Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Gauge symmetries, contact reduction, and singular field theories

Callum Bell* and David Sloan

  • *Contact author: c.bell8@lancaster.ac.uk
  • Contact author: d.sloan@lancaster.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 113, 125023 – Published 17 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2w3v-4xvr

Abstract

The symmetry reduction of dynamical systems that are invariant under changes of global scale is well understood for classical theories of particles and fields. The excision of the superfluous degree of freedom generating such rescalings leads to a dynamically equivalent theory, which is frictional in nature. In this article, we extend the formalism to physical models, of both particles and fields, described by singular Lagrangians. In order to work with a finite-dimensional (velocity) phase space, our construction requires that we treat classical field theories within the De-Donder Weyl formalism, in which a multisymplectic structure is introduced on the first jets of the bundle of fields. The results obtained are subsequently applied to a number of physically motivated examples, as well as a discussion presented on the implications of our work for classical general relativity.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. Michael E. Peskin, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2018).
  2. Eran Palti, The swampland: Introduction and review, Fortschr. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019).
  3. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Discourse on metaphysics: 1686, in Philosophical Papers and Letters (Springer, New York, 1989), pp. 303–330.
  4. David Sloan, Dynamical similarity, Phys. Rev. D 97, 123541 (2018).
  5. José F. Cariñena, Fernando Falceto, and Manuel F. Ranada, Canonoid transformations and master symmetries, J. Geom. Mech. 5, 151 (2013).
  6. David Sloan, Scale symmetry and friction, Symmetry 13, 1639 (2021).
  7. Callum Bell and David Sloan, Dynamical similarity in multisymplectic field theory, arXiv:2509.16099.
  8. Mark J. Gotay, James M. Nester, and George Hinds, Presymplectic manifolds and the Dirac-Bergmann theory of constraints, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 19, 2388 (1978).
  9. Callum Bell and David Sloan, Constrained symplectic and contact Hamiltonian systems: A review, arXiv:2604.27940.
  10. Narciso Román-Roy et al., Multisymplectic Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms of classical field theories, SIGMA 5, 100 (2009).
  11. Manuel de León, Jordi Gaset, Miguel C. Muñoz-Lecanda, Xavier Rivas, and Narciso Román-Roy, Multicontact formulation for non-conservative field theories, J. Phys. A 56, 025201 (2023).
  12. Rainer Dick, Implications of a dilaton in gauge theory and cosmology, Fortschr. Phys./Prog. Phys. 45, 537 (1997).
  13. David Sloan, Dynamical similarity in field theories, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 045001 (2025).
  14. Manuel de León and Manuel Lainz Valcázar, Contact Hamiltonian systems, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.), 60, 10, 2019.
  15. Manuel de León and Manuel Lainz, A review on contact Hamiltonian and Lagrangian systems, arXiv:2011.05579.
  16. Alessandro Bravetti, Contact geometry and thermodynamics, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 16, 1940003 (2019).
  17. Jenann Ismael, Symmetry and superfluous structure: Lessons from history and tempered enthusiasm, in The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics (Routledge, Oxfordshire, England, 2021), pp. 563–577.
  18. Jenann Ismael and Bas C. Van Fraassen, Symmetry as a guide to superfluous theoretical structure, Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, edited by K. Brading and E. Castellani (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003), pp. 371–392.
  19. David Sloan, Scalar fields and the FLRW singularity, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 235004 (2019).
  20. Alessandro Bravetti, Connor Jackman, and David Sloan, Scaling symmetries, contact reduction and Poincaré’s dream, J. Phys. A 56, 435203 (2023).
  21. Frans Cantrijn, Alberto Ibort, and Manuel De León, On the geometry of multisymplectic manifolds, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 66, 303 (1999).
  22. Michael Forger and Leandro G. Gomes, Multisymplectic and polysymplectic structures on fiber bundles, Rev. Math. Phys. 25, 1350018 (2013).
  23. Manuel de León, Jesús Marin-Solano, and Juan C Marrero, A geometrical approach to classical field theories: A constraint algorithm for singular theories, in New Developments in Differential Geometry: Proceedings of the Colloquium on Differential Geometry, Debrecen, Hungary, 1994 (Springer, New York, 1996), pp. 291–312.
  24. Manuel De León, Jesús Marín-Solano, Juan Carlos Marrero, Miguel C. Munoz-Lecanda, and Narciso Román-Roy, Pre-multisymplectic constraint algorithm for field theories, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 02, 839 (2005).
  25. David J Saunders, The Geometry of Jet Bundles (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1989), Vol. 142.
  26. Jordi Gaset, Manuel Lainz, Arnau Mas, and Xavier Rivas, The Herglotz variational principle for dissipative field theories, Geom. Mech. 01, 153 (2024).
  27. Michael B. Green, John H. Schwarz, and Edward Witten, Superstring Theory: Volume 2, Loop Amplitudes, Anomalies and Phenomenology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012).
  28. Mohamed Chabab, Confinement driven by scalar field in 4d non-Abelian gauge theories, AIP Conf. Proc. 881, 238 (2007).
  29. Mark J. Gotay, James Isenberg, Jerrold E. Marsden, and Richard Montgomery, Momentum maps and classical relativistic fields. Part I: Covariant field theory, arXiv:physics/9801019.
  30. M. C. Lopez and J. M. Masque, The geometry of the bundle of connections, Math. Z. 236, 797 (2001).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation