017).
- Michele Maggiore et al., Science case for the Einstein Telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 050.
- Gabriel Andres Piovano, Andrea Maselli, and Paolo Pani, Constraining the tidal deformability of supermassive objects with extreme mass ratio inspirals and semianalytical frequency-domain waveforms, Phys. Rev. D 107, 024021 (2023).
- Hua Fang and Geoffrey Lovelace, Tidal coupling of a Schwarzschild black hole and circularly orbiting moon, Phys. Rev. D 72, 124016 (2005).
- Lam Hui, Austin Joyce, Riccardo Penco, Luca Santoni, and Adam R. Solomon, Static response and Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2021) 052.
- Alexandre Le Tiec, Marc Casals, and Edgardo Franzin, Tidal Love numbers of Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 084021 (2021).
- Alexandre Le Tiec and Marc Casals, Spinning black holes fall in Love, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 131102 (2021).
- Horng Sheng Chia, Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 104, 024013 (2021).
- Eric Poisson, Tidally induced multipole moments of a nonrotating black hole vanish to all post-Newtonian orders, Phys. Rev. D 104, 104062 (2021).
- Panagiotis Charalambous, Sergei Dubovsky, and Mikhail M. Ivanov, On the vanishing of Love numbers for Kerr black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 038.
- Roberto Emparan, Alejandro Fernandez-Pique, and Raimon Luna, Geometric polarization of plasmas and Love numbers of AdS black branes, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 150.
- Sebastian Garcia-Saenz, Aaron Held, and Jun Zhang, Schwarzschild quasi-normal modes of non-minimally coupled vector fields, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 139.
- Sreejith Nair, Sumanta Chakraborty, and Sudipta Sarkar, Asymptotically de Sitter black holes have nonzero tidal Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064025 (2024).
- Sumanta Chakraborty, Pierre Heidmann, and Paolo Pani, Fermionic Love of black holes in general Relativity, Phys. Rev. D 113, L061503 (2026).
- Xiankai Pang, Yu Tian, Hongbao Zhang, and Qingquan Jiang, Fermionic Love number of Reissner-Nordström black holes, Phys. Lett. B 878, 140555 (2026).
- Walter D. Goldberger and Ira Z. Rothstein, An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104029 (2006).
- Walter D. Goldberger, Les Houches lectures on effective field theories and gravitational radiation. In Les Houches Summer School—Session 86: Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Fabric of Spacetime (2007).
- Ira Z. Rothstein, Progress in effective field theory approach to the binary inspiral problem, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 46, 1726 (2014).
- Rafael A. Porto, The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics, Phys. Rep. 633, 1 (2016).
- Rafael A. Porto, The tune of Love and the nature(ness) of spacetime, Fortschr. Phys. 64, 723 (2016).
- Robert F. Penna, Near-horizon Carroll symmetry and black hole Love numbers, arXiv:1812.05643.
- Panagiotis Charalambous, Sergei Dubovsky, and Mikhail M. Ivanov, Hidden symmetry of vanishing Love numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 101101 (2021).
- Lam Hui, Austin Joyce, Riccardo Penco, Luca Santoni, and Adam R. Solomon, Ladder symmetries of black holes. Implications for love numbers and no-hair theorems, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2022) 032.
- Lam Hui, Austin Joyce, Riccardo Penco, Luca Santoni, and Adam R. Solomon, Near-zone symmetries of Kerr black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 049.
- Jibril Ben Achour, Etera R. Livine, Shinji Mukohyama, and Jean-Philippe Uzan, Hidden symmetry of the static response of black holes: Applications to Love numbers, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 112.
- Panagiotis Charalambous, Sergei Dubovsky, and Mikhail M. Ivanov, Love symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 175.
- Oscar Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, Lam Hui, Luca Santoni, Adam R. Solomon, and Sam S. C. Wong, Symmetries of vanishing nonlinear Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 124.
- Mudit Rai and Luca Santoni, Ladder symmetries and Love numbers of Reissner-Nordström black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 098.
- Valerio De Luca, Brandon Khek, Justin Khoury, and Mark Trodden, Tidal Love numbers of analog black holes, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044069 (2025).
- Roman Berens, Lam Hui, Daniel McLoughlin, Riccardo Penco, and John Staunton, Geometric Symmetries for the vanishing of the black hole tidal Love numbers, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2026) 096.
- Julio Parra-Martinez and Alessandro Podo, Naturalness of vanishing black-hole tides, arXiv:2510.20694.
- Valerio De Luca, Brandon Khek, Justin Khoury, and Mark Trodden, Hidden symmetries for tidal Love numbers: Generalities and applications to analogue black holes, Phys. Rev. D 113, 044006 (2026).
- Barak Kol and Michael Smolkin, Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 010.
- Mikhail M. Ivanov and Zihan Zhou, Revisiting the matching of black hole tidal responses: A systematic study of relativistic and logarithmic corrections, Phys. Rev. D 107, 084030 (2023).
- M. V. S. Saketh, Zihan Zhou, and Mikhail M. Ivanov, Dynamical tidal response of Kerr black holes from scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064058 (2024).
- Manoj K. Mandal, Pierpaolo Mastrolia, Hector O. Silva, Raj Patil, and Jan Steinhoff, Renormalizing Love: Tidal effects at the third post-Newtonian order, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 188.
- Tomer Hadad, Barak Kol, and Michael Smolkin, Gravito-magnetic polarization of Schwarzschild black hole, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 169.
- Hajime Kobayashi, Shinji Mukohyama, Naritaka Oshita, Kazufumi Takahashi, and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat, Dynamical tidal response of non-rotating black holes: Connecting the MST formalism and worldline EFT, Phys. Rev. D 113, 8 (2026).
- Simon Caron-Huot, Miguel Correia, Giulia Isabella, and Mikhail Solon, Gravitational wave scattering via the born series: Scalar tidal matching to O(G7) and beyond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 191601 (2025).
- Dimitrios Kosmopoulos, Davide Perrone, and Mikhail Solon, Dynamical Love numbers for black holes and beyond from shell effective field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 211401 (2026).
- Sergio Barbosa, Philippe Brax, Sylvain Fichet, and Lucas de Souza, Running Love numbers and the effective field theory of gravity, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 071.
- Chams Gharib Ali Barura, Hajime Kobayashi, Shinji Mukohyama, Naritaka Oshita, Kazufumi Takahashi, and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat, Tidal Love numbers from EFT of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2024) 001.
- Hajime Kobayashi, Shinji Mukohyama, Naritaka Oshita, Kazufumi Takahashi, and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat, Parametrized tidal dissipation numbers of nonrotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084061 (2025).
- Chiara Coviello, Vania Vellucci, and Luis Lehner, Tidal response of regular black holes, Phys. Rev. D 111, 104073 (2025).
- Pablo A. Cano, Love numbers beyond GR from the modified Teukolsky equation, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 152.
- Rui Wang, Qi-Long Shi, Wei Xiong, and Peng-Cheng Li, Tidal Love numbers for regular black holes, APS Open Sci. 1, 000010 (2026).
- Yunlong Liu and Xiangdong Zhang, Quasinormal modes and tidal Love numbers of covariant effective quantum black holes with cosmological constant, arXiv:2509.12013.
- Carl M. Bender and Steven A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I (Springer, New York, 1999).
- W. E. Boyce and R. C. DiPrima, Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems 8th ed. (Wiley, New York, 2004).
- David Pereñiguez and Vitor Cardoso, Love numbers and magnetic susceptibility of charged black holes, Phys. Rev. D 105, 044026 (2022).
- Vitor Cardoso, Leonardo Gualtieri, and Christopher J. Moore, Gravitational waves and higher dimensions: Love numbers and Kaluza-Klein excitations, Phys. Rev. D 100, 124037 (2019).
- Shinji Mukohyama and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat, Effective field theory of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile: Formulation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 010.
- Shinji Mukohyama, Kazufumi Takahashi, and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat, Generalized Regge-Wheeler equation from effective field theory of black hole perturbations with a timelike scalar profile, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 050.
- Tsutomu Kobayashi, Hayato Motohashi, and Teruaki Suyama, Black hole perturbation in the most general scalar-tensor theory with second-order field equations I: The odd-parity sector, Phys. Rev. D 85, 084025 (2012); 96, 109903(E) (2017).
- Gabriele Franciolini, Lam Hui, Riccardo Penco, Luca Santoni, and Enrico Trincherini, Effective field theory of black hole quasinormal modes in scalar-tensor theories, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 127.
- Adrien Kuntz, Federico Piazza, and Filippo Vernizzi, Effective field theory for gravitational radiation in scalar-tensor gravity, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2019) 052.
- Lam Hui, Alessandro Podo, Luca Santoni, and Enrico Trincherini, Effective field theory for the perturbations of a slowly rotating black hole, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 183.
- Shinji Mukohyama, Kazufumi Takahashi, Keitaro Tomikawa, and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat, Quasinormal modes from EFT of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2023) 050.
- Chen Lan, Hao Yang, Yang Guo, and Yan-Gang Miao, Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62, 202 (2023).
- Alex Simpson and Matt Visser, Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores, Universe 6, 8 (2019).
- James Bardeen, Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity (1968), p. 87.
- Sean A. Hayward, Formation and evaporation of regular black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 031103 (2006).
- Tian Zhou and Leonardo Modesto, Geodesic incompleteness of some popular regular black holes, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044016 (2023).
- Vitor Cardoso, Masashi Kimura, Andrea Maselli, and Leonardo Senatore, Black holes in an effective field theory extension of general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251105 (2018); 131, 109903(E) (2023).
- Valerio De Luca, Justin Khoury, and Sam S. C. Wong, Implications of the weak gravity conjecture for tidal Love numbers of black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044066 (2023).
- Takuya Katagiri, Tact Ikeda, and Vitor Cardoso, Parametrized Love numbers of nonrotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044067 (2024).
- David J. Gross and Edward Witten, Superstring modifications of Einstein’s equations, Nucl. Phys. B277, 1 (1986).
- Y. Kikuchi, C. Marzban, and Y. J. Ng, Heterotic string modifications of Einstein’s and Yang-Mills’ actions, Phys. Lett. B 176, 57 (1986).
- David J. Gross and John H. Sloan, The quartic effective action for the heterotic string, Nucl. Phys. B291, 41 (1987).
- Minghao Xia, Liang Ma, Yi Pang, and H. Lu, Full spectrum of Love numbers of Reissner-Nordstrom black hole in D-dimensions, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 69, 250411 (2026).
- Massimiliano Maria Riva, Luca Santoni, Nikola Savić, and Filippo Vernizzi, Vanishing of nonlinear tidal Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Lett. B 854, 138710 (2024).
- Simon Iteanu, Massimiliano Maria Riva, Luca Santoni, Nikola Savić, and Filippo Vernizzi, Vanishing of quadratic Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 174.
- Valerio De Luca, Justin Khoury, and Sam S. C. Wong, Nonlinearities in the tidal Love numbers of black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 024048 (2023).
- Alex Kehagias and Antonio Riotto, Black holes in a gravitational field: The non-linear static love number of Schwarzschild black holes vanishes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2025) 039.
- L. R. Gounis, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto, The vanishing of the non-linear static love number of Kerr black holes and the role of symmetries, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2025) 002.
- Paolo Pani, Massimiliano Maria Riva, Luca Santoni, Nikola Savić, and Filippo Vernizzi, Nonlinear relativistic tidal response of neutron stars, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 074.
- Chanchal Sharma, Shuvayu Roy, and Sudipta Sarkar, Ladder symmetry: The necessary and sufficient condition for vanishing Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D 113, 2 (2026).
- Chanchal Sharma, Rajes Ghosh, and Sudipta Sarkar, Exploring ladder symmetry and Love numbers for static and rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109, L041505 (2024).