Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Precision evaluation of the Ga71(νe,e) solar neutrino capture rate from the (He3,t) charge-exchange reaction

D. Frekers1, T. Adachi2, H. Akimune3, M. Alanssari1, B. A. Brown4, B. T. Cleveland5,*, H. Ejiri2, H. Fujita2, Y. Fujita2,6 et al.

M. Fujiwara2, V. N. Gavrin7, M. N. Harakeh8,9, K. Hatanaka2, M. Holl1, C. Iwamoto2, A. Lennarz1, A. Okamoto2, H. Okamura2,†, T. Suzuki2, and A. Tamii2

  • 1Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
  • 2Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan
  • 3Department of Physics, Konan University, Kobe 658-8501, Japan
  • 4National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, The Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics and the Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 5Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle WA98195, USA
  • 6Department of Physics, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan
  • 7Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117312, Russia
  • 8Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, University of Groningen, NL-9747 AA Groningen, The Netherlands
  • 9GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerinonenforschung GmbH, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany

  • *Also at SNOLAB, Lively, Ontario, Canada.
  • Deceased.

Phys. Rev. C 91, 034608 – Published 13 March, 2015Erratum Phys. Rev. C 100, 049901 (2019)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.034608

Abstract

A precision measurement of the Ga71(He3,t)Ge71 charge-exchange reaction was performed. By using a rather complete set of theoretical form factors to describe the cross-section angular distributions over a large angular range, the Gamow-Teller strength distribution up to the effective neutron-separation energy in Ge71 was extracted. The data and the analysis constrain the Ga71(νe,e) solar neutrino rate in a neutrino nonoscillation scenario. For nonoscillating neutrinos we report a solar neutrino capture rate of 122.4±3.4(stat)±1.1(sys) SNU, which is lower than the presently accepted value of 132±18 SNU, though not in disagreement given the quoted errors.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Erratum

Erratum: Precision evaluation of the Ga71(νe,e) solar neutrino capture rate from the (He3,t) charge-exchange reaction [Phys. Rev. C 91, 034608 (2015)]

D. Frekers, T. Adachi, H. Akimune, M. Alanssari, B. A. Brown, B. T. Cleveland, H. Ejiri, H. Fujita, Y. Fujita, M. Fujiwara, V. N. Gavrin, M. N. Harakeh, K. Hatanaka, M. Holl, C. Iwamoto, A. Lennarz, A. Okamoto, H. Okamura, T. Suzuki, and A. Tamii
Phys. Rev. C 100, 049901 (2019)

Article Text

References (35)

  1. A. Aguilar, L. B. Auerbach, R. L. Burman, D. O. Caldwell, E. D. Church, A. K. Cochran, J. B. Donahue, A. Fazely, G. T. Garvey, R. M. Gunasingha et al. (LSND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 64, 112007 (2001).
  2. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, C. E. Anderson, S. J. Brice, B. C. Brown, L. Bugel, J. M. Conrad, Z. Djurcic, B. T. Fleming, R. Ford, F. G. Garcia et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 111801 (2009).
  3. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, C. E. Anderson, S. J. Brice, B. C. Brown, L. Bugel, J. M. Conrad, R. Dharmapalan, Z. Djurcic, B. T. Fleming, R. Ford et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 181801 (2010).
  4. Th. A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Fallot, A. Letourneau, S. Cormon, M. Fechner, L. Giot, T. Lasserre, J. Martino, G. Mention et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 054615 (2011).
  5. J. N. Abdurashitov, V. N. Gavrin, V. V. Gorbachev, P. P. Gurkina, T. V. Ibragimova, A. V. Kalikhov, N. G. Khairnasov, T. V. Knodel, I. N. Mirmov, A. A. Shikhin et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 015807 (2009).
  6. V. N. Gavrin, V. V. Gorbachev, E. P. Veretenkin, and B. T. Cleveland, arXiv:1006.2103v2.
  7. J. Kopp, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 091801 (2011).
  8. K. N. Abazajian, M. A. Acero, S. K. Agarwalla, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, C. H. Albright, S. Antusch, C. A. Arguelles, A. B. Balantekin, G. Barenboim, V. Barger et al., arXiv:1204.5379.
  9. W. Hampel, G. Heusser, J. Kiko, T. Kirsten, M. Laubenstein, E. Pernicka, W. Rau, U. Rönn, C. Schlosser, M. Wójcik et al., Phys. Lett. B 420, 114 (1998).
  10. F. Kaether, W. Hampel, G. Heusser, J. Kiko, and T. Kirsten, Phys. Lett. B 685, 47 (2010).
  11. J. N. Abdurashitov, V. N. Gavrin, S. V. Girin, V. V. Gorbachev, T. V. Ibragimova, A. V. Kalikhov, N. G. Khairnasov, T. V. Knodel, V. N. Kornoukhov, I. N. Mirmov et al., Phys. Rev. C 59, 2246 (1999).
  12. B. T. Cleveland, T. Daily, R. Davis, Jr., J. Distel, K. Lande, C. K. Lee, and P. Wildenhain, Astrophys. J. 496, 505 (1998).
  13. J. N. Bahcall and M. H. Pinsonneault, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 885 (1992).
  14. D. Frekers, H. Ejiri, H. Akimune, T. Adachi, B. Bilgier, B. A. Brown, B. T. Cleveland, H. Fujita, Y. Fujita, M. Fujiwara et al., Phys. Lett. B 706, 134 (2011).
  15. D. Frekers, M. C. Simon, C. Andreoiu, J. C. Bale, M. Brodeur, T. Brunner, A. Chaudhuri, U. Chowdhury, J. R. Crespo López-Urrutia, P. Delheij et al., Phys. Lett. B 722, 233 (2013).
  16. T. D. Macdonald, B. E. Schultz, J. C. Bale, A. Chaudhuri, U. Chowdhury, D. Frekers, A. T. Gallant, A. Grossheim, A. A. Kwiatkowski, A. Lennarz et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 044318 (2014).
  17. H. Ejiri, H. Akimune, Y. Arimoto, I. Daito, H. Fujimura, Y. Fujita, M. Fujiwara, K. Fushimi, M. B. Greenfield, M. N. Harakeh et al., Phys. Lett. B 433, 257 (1998).
  18. T. Wakasa, K. Hatanaka, Y. Fujita, G. P. A. Berg, H. Fujimura, H. Fujita, M. Itoh, J. Kamiya, T. Kawabata, K. Nagayama et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 482, 79 (2002).
  19. M. Fujiwara, H. Akimune, I. Daito, H. Fujimura, Y. Fujita, K. Hatanaka, H. Ikegami, I. Katayama, K. Nagayama, N. Matsuoka et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 422, 484 (1999).
  20. H. Fujita, G. P. A. Berg, Y. Fujita, K. Hatanaka, T. Noro, E. J. Stephenson, C. C. Foster, H. Sakaguchi, M. Itoh, T. Taki et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 469, 55 (2001).
  21. H. Fujita, Y. Fujita, G. P. A. Berg, A. D. Bacher, C. C. Foster, K. Hara, K. Hatanaka, T. Kawabata, T. Noro, H. Sakaguchi et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 484, 17 (2002).
  22. D. Frekers, A. Lennarz, P. Puppe, and J. H. Thies, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 621, 704 (2010).
  23. D. E. Bainum, J. Rapaport, C. D. Goodman, D. J. Horen, C. C. Foster, M. B. Greenfield, and C. A. Goulding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1751 (1980).
  24. National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory (2011), http://www.nndc.bnl.gov.
  25. J. Cookand J. A. Carr, computer program fold, Florida State University (unpublished, 1988), based on F. Petrovich and D. Stanley, Nucl. Phys. A 275, 487 (1977), modified as described in J. Cook, K. W. Kemper, P. V. Drumm, L. K. Fifield, M. A. C. Hotchkis, T. R. Ophel, and C. L. Woods, Phys. Rev. C 30, 1538 (1984), and R. G. T. Zegers, S. Fracasso and G. Colò, NSCL, Michigan State University (unpublished, 2006).
  26. W. G. Love and M. A. Franey, Phys. Rev. C 24, 1073 (1981).
  27. M. A. Franey and W. G. Love, Phys. Rev. C 31, 488 (1985).
  28. B. A. Brownand W. D. M. Rae, Nuclear Data Sheets 120, 115 (2014).
  29. M. Honma, T. Otsuka, B. A. Brown, and T. Mizusaki, Phys. Rev. C 65, 061301(R) (2002).
  30. M. Honma, T. Otsuka, B. A. Brown, and T. Mizusaki, Eur. Phys. J. A 25, 499 (2005).
  31. J. N. Bahcall, Phys. Rev. C 56, 3391 (1997).
  32. J. N. Bahcall and B. R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. C 33, 2121 (1986).
  33. A. Ianni, Phys. Dark Universe 4, 44 (2014).
  34. B. Aharmim, S. N. Ahmed, A. E. Anthony, E. W. Beier, A. Bellerive, M. Bergevin, S. D. Biller, M. G. Boulay, Y. D. Chan, M. Chen et al., Astrophys. J. 653, 1545 (2006).
  35. J. N. Bahcall and P. I. Krastev, Phys. Lett. B 436, 243 (1998).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation