- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

How bright in gravitational waves are millisecond pulsars for the Galactic Center GeV gamma-ray excess? A systematic study and implications for dark matter

Ming-Yu Lei1,2, Bei Zhou3,4,*, and Xiaoyuan Huang1,2,†

  • *Contact author: beizhou@fnal.gov
  • †Contact author: xyhuang@pmo.ac.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 103014 – Published 9 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/278k-lmv9

Abstract

The existence of dark matter (DM) is supported by various macroscopic observations, but its microscopic nature remains elusive. The Galactic Center GeV gamma-ray excess (GCE) has been a leading candidate signal for particle DM annihilation. However, an unresolved population of millisecond pulsars (MSPs) in the bulge provides the alternative explanation for the excess. Identifying these MSPs in electromagnetic bands is difficult due to source confusion, pulse broadening, and extinction. Gravitational waves (GWs) provide a complementary probe: a steadily rotating, nonaxisymmetric MSP emits a nearly monochromatic GW signal in the sensitive band of ground-based detectors, with amplitude set by its ellipticity. In this work, we systematically investigate the GW emission from the MSP population proposed to explain the GCE and its detectability with current and future detectors. We consider three major scenarios for the origin of ellipticity and model the population properties of these MSPs. We also consider both isolated MSPs and MSPs in binary systems, as well as Doppler effects in the detection. We find that while the signal is generally below the reach of current interferometers, next-generation detectors such as the Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer may detect a fraction of those MSPs, offering a novel test of the MSP interpretation of the GCE. Future directed searches toward the Galactic Center may either uncover this long-sought MSP population or place stringent constraints on bulge MSP properties. Continued improvements in detector sensitivity will provide increasingly stringent tests of the MSP interpretation, with growing power to distinguish between the astrophysical and DM interpretations of the GCE.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (167)

  1. V. C. Rubin, N. Thonnard, and W. K. Ford, Jr., Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 /R = 4 kpc/ to UGC 2885 /R = 122 kpc/, Astrophys. J. 238, 471 (1980).
  2. A. Bosma, 21-cm line studies of spiral galaxies. 2. The distribution and kinematics of neutral hydrogen in spiral galaxies of various morphological types, Astron. J. 86, 1825 (1981).
  3. Edvige Corbelli and Paolo Salucci, The extended rotation curve and the dark matter halo of M33, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 311, 441 (2000).
  4. Douglas Clowe, Anthony Gonzalez, and Maxim Markevitch, Weak-lensing mass reconstruction of the interacting cluster 1e 0657-558: Direct evidence for the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. 604, 596 (2004).
  5. Douglas Clowe, Marusa Bradac, Anthony H. Gonzalez, Maxim Markevitch, Scott W. Randall, Christine Jones, and Dennis Zaritsky, A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett. 648, L109 (2006).
  6. Daniel J. Eisenstein et al. (SDSS Collaboration), Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of SDSS luminous red galaxies, Astrophys. J. 633, 560 (2005).
  7. Volker Springel, Carlos S. Frenk, and Simon D. M. White, The large-scale structure of the Universe, Nature (London) 440, 1137 (2006).
  8. G. Hinshaw et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Nine-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Cosmological parameter results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 208, 19 (2013).
  9. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  10. Gerard Jungman, Marc Kamionkowski, and Kim Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rep. 267, 195 (1996).
  11. Gianfranco Bertone and Dan Hooper, History of dark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018).
  12. Marco Cirelli, Alessandro Strumia, and Jure Zupan, Dark matter, arXiv:2406.01705.
  13. Esra Bulbul, Maxim Markevitch, Adam Foster, Randall K. Smith, Michael Loewenstein, and Scott W. Randall, Detection of an unidentified emission line in the stacked x-ray spectrum of galaxy clusters, Astrophys. J. 789, 13 (2014).
  14. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Searching for dark matter annihilation from Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with six years of Fermi large area telescope data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 231301 (2015).
  15. Morad Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for dark matter at s=13  TeV in final states containing an energetic photon and large missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 393 (2017).
  16. N. Du et al. (ADMX Collaboration), A search for invisible axion dark matter with the axion dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 151301 (2018).
  17. Julien Billard et al., Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 056201 (2022).
  18. Yue Meng et al. (PandaX-4T Collaboration), Dark matter search results from the PandaX-4T commissioning run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 261802 (2021).
  19. Haipeng An, Shuailiang Ge, Wen-Qing Guo, Xiaoyuan Huang, Jia Liu, and Zhiyao Lu, Direct detection of dark photon dark matter using radio telescopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 181001 (2023).
  20. Wen-Qing Guo, Yichao Li, Xiaoyuan Huang, Yin-Zhe Ma, Geoff Beck, Yogesh Chandola, and Feng Huang, Constraints on dark matter annihilation from the FAST observation of the Coma Berenices dwarf galaxy, Phys. Rev. D 107, 103011 (2023).
  21. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  22. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First dark matter search with nuclear recoils from the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
  23. Zhen Cao et al. (LHAASO Collaboration), Constraints on ultraheavy dark matter properties from dwarf spheroidal galaxies with LHAASO observations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 061001 (2024).
  24. Lisa Goodenough and Dan Hooper, Possible evidence for dark matter annihilation in the inner Milky Way from the Fermi gamma ray space telescope, arXiv:0910.2998.
  25. Oscar Macias and Chris Gordon, Contribution of cosmic rays interacting with molecular clouds to the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev. D 89, 063515 (2014).
  26. Kevork N. Abazajian, Nicolas Canac, Shunsaku Horiuchi, and Manoj Kaplinghat, Astrophysical and dark matter interpretations of extended gamma-ray emission from the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D 90, 023526 (2014).
  27. Bei Zhou, Yun-Feng Liang, Xiaoyuan Huang, Xiang Li, Yi-Zhong Fan, Lei Feng, and Jin Chang, GeV excess in the Milky Way: The role of diffuse galactic gamma-ray emission templates, Phys. Rev. D 91, 123010 (2015).
  28. Francesca Calore, Ilias Cholis, and Christoph Weniger, Background model systematics for the Fermi GeV excess, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2015) 038.
  29. Xiaoyuan Huang, Torsten Enßlin, and Marco Selig, Galactic dark matter search via phenomenological astrophysics modeling, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2016) 030.
  30. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), The Fermi Galactic Center GeV excess and implications for dark matter, Astrophys. J. 840, 43 (2017).
  31. Yi-Ming Zhong, Samuel D. McDermott, Ilias Cholis, and Patrick J. Fox, Testing the sensitivity of the Galactic Center excess to the point source mask, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 231103 (2020).
  32. Ilias Cholis, Yi-Ming Zhong, Samuel D. McDermott, and Joseph P. Surdutovich, Return of the templates: Revisiting the Galactic Center excess with multimessenger observations, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103023 (2022).
  33. Yi-Ming Zhong and Ilias Cholis, Robustness of the Galactic Center excess morphology against masking, Phys. Rev. D 109, 123017 (2024).
  34. Deheng Song, Christopher Eckner, Chris Gordon, Francesca Calore, Oscar Macias, Kevork N. Abazajian, Shunsaku Horiuchi, Manoj Kaplinghat, and Martin Pohl, Robust inference of the Galactic Centre gamma-ray excess spatial properties, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 530, 4395 (2024).
  35. Dan Hooper and Lisa Goodenough, Dark matter annihilation in the Galactic Center as seen by the Fermi gamma ray space telescope, Phys. Lett. B 697, 412 (2011).
  36. Tansu Daylan, Douglas P. Finkbeiner, Dan Hooper, Tim Linden, Stephen K. N. Portillo, Nicholas L. Rodd, and Tracy R. Slatyer, The characterization of the gamma-ray signal from the central Milky Way: A case for annihilating dark matter, Phys. Dark Universe 12, 1 (2016).
  37. Francesca Calore, Ilias Cholis, Christopher McCabe, and Christoph Weniger, A tale of tails: Dark matter interpretations of the Fermi GeV excess in light of background model systematics, Phys. Rev. D 91, 063003 (2015).
  38. Prateek Agrawal, Brian Batell, Patrick J. Fox, and Roni Harnik, WIMPs at the Galactic Center, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2015) 011.
  39. Eder Izaguirre, Gordan Krnjaic, and Brian Shuve, The Galactic Center excess from the bottom up, Phys. Rev. D 90, 055002 (2014).
  40. Rebecca K. Leane and Tracy R. Slatyer, Revival of the dark matter hypothesis for the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 241101 (2019).
  41. Simona Murgia, The Fermi–LAT Galactic Center excess: Evidence of annihilating dark matter?, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 455 (2020).
  42. Kevork N. Abazajian, The consistency of Fermi-LAT observations of the Galactic Center with a millisecond pulsar population in the central stellar cluster, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2011) 010.
  43. Qiang Yuan and Bing Zhang, Millisecond pulsar interpretation of the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess, J. High Energy Astrophys. 3–4, 1 (2014).
  44. Jovana Petrović, Pasquale D. Serpico, and Gabrijela Zaharijas, Millisecond pulsars and the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess: The importance of luminosity function and secondary emission, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2015) 023.
  45. Samuel K. Lee, Mariangela Lisanti, Benjamin R. Safdi, Tracy R. Slatyer, and Wei Xue, Evidence for unresolved gamma-ray point sources in the inner galaxy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 051103 (2016).
  46. Richard Bartels, Suraj Krishnamurthy, and Christoph Weniger, Strong support for the millisecond pulsar origin of the Galactic Center GeV excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 051102 (2016).
  47. Oscar Macias, Chris Gordon, Roland M. Crocker, Brenna Coleman, Dylan Paterson, Shunsaku Horiuchi, and Martin Pohl, Galactic bulge preferred over dark matter for the Galactic Centre gamma-ray excess, Nat. Astron. 2, 387 (2018).
  48. Richard Bartels, Emma Storm, Christoph Weniger, and Francesca Calore, The Fermi-LAT GeV excess as a tracer of stellar mass in the Galactic bulge, Nat. Astron. 2, 819 (2018).
  49. Anuj Gautam, Roland M. Crocker, Lilia Ferrario, Ashley J. Ruiter, Harrison Ploeg, Chris Gordon, and Oscar Macias, Millisecond pulsars from accretion-induced collapse as the origin of the Galactic Centre gamma-ray excess signal, Nat. Astron. 6, 703 (2022).

  50. We note that some earlier studies questioned the MSP interpretation, arguing that the spectra of known MSPs are too soft at sub-GeV energies and that population estimates inferred from low-mass x-ray binary (LMXB) counts suggest unresolved MSPs could contribute only a small fraction of the GCE intensity [51, 52]. However, subsequent analyses have largely addressed these concerns. The sub-GeV spectrum of the GCE is now known to be heavily affected by systematic uncertainties in Galactic diffuse emission modeling [30]. Furthermore, recent binary population synthesis models have demonstrated that an MSP population formed via the accretion-induced collapse of oxygen-neon white dwarfs can naturally reproduce the GCE’s intensity, spectrum, and morphology, while strictly obeying LMXB constraints [49].

  51. Dan Hooper, Ilias Cholis, Tim Linden, Jennifer Siegal-Gaskins, and Tracy Slatyer, Pulsars cannot account for the inner galaxy’s GeV excess, Phys. Rev. D 88, 083009 (2013).
  52. Ilias Cholis, Dan Hooper, and Tim Linden, Challenges in explaining the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess with millisecond pulsars, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2015) 043.
  53. M. A. Alpar, A. F. Cheng, M. A. Ruderman, and J. Shaham, A new class of radio pulsars, Nature (London) 300, 728 (1982).
  54. D. Bhattacharya and E. P. J. van den Heuvel, Formation and evolution of binary and millisecond radio pulsars, Phys. Rep. 203, 1 (1991).
  55. D. R. Lorimer, Binary and millisecond pulsars, Living Rev. Relativity 11, 8 (2008).
  56. Oleg Y. Gnedin, Jeremiah P. Ostriker, and Scott Tremaine, Co-evolution of galactic nuclei and globular cluster systems, Astrophys. J. 785, 71 (2014).
  57. Manuel Arca-Sedda and Roberto Capuzzo-Dolcetta, The globular cluster migratory origin of nuclear star clusters, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 3738 (2014).
  58. Timothy D. Brandt and Bence Kocsis, Disrupted globular clusters can explain the Galactic Center gamma ray excess, Astrophys. J. 812, 15 (2015).
  59. Jean-Pierre Macquart and Nissim Kanekar, On detecting millisecond pulsars at the Galactic Center, Astrophys. J. 805, 172 (2015).
  60. Marcus E. Lower, Shi Dai, Simon Johnston, and Ewan D. Barr, A millisecond pulsar binary embedded in a Galactic Center radio filament, Astrophys. J. Lett. 967, L16 (2024).
  61. M. Ajello et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Fermi large area telescope performance after 10 years of operation, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 256, 12 (2021).
  62. Harrison Ploeg, Chris Gordon, Roland Crocker, and Oscar Macias, Comparing the galactic bulge and galactic disk millisecond pulsars, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2020) 035.
  63. Ian Holst and Dan Hooper, New determination of the millisecond pulsar gamma-ray luminosity function and implications for the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev. D 111, 023048 (2025).
  64. James M. Cordes and T. J. W. Lazio, NE2001. 1. A new model for the galactic distribution of free electrons and its fluctuations, arXiv:astro-ph/0207156.
  65. K. Stovall, D. R. Lorimer, and R. S. Lynch, Searching for millisecond pulsars: Surveys, techniques and prospects, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 224003 (2013).
  66. Francesca Calore, Mattia Di Mauro, Fiorenza Donato, Jason W. T. Hessels, and Christoph Weniger, Radio detection prospects for a bulge population of millisecond pulsars as suggested by Fermi LAT observations of the inner Galaxy, Astrophys. J. 827, 143 (2016).
  67. W. C. Jing et al., FAST pulsar database: II. Scattering profiles of 122 Pulsars, arXiv:2506.14519.
  68. Joanna Berteaud, Francesca Calore, Maica Clavel, Pasquale Dario Serpico, Guillaume Dubus, and Pierre-Olivier Petrucci, Galactic bulge millisecond pulsars shining in x rays: A gamma-ray perspective, Phys. Rev. D 104, 043007 (2021).
  69. J. Berteaud, F. Calore, M. Clavel, J. Marvil, S. Hyman, F. K. Schinzel, and M. Kerr, Multiwavelength identification of millisecond pulsar candidates in the Galactic bulge, Astron. Astrophys. 690, A330 (2024).

  70. In addition, the mHz band of the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna could also probe those MSPs in the binary systems; see Ref. [71] for a recent study.

  71. Valeriya Korol and Andrei Igoshev, Probing the millisecond pulsar origin of the GeV excess in the Galactic Centre with LISA, Astron. Astrophys. 705, A154 (2026).
  72. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  73. F. Acernese et al. (VIRGO Collaboration), Advanced Virgo: A second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
  74. T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA Collaboration), KAGRA: 2.5 Generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Nat. Astron. 3, 35 (2019).
  75. Matthew Evans et al., Cosmic explorer: A submission to the NSF MPSAC ngGW subcommittee, arXiv:2306.13745.
  76. M. Punturo et al., The Einstein telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010).
  77. Francesca Calore, Tania Regimbau, and Pasquale Dario Serpico, Probing the Fermi-LAT GeV excess with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 081103 (2019).
  78. Andrew L. Miller and Yue Zhao, Probing the pulsar explanation of the Galactic-Center GeV excess using continuous gravitational-wave searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 081401 (2023).
  79. Kayla Bartel and Stefano Profumo, Gravitational wave counterpart to a gamma-ray Galactic Center signal from millisecond pulsars, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123036 (2024).

  80. As a complementary avenue to ground-based interferometers, a recent proposal suggests probing kHz-band backgrounds using a laser-polarization “Gravitational Photon Polarization Twist” in space [81]. With optimistic baselines (∼106  km) and millisecond pulses, its reach could overlap the collective strains expected from a bulge MSP population [81].

  81. Rodolfo Capdevilla, Gravitational photon polarization twist to probe the early universe and the Galactic Center, arXiv:2507.05347.
  82. Varun Srivastava, Derek Davis, Kevin Kuns, Philippe Landry, Stefan Ballmer, Matthew Evans, Evan D. Hall, Jocelyn Read, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Science-driven tunable design of cosmic explorer detectors, Astrophys. J. 931, 22 (2022).
  83. Stefan Hild, Simon Chelkowski, and Andreas Freise, Pushing towards the ET sensitivity using “conventional” technology, arXiv:0810.0604.
  84. E. Capote et al., Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062002 (2025).
  85. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, and KAGRA Collaborations), Search for continuous gravitational waves from known pulsars in the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run, Astrophys. J. 983, 99 (2025).
  86. R. N. Manchester, G. B. Hobbs, A. Teoh, and M. Hobbs, The Australia Telescope National Facility pulsar catalogue, Astron. J. 129, 1993 (2005).
  87. Florian List, Yujin Park, Nicholas L. Rodd, Eve Schoen, and Florian Wolf, On the energy distribution of the Galactic Center excess’ sources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 231001 (2026).
  88. Michele Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments (Oxford University Press, New York, 2007).
  89. Gianluca Pagliaro, Maria Alessandra Papa, Jing Ming, Jianhui Lian, Daichi Tsuna, Claudia Maraston, and Daniel Thomas, Continuous gravitational waves from galactic neutron stars: Demography, detectability, and prospects, Astrophys. J. 952, 123 (2023).
  90. G. Woan, M. D. Pitkin, B. Haskell, D. I. Jones, and P. D. Lasky, Evidence for a minimum ellipticity in millisecond pulsars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 863, L40 (2018).
  91. S. Chandrasekhar and E. Fermi, Problems of gravitational stability in the presence of a magnetic field, Astrophys. J. 118, 116 (1953); 122, 208(E) (1955).
  92. Michele Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology (Oxford University Press, New York, 2018).
  93. A. B. Migdal, Superfluidity and the moments of inertia of nuclei, Nucl. Phys. 13, 655 (1959).
  94. Gordon Baym, Christopher Pethick, David Pines, and Malvin Ruderman, Spin up in neutron stars: The future of the vela pulsar, Nature (London) 224, 872 (1969).
  95. Curt Cutler, Gravitational waves from neutron stars with large toroidal B fields, Phys. Rev. D 66, 084025 (2002).
  96. Taner Akgun and Ira Wasserman, Toroidal magnetic fields in type II superconducting neutron stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 383, 1551 (2008).
  97. S. K. Lander, N. Andersson, and K. Glampedakis, Magnetic neutron star equilibria with stratification and type II superconductivity: Stratified and superconducting ns equilibria, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, 732 (2011).
  98. S. K. Lander, The contrasting magnetic fields of superconducting pulsars and magnetars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, 424 (2014).
  99. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Gravitational-wave constraints on the equatorial ellipticity of millisecond pulsars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 902, L21 (2020).
  100. Alpha Mastrano and Andrew Melatos, Updated gravitational-wave upper limits on the internal magnetic field strength of recycled pulsars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 760 (2012).
  101. Riccardo Ciolfi and Luciano Rezzolla, Twisted-torus configurations with large toroidal magnetic fields in relativistic stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435, L43 (2013).
  102. B. Haskell, Maxim Priymak, Alessandro Patruno, Manuel Oppenoorth, Andrew Melatos, and Paul D. Lasky, Detecting gravitational waves from mountains on neutron stars in the advanced detector era, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 2393 (2015).
  103. Anatoly Spitkovsky, Time-dependent force-free pulsar magnetospheres: Axisymmetric and oblique rotators, Astrophys. J. Lett. 648, L51 (2006).
  104. Lars Bildsten, Gravitational radiation and rotation of accreting neutron stars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 501, L89 (1998).
  105. Greg Ushomirsky, Curt Cutler, and Lars Bildsten, Deformations of accreting neutron star crusts and gravitational wave emission, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 319, 902 (2000).
  106. Benjamin J. Owen, Maximum elastic deformations of compact stars with exotic equations of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 211101 (2005).
  107. N. Andersson, V. Ferrari, D. I. Jones, K. D. Kokkotas, B. Krishnan, J. S. Read, L. Rezzolla, and B. Zink, Gravitational waves from neutron stars: Promises and challenges, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 409 (2010).
  108. Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel and Benjamin J. Owen, Maximum elastic deformations of relativistic stars, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044004 (2013).
  109. C. J. Horowitz and Kai Kadau, The breaking strain of neutron star crust and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 191102 (2009).
  110. A. I. Chugunov and C. J. Horowitz, Breaking stress of neutron star crust, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 407, L54 (2010).
  111. J. A. Morales and C. J. Horowitz, Limiting rotation rate of neutron stars from crust breaking and gravitational waves, Astrophys. J. Lett. 978, L8 (2025).
  112. J. A. Morales and C. J. Horowitz, Finite-element simulations of rotating neutron stars with anisotropic crusts and continuous gravitational waves, arXiv:2409.14482.
  113. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, and VIRGO Collaborations), Search for continuous gravitational wave emission from the Milky Way center in O3 LIGO-Virgo data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 042003 (2022).
  114. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, and KAGRA Collaborations), Searches for gravitational waves from known pulsars at two harmonics in the second and third LIGO-Virgo observing runs, Astrophys. J. 935, 1 (2022).
  115. Roland M. Crocker et al., Diffuse galactic antimatter from faint thermonuclear supernovae in old stellar populations, Nat. Astron. 1, 0135 (2017).
  116. Florian List, Nicholas L. Rodd, Geraint F. Lewis, and Ishaan Bhat, The GCE in a new light: Disentangling the gamma-ray sky with Bayesian graph convolutional neural networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 241102 (2020).
  117. Florian List, Nicholas L. Rodd, and Geraint F. Lewis, Extracting the Galactic Center excess’ source-count distribution with neural nets, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123022 (2021).
  118. P. C. C. Freire et al., Long-term observations of the pulsars in 47 Tucanae—II. Proper motions, accelerations and jerks, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 857 (2017).
  119. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, and VIRGO Collaborations), All-sky search for continuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars using Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo O3 data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 102008 (2022).
  120. I. S. Shklovskii, Possible causes of the secular increase in pulsar periods, Sov. Astron. 13, 562 (1970).
  121. Thibault Damour and Joseph H. Taylor, On the orbital period change of the binary pulsar PSR-1913 + 16, Astrophys. J. 366, 501 (1991).

  122. The KDE method can be found in the documentation: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.stats.gaussian_kde.html.

  123. See Eq. (2.23) and the surrounding text in Ref. [62].

  124. See also Ref. [125] for a recent study, which shows that realistic Milky Way simulations yield a flattened, boxy DM distribution, making the GCE morphology from WIMP annihilation hard to distinguish from that of MSPs.

  125. Moorits Mihkel Muru, Joseph Silk, Noam I. Libeskind, Stefan Gottloeber, and Yehuda Hoffman, Fermi-LAT Galactic Center excess morphology of dark matter in simulations of the Milky Way galaxy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 161005 (2025).
  126. H. T. Freudenreich, A COBE model of the galactic bar, and disk, Astrophys. J. 492, 495 (1998).
  127. Oscar Macias, Shunsaku Horiuchi, Manoj Kaplinghat, Chris Gordon, Roland M. Crocker, and David M. Nataf, Strong evidence that the galactic bulge is shining in gamma rays, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2019) 042.
  128. Jack T. Dinsmore and Tracy R. Slatyer, Luminosity functions consistent with a pulsar-dominated Galactic Center excess, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2022) 025.
  129. Julio F. Navarro, Carlos S. Frenk, and Simon D. M. White, The structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. 462, 563 (1996).
  130. HongSheng Zhao, Analytical models for galactic nuclei, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 278, 488 (1996).
  131. Julio F. Navarro, Carlos S. Frenk, and Simon D. M. White, A Universal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astrophys. J. 490, 493 (1997).

  132. See Eq. (7.149) and the surrounding text in Ref. [88].

  133. See Eq. (7.151) and the surrounding text in Ref. [88].

  134. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), All-sky search for continuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars in the early O3 LIGO data, Phys. Rev. D 104, 082004 (2021).

  135. This is somewhat analogous to the stochastic GW background [136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145], though the MSP signals are mainly from the Galactic Center.

  136. Bruce Allen and Joseph D. Romano, Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities, Phys. Rev. D 59, 102001 (1999).
  137. Ashish Sharma and Jan Harms, Searching for cosmological gravitational-wave backgrounds with third-generation detectors in the presence of an astrophysical foreground, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063009 (2020).
  138. Sylvia Biscoveanu, Colm Talbot, Eric Thrane, and Rory Smith, Measuring the primordial gravitational-wave background in the presence of astrophysical foregrounds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 241101 (2020).
  139. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 104, 022004 (2021).
  140. Suvodip Mukherjee, Matthew S. P. Meinema, and Joseph Silk, Prospects of discovering subsolar primordial black holes using the stochastic gravitational wave background from third-generation detectors, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 6218 (2022).
  141. Bei Zhou, Luca Reali, Emanuele Berti, Mesut Çal𝚤şkan, Cyril Creque-Sarbinowski, Marc Kamionkowski, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Compact binary foreground subtraction in next-generation ground-based observatories, arXiv:2209.01221.
  142. Bei Zhou, Luca Reali, Emanuele Berti, Mesut Çal𝚤şkan, Cyril Creque-Sarbinowski, Marc Kamionkowski, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Subtracting compact binary foregrounds to search for subdominant gravitational-wave backgrounds in next-generation ground-based observatories, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064040 (2023).
  143. Haowen Zhong, Rich Ormiston, and Vuk Mandic, Detecting cosmological gravitational wave background after removal of compact binary coalescences in future gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 107, 064048 (2023); 108, 089902(E) (2023).
  144. Haowen Zhong, Bei Zhou, Luca Reali, Emanuele Berti, and Vuk Mandic, Searching for cosmological stochastic backgrounds by notching out resolvable compact binary foregrounds with next-generation gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064047 (2024).
  145. Haowen Zhong, Luca Reali, Bei Zhou, Emanuele Berti, and Vuk Mandic, Two-step procedure to detect cosmological gravitational wave backgrounds with next-generation terrestrial gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111401 (2025).
  146. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific and VIRGO Collaborations), Directed search for continuous gravitational waves from the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D 88, 102002 (2013).
  147. Ornella J. Piccinni, P. Astone, S. D’Antonio, S. Frasca, G. Intini, I. La Rosa, P. Leaci, S. Mastrogiovanni, A. Miller, and C. Palomba, Directed search for continuous gravitational-wave signals from the Galactic Center in the Advanced LIGO second observing run, Phys. Rev. D 101, 082004 (2020).
  148. P. B. Covas, M. A. Papa, R. Prix, and B. J. Owen, Constraints on r-modes and mountains on millisecond neutron stars in binary systems, Astrophys. J. Lett. 929, L19 (2022).
  149. A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, and KAGRA Collaborations), All-sky searches for continuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars in the data from the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run, arXiv:2603.14168.

  150. The sensitivity curves for LVK O4 are adopted from Ref. [85]. The PSD data files for CE (with the baseline 40 km detector) and ET (with 20 km arms) [151, 152] are available for download at https://dcc.cosmicexplorer.org/CE-T2000017/public and https://apps.et-gw.eu/tds/ql/?c=16492, respectively.

  151. Marica Branchesi et al., Science with the Einstein telescope: A comparison of different designs, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2023) 068.
  152. Adrian Abac et al. (ET Collaboration), The science of the Einstein telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2026) 081.
  153. Andrew L. Miller and Yue Zhao (private communication).

  154. Despite not being a member of the MSP population involved in our Population I samples, it remains a promising candidate for targeted GW searches [85, 155, 156, 157].

  155. Liudmila Fesik and Maria Alessandra Papa, First search for r-mode gravitational waves from PSR J0537–6910, Astrophys. J. 895, 11 (2020); 897, 185(E) (2020).
  156. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Constraints from LIGO O3 data on gravitational-wave emission due to R-modes in the glitching pulsar PSR J0537–6910, Astrophys. J. 922, 71 (2021).
  157. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Diving below the spin-down limit: Constraints on gravitational waves from the energetic young pulsar PSR J0537-6910, Astrophys. J. 913, L27 (2021).
  158. I. Yusifov and I. Kucuk, Revisiting the radial distribution of pulsars in the galaxy, Astron. Astrophys. 422, 545 (2004).
  159. D. R. Lorimer et al., The parkes multibeam pulsar survey: VI. Discovery and timing of 142 pulsars and a Galactic population analysis, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 372, 777 (2006).
  160. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), An extremely bright gamma-ray pulsar in the Large Magellanic Cloud, Science 350, 801 (2015).
  161. A. Abramowski et al. (H.E.S.S.Collaboration), Discovery of gamma-ray emission from the extragalactic pulsar wind nebula N157B with the High Energy Stereoscopic System, Astron. Astrophys. 545, L2 (2012).
  162. Kayla Bartel and Stefano Profumo (private communication).
  163. Paola Leaci and Reinhard Prix, Directed searches for continuous gravitational waves from binary systems: Parameter-space metrics and optimal scorpius x-1 sensitivity, Phys. Rev. D 91, 102003 (2015).
  164. Paola Leaci, Pia Astone, Sabrina D’Antonio, Sergio Frasca, Cristiano Palomba, Ornella Piccinni, and Simone Mastrogiovanni, Novel directed search strategy to detect continuous gravitational waves from neutron stars in low- and high-eccentricity binary systems, Phys. Rev. D 95, 122001 (2017).
  165. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), All-sky search for continuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars using Advanced LIGO O2 data, Phys. Rev. D 100, 024004 (2019).
  166. James Binney, Ortwin Gerhard, and David Spergel, The photometric structure of the inner galaxy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 288, 365 (1997).
  167. E. Vanhollebeke, M. A. T. Groenewegen, and L. Girardi, Stellar populations in the galactic bulge: Modelling the galactic bulge with trilegal, Astron. Astrophys. 498, 95 (2009).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 103014– Published 9 November, 2026
  • Received 1 March 2026
  • Accepted 30 September 2026
Article part of CHORUS
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation