Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nonexistence of hidden-charm pentaquarks in J/ψ photoproduction

Samson Clymton1,*, Sang-Ho Kim2,†, and Hyun-Chul Kim3,4,‡

  • *Contact author: samson.clymton@apctp.org
  • Contact author: shkimphy@gmail.com
  • Contact author: hchkim@inha.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. D 114, 054010 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/271x-zb8h

Abstract

We investigate J/ψ photoproduction off the proton, γpJ/ψp, to elucidate the nonexistence of hidden-charm pentaquark signals reported by the GlueX and CLAS12 experiments. Within a coupled-channel rescattering mechanism, we employ the transition amplitudes from a previous coupled-channel analysis that dynamically generates the Pcc¯ states. The kernel amplitudes for the transition to the J/ψN channel include both t-channel heavy-meson exchange and u-channel heavy-baryon exchange. We find that the rescattering contributions from the D¯(*)Σc channels—indispensable for the formation of the Pcc¯ resonances—are about one order of magnitude smaller than those from D¯(*)Λc, since gD¯(*)NΣc is roughly 5 times smaller than gD¯(*)NΛc. Since the Pcc¯ resonances couple to the J/ψN channel predominantly through the D¯(*)Σc intermediate states, their suppression prevents the pentaquark signal from appearing in photoproduction. With only a single parameter controlling the overall normalization, the present work describes the GlueX and CLAS12 cross sections well. These results suggest that the null result from photoproduction need not be in conflict with the pentaquark signals observed by the LHCb Collaboration.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (35)

  1. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019).
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 062001 (2022).
  4. A. Ali et al. (GlueX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 072001 (2019).
  5. S. Adhikari et al. (GlueX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 108, 025201 (2023).
  6. P. Chatagnon et al. (CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 113, 065203 (2026).
  7. M.-L. Du, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, A. Nefediev, and I. Strakovsky, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1053 (2020).
  8. D. Winney et al. (Joint Physics Analysis Center Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 054018 (2023).
  9. X. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1120 (2025).
  10. S. Sakinah, S.-H. Kim, and H. M. Choi, arXiv:2604.14814.
  11. S. Clymton, H.-C. Kim, and T. Mart, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094014 (2024).
  12. S.-H. Kim, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139725 (2025).
  13. V. G. J. Stoks and T. A. Rijken, Phys. Rev. C 59, 3009 (1999).
  14. T. A. Rijken, V. G. J. Stoks, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. C 59, 21 (1999).
  15. S. Clymton and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 106, 114015 (2022).
  16. S.-H. Kim, Y. Oh, S. Son, S. Sakinah, and M.-K. Cheoun, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054031 (2025).
  17. H.-C. Kim, J. W. Durso, and K. Holinde, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2355 (1994).
  18. J.-Y. Kim and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114009 (2018).
  19. J.-Y. Kim, H.-C. Kim, G.-S. Yang, and M. Oka, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074025 (2021).
  20. H.-Y. Cheng, C.-K. Chua, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014030 (2005).
  21. S. Clymton and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074021 (2023).
  22. H.-J. Kim and H.-C. Kim, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 073D01 (2024).
  23. S. Clymton and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114002 (2024).
  24. H.-J. Kim and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 112, 094025 (2025).
  25. S. Clymton, H.-C. Kim, and T. Mart, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014041 (2025).
  26. S. Clymton, H.-C. Kim, and T. Mart, Phys. Rev. D 112, 034015 (2025).
  27. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  28. J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 88, 034034 (2013).
  29. A. S. Fomin, S. Barsuk, A. Y. Korchin, V. A. Kovalchuk, E. Kou, M. Liul, A. Natochii, E. Niel, P. Robbe, and A. Stocchi, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 358 (2020).
  30. A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Nucl. Phys. B244, 322 (1984).
  31. A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Nucl. Phys. B267, 690 (1986).
  32. A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. B 185, 403 (1987).
  33. Y. Guo, X. Ji, and Y. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 096010 (2021).
  34. Y. Hatta and D.-L. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074003 (2018).
  35. B. Duran et al., Nature (London) 615, 813 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation