- Open Access
- Access by Xinjiang University
Nonexistence of hidden-charm pentaquarks in photoproduction
Phys. Rev. D 114, 054010 – Published 8 September, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/271x-zb8h
Abstract
We investigate photoproduction off the proton, , to elucidate the nonexistence of hidden-charm pentaquark signals reported by the GlueX and CLAS12 experiments. Within a coupled-channel rescattering mechanism, we employ the transition amplitudes from a previous coupled-channel analysis that dynamically generates the states. The kernel amplitudes for the transition to the channel include both -channel heavy-meson exchange and -channel heavy-baryon exchange. We find that the rescattering contributions from the channels—indispensable for the formation of the resonances—are about one order of magnitude smaller than those from , since is roughly 5 times smaller than . Since the resonances couple to the channel predominantly through the intermediate states, their suppression prevents the pentaquark signal from appearing in photoproduction. With only a single parameter controlling the overall normalization, the present work describes the GlueX and CLAS12 cross sections well. These results suggest that the null result from photoproduction need not be in conflict with the pentaquark signals observed by the LHCb Collaboration.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (35)
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 062001 (2022).
- A. Ali et al. (GlueX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 072001 (2019).
- S. Adhikari et al. (GlueX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 108, 025201 (2023).
- P. Chatagnon et al. (CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 113, 065203 (2026).
- M.-L. Du, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, A. Nefediev, and I. Strakovsky, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1053 (2020).
- D. Winney et al. (Joint Physics Analysis Center Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 054018 (2023).
- X. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1120 (2025).
- S. Sakinah, S.-H. Kim, and H. M. Choi, arXiv:2604.14814.
- S. Clymton, H.-C. Kim, and T. Mart, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094014 (2024).
- S.-H. Kim, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139725 (2025).
- V. G. J. Stoks and T. A. Rijken, Phys. Rev. C 59, 3009 (1999).
- T. A. Rijken, V. G. J. Stoks, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. C 59, 21 (1999).
- S. Clymton and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 106, 114015 (2022).
- S.-H. Kim, Y. Oh, S. Son, S. Sakinah, and M.-K. Cheoun, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054031 (2025).
- H.-C. Kim, J. W. Durso, and K. Holinde, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2355 (1994).
- J.-Y. Kim and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114009 (2018).
- J.-Y. Kim, H.-C. Kim, G.-S. Yang, and M. Oka, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074025 (2021).
- H.-Y. Cheng, C.-K. Chua, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014030 (2005).
- S. Clymton and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074021 (2023).
- H.-J. Kim and H.-C. Kim, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 073D01 (2024).
- S. Clymton and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114002 (2024).
- H.-J. Kim and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 112, 094025 (2025).
- S. Clymton, H.-C. Kim, and T. Mart, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014041 (2025).
- S. Clymton, H.-C. Kim, and T. Mart, Phys. Rev. D 112, 034015 (2025).
- S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
- J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 88, 034034 (2013).
- A. S. Fomin, S. Barsuk, A. Y. Korchin, V. A. Kovalchuk, E. Kou, M. Liul, A. Natochii, E. Niel, P. Robbe, and A. Stocchi, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 358 (2020).
- A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Nucl. Phys. B244, 322 (1984).
- A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Nucl. Phys. B267, 690 (1986).
- A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. B 185, 403 (1987).
- Y. Guo, X. Ji, and Y. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 096010 (2021).
- Y. Hatta and D.-L. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074003 (2018).
- B. Duran et al., Nature (London) 615, 813 (2023).