Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Four inequivalent paths to thermality in Minkowski spacetime

Rakesh K Jha*, Akhil U. Nair, Prasant Samantray, and Sashideep Gutti§

  • *Contact author: p20230070@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in
  • Contact author: p20200473@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in
  • Contact author: prasant.samantray@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in
  • §Contact author: sashideep@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in

Phys. Rev. D 114, 045009 – Published 12 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1ypz-kvf8

Abstract

In this article, we explore the answer to an inverse question to the Unruh effect. Given a two-dimensional Rindler wedge R with a thermal distribution of massless scalar particles, we explore the supersets of R, whose reduced state yields the observed particle content in R. If we restrict our analysis to particle content close to the Rindler horizon in R, we show that the answer to the inverse question is not unique. The analysis is done using two methods, the first uses Bogolibov coefficients and the second method uses Virasoro anomaly. We identify four inequivalent paths with various “parent” spacetimes of R from which we can arrive at the given particle content in R. We show that the supersets are Minkowski spacetime, a Rindler wedge in vacuum, a Rindler wedge with a thermal flux of left-moving particles and lastly a Rindler wedge with a thermal flux of right moving flux of particles. We also show an interesting phenomenon; flux to density conversion, wherein a thermal flux of either left-moving or right-moving particles can be converted to thermal density of particles involving both left-moving and right-moving particles. The analysis presents a natural possibility to define the information entropy for a given Rindler wedge. This stems from the fact that a given Rindler wedge with its particle content could have originated from various supersets found in the article. Based on the analysis done in the article, we present qualitative arguments regarding the possibility that the continuous evaporation of a black hole might be punctuated by a series of pauses and bursts of radiation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (26)

  1. W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
  2. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975); 46, 206(E) (1976).
  3. K. Lochan and T. Padmanabhan, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 03LT01 (2025).
  4. S. Gutti, A. U. Nair, and P. Samantray, Phys. Rev. D 108, 025010 (2023).
  5. A. U. Nair, R. K. Jha, P. Samantray, and S. Gutti, Phys. Rev. D 111, 125016 (2025).
  6. L. Aalsma, M. Parikh, and J. P. Van Der Schaar, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 136.
  7. W. Rindler, Phys. Rev. 119, 2082 (1960).
  8. H. W. Wiesbrock, Commun. Math. Phys. 157, 83 (1993); 184, 683(E) (1997).
  9. R. M. Wald, General Relativity (Chicago University Press, Chicago, USA, 1984).
  10. R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 48, R2377 (1993).
  11. E. Frodden and N. Valdés, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1830026 (2018).
  12. A. Fabbri and J. Navarro-Salas, Modeling Black Hole Evaporation (Imperial College Press, London, United Kingdom, 2005).
  13. L. Sriramkumar and T. Padmanabhan, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11, 1 (2002).
  14. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  15. A. Fabbri and J. Navarro-Salas, Modeling Black Hole Evaporation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2005).
  16. R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn, Introduction to Conformal Field Theory: With Applications to String Theory (springer, New York, 2009), Vol. 779, 10.1007/978-3-642-00450-6.
  17. W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1047 (1984).
  18. R. Utiyama and B. S. DeWitt, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 608 (1962).
  19. V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki, Introduction to Quantum Effects in Gravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  20. T. Padmanabhan, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 306, 012001 (2011).
  21. S. Kolekar and T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064055 (2014).
  22. T. Padmanabhan, Gravitation: Foundations and Frontiers (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2014).
  23. D. Tong, Quantum field theory, Lecture notes, University of Cambridge (2006–2012), see section II. 3 The Vacuum for discussion of δ(0) as volume.
  24. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995), 10.1201/9780429503559.
  25. M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007), 10.1017/CBO9780511813917.
  26. S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 1: Foundations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2005), 10.1017/CBO9781139644167.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation