- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Multifield dark energy: Interplay between curved field space and curved spacetime

Diego Gallego1,* and J. Bayron Orjuela-Quintana2,†

  • *Contact author: diego.gallego@uptc.edu.co
  • †Contact author: john.orjuela@correounivalle.edu.co
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 023566 – Published 30 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5jsk-bx75

Abstract

Exponential quintessence models motivated by string compactifications naturally involve both a dilatonic scalar and its axionic partner evolving on a curved field space, while spatial curvature enlarges the cosmological phase space and may affect late-time dynamics. We perform a systematic analysis of the minimal two-field exponential system in a curved FLRW background including radiation and matter components, combining a complete dynamical systems classification with analytical approximations and numerical integration. In the scalar-dominated limit, nongeodesic trajectories can sustain accelerated expansion on steep potentials, and in curved universes, a scaling-curvature fixed point can in principle soften the requirements for acceleration. However, we show that these mechanisms arise in distinct invariant manifolds and cannot be simultaneously realized in the presence of a background fluid: no nongeodesic scaling fixed point exists within an open region of parameter space. As a consequence, in the observationally viable thawing regime, the axion does not track the background fluid and spatial curvature becomes dynamically subdominant, leading to an effectively single-field evolution. We further identify a degeneracy between curvature effects and scalar-field dynamics that limits their independent impact on late-time cosmology. Confronting the model with current cosmological background data (Planck 2018 distance priors, Pantheon+, BAO, and cosmic chronometers), we obtain an upper bound λ≲0.75 (95% C.L.) on the potential slope. Our results demonstrate that even in the minimal multifield setup with spatial curvature, sustained late-time acceleration requires a sufficiently flat potential, so that the tension between cosmic acceleration and quantum gravity expectations persists within this framework.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (115)

  1. Supernova Search Team, Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998).
  2. Supernova Cosmology Project, Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999).
  3. WMAP Collaboration, Nine-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Cosmological parameter results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 208, 19 (2013).
  4. WMAP Science Team, Results from the Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2014, 6B102 (2014).
  5. Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  6. P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, The cosmological constant and dark energy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 559 (2003).
  7. T. Padmanabhan, Cosmological constant—the weight of the vacuum, Phys. Rep. 380, 235 (2003).
  8. J. Martin, Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask), C. R. Phys. 13, 566 (2012).
  9. A. G. Riess, L. M. Macri, S. L. Hoffmann, D. Scolnic, S. Casertano, A. V. Filippenko et al., A 2.4% determination of the local value of the hubble constant, Astrophys. J. 826, 56 (2016).
  10. A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, J. B. Bowers, L. Macri, J. C. Zinn, and D. Scolnic, Cosmic distances calibrated to 1% precision with Gaia EDR3 parallaxes and hubble space telescope photometry of 75 Milky Way cepheids confirm tension with ΛCDM, Astrophys. J. Lett. 908, L6 (2021).
  11. L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, Tensions between the early and late Universe, Nat. Astron. 3, 891 (2019).
  12. N. Schöneberg, G. F. Abellán, A. P. Sánchez, S. J. Witte, V. Poulin, and J. Lesgourgues, The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models, Phys. Rep. 984, 2228 (2022).
  13. L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, Challenges for ΛCDM: An update, New Astron. Rev. 95, 101659 (2022).
  14. DESI Collaboration, The DESI experiment Part I: Science, targeting, and survey design, arXiv:1611.00036.
  15. L. Amendola, S. Appleby, A. Avgoustidis et al., Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite, Living Rev. Relativity 21, 2 (2018).
  16. K. Gebhardt, E. M. Cooper, R. Ciardullo, V. Acquaviva, R. Bender, W. P. Bowman et al., The Hobby–Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX) survey design, reductions, and detections*, Astrophys. J. 923, 217 (2021).
  17. DESI Collaboration, Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083511 (2025).
  18. DESI Collaboration, Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements, Nat. Astron. 9, 1879 (2025).
  19. C. Wetterich, Cosmology and the fate of dilatation symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B302, 668 (1988).
  20. P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Cosmology with a time-variable cosmological ‘constant’, Astrophys. J. Lett. 325, L17 (1988).
  21. C. Wetterich, The Cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time dependent cosmological ‘constant’, Astron. Astrophys. 301, 321 (1995).
  22. R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1582 (1998).
  23. I. Zlatev, L. Wang, and P. J. Steinhardt, Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 896 (1999).
  24. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006).
  25. K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Dark energy cosmology: The equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests, Astrophys. Space Sci. 342, 155 (2012).
  26. B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3406 (1988).
  27. E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and D. Wands, Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4686 (1998).
  28. E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Late-time cosmology in (phantom) scalar-tensor theory: Dark energy and the cosmic speed-up, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043539 (2004).
  29. N. Kaloper and L. Sorbo, Of pNGB quintessence, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2006) 007.
  30. N. Kaloper and L. Sorbo, Where in the string landscape is quintessence, Phys. Rev. D 79, 043528 (2009).
  31. M. Cicoli, F. G. Pedro, and G. Tasinato, Natural quintessence in string theory, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2012) 044.
  32. J. Blåbäck, U. Danielsson, and G. Dibitetto, Accelerated universes from type IIA compactifications, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2014) 003.
  33. M. Kamionkowski, J. Pradler, and D. G. E. Walker, Dark energy from the string axiverse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 251302 (2014).
  34. P. Christodoulidis, D. Roest, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Scaling attractors in multi-field inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2019) 059.
  35. S. Alexander and E. McDonough, Axion-dilaton destabilization and the hubble tension, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134830 (2019).
  36. E. McDonough and M. Scalisi, Towards early dark energy in string theory, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 118.
  37. H. Bernardo, R. Brandenberger, and J. Fröhlich, Towards a dark sector model from string theory, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 040.
  38. F. Revello, Attractive (s)axions: Cosmological trackers at the boundary of moduli space, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 037.
  39. J. Sonner and P. K. Townsend, Recurrent acceleration in dilaton-axion cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 74, 103508 (2006).
  40. R. Catena and J. Möller, Axion–dilaton cosmology and dark energy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2008) 012.
  41. A. R. Brown, Hyperbolic inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251601 (2018).
  42. C. van de Bruck and C. C. Thomas, Dark energy, the swampland, and the equivalence principle, Phys. Rev. D 100, 023515 (2019).
  43. M. Cicoli, G. Dibitetto, and F. G. Pedro, New accelerating solutions in late-time cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 101, 103524 (2020).
  44. M. Cicoli, G. Dibitetto, and F. G. Pedro, Out of the swampland with multifield quintessence?, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 035.
  45. D. Gallego, J. B. Orjuela-Quintana, and C. A. Valenzuela-Toledo, Anisotropic dark energy from string compactifications, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 131.
  46. A. Achúcarro and G. A. Palma, The string swampland constraints require multi-field inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 041.
  47. Y. Akrami, M. Sasaki, A. R. Solomon, and V. Vardanyan, Multi-field dark energy: Cosmic acceleration on a steep potential, Phys. Lett. B 819, 136427 (2021).
  48. DESI Collaboration, DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2025) 021.
  49. DESI Collaboration, DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  50. S. Vagnozzi, E. Di Valentino, S. Gariazzo, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, and J. Silk, The galaxy power spectrum take on spatial curvature and cosmic concordance, Phys. Dark Universe 33, 100851 (2021).
  51. M. Takada and O. Doré, Geometrical constraint on curvature with BAO experiments, Phys. Rev. D 92, 123518 (2015).
  52. C. D. Leonard, P. Bull, and R. Allison, Spatial curvature endgame: Reaching the limit of curvature determination, Phys. Rev. D 94, 023502 (2016).
  53. S. Vagnozzi, A. Loeb, and M. Moresco, Eppur è piatto? The cosmic chronometers take on spatial curvature and cosmic concordance, Astrophys. J. 908, 84 (2021).
  54. S. Dhawan, J. Alsing, and S. Vagnozzi, Non-parametric spatial curvature inference using late-Universe cosmological probes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 506, L1 (2021).
  55. J.-Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa, and S. Vagnozzi, Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123519 (2024).
  56. E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, and J. Silk, Planck evidence for a closed Universe and a possible crisis for cosmology, Nat. Astron. 4, 196 (2019).
  57. W. Handley, Curvature tension: Evidence for a closed universe, Phys. Rev. D 103, L041301 (2021).
  58. SPT Collaboration, Constraints on cosmological parameters from the 500 deg2 SPTPOL lensing power spectrum, Astrophys. J. 888, 119 (2020).
  59. ACT Collaboration, The Atacama cosmology telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 063.
  60. SPT-3G Collaboration, SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field, Phys. Rev. D 113, 083504 (2026).
  61. J. N. Dossett and M. Ishak, Spatial curvature and cosmological tests of general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 86, 103008 (2012).
  62. J. E. Gonzalez, M. Benetti, R. von Marttens, and J. Alcaniz, Testing the consistency between cosmological data: The impact of spatial curvature and the dark energy EoS, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2021) 060.
  63. W. Yang, W. Giarè, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, and J. Silk, Revealing the effects of curvature on the cosmological models, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063509 (2023).
  64. J. d. C. Pérez, C.-G. Park, and B. Ratra, Updated observational constraints on spatially flat and nonflat, Phys. Rev. D 110, 023506 (2024).
  65. C. Clarkson, M. Cortês, and B. Bassett, Dynamical dark energy or simply cosmic curvature?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2007) 011.
  66. Y. Gong, Q. Wu, Anzhong Wang, and A. Wang, Dark energy and cosmic curvature: Monte Carlo Markov chain approach, Astrophys. J. 681, 27 (2008).
  67. J.-M. Virey, D. Talon-Esmieu, A. Ealet, P. Taxil, and A. Tilquin, On the determination of curvature and dynamical dark energy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2008) 008.
  68. Y. Chen, B. Ratra, M. Biesiada, S. Li, and Z.-H. Zhu, Constraints on non-flat cosmologies with massive neutrinos after planck 2015, Astrophys. J. 829, 61 (2016).
  69. S. Vagnozzi, E. Giusarma, O. Mena, K. Freese, M. Gerbino, S. Ho, and M. Lattanzi, Unveiling ν secrets with cosmological data: Neutrino masses and mass hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 96, 123503 (2017).
  70. J. J. Halliwell, Scalar fields in cosmology with an exponential potential, Phys. Lett. B 185, 341 (1987).
  71. R. J. van den Hoogen, A. A. Coley, and D. Wands, Scaling solutions in Robertson-Walker spacetimes, Classical Quantum Gravity 16, 1843 (1999).
  72. M. Gosenca and P. Coles, Dynamical analysis of scalar field cosmologies with spatial curvature, Open J. Astrophys. 1, 1 (2016).
  73. D. Andriot, D. Tsimpis, and T. Wrase, Accelerated expansion of an open universe and string theory realizations, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123515 (2023).
  74. D. Andriot, S. Parameswaran, D. Tsimpis, T. Wrase, and I. Zavala, Exponential quintessence: Curved, steep and stringy?, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 117.
  75. R. V. Buniy, S. D. H. Hsu, and A. Zee, Does string theory predict an open universe?, Phys. Lett. B 660, 382 (2008).
  76. S. Céspedes, S. P. de Alwis, F. Muia, and F. Quevedo, Lorentzian vacuum transitions: Open or closed universes?, Phys. Rev. D 104, 026013 (2021).
  77. B. Horn, Positive curvature and scalar field tunneling in the landscape, Phys. Rev. D 99, 025010 (2019).
  78. A. H. Guth and Y. Nomura, What can the observation of nonzero curvature tell us?, Phys. Rev. D 86, 023534 (2012).
  79. M. Kleban and M. Schillo, Spatial curvature falsifies eternal inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2012) 029.
  80. S. Bhattacharya, G. Borghetto, A. Malhotra, S. Parameswaran, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, Cosmological constraints on curved quintessence, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2024) 073.
  81. G. Alestas, M. Delgado, I. Ruiz, Y. Akrami, M. Montero, and S. Nesseris, Is curvature-assisted quintessence observationally viable?, Phys. Rev. D 110, 106010 (2024).
  82. T. Patil and S. Panda, Role of spatial curvature in a dark energy interacting model, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 48 (2025).
  83. C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, arXiv:hep-th/0509212.
  84. H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland, Nucl. Phys. B766, 21 (2007).
  85. H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 21, 1787 (2017).
  86. T. D. Brennan, F. Carta, and C. Vafa, The string landscape, the swampland, and the missing corner, Proc. Sci. TASI2017 (2017) 015. [arXiv:1711.00864].
  87. E. Palti, The swampland: Introduction and review, Fortschr. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019).
  88. T. Van Riet and G. Zoccarato, Beginners lectures on flux compactifications and related Swampland topics, Phys. Rep. 1049, 2296 (2023).
  89. S. García-Serna, J. B. Orjuela-Quintana, C. A. Valenzuela-Toledo, and H. Ocampo-Durán, Reconstructing the parameter space of nonanalytical cosmological fixed points, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 32, 2350073 (2023).
  90. D. Andriot, Quintessence: An analytical study, with theoretical and observational applications, Fortschr. Phys. 73, e70007 (2025).
  91. G. D’Amico and N. Kaloper, Rollercoaster cosmology, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2021) 058.
  92. A. P. Billyard, A. A. Coley, and J. E. Lidsey, Qualitative analysis of early universe cosmologies, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 40, 5092 (1999).
  93. A. P. Billyard, A. A. Coley, and J. E. Lidsey, Cyclical behavior in early universe cosmologies, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 41, 6277 (2000).
  94. L. Anguelova, J. Dumancic, R. Gass, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Dark energy from inspiraling in Field Space, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2022) 018.
  95. M. Brinkmann, M. Cicoli, G. Dibitetto, and F. G. Pedro, Stringy multifield quintessence and the swampland, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 044.
  96. DESI Collaboration, Frequentist cosmological constraints from full-shape clustering measurements in DESI DR1, arXiv:2508.11811.
  97. M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 213 (2001).
  98. E. V. Linder, Exploring the expansion history of the universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003).
  99. R. R. Caldwell and E. V. Linder, The limits of quintessence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 141301 (2005).
  100. G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko, and C. Vafa, De Sitter space and the swampland, arXiv:1806.08362.
  101. P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P. J. Steinhardt, and C. Vafa, On the cosmological implications of the string swampland, Phys. Lett. B 784, 271 (2018).
  102. M. Álvarez, J. B. Orjuela-Quintana, Y. Rodriguez, and C. A. Valenzuela-Toledo, Einstein Yang-Mills Higgs dark energy revisited, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 195004 (2019).
  103. J. Lesgourgues, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview, arXiv:1104.2932.
  104. D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2011) 034.
  105. T. Brinckmann and J. Lesgourgues, MontePython 3: Boosted MCMC sampler and other features, Phys. Dark Universe 24, 100260 (2019).
  106. D. Brout et al., The pantheon+analysis: Cosmological constraints, Astrophys. J. 938, 110 (2022).
  107. F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, L. Campbell, Q. Parker, W. Saunders, and Fred Watson, The 6dF galaxy survey: Baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 3017 (2011).
  108. A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W. J. Percival, A. Burden, and M. Manera, The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample—I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z=0.15, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 449, 835 (2015).
  109. R.-Y. Guo and X. Zhang, Constraining dark energy with Hubble parameter measurements: An analysis including future redshift-drift observations, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 163 (2016).
  110. M. Moresco, L. Pozzetti, A. Cimatti, R. Jimenez, C. Maraston, L. Verde, D. Thomas, A. Citro, R. Tojeiro, and D. Wilkinson, A 6% measurement of the Hubble parameter at z∼0.45: Direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2016) 014.
  111. S. Alexander, H. Bernardo, and M. W. Toomey, Addressing the Hubble and S8 tensions with a kinetically mixed dark sector, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2023) 037.
  112. C. P. Burgess, D. Dineen, and F. Quevedo, Yoga dark energy: Natural relaxation and other dark implications of a supersymmetric gravity sector, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2022) 064.
  113. A. Smith, M. Mylova, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, A minimal axio-dilaton dark sector, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 023.
  114. A. Berera, H. Bernardo, S. Brahma, J. Calderón-Figueroa, R. O. Ramos, and M. W. Toomey, Heterotic warm inflation, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2026) 099.
  115. A. Smith, M. Mylova, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and E. Di Valentino, The serendipitous axiodilaton: A self-consistent recombination-era solution to the hubble tension, arXiv:2512.13544.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 023566– Published 30 July, 2026
  • Received 28 March 2026
  • Accepted 10 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation