Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Wasserstein distance in cosmological structure formation: An optimal transport perspective

Tsutomu T. Takeuchi*

  • Division of Particle and Astrophysical Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464–8602, Japan and The Research Center for Statistical Machine Learning, the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 10-3 Midori-cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190–8562, Japan

  • *Contact author: tsutomu.takeuchi.ttt@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 114, 023555 – Published 23 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3n9q-x4h2

Abstract

The formation of cosmological large-scale structure is usually described in terms of the evolution of density fluctuations and their statistical measures, such as the power spectrum and correlation function. However, these statistics characterize the amplitude structure of density fluctuations and do not directly describe the spatial redistribution of matter that occurs during structure formation. In this work we formulate cosmological structure formation as a transport problem of mass distributions using the Wasserstein distance from optimal transport theory. The generative process from the initial linear density field to the observed galaxy catalog is treated as a hierarchical mapping from a continuous density field to a galaxy point process, and an approximate expression for the Wasserstein distance between them is derived under the small-fluctuation approximation. We show that this distance naturally decomposes into contributions associated with three physical processes: mass transport by gravitational evolution, galaxy formation bias, and shot noise arising from the discrete sampling of galaxies. The gravitational transport term is expressed as an integral of the matter power spectrum, while the galaxy formation contribution appears as a transport-weighted integral of the galaxy correlation function. The sampling term corresponds to Poisson shot noise originating from the discreteness of the galaxy catalog. A notable feature of the resulting expression is that the correlation contribution differs fundamentally from conventional volume-weighted clustering statistics and is naturally related to cumulative matter displacements and baryon acoustic oscillation smearing. These results provide a unified framework for describing cosmological large-scale structure formation from the perspective of transport geometry and suggest that the Wasserstein distance may serve as a new statistical quantity linking continuous density fields with observed galaxy catalogs.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (25)

  1. P. J. E. Peebles, The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1980).
  2. T. T. Takeuchi, Physics of the Formation and Evolution of Galaxies: Multiwavelength Point of View, Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology (Springer Nature, Singapore, 2025).
  3. Y. B. Zel’dovich, Astron. Astrophys. 5, 84 (1970).
  4. C. Villani, Optimal Transport: Old and New, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
  5. U. Frisch, S. Matarrese, R. Mohayaee, and A. Sobolevski, Nature (London) 417, 260 (2002).
  6. F. Nikakhtar, R. K. Sheth, B. Lévy, and R. Mohayaee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 251101 (2022).
  7. F. Nikakhtar, N. Padmanabhan, B. Lévy, R. K. Sheth, and R. Mohayaee, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083534 (2023).
  8. F. Nikakhtar, R. K. Sheth, N. Padmanabhan, B. Lévy, and R. Mohayaee, Phys. Rev. D 109, 123512 (2024).
  9. J.-D. Benamou and Y. Brenier, Numer. Math. 84, 375 (2000).
  10. Y. Brenier, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 44, 375 (1991).
  11. E. Boissard and T. L. Gouic, Prob. Stat. 50, 539 (2014).
  12. N. Fournier and A. Guillin, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 162, 707 (2015).
  13. D. J. Daley and D. Vere-Jones, An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. Volume I: Elementary Theory and Methods (Springer, New York, 2003).
  14. D. J. Daley and D. Vere-Jones, An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. Volume II: General Theory and Structure (Springer, New York, 2008).
  15. G. Last and M. Penrose, Lectures on the Poisson Process, Institute of Mathematical Statistics Textbooks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2017).
  16. J. A. Peacock, Cosmological Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).
  17. H. A. Feldman, N. Kaiser, and J. A. Peacock, Astrophys. J. 426, 23 (1994).
  18. M. A. Strauss and J. A. Willick, Phys. Rep. 261, 271 (1995).
  19. D. J. Eisenstein, H.-J. Seo, and M. White, Astrophys. J. 664, 660 (2007).
  20. A. Paranjape and R. K. Sheth, arXiv:2602.14533.
  21. N. Kaiser, Astrophys. J. 284, L9 (1984).
  22. J. N. Fry and E. Gaztanaga, Astrophys. J. 413, 447 (1993).
  23. V. Desjacques, D. Jeong, and F. Schmidt, Phys. Rep. 733, 1 (2018).
  24. D. J. Eisenstein and W. Hu, Astrophys. J. 496, 605 (1998).
  25. Planck Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation