- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Surface gravity wave on a neutron star ocean trapped around a magnetic pole

Shin’ichirou Yoshida*

  • Department of Earth Science and Astronomy, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan

  • *Contact author: syoshida@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 063019 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1x62-nw3p

Abstract

A warm neutron star is expected to have a fluid “ocean” of heavy elements at its outermost part of the outer crust. As is on the terrestrial ocean, the neutron star ocean also has surface gravity waves. Around a magnetic pole of a star, the ocean may have a dip due to the strong magnetic pressure coming into play in the hydrostatic balance of the ocean. The dip enables the surface gravity wave to be trapped around the magnetic pole to form eigenmodes. The frequency of the mode is much lower than the dynamical frequency at the stellar surface, owing to the weak Coriolis force and the gradient in the ocean’s depth that makes the eigenmodes present. We solve the equation of surface gravity waves in the local β-plane approximation and obtain the spectrum of discrete eigenmodes. We see that there are no axisymmetric modes and that the mode frequency decreases and asymptotes to zero as the number of nodes of the corresponding eigenfunction increases. This is reminiscent of the g-modes in the context of asteroseismology. Observations of x-ray binaries containing neutron stars reveal that some of the systems exhibit low-frequency quasiperiodic oscillations (QPOs) whose frequency is 1−103  mHz. We investigate whether the eigenmodes considered here may explain the low-frequency QPO spectrum. It is suggested that some of the QPOs in the system whose neutron star spins at the period less than 10s may be consistent with the model. As far as the spin period is larger than 10s, the eigenmode frequencies are too low to explain the observed QPOs.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. V. Urpin, Astron. Astrophys. 421, L5 (2004).
  2. J. Nättilä, J. Y.-K. Cho, J. W. Skinner, E. R. Most, and B. Ripperda, Astrophys. J. 971, 37 (2024).
  3. L. Bildsten and C. Cutler, Astrophys. J. 449, 800 (1995).
  4. L. Bildsten, G. Ushomirsky, and C. Cutler, Astrophys. J. 460, 827 (1996).
  5. J. S. Heyl, Astrophys. J. 600, 939 (2004).
  6. B. F. A. van Baal, F. R. N. Chambers, and A. L. Watts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 496, 2098 (2020).
  7. M. Rieutord, arXiv:astro-ph/0308313.
  8. L. G. Chambers, J. Fluid Mech. 22, 209 (1965).
  9. M. S. Longuet-Higgins, J. Fluid Mech. 29, 781 (1967).
  10. M. S. Longuet-Higgins, J. Fluid Mech. 37, 773 (1969).
  11. K. Fujima, D. Yuliadi, C. Goto, K. Hayashi, and T. Shigemura, Coastal Eng. Jpn. 38, 111 (1995).
  12. N. Chamel and P. Haensel, Living Rev. Relativity 11, 10 (2008).
  13. M. Nava-Callejas, D. Page, and Y. Cavecchi, Astrophys. J. 991, 62 (2025).
  14. Z. Medin and D. Lai, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 382, 1833 (2007).
  15. S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, Black Holes, White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Objects (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986).

  16. Assuming the stellar radius of 10 km and the mass of 1.4M⊙, we see the phase velocity of the surface gravity wave in the shallow-water approximation, GM/R2h, is the order of a few percent of the speed of light, when the depth of the ocean is 102  m.

  17. R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1965), Vol. I.
  18. W. Unno, Y. Osaki, H. Ando, H. Saio, and H. Shibahashi, Nonradial Oscillations of Stars (Universiy of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1989).
  19. M. van der Klis, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 27, 517 (1989).
  20. M. van der Klis, arXiv:astro-ph/0410551.
  21. R. I. Klein, J. Arons, G. Jernigan, and J. J.-L. Hsu, Astrophys. J. Lett. 457, L85 (1996).
  22. M. Bachetti, M. M. Romanova, A. Kulkarni, L. Burderi, and T. di Salvo, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 403, 1193 (2010).
  23. L. Zhang, O. Blaes, and Y.-F. Jiang, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 520, 1421 (2023).
  24. C.-S. Shi, S.-N. Zhang, and X.-D. Li, Astrophys. J. 791, 16 (2014).
  25. H. Manikantan, B. Paul, R. Sharma, P. Pradhan, and V. Rana, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531, 530 (2024).
  26. P. P. Li, L. Tao, R. C. Ma, M. Y. Ge, Q. C. Zhao, S. J. Zhao, L. Zhang, Q. C. Bu, L. D. Kong, Y. L. Tuo, L. Ji, S. Zhang, J. L. Qu, S. N. Zhang, Y. Huang, X. Ma, W. T. Ye, and Q. C. Shui, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 529, 1187 (2024).
  27. C. Malacaria, D. Huppenkothen, O. J. Roberts, L. Ducci, E. Bozzo, P. Jenke, C. A. Wilson-Hodge, and M. Falanga, Astron. Astrophys. 681, A25 (2024).
  28. W. Yang and W. Wang, Universe 12, 7 (2025).
  29. A. Heger, A. Cumming, and S. E. Woosley, Astrophys. J. 665, 1311 (2007).
  30. M. van der Klis, L. Stella, N. White, F. Jansen, and A. N. Parmar, Astrophys. J. 316, 411 (1987).
  31. J. M. Kommers, D. Chakrabarty, and W. H. G. Lewin, Astrophys. J. 497, L33 (1998).
  32. M. A. Alpar and J. Shaham, Nature (London) 316, 239 (1985).
  33. Y. Z. Ding et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 503, 6045 (2021).
  34. A. Shirakawa and D. Lai, Astrophys. J. 564, 361 (2002).
  35. W. A. Baan and A. Treves, Astron. Astrophys. 22, 421 (1973).
  36. K. Davidson, Nat. Phys. Sci. 246, 1 (1973).
  37. M. M. Basko and R. A. Sunyaev, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 175, 395 (1976).
  38. J. Arons, Astrophys. J. 388, 561 (1992).
  39. C. F. Gammie, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 297, 929 (1998).
  40. M. C. Begelman, Astrophys. J. 636, 995 (2006).
  41. A. Salganik, S. S. Tsygankov, S. V. Molkov, I. Y. Lapshov, A. A. Lutovinov, A. Y. Tkachenko, A. A. Mushtukov, and J. Poutanen, Astron. Astrophys. 705, A141 (2026).
  42. M. Čemeljić, W. Kluźniak, and S. Kundu, Astron. Astrophys. 703, A7 (2025).
  43. D. E. Gruber, W. A. Heindl, R. E. Rothschild, W. Coburn, R. Staubert, I. Kreykenbohm, and J. Wilms, Astrophys. J. 562, 499 (2001).
  44. Q. Liu, W. Wang, X. Chen, W. Yang, F. J. Lu, L. M. Song, J. L. Qu, S. Zhang, and S. N. Zhang, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 516, 5579 (2022).
  45. S. S. Tsygankov, V. Doroshenko, A. A. Mushtukov, A. A. Lutovinov, and J. Poutanen, Astron. Astrophys. 621, A134 (2019).
  46. K. Makishima et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 42, 295 (1990).
  47. A. D’Aì et al., Astron. Astrophys. 694, A316 (2025).
  48. P. P. Li, P. A. Becker, and L. Tao, Astron. Astrophys. 689, A316 (2024).
  49. P. R. Epili and W. Wang, Astron. Astrophys. 701, A213 (2025).
  50. A. King, J.-P. Lasota, and M. Middleton, New Astron. Rev. 96, 101672 (2023).
  51. M. Veresvarska, M. Imbrogno, R. Amato, G. L. Israel, S. Scaringi, P. Casella, D. de Martino, F. Fürst, A. Gúrpide, C. Knigge, and M. J. Middleton, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 541, 3627 (2025).
  52. H. P. Pfeiffer and D. Lai, Astrophys. J. 604, 766 (2004).
  53. A. King, J.-P. Lasota, and W. Kluźniak, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, L59 (2017).
  54. S. Yoshida, Data: Surface gravity wave on a neutron star ocean trapped around a magnetic pole, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.22005255 (2026).
  55. J. Pedlosky, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (Springer-Verlag, New York and Tokyo, 1987).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 063019– Published 8 September, 2026
  • Received 27 March 2026
  • Accepted 17 August 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation