Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Comparison of the hadronic vacuum polarization between hadronic τ-decay data and lattice QCD

Noah Allen1, Diogo Boito2, Maarten Golterman1,3, Kim Maltman4,5, Lucas M. Mansur6, and Santiago Peris3

Phys. Rev. D 114, 034021 – Published 11 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5y9v-c2h6

Abstract

We compare the isospin-one, vector-current hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) obtained from isospin-symmetric lattice QCD with that obtained from a dispersive representation employing inclusive hadronic τ decay data corrected for isospin breaking. We consider the subtracted HVP evaluated at squared Euclidean momenta ranging from 0.5GeV2 to 12GeV2, together with the light-quark-connected HVP contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and the short-, intermediate- and long-distance RBC/UKQCD window components thereof. Dispersive contributions from the region of hadronic invariant masses above the τ mass are evaluated using perturbative QCD. We also consider dispersive determinations using τ data only for contributions from two-pion, or two-pion and four-pion, modes, and evaluating the remaining contributions using exclusive-mode e+ehadrons cross sections up to about 2 GeV, lessening the dependence on perturbation theory. We find generally good agreement between lattice and τ-based results. However, a comparison of τ-based window-quantity contributions for the two four-pion modes to expectations for those contributions based on the Pais relations and e+e four-pion cross sections, reveals significant differences for the 2ππ+π0 mode.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (83)

  1. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Final report of the muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006).
  2. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 127 ppb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101802 (2025).
  3. R. Aliberti, T. Aoyama, E. Balzani, A. Bashir, G. Benton, J. Bijnens, V. Biloshytskyi, T. Blum, D. Boito, M. Bruno et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: An update, Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  4. F. V. Ignatov et al. (CMD-3 Collaboration), Measurement of the e+eπ+π cross section from threshold to 1.2 GeV with the CMD-3 detector, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112002 (2024).
  5. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, A. M. Lutz, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, Tensions in e+eπ+π(γ) measurements: The new landscape of data-driven hadronic vacuum polarization predictions for the muon g2, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 721 (2024).
  6. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, G. Lopez Castro, B. Malaescu, X. H. Mo, G. Toledo Sanchez, P. Wang, C. Z. Yuan, and Z. Zhang, The discrepancy between tau and e+e spectral functions revisited and the consequences for the muon magnetic anomaly, Eur. Phys. J. C 66, 127 (2010).
  7. J. A. Miranda and P. Roig, New τ-based evaluation of the hadronic contribution to the vacuum polarization piece of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114017 (2020).
  8. P. Masjuan, A. Miranda, and P. Roig, τ data-driven evaluation of Euclidean windows for the hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Lett. B 850, 138492 (2024).
  9. G. L. Castro, A. Miranda, and P. Roig, Isospin breaking corrections in 2π production in tau decays and e+e annihilation: Consequences for the muon g-2 and conserved vector current tests, Phys. Rev. D 111, 073004 (2025).
  10. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, and P. Stoffer, Isospin-breaking effects in the two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 032.
  11. M. Hoferichter, G. Colangelo, B. L. Hoid, B. Kubis, J. R. de Elvira, D. Schuh, D. Stamen, and P. Stoffer, Phenomenological estimate of isospin breaking in hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161905 (2023).
  12. M. Davier, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, Data-based form factor corrections between the two-pion τ and e+e spectral functions, arXiv:2504.13789.
  13. G. Colangelo, M. Cottini, M. Hoferichter, and S. Holz, Improved calculation of radiative corrections to τππντ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 101903 (2026) arXiv:2510.26871; Radiative corrections to τππντ, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 181.
  14. T. Blum, P.  A. Boyle, V. Gülpers, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, A. Jüttner, C. Lehner, A. Portelli, and J.  T. Tsang (RBC Collaboration and UKQCD Collaboration), Calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022003 (2018).
  15. A. Conigli, D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, S. Kuberski, H. B. Meyer, K. Miura, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, Precision lattice calculation of the hadronic contribution to the running of the electroweak gauge couplings, arXiv:2511.01623.
  16. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, L. Lellouch, T. Lippert, K. Miura, L. Parato, K. K. Szabo et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature (London) 593, 51 (2021).
  17. G. Benton, D. Boito, M. Golterman, A. Keshavarzi, K. Maltman, and S. Peris, Data-driven determination of the light-quark connected component of the intermediate-window contribution to the muon g2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 251803 (2023).
  18. D. Bernecker and H. B. Meyer, Vector correlators in lattice QCD: Methods and applications, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 148 (2011).
  19. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kühn, Order αs4 QCD corrections to Z and τ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 012002 (2008).
  20. D. Boito, A. Eiben, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, L. M. Mansur, and S. Peris, Strong coupling from hadronic τππ0ντ from Belle, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074010 (2025).
  21. R. Barate et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), Measurement of the spectral functions of axial-vector hadronic tau decays and determination of αs(Mτ2), Eur. Phys. J. C 4, 409 (1998).
  22. S. Schael et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), Branching ratios and spectral functions of tau decays: Final ALEPH measurements and physics implications, Phys. Rep. 421, 191 (2005).
  23. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, C. Z. Yuan, and Z. Zhang, Update of the ALEPH non-strange spectral functions from hadronic τ decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2803 (2014).
  24. K. Ackerstaff et al. (OPAL Collaboration), Measurement of the strong coupling constant alpha(s) and the vector and axial-vector spectral functions in hadronic tau decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 7, 571 (1999).
  25. M. Fujikawa et al. (Belle Collaboration), High-statistics study of the τππ0ν(τ) decay, Phys. Rev. D 78, 072006 (2008).
  26. D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, S. Peris, M. V. Rodrigues, and W. Schaaf, Strong coupling from an improved τ vector isovector spectral function, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034028 (2021).
  27. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Measurement of the spectra function for the τKKSντ decay, Phys. Rev. D 98, 032010 (2018).
  28. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, g2 of charged leptons, α(MZ2) and the hyperfine splitting of muonium: A new data-based analysis, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014029 (2020).
  29. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG), FLAG review 2024, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014508 (2026).
  30. J. Erler, Electroweak radiative corrections to semileptonic tau decays, Rev. Mex. Fis. 50, 200 (2004).
  31. A. Pais, The many pi-meson problem, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 9, 548 (1960).
  32. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kühn, Five-loop running of the QCD coupling constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 082002 (2017).
  33. F. Herzog, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, The five-loop beta function of Yang-Mills theory with fermions, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 090.
  34. M. Jamin, Contour-improved versus fixed-order perturbation theory in hadronic τ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2005) 058.
  35. M. Beneke and M. Jamin, αs and the τ hadronic width: Fixed-order, contour-improved and higher-order perturbation theory, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2008) 044.
  36. D. Boito, P. Masjuan, and F. Oliani, Higher-order QCD corrections to hadronic τ decays from Padé approximants, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 075.
  37. M. Cè, A. Gérardin, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Miura, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, T. San José, J. Wilhelm, and H. Wittig, The hadronic running of the electromagnetic coupling and the electroweak mixing angle from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 220.
  38. S. Kuberski, M. Cè, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, Hadronic vacuum polarization in the muon g2: The short-distance contribution from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 172.
  39. D. Boito, O. Catà, M. Golterman, M. Jamin, K. Maltman, J. Osborne, and S. Peris, A new determination of αs from hadronic τ decays, Phys. Rev. D 84, 113006 (2011).
  40. D. Boito, I. Caprini, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, and S. Peris, Hyperasymptotics and quark-hadron duality violations in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054007 (2018).
  41. E. C. Poggio, H. R. Quinn, and S. Weinberg, Smearing the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 13, 1958 (1976).
  42. O. Catà, M. Golterman, and S. Peris, Possible duality violations in τ decay and their impact on the determination of αs, Phys. Rev. D 79, 053002 (2009).
  43. B. Blok, M. A. Shifman, and D. X. Zhang, An illustrative example of how quark-hadron duality might work, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2691 (1998); 59, 019901(E) (1999).
  44. I. I. Y. Bigi, M. A. Shifman, N. Uraltsev, and A. I. Vainshtein, Heavy flavor decays, OPE and duality in two-dimensional ’t Hooft model, Phys. Rev. D 59, 054011 (1999).
  45. M. A. Shifman, Quark Hadron Duality (2021), pp. 1447–1494.
  46. M. Golterman, S. Peris, B. Phily, and E. de Rafael, Testing an approximation to large-Nc QCD with a toy model, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2002) 024.
  47. O. Catà, M. Golterman, and S. Peris, Duality violations and spectral sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2005) 076.
  48. O. Catà, M. Golterman, and S. Peris, Unraveling duality violations in hadronic tau decays, Phys. Rev. D 77, 093006 (2008).
  49. M. Della Morte, A. Francis, V. Gülpers, G. Herdoíza, G. von Hippel, H. Horch, B. Jäger, H. B. Meyer, A. Nyffeler, and H. Wittig, The hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g2 from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 020.
  50. V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, and H. Neufeld, Isospin violation and the magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Lett. B 513, 361 (2001).
  51. C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration), Lattice calculation of the short and intermediate time-distance hadronic vacuum polarization contributions to the muon magnetic moment using twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074506 (2023).
  52. T. Blum et al. (RBC Collaboration and UKQCD Collaboration), Update of Euclidean windows of the hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054507 (2023).
  53. A. Bazavov et al. (MILC Collaboration, Fermilab Lattice Collaboration and HPQCD Collaboration), Hadronic vacuum polarization for the muon g2 from lattice QCD: Complete short and intermediate windows, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094508 (2025).
  54. V. Cirigliano, M. Hoferichter, and N. Valori, Pion β decay and τππντ beyond leading logarithms, arXiv:2602.11253.
  55. F. Guerrero and A. Pich, Effective field theory description of the pion form-factor, Phys. Lett. B 412, 382 (1997).
  56. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, G. Lopez Castro, B. Malaescu, X. H. Mo, G. Toledo Sanchez, P. Wang, C. Z. Yuan, and Z. Zhang, The discrepancy between tau and e+e spectral functions revisited and the consequences for the muon magnetic anomaly, Eur. Phys. J. C 66, 127 (2010).
  57. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  58. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG), FLAG review 2024, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014508 (2026).
  59. T. Coan et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Measurement of αs from tau decays, Phys. Lett. B 356, 580 (1995).
  60. S. Anderson et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Hadronic structure in the decay τππ0ντ, Phys. Rev. D 61, 112002 (2000).
  61. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, A. M. Lutz, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, Tensions in e+eπ+π(γ) measurements: The new landscape of data-driven hadronic vacuum polarization predictions for the muon g2, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 721 (2024).
  62. R. Alemany, M. Davier, and A. Hoecker, Improved determination of the hadronic contribution to the muon (g2) and to α(MZ2) using new data from hadronic tau decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 2, 123 (1998).
  63. A. del Pino, D. A. Clarke, C. DeTar, A. X. El-Khadra, E. Gámiz, S. Gottlieb, A. V. Grebe, L. Hostetler, W. I. Jay, A. S. Kronfeld et al., Hadronic contributions to α(Q2) and sinW2(Q2) from spectral reconstruction of lattice-QCD data, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2025 (2025) 518 [arXiv:2604.22349].
  64. D. Giusti, F. Sanfilippo, and S. Simula, Light-quark contribution to the leading hadronic vacuum polarization term of the muon g2 from twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114504 (2018).
  65. E. Shintani and Y. Kuramashi (PACS Collaboration), Hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g2 with 2+1 flavor lattice QCD on a larger than (10fm)4 lattice at the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034517 (2019).
  66. D. Giusti and S. Simula, Lepton anomalous magnetic moments in Lattice QCD+QED, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2019 (2019) 104.
  67. C. Lehner and A. S. Meyer, Consistency of hadronic vacuum polarization between lattice QCD and the R-ratio, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074515 (2020).
  68. G. Wang , T. Draper, K.-F. Liu, and Y.-B. Yang (chiQCD Collaboration), Muon g2 with overlap valence fermions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034513 (2023).
  69. C. Aubin, T. Blum, M. Golterman, and S. Peris, Muon anomalous magnetic moment with staggered fermions: Is the lattice spacing small enough?, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054503 (2022).
  70. M. Cè, A. Gérardin, G. von Hippel, R. J. Hudspith, S. Kuberski, H. B. Meyer, K. Miura, D. Mohler, K. Ottnad, P. Srijit et al., Window observable for the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g2 from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 106, 114502 (2022).
  71. A. Boccaletti, S. Borsanyi, M. Davier, Z. Fodor, F. Frech, A. Gerardin, D. Giusti, A. Y. Kotov, L. Lellouch, T. Lippert et al., High precision calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contribution to the muon anomaly, Nature (London) 653, 373 (2026).
  72. S. Spiegel and C. Lehner, High-precision continuum limit study of the HVP short-distance window, Phys. Rev. D 111, 114517 (2025).
  73. T. Blum et al. (RBC Collaboration and UKQCD Collaboration), Long-distance window of the hadronic vacuum polarization for the muon g2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 201901 (2025).
  74. D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, S. Kuberski, H. B. Meyer, N. Miller, K. Ottnad, J. Parrino, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, The hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g2 at long distances, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 098.
  75. C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration), Strange and charm quark contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment in lattice QCD with twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054502 (2025).
  76. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice Collaboration, HPQCD Collaboration, and MILC Collaboration), Hadronic vacuum polarization for the muon g2 from lattice QCD: Long-distance and full light-quark connected contribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011901 (2025).
  77. K. G. Chetyrkin and A. Maier, Massless correlators of vector, scalar and tensor currents in position space at orders αs3 and αs4: Explicit analytical results, Nucl. Phys. B844, 266 (2011).
  78. G. Benton, D. Boito, M. Golterman, A. Keshavarzi, K. Maltman, and S. Peris, Data-driven results for light-quark connected and strange-plus-disconnected hadronic g2 short- and long-distance windows, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034018 (2025).
  79. D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, and S. Peris, Data-based determination of the isospin-limit light-quark-connected contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074001 (2023).
  80. D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, and S. Peris, Evaluation of the three-flavor quark-disconnected contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment from experimental data, Phys. Rev. D 105, 093003 (2022).
  81. G. Benton, D. Boito, M. Golterman, A. Keshavarzi, K. Maltman, and S. Peris, Data-driven estimates for light-quark-connected and strange-plus-disconnected hadronic g2 window quantities, Phys. Rev. D 109, 036010 (2024).
  82. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to αs(mZ2), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 241 (2020); 80, 410(E) (2020).
  83. B. Aubert et al., BABAR Collaboration), Measurements of e+eK+Kη, K+Kπ0 and KS0K±π cross sections using initial state radiation events, Phys. Rev. D 77, 092002 (2008).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation