Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Stellarlike Galactic Center excess challenges particle dark matter

Silvia Manconi1,2,*, Christopher Eckner3,†, Francesca Calore2,‡, and Fiorenza Donato4,5,§

  • *Contact author: manconi@lpthe.jussieu.fr
  • Contact author: ceckner@ung.si
  • Contact author: calore@lapth.cnrs.fr
  • §Contact author: fiorenza.donato@unito.it

Phys. Rev. D 114, 043053 – Published 20 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2wkq-xrsc

Abstract

The Galactic Center is potentially hosting the largest indirect signal from particle dark matter (DM), which in many well-motivated models would produce gamma rays as their final states. However, this region has often been dismissed for DM studies because of the evidence for an unexpected gamma-ray component over astrophysical backgrounds at GeV energies, firstly discovered in the data of the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT), the so-called Galactic Center excess (GCE). While this was initially considered to hint at GeV thermal relics, recent work supports a GCE interpretation in terms of a stellar population of millisecond pulsarlike sources in the Galactic bulge. Building on this preference, we reevaluate the Galactic Center as a powerful target for indirect DM searches via gamma rays. This is achieved by combining adaptive template fitting and photon-count statistical methods to assess the role of subthreshold point sources in the observed Fermi-LAT gamma-ray counts while minimizing the mismodeling of Galactic diffuse-emission backgrounds. In a fully self-consistent way, the gamma-ray data are fitted with a mixed model comprising a DM signal and a stellar bulge, both potentially contributing to the GCE. The space left for signals from weak-scale DM particle annihilations is quantified by extracting 95% confidence level upper limits on the annihilation cross section, which, depending on the DM density profile, result in stringent limits for masses 300GeV. The robustness of our results is supported by tests on simulated data.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (96)

  1. L. Goodenough and D. Hooper, Possible evidence for dark matter annihilation in the inner milky way from the Fermi gamma ray space telescope, arXiv:0910.2998.
  2. V. Vitale and A. Morselli (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Indirect search for dark matter from the center of the milky way with the Fermi-Large area telescope, in Proceedings of the 2009 Fermi Symposium (2009); arXiv:0912.3828.
  3. D. Hooper and L. Goodenough, Dark matter annihilation in the galactic center as seen by the Fermi gamma ray space telescope, Phys. Lett. B 697, 412 (2011).
  4. D. Hooper and T. Linden, On the origin of the gamma rays from the galactic center, Phys. Rev. D 84, 123005 (2011).
  5. K. N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, Detection of a gamma-ray source in the galactic center consistent with extended emission from dark matter annihilation and concentrated astrophysical emission, Phys. Rev. D 86, 083511 (2012).
  6. C. Gordon and O. Macias, Dark matter and pulsar model constraints from galactic center Fermi-LAT gamma ray observations, Phys. Rev. D 88, 083521 (2013); 89, 049901(E) (2014).
  7. B. Zhou, Y.-F. Liang, X. Huang, X. Li, Y.-Z. Fan, L. Feng, and J. Chang, GeV excess in the milky way: The role of diffuse galactic gamma-ray emission templates, Phys. Rev. D 91, 123010 (2015).
  8. F. Calore, I. Cholis, and C. Weniger, Background model systematics for the Fermi GeV excess, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2014) 038.
  9. T. Daylan, D. P. Finkbeiner, D. Hooper, T. Linden, S. K. N. Portillo, N. L. Rodd, and T. R. Slatyer, The characterization of the gamma-ray signal from the central milky way: A case for annihilating dark matter, Phys. Dark Universe 12, 1 (2016).
  10. M. Ajello et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Fermi-LAT observations of high-energy γ-ray emission toward the galactic center, Astrophys. J. 819, 44 (2016).
  11. M. Di Mauro, Characteristics of the galactic center excess measured with 11 years of Fermi-LAT data, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063029 (2021).
  12. S. Murgia, The Fermi–LAT galactic center excess: Evidence of annihilating dark matter?, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 455 (2020).
  13. K. N. Abazajian, The consistency of Fermi-LAT observations of the galactic center with a millisecond pulsar population in the central stellar cluster, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2010) 010.
  14. R. Bartels, E. Storm, C. Weniger, and F. Calore, The Fermi-LAT GeV excess as a tracer of stellar mass in the galactic bulge, Nat. Astron. 2, 819 (2018).
  15. O. Macias, C. Gordon, R. M. Crocker, B. Coleman, D. Paterson, S. Horiuchi, and M. Pohl, Galactic bulge preferred over dark matter for the galactic centre gamma-ray excess, Nat. Astron. 2, 387 (2018).
  16. O. Macias, S. Horiuchi, M. Kaplinghat, C. Gordon, R. M. Crocker, and D. M. Nataf, Strong evidence that the galactic bulge is shining in gamma rays, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2019) 042.
  17. F. Calore, F. Donato, and S. Manconi, Dissecting the Inner Galaxy with γ-Ray Pixel Count Statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 161102 (2021).
  18. S. Manconi, F. Calore, and F. Donato, Galactic center excess at the highest energies: Morphology and photon-count statistics, Phys. Rev. D 109, 123042 (2024).
  19. D. Song, C. Eckner, C. Gordon, F. Calore, O. Macias, K. N. Abazajian, S. Horiuchi, M. Kaplinghat, and M. Pohl, Robust inference of the galactic centre gamma-ray excess spatial properties, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 530, 4395 (2024).
  20. M. Pohl, O. Macias, P. Coleman, and C. Gordon, Assessing the impact of hydrogen absorption on the characteristics of the galactic center excess, Astrophys. J. 929, 136 (2022).
  21. I. Cholis, Y.-M. Zhong, S. D. McDermott, and J. P. Surdutovich, Return of the templates: Revisiting the galactic center excess with multimessenger observations, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103023 (2022).
  22. S. D. McDermott, Y.-M. Zhong, and I. Cholis, On the morphology of the gamma-ray galactic centre excess, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 522, L21 (2023).
  23. B. Coleman, D. Paterson, C. Gordon, O. Macias, and H. Ploeg, Maximum entropy estimation of the galactic bulge morphology via the VVV red clump, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 495, 3350 (2020).
  24. Y.-M. Zhong and I. Cholis, Robustness of the galactic center excess morphology against masking, Phys. Rev. D 109, 123017 (2024).
  25. K. N. Abazajian, S. Horiuchi, M. Kaplinghat, R. E. Keeley, and O. Macias, Strong constraints on thermal relic dark matter from Fermi-LAT observations of the galactic center, Phys. Rev. D 102, 043012 (2020).
  26. H. C. Woudenberg and A. Helmi, First measurement of the triaxiality of the inner dark matter halo of the milky way, Astron. Astrophys. 691, A277 (2024).
  27. A. Hussein, L. Necib, M. Kaplinghat, S. Y. Kim, A. Wetzel, J. I. Read, M. P. Rey, and O. Agertz, Theoretical predictions for the inner dark matter distribution in the milky way informed by simulations, arXiv:2501.14868.
  28. M. M. Muru, J. Silk, N. I. Libeskind, S. Gottloeber, and Y. Hoffman, Fermi-LAT galactic center excess morphology of dark matter in simulations of the milky way galaxy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 161005 (2025).
  29. D. McKeown, Analysis of shape and angular orientation parameters of velocity-dependent dark matter annihilation signals in galactic centres for fire simulations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 541, 348 (2025).
  30. L. Q. Hu, I. Cholis, and Y.-M. Zhong, Galactic center gamma-ray excess from a generic triaxial halo, Phys. Rev. D 114, 023021 (2026).
  31. F. List, N. L. Rodd, and G. F. Lewis, Extracting the galactic center excess’ source-count distribution with neural nets, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123022 (2021).
  32. F. List, Y. Park, N. L. Rodd, E. Schoen, and F. Wolf, Energy distribution of the galactic center excess’s sources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 231001 (2026).
  33. F. Calore, M. Di Mauro, F. Donato, J. W. T. Hessels, and C. Weniger, Radio detection prospects for a bulge population of millisecond pulsars as suggested by Fermi LAT observations of the inner galaxy, Astrophys. J. 827, 143 (2016).
  34. J. Berteaud, F. Calore, M. Clavel, J. Marvil, S. Hyman, F. K. Schinzel, and M. Kerr, Multiwavelength identification of millisecond pulsar candidates in the galactic bulge, Astron. Astrophys. 690, A330 (2024).
  35. J. Berteaud et al., Discovery of two new millisecond pulsars towards the galactic bulge, Astron. Astrophys. 707, A247 (2026).
  36. K. I. Perez, V. Gajjar, S. Bogdanov, J. P. Halpern, P. B. Demorest, S. Croft, M. Lebofsky, D. H. E. MacMahon, and A. P. V. Siemion, On the deepest search for galactic center pulsars and an examination of an intriguing millisecond pulsar candidate, Astrophys. J. 998, 147 (2026).
  37. J. T. Dinsmore and T. R. Slatyer, Luminosity functions consistent with a pulsar-dominated galactic center excess, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2021) 025,
  38. D. Malyshev and D. W. Hogg, Statistics of gamma-ray point sources below the Fermi detection limit, Astrophys. J. 738, 181 (2011).
  39. H.-S. Zechlin, A. Cuoco, F. Donato, N. Fornengo, and A. Vittino, Unveiling the gamma-ray source count distribution below the Fermi detection limit with photon statistics, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 225, 18 (2016).
  40. S. Mishra-Sharma, N. L. Rodd, and B. R. Safdi, NPTFit: A code package for non-Poissonian template fitting, Astron. J. 153, 253 (2017).
  41. L. J. Chang, S. Mishra-Sharma, M. Lisanti, M. Buschmann, N. L. Rodd, and B. R. Safdi, Characterizing the nature of the unresolved point sources in the galactic center: An assessment of systematic uncertainties, Phys. Rev. D 101, 023014 (2020).
  42. R. K. Leane and T. R. Slatyer, The enigmatic galactic center excess: Spurious point sources and signal mismodeling, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063019 (2020).
  43. R. K. Leane and T. R. Slatyer, Spurious point source signals in the galactic center excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 121105 (2020).
  44. E. Storm, C. Weniger, and F. Calore, skyfact: High-dimensional modeling of gamma-ray emission with adaptive templates and penalized likelihoods, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2017) 022.
  45. M. Ackermann et al., Constraints on the galactic halo dark matter fromfermi-lat diffuse measurements, Astrophys. J. 761, 91 (2012).
  46. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), The Fermi galactic center GeV excess and implications for dark matter, Astrophys. J. 840, 43 (2017).
  47. H.-S. Zechlin, S. Manconi, and F. Donato, Constraining galactic dark matter with gamma-ray pixel counts statistics, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083022 (2018).
  48. F. Calore, I. Cholis, C. McCabe, and C. Weniger, A tale of tails: Dark matter interpretations of the Fermi GeV excess in light of background model systematics, Phys. Rev. D 91, 063003 (2015).
  49. Y. Hu, C. Cesarotti, and T. R. Slatyer, Testing viability of benchmark dark matter models for the galactic center excess, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 134.
  50. J. Koechler and M. Di Mauro, Leptophilic dark matter in U(1)LiLj models: A solution to the Fermi-LAT galactic center excess consistent with cosmological and laboratory observations, Phys. Rev. D 112, 115016 (2025).
  51. D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, D. Rocha, and S. Roy, Gamma-rays and gravitational waves from inelastic Higgs portal dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 113, 115009 (2026).
  52. S. Roy, Dark matter and electroweak baryogenesis with spontaneous CP violation in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 113, 055040 (2026).
  53. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astrophys. J. 490, 493 (1997). astro-ph/9611107.
  54. M. Schaller et al., Dark matter annihilation radiation in hydrodynamic simulations of milky way haloes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 4442 (2016).
  55. F. Calore, N. Bozorgnia, M. Lovell, G. Bertone, M. Schaller, C. S. Frenk, R. A. Crain, J. Schaye, T. Theuns, and J. W. Trayford, Simulated milky way analogues: Implications for dark matter indirect searches, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2015) 053.
  56. D. McKeown, J. S. Bullock, F. J. Mercado, Z. Hafen, M. Boylan-Kolchin, A. Wetzel, L. Necib, P. F. Hopkins, and S. Yu, Amplified J-factors in the galactic centre for velocity-dependent dark matter annihilation in FIRE simulations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, 55 (2022).
  57. M. Benito, A. Cuoco, and F. Iocco, Handling the uncertainties in the galactic dark matter distribution for particle dark matter searches, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2019) 033.
  58. M. Benito, F. Iocco, and A. Cuoco, Uncertainties in the galactic dark matter distribution: An update, Phys. Dark Universe 32, 100826 (2021).
  59. J. Einasto, On the construction of a composite model for the galaxy and on the determination of the system of galactic parameters, Tr. Astrofiz. Inst. Alma-Ata 5, 87 (1965).
  60. A. Burkert, The structure of dark matter halos in dwarf galaxies, Astrophys. J. 447, L25 (1995).
  61. A. McCann, A stacked analysis of 115 pulsars observed by the Fermi LAT, Astrophys. J. 804, 86 (2015).
  62. L. Maccione, C. Evoli, D. Gaggero, and D. Grasso, DRAGON: Galactic cosmic ray diffusion code, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1106.011(2011).
  63. https://galprop.stanford.edu/.
  64. T. A. Porter, G. Johannesson, and V. I. Moskalenko, The GALPROP Cosmic-ray propagation and nonthermal emissions framework: Release v57, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 262, 30 (2022).
  65. M. Ackermann et al., Fermi-LAT observations of the diffuse γ-ray emission: Implications for cosmic rays and the interstellar medium, Astrophys. J. 750, 3 (2012).
  66. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), The spectrum and morphology of the Fermi bubbles, Astrophys. J. 793, 64 (2014).
  67. S. Abdollahi et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 247, 33 (2020).
  68. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), The spectrum of isotropic diffuse gamma-ray emission between 100 MeV and 820 GeV, Astrophys. J. 799, 86 (2015).
  69. C. Eckner, S. Manconi, and F. Calore, No evidence for gamma-ray emission from the sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123006 (2024).
  70. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Resolving the extragalactic γ-ray background above 50 GeV with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 151105 (2016).
  71. M. Di Mauro, S. Manconi, H.-S. Zechlin, M. Ajello, E. Charles, and F. Donato, Deriving the contribution of blazars to the Fermi-LAT Extragalactic γ-ray background at E>10GeV with efficiency corrections and photon statistics, Astrophys. J. 856, 106 (2018).
  72. H.-S. Zechlin, A. Cuoco, F. Donato, N. Fornengo, and M. Regis, Statistical measurement of the Gamma-ray Source-count distribution as a function of energy, Astrophys. J. Lett. 826, L31 (2016).
  73. M. Lisanti, S. Mishra-Sharma, L. Necib, and B. R. Safdi, Deciphering contributions to the extragalactic gamma-ray background from 2 GeV to 2 TeV, Astrophys. J. 832, 117 (2016).
  74. S. K. Lee, M. Lisanti, B. R. Safdi, T. R. Slatyer, and W. Xue, Evidence for unresolved gamma-ray point sources in the inner galaxy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 051103 (2016).
  75. F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, and M. Bridges, multinest: An efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1601 (2009).
  76. K. M. Górski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wandelt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelman, healpix—A framework for high resolution discretization, and fast analysis of data distributed on the sphere, Astrophys. J. 622, 759 (2005).
  77. G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact on searches for dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 86, 023506 (2012).
  78. C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, Y. Park, B. R. Safdi, and W. L. Xu, Higgsino dark matter confronts 14 years of Fermi γ-ray data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 201001 (2023).
  79. J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, M. Nagai, O. Saito, and M. Senami, Non-perturbative effect on thermal relic abundance of dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 646, 34 (2007).
  80. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and M. Tamburini, Cosmology and astrophysics of minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B787, 152 (2007).
  81. C. Arina, M. Di Mauro, N. Fornengo, J. Heisig, A. Jueid, and R. R. de Austri, CosmiXs: Cosmic messenger spectra for indirect dark matter searches, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2023) 035.
  82. F. Calore, P. D. Serpico, and B. Zaldivar, Dark matter constraints from dwarf galaxies: A data-driven analysis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2018) 029.
  83. A. Alvarez, F. Calore, A. Genina, J. Read, P. D. Serpico, and B. Zaldivar, Dark matter constraints from dwarf galaxies with data-driven J-factors, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2020) 004.
  84. S. Abdollahi et al. (Fermi-LAT, HAWC, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, VERITAS Collaborations), Combined dark matter search towards dwarf spheroidal galaxies with Fermi-LAT, HAWC, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, and VERITAS, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2026) 035.
  85. A. McDaniel, M. Ajello, C. M. Karwin, M. Di Mauro, A. Drlica-Wagner, and M. A. Sánchez-Conde, Legacy analysis of dark matter annihilation from the Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with 14 years of Fermi-LAT data, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063024 (2024).
  86. F. Calore, M. Cirelli, L. Derome, Y. Genolini, D. Maurin, P. Salati, and P. D. Serpico, AMS-02 antiprotons and dark matter: Trimmed hints and robust bounds, SciPost Phys. 12, 163 (2022).
  87. M. Regis et al., The EMU view of the large magellanic cloud: Troubles for sub-TeV WIMPs, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2021) 046,
  88. M. Baumgart, S. Bottaro, D. Redigolo, N. L. Rodd, and T. R. Slatyer, Testing real WIMPs with CTAO, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 213.
  89. M. Aghaie, A. Dondarini, G. Marino, and P. Panci, Minimal dark matter in the sky: Updated indirect detection probes, arXiv:2507.17607.
  90. B. R. Safdi and W. L. Xu, Wino and real minimal dark matter excluded by Fermi gamma-ray observations, arXiv:2507.15934.
  91. A. Acharyya et al. (CTA Collaboration), Sensitivity of the cherenkov telescope array to a dark matter signal from the galactic centre, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 057.
  92. A. Acharyya et al. (Cherenkov Telescope Array Collaboration), Sensitivity of the cherenkov telescope array to TeV photon emission from the Large Magellanic Cloud, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 523, 5353 (2023).
  93. K. Abe et al. (CTA Consortium Collaboration), Prospects for γ-ray observations of the Perseus galaxy cluster with the Cherenkov Telescope Array, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2023) 004.
  94. S. Abe et al. (CTAO Collaboration), Dark matter line searches with the Cherenkov telescope array, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 047.
  95. K. Abe et al. (CTAO Collaboration), Prospects for dark matter observations in dwarf spheroidal galaxies with the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 544, 2946 (2025).
  96. S. Abe, T. Inada, E. Moulin, N. L. Rodd, B. R. Safdi, and W. L. Xu, Discovering the Higgsino at CTAO-north within the decade, arXiv:2506.08084.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation