Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A demonstration of CMB lensing measurement from daytime data

Irene Abril-Cabezas1,2,*, Frank J. Qu3,4, Joshua Kim5, Mathew S. Madhavacheril5, Karen Perez-Sarmiento5, Zachary Atkins5,6, Erminia Calabrese7, Anthony Challinor8,2,1, Mark J. Devlin5 et al.

Adriaan J. Duivenvoorden9, Jo Dunkley10, Alexander van Engelen11, Simone Ferraro12,13, Emily Finson14, Carlos Hervías-Caimapo3,4,15, Matt Hilton16,17, Arthur Kosowsky18, Aleksandra Kusiak8,2, Thibaut Louis19, Niall MacCrann1,2, Kavilan Moodley17, Toshiya Namikawa20,1,2, Sigurd Næss21, Lyman A. Page6, Adrien La Posta22, Emmanuel Schaan3,4, Neelima Sehgal14, Blake D. Sherwin1,2, Carlos E. Sierra3,4, Cristóbal Sifón23, Suzanne T. Staggs6, Emilie Storer24,6, and Edward J. Wollack25

  • *Contact author: ia404@cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 114, 063524 – Published 14 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3ksm-wlxr

Abstract

We present a cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing power spectrum analysis using daytime data (11am–11pm UTC) gathered by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) over the period 2017–2022 (ACT Data Release 6). This dataset is challenging to analyze because the Sun heats and deforms the telescope mirror, complicating the characterization of the telescope. We perform more than one hundred null and consistency checks to ensure the robustness of our measurement and its compatibility with nighttime observations. We detect the CMB lensing power spectrum at 18σ significance, with an amplitude Alens=1.071±0.060 with respect to the prediction from the best-fit Planck-ACT CMB power spectrum ΛCDM cosmology. In combination with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data, this corresponds to a constraint on the amplitude of matter fluctuations σ8=0.842±0.026. The analysis presented here is especially relevant for ground-based millimeter-wave CMB experiments at the Atacama site, paving the way for future analyses making use of both nighttime and daytime data to place tight constraints on cosmological parameters.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (61)

  1. A. Lewis and A. Challinor, Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB, Phys. Rep. 429, 1 (2006).
  2. F. J. Qu et al., Unified and consistent structure growth measurements from joint ACT, SPT and Planck CMB lensing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 021001 (2026).
  3. F. J. Qu et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A measurement of the DR6 CMB lensing power spectrum and its implications for structure growth, Astrophys. J. 962, 112 (2024).
  4. M. S. Madhavacheril et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 gravitational lensing map and cosmological parameters, Astrophys. J. 962, 113 (2024).
  5. N. MacCrann et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Mitigating the impact of extragalactic foregrounds for the DR6 cosmic microwave background lensing analysis, Astrophys. J. 966, 138 (2024).
  6. J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein, and A. Lewis, CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 039.
  7. F. Ge et al., Cosmology from CMB lensing and delensed EE power spectra using 2019–2020 SPT-3G polarization data, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083534 (2025).
  8. J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor, Massive neutrinos and cosmology, Phys. Rep. 429, 307 (2006).
  9. R. Allison, P. Caucal, E. Calabrese, J. Dunkley, and T. Louis, Towards a cosmological neutrino mass detection, Phys. Rev. D 92, 123535 (2015).
  10. M. Schmittfull and U. Seljak, Parameter constraints from cross-correlation of CMB lensing with galaxy clustering, Phys. Rev. D 97, 123540 (2018).
  11. F. McCarthy, M. S. Madhavacheril, and A. S. Maniyar, Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from halo bias measured through CMB lensing cross-correlations, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083522 (2023).
  12. S. Naess et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 maps, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 061.
  13. R. Dünner et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Data characterization and mapmaking, Astrophys. J. 762, 10 (2013).
  14. S. Aiola et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2020) 047.
  15. E. R. Storer, From raw data to cosmology with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 2023, http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01j3860b180.
  16. Simons Observatory Collaboration., The Simons Observatory:Science goals and forecasts for the enhanced large aperture telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 034.
  17. BICEP2 and Keck Array Collaborations, BICEP2/Keck Array VIII: Measurement of gravitational lensing from large-scale B-mode polarization, Astrophys. J. 833, 228 (2016).
  18. M. A. Faúndez et al., Measurement of the cosmic microwave background polarization lensing power spectrum from two years of polarbear data, Astrophys. J. 893, 85 (2020).
  19. J. Kim (ACT Collaboration), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Measurement of the CMB lensing power spectrum from ACT+Planck over 27,000 sq. deg. and implications for structure formation (to be published).
  20. I. Abril-Cabezas (ACT Collaboration), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: LCDM cosmological constraints from an ACT+Planck CMB lensing map over 27,000 sq. deg. (to be published).
  21. F. J. Qu (ACT Collaboration), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Constraints on extensions to LCDM from an ACT+Planck CMB lensing map over 27,000 sq. deg. (to be published).
  22. Z. Atkins et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Map-based noise simulations for DR6, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2023) 073.
  23. R. J. Thornton et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: The Polarization-sensitive ACTPol instrument, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 227, 21 (2016).
  24. T. Louis et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 062.
  25. I. Abril-Cabezas et al., Impact of galactic non-Gaussian foregrounds on CMB lensing measurements, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023522 (2025).
  26. M. S. Madhavacheril et al., Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Component-separated maps of CMB temperature and the thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect, Phys. Rev. D 102, 023534 (2020).
  27. M. Aguena et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Sunyaev-Zel’dovich selected galaxy clusters catalog, Open J. Astrophys. 9, 55863 (2026).
  28. M. Hilton et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Catalog of >4000 Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Galaxy Clusters, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 253, 3 (2021).
  29. A. J. Duivenvoorden et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Beam measurements for DR6, 10.21105/astro.2210.02243.
  30. S. Naess and T. Louis, Large-scale power loss in ground-based CMB mapmaking, Open J. Astrophys. 6, 21 (2023).
  31. A. S. Maniyar, Y. Ali-Haïmoud, J. Carron, A. Lewis, and M. S. Madhavacheril, Quadratic estimators for CMB weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D 103, 083524 (2021).
  32. T. Namikawa, D. Hanson, and R. Takahashi, Bias-hardened CMB lensing, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 431, 609 (2013).
  33. S. J. Osborne, D. Hanson, and Doré, O. Extragalactic foreground contamination in temperature-based CMB lens reconstruction, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2014) 024.
  34. N. Sailer, E. Schaan, and S. Ferraro, Lower bias, lower noise CMB lensing with foreground-hardened estimators, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063517 (2020).
  35. N. Sailer, S. Ferraro, and E. Schaan, Foreground-immune CMB lensing reconstruction with polarization, Phys. Rev. D 107, 023504 (2023).
  36. Planck Collaboration, Planck 2015 results.X. Diffuse component separation: Foreground maps, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A10 (2016).
  37. Y.-S. Song, A. Cooray, L. Knox, and M. Zaldarriaga, The far-infrared background correlation with cosmic microwave background lensing, Astrophys. J. 590, 664 (2003).
  38. Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A8 (2020).
  39. E. Calabrese et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 063.
  40. https://github.com/ACTCollaboration/dr6plus_lenslike.
  41. J. Hartlap, P. Simon, and P. Schneider, Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix, Astron. Astrophys. 464, 399 (2007).
  42. M. Abdul Karim et al., DESI DR2 results. I. Baryon acoustic oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083514 (2025).
  43. M. Abdul Karim et al., DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  44. Simons Observatory Collaboration., The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 056.
  45. https://github.com/simonsobs/tempura.
  46. https://github.com/simonsobs/falafel.
  47. https://github.com/msyriac/orphics.
  48. Astropy Collaboration., astropy: A community python package for astronomy, Astron. Astrophys. 558, A33 (2013).
  49. S. Waltvan dervan der Walt, S. C. Colbert, and G. Varoquaux, The numpy array: A structure for efficient numerical computation, Comput. Sci. Eng. 13, 22 (2011).
  50. P. Virtanen et al., scipy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
  51. J. D. Hunter, matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90 (2007).
  52. A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, Efficient computation of cosmic microwave background anisotropies in closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker models, Astrophys. J. 538, 473 (2000).
  53. A. Lewis, getdist: A python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 025.
  54. J. Torrado and A. Lewis, cobaya: Code for Bayesian analysis of hierarchical physical models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2021) 057.
  55. J. Zuntz et al., cosmosis: Modular cosmological parameter estimation, Astron. Comput. 12, 45 (2015).
  56. www.csd3.cam.ac.uk.
  57. www.dirac.ac.uk.
  58. http://www.esa.int/Planck.
  59. https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/act/actadv_prod_table.html.
  60. R. J. Cooke, M. Pettini, and C. C. Steidel, One percent determination of the primordial deuterium abundance, Astrophys. J. 855, 102 (2018).
  61. V. Mossa et al., The baryon density of the universe from an improved rate of deuterium burning, Nature (London) 587, 210 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation