- Access by Xinjiang University
Study of Levels with the Reaction
Phys. Rev. C 7, 445 – Published 1 January, 1973
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.7.445
Abstract
Levels of have been studied with the reaction at 15-MeV incident energy. Angular distributions for transitions to a dozen prominent levels below 2 MeV have been measured with 30- to 40-keV experimental resolution over , and they have been compared with distorted-wave Born-approximation (DWBA) calculations. Angular distributions for and elastic scattering have also been measured, and proton and -optical-model potential parameter sets have been determined by a search procedure. Of the three sets of -potential parameters, the one which best reproduced the measured () angular distributions of known low-lying levels in was chosen as the standard set for the rest of the () calculations. The conventional triton-cluster form factor was used exclusively for the () DWBA calculations which lead to assignments. A semimicroscopic form factor was used in a few test cases in order to check the sensitivity of calculations to the choice of form factor. Reliable assignments have been made for levels below 1.5 MeV based on the dependence for transfers, as well as for higher angular momentum transfers observed in the present work; and they are in excellent agreement with those determined from recent Coulomb-excitation and works. Dominant three-nucleon shell-model configurations to which the levels of interest belong have been proposed.
References (34)
- V. C. Rogers, L. E. Beghian, F. M. Clikeman, F. Hofman, and S. Wilensky, Nucl. Phys. A142, 100 (1970)
- H. Gobel, E. J. Feicht, and H. Vonach, Z. Physik 240, 430 (1970)
- P. H. Stelson, R. L. Robinson, W. T. Milner, F. K. McGowan, and M. A. Ludington, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 16, 619 (1971)
- M. Kregar and G. G. Seaman, Nucl. Phys. A179, 153 (1972)
- K. H. Bhatt and J. B. Ball, Nucl. Phys. 63, 286 (1965) N. Auerbach and I. Talmi, 64, 458 (1965) J. Vervier, ibid. 75, 17 (1965)
- H. Ohnuma and J. L. Yntema, Phys. Rev. 176, 1416 (1968)
- M. R. Cates, J. B. Ball, and E. Newman, Phys. Rev. 187, 1682 (1969)
- N. Austern, Direct Nuclear Reaction Theories (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1970)
- M. S. Zisman and B. G. Harvey, Phys. Rev. C 5, 1031 (1972)
- J. P. Schiffer, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, Suppl. 24, 319 (1968)
- L. L. Lee, Jr., A. Marinov, C. Mayer-Boricke, J. P. Schiffer, R. H. Bassel, R. M. Drisco, and G. R. Satchler, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 261 (1965)
- J. A. Nolen, Jr., and C. M. Glashausser, Phys. Letters 21, 705 (1966)
- D. L. Dittmer and W. W. Daehnick, Phys. Rev. C 2, 238 (1970)
- R. O. Ginaven and A. M. Bernstein, Nucl. Phys. A154, 417 (1970)
- D. Bucurescu, M. Ivascu, G. Semenescu, and M. Titirici, Nucl. Phys. A189, 577 (1972)
- Yong Sook Park, H. D. Jones, and D. E. Bainum, Phys. Rev. C 4, 778 (1971)
- B. F. Bayman, Argonne National Laboratory Report No. ANL-6878, 335, 1964 (unpublished)
- B. F. Bayman and E. Rost, unpublished ([19])
- J. A. Nolen, Jr., Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 1965 (unpublished)
- R. M. Drisko, unpublished ([14])
- C. B. Fulmer and J. B. Ball, Phys. Rev. 140, B330 (1965)
- Yong Sook Park, H. D. Jones, D. E. Bainum, and A. W. Barrows, Jr., U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratories Report No. 1564, 1971 (unpublished)
Omitted endnote
- W. R. Smith, Argonne National Laboratory Report No. ANL-6848, 30, 1964 (unpublished)
Omitted endnote
Omitted endnote
- P. J. A. Buttle and L. J. B. Goldfarb, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 83, 701 (1964)
- B. Hird and T. Y. Li, Can. J. Phys. 46, 1273 (1968)
- R. Stock, R. Bock, P. David, H. H. Duhm, and T. Tamura, Nucl. Phys. A104, 137 (1967)
- W. W. Daehnick and Y. S. Park, Phys. Rev. 180, 1062 (1969) Y. S. Park, Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 1968 (unpublished)
- R. M. Tapphorn and R. Shnidman, to be published
- S. H. Suck, University of Texas, private communication
- S. H. Suck and W. R. Coker, Nucl. Phys. A176, 89 (1971)
- F. Rybicki, Temple University, private communication