Spontaneous natural optical activity in disordered media
F. A. Pinheiro, V. A. Fedotov, N. Papasimakis, and N. I. Zheludev
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220201(R) (2017) - Published 20 June, 2017
Øyvind Johansen and Arne Brataas
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220408(R) (2017) - Published 20 June, 2017
The real benefit of antiferromagnets is that they can enable terahertz spintronic circuits. Spin pumping is a versatile tool for generating pure spin currents and probing spin dynamics. The high antiferromagnetic resonance frequencies represent a challenge for experimental detection, but magnetic fields can reduce these resonance frequencies. The authors compute the inverse spin Hall voltages resulting from dynamical spin excitations. They suggest practical opportunities that will significantly enhance the spin pumping and inverse spin Hall voltage for the uniaxial antiferromagnets MnF and FeF.
Patryk Krzysteczko, James Wells, Alexander Fernández Scarioni, Zbynek Soban, Tomas Janda, Xiukun Hu, Vit Saidl, Richard P. Campion, Rhodri Mansell, Ji-Hyun Lee, Russell P. Cowburn, Petr Nemec, Olga Kazakova, Joerg Wunderlich, and Hans Werner Schumacher
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220410(R) (2017) - Published 27 June, 2017
The authors demonstrate a novel ultrahigh-resolution, minimally invasive technique for the detection of the domain-wall position within magnetic nanostructures. Based on the anomalous Nernst effect, the technique is suitable for a wide range of spintronic nanodevices implementing perpendicular-anisotropy materials. A thermal gradient generated on-chip is used to drive charge carriers, which are in turn deflected by the sample’s magnetization. Domain-wall positions within the device can be monitored with a resolution of 20 nm by measurement of the resulting Nernst voltages.
N. Prasai, B. A. Trump, G. G. Marcus, A. Akopyan, S. X. Huang, T. M. McQueen, and J. L. Cohn
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224407 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
Low-temperature thermal conductivity measurements in the ferrimagnetic insulator CuOSeO reveal an unprecedentedly large magnonic contribution below T~10K, far exceeding (by nearly two orders of magnitude) that observed previously in any other ferromagnet or ferrimagnet. Features predicted by theory more than 50 years ago are identified, including ballistic behavior with , and, possibly, Poiseuille flow, wherein the magnon mean-free path exceeds the specimen dimensions as momentum conserving scattering occurs more frequently than scattering by resistive processes.
S. Kolenda, C. Sürgers, G. Fischer, and D. Beckmann
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224505 (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
Thermoelectric effects can be surprisingly large in superconductor-ferromagnet tunnel junctions when the superconductor is subject to a spin-splitting field. The spin splitting can be provided by an applied magnetic field, but can also be created by exchange coupling to a ferromagnetic insulator. Here, it is shown that thermoelectric effects in superconductor-ferromagnet tunnel junctions can be enhanced by boosting the spin splitting with an intrinsic exchange field provided by a ferromagnetic insulator. These findings could lead to more precise local electron thermometry or efficient microrefrigerators.
C. Collignon, S. Badoux, S. A. A. Afshar, B. Michon, F. Laliberté, O. Cyr-Choinière, J.-S. Zhou, S. Licciardello, S. Wiedmann, N. Doiron-Leyraud, and Louis Taillefer
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224517 (2017) - Published 29 June, 2017
After two decades of intense investigation, the pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors still remains a puzzle. The authors explore it by measuring the electrical resistivity and Hall coefficient of the cuprate Nd-LSCO in high magnetic fields for closely spaced doping rates across the pseudogap critical point. They report two main observations. First, both types of measurement indicate a drop of carrier density from 1+ to upon entering the pseudogap phase; the process is best characterized as a crossover as a function of temperature at fixed doping and as a transition as a function of doping at zero temperature. Second, the mobility is unaffected by the transition. These findings, quantitively consistent with the cases of YBCO and LSCO, appear to be a universal signature of the pseudogap.
F. A. Pinheiro, V. A. Fedotov, N. Papasimakis, and N. I. Zheludev
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220201(R) (2017) - Published 20 June, 2017
N. Bondarenko, Y. Kvashnin, J. Chico, A. Bergman, O. Eriksson, and N. V. Skorodumova
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220401(R) (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
Sanghoon Kim, Peong-Hwa Jang, Duck-Ho Kim, Mio Ishibashi, Takuya Taniguchi, Takahiro Moriyama, Kab-Jin Kim, Kyung-Jin Lee, and Teruo Ono
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220402(R) (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
Qiang Zhang, Feng Ye, Wei Tian, Huibo Cao, Songxue Chi, Biao Hu, Zhenyu Diao, David A. Tennant, Rongying Jin, Jiandi Zhang, and Ward Plummer
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220403(R) (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
Cliò Efthimia Agrapidis, Stefan-Ludwig Drechsler, Jeroen van den Brink, and Satoshi Nishimoto
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220404(R) (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
E. Svanidze, T. Besara, J. K. Wang, D. Geiger, L. Prochaska, J. M. Santiago, J. W. Lynn, S. Paschen, T. Siegrist, and E. Morosan
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220405(R) (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
R. Takagi, D. Morikawa, K. Karube, N. Kanazawa, K. Shibata, G. Tatara, Y. Tokunaga, T. Arima, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, and S. Seki
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220406(R) (2017) - Published 16 June, 2017
Sayak Dasgupta, Se Kwon Kim, and Oleg Tchernyshyov
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220407(R) (2017) - Published 19 June, 2017
Øyvind Johansen and Arne Brataas
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220408(R) (2017) - Published 20 June, 2017
The real benefit of antiferromagnets is that they can enable terahertz spintronic circuits. Spin pumping is a versatile tool for generating pure spin currents and probing spin dynamics. The high antiferromagnetic resonance frequencies represent a challenge for experimental detection, but magnetic fields can reduce these resonance frequencies. The authors compute the inverse spin Hall voltages resulting from dynamical spin excitations. They suggest practical opportunities that will significantly enhance the spin pumping and inverse spin Hall voltage for the uniaxial antiferromagnets MnF and FeF.
S. Brener, B. Murzaliev, M. Titov, and M. I. Katsnelson
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220409(R) (2017) - Published 26 June, 2017
Patryk Krzysteczko, James Wells, Alexander Fernández Scarioni, Zbynek Soban, Tomas Janda, Xiukun Hu, Vit Saidl, Richard P. Campion, Rhodri Mansell, Ji-Hyun Lee, Russell P. Cowburn, Petr Nemec, Olga Kazakova, Joerg Wunderlich, and Hans Werner Schumacher
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220410(R) (2017) - Published 27 June, 2017
The authors demonstrate a novel ultrahigh-resolution, minimally invasive technique for the detection of the domain-wall position within magnetic nanostructures. Based on the anomalous Nernst effect, the technique is suitable for a wide range of spintronic nanodevices implementing perpendicular-anisotropy materials. A thermal gradient generated on-chip is used to drive charge carriers, which are in turn deflected by the sample’s magnetization. Domain-wall positions within the device can be monitored with a resolution of 20 nm by measurement of the resulting Nernst voltages.
Bosen Wang, Yu Liu, Kento Ishigaki, Kazuyuki Matsubayashi, Jinguang Cheng, Wenjian Lu, Yuping Sun, and Yoshiya Uwatoko
Phys. Rev. B 95, 220501(R) (2017) - Published 9 June, 2017
M. Hemmida, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, Vladimir Tsurkan, and A. Loidl
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224101 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
F. Berthier, J. Creuze, and B. Legrand
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224102 (2017) - Published 8 June, 2017
G. P. Purja Pun and Y. Mishin
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224103 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
J. Zheng, Q. F. Chen, Y. J. Gu, J. T. Li, Z. G. Li, C. J. Li, and Z. Y. Chen
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224104 (2017) - Published 20 June, 2017
Q. Chen, I. Schwarz, and M. B. Plenio
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224105 (2017) - Published 21 June, 2017
S. H. Zhang, I. J. Beyerlein, D. Legut, Z. H. Fu, Z. Zhang, S. L. Shang, Z. K. Liu, T. C. Germann, and R. F. Zhang
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224106 (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
Cristian Enachescu, Laurentiu Stoleriu, Masamichi Nishino, Seiji Miyashita, Alexandru Stancu, Maciej Lorenc, Roman Bertoni, Hervé Cailleau, and Eric Collet
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224107 (2017) - Published 29 June, 2017
Matthew J. Cliffe, Albert P. Bartók, Rachel N. Kerber, Clare P. Grey, Gábor Csányi, and Andrew L. Goodwin
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224108 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
B. G. del Rio and L. E. González
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224201 (2017) - Published 1 June, 2017
J. P. Vasco and S. Hughes
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224202 (2017) - Published 2 June, 2017
Q. Yu, X. D. Wang, Y. Su, Q. P. Cao, Y. Ren, D. X. Zhang, and J. Z. Jiang
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224203 (2017) - Published 6 June, 2017
Renfeng Li, Luhong Wang, Liangliang Li, Tony Yu, Haiyan Zhao, Karena W. Chapman, Mark L. Rivers, Peter J. Chupas, Ho-kwang Mao, and Haozhe Liu
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224204 (2017) - Published 6 June, 2017
Xiaozhi Yan, Xiangting Ren, Guangai Sun, Dong Li, Xin Li, Duanwei He, and Wenge Yang
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224205 (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
S. Ohno, T. Sonehara, E. Tatsu, A. Koreeda, and S. Saikan
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224301 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
Ryuji Takahashi and Naoyuki Sugimoto
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224302 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
Zhi-Peng Gao, Dan-Wei Zhang, Yang Yu, and Shi-Liang Zhu
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224303 (2017) - Published 19 June, 2017
Navid Nemati, Yoonkyung E. Lee, Denis Lafarge, Aroune Duclos, and Nicholas Fang
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224304 (2017) - Published 27 June, 2017
I. P. Rusinov, I. Yu. Sklyadneva, R. Heid, K.-P. Bohnen, E. K. Petrov, Yu. M. Koroteev, P. M. Echenique, and E. V. Chulkov
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224305 (2017) - Published 28 June, 2017
Tribhuwan Pandey, Carlos A. Polanco, Lucas Lindsay, and David S. Parker
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224306 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
M. Ramazanoglu, A. Sapkota, Abhishek Pandey, J. Lamsal, D. L. Abernathy, J. L. Niedziela, M. B. Stone, A. Kreyssig, A. I. Goldman, D. C. Johnston, and R. J. McQueeney
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224401 (2017) - Published 1 June, 2017
R. Cid, J. M. Alameda, S. M. Valvidares, J. C. Cezar, P. Bencok, N. B. Brookes, and J. Díaz
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224402 (2017) - Published 1 June, 2017
Ying Su, X. S. Wang, and X. R. Wang
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224403 (2017) - Published 1 June, 2017
Wen-Long You, Cheng-Jie Zhang, Weihai Ni, Ming Gong, and Andrzej M. Oleś
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224404 (2017) - Published 2 June, 2017
S. A. Montoya, S. Couture, J. J. Chess, J. C. T. Lee, N. Kent, M.-Y. Im, S. D. Kevan, P. Fischer, B. J. McMorran, S. Roy, V. Lomakin, and E. E. Fullerton
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224405 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
S. Ibuka, S. Itoh, T. Yokoo, and Y. Endoh
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224406 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
N. Prasai, B. A. Trump, G. G. Marcus, A. Akopyan, S. X. Huang, T. M. McQueen, and J. L. Cohn
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224407 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
Low-temperature thermal conductivity measurements in the ferrimagnetic insulator CuOSeO reveal an unprecedentedly large magnonic contribution below T~10K, far exceeding (by nearly two orders of magnitude) that observed previously in any other ferromagnet or ferrimagnet. Features predicted by theory more than 50 years ago are identified, including ballistic behavior with , and, possibly, Poiseuille flow, wherein the magnon mean-free path exceeds the specimen dimensions as momentum conserving scattering occurs more frequently than scattering by resistive processes.
Geetanjali Giri, Dayasindhu Dey, Manoranjan Kumar, S. Ramasesha, and Zoltán G. Soos
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224408 (2017) - Published 6 June, 2017
Tomek Schulz, Kyujoon Lee, Benjamin Krüger, Roberto Lo Conte, Gurucharan V. Karnad, Karin Garcia, Laurent Vila, Berthold Ocker, Dafiné Ravelosona, and Mathias Kläui
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224409 (2017) - Published 6 June, 2017
Victor Laliena, Javier Campo, and Yusuke Kousaka
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224410 (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
Z. Seidov, T. P. Gavrilova, R. M. Eremina, L. E. Svistov, A. A. Bush, A. Loidl, and H.-A. Krug von Nidda
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224411 (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
J. J. Bible and R. E. Camley
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224412 (2017) - Published 8 June, 2017
Y. W. Windsor, C. Piamonteze, M. Ramakrishnan, A. Scaramucci, L. Rettig, J. A. Huever, E. M. Bothschafter, N. S. Bingham, A. Alberca, S. R. V. Avula, B. Noheda, and U. Staub
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224413 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
D. O. Tolmachev, A. S. Gurin, Yu. A. Uspenskaya, G. R. Asatryan, A. G. Badalyan, N. G. Romanov, A. G. Petrosyan, P. G. Baranov, H. Wieczorek, and C. Ronda
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224414 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
Jozef Strečka, Johannes Richter, Oleg Derzhko, Taras Verkholyak, and Katarína Karľová
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224415 (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
Somnath Ghara, Emmanuelle Suard, François Fauth, T. Thao Tran, P. Shiv Halasyamani, Akira Iyo, Juan Rodríguez-Carvajal, and A. Sundaresan
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224416 (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
Y. Takahashi, T. Miyamachi, S. Nakashima, N. Kawamura, Y. Takagi, M. Uozumi, V. N. Antonov, T. Yokoyama, A. Ernst, and F. Komori
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224417 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
M. Kriener, T. Nakajima, Y. Kaneko, A. Kikkawa, D. Hashizume, K. Kato, M. Takata, T. Arima, Y. Tokura, and Y. Taguchi
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224418 (2017) - Published 15 June, 2017
J. D. Song, X. M. Wang, Z. Y. Zhao, J. C. Wu, J. Y. Zhao, X. G. Liu, X. Zhao, and X. F. Sun
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224419 (2017) - Published 15 June, 2017
V. K. Anand, D. L. Abernathy, D. T. Adroja, A. D. Hillier, P. K. Biswas, and B. Lake
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224420 (2017) - Published 16 June, 2017
Hiroaki Ueda, Yasuaki Tanioku, Chishiro Michioka, and Kazuyoshi Yoshimura
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224421 (2017) - Published 16 June, 2017
L. B. Duffy, A. I. Figueroa, Ł. Gładczuk, N.-J. Steinke, K. Kummer, G. van der Laan, and T. Hesjedal
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224422 (2017) - Published 19 June, 2017
F. D. Domínguez, R. C. Zamar, H. H. Segnorile, and C. E. González
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224423 (2017) - Published 19 June, 2017
Satoru Hayami, Ryo Ozawa, and Yukitoshi Motome
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224424 (2017) - Published 20 June, 2017
Makoto Yokoyama, Hiroaki Mashiko, Ryo Otaka, Yoshiki Oshima, Kohei Suzuki, Kenichi Tenya, Yusei Shimizu, Ai Nakamura, Dai Aoki, Akihiro Kondo, Koichi Kindo, Shota Nakamura, and Toshiro Sakakibara
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224425 (2017) - Published 20 June, 2017
L. L. Xiong, M. Kostylev, and A. O. Adeyeye
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224426 (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
Rina Takagi, Hiro Gangi, Kazuya Miyagawa, Biao Zhou, Akiko Kobayashi, and Kazushi Kanoda
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224427 (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
Shi Cao, Kishan Sinha, Xin Zhang, Xiaozhe Zhang, Xiao Wang, Yuewei Yin, Alpha T. N'Diaye, Jian Wang, David J. Keavney, Tula R. Paudel, Yaohua Liu, Xuemei Cheng, Evgeny Y. Tsymbal, Peter A. Dowben, and Xiaoshan Xu
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224428 (2017) - Published 26 June, 2017
Dalila Bounoua, Romuald Saint-Martin, Sylvain Petit, Patrick Berthet, Françoise Damay, Yvan Sidis, Frédéric Bourdarot, and Loreynne Pinsard-Gaudart
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224429 (2017) - Published 26 June, 2017
Keita Hamamoto, Motohiko Ezawa, Kun Woo Kim, Takahiro Morimoto, and Naoto Nagaosa
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224430 (2017) - Published 26 June, 2017
Joseph Sklenar, Wei Zhang, Matthias B. Jungfleisch, Hilal Saglam, Scott Grudichak, Wanjun Jiang, John E. Pearson, John B. Ketterson, and Axel Hoffmann
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224431 (2017) - Published 27 June, 2017
P. C. Lingos, A. Patz, T. Li, G. D. Barmparis, A. Keliri, M. D. Kapetanakis, L. Li, J. Yan, J. Wang, and I. E. Perakis
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224432 (2017) - Published 28 June, 2017
A. M. Belemuk and S. M. Stishov
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224433 (2017) - Published 28 June, 2017
Laura López-Mir, Regina Galceran, Javier Herrero-Martín, Bernat Bozzo, José Cisneros-Fernández, Elisa V. Pannunzio Miner, Alberto Pomar, Lluís Balcells, Benjamín Martínez, and Carlos Frontera
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224434 (2017) - Published 28 June, 2017
S. Gerlach, L. Oroszlany, D. Hinzke, S. Sievering, S. Wienholdt, L. Szunyogh, and U. Nowak
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224435 (2017) - Published 28 June, 2017
Y. Mizuno, T. Hasegawa, and T. Katsufuji
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224436 (2017) - Published 29 June, 2017
Debangsu Roy, Sagi Davidovitch, Yu-Ming Hung, Moty Schultz, Stephen D. Albright, M. D. Morales-Acosta, Frederick J. Walker, James W. Reiner, C. H. Ahn, Andrew D. Kent, and Lior Klein
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224437 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
Pallab Goswami and Qimiao Si
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224438 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
W. Weng, H. Huang, J. Briones, N. Teeny, B. Y. Mueller, M. Haag, T. Kuhn, and M. Fähnle
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224439 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
T. Osaka, H. Takahashi, H. Sagayama, Y. Yamasaki, and S. Ishiwata
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224440 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
Anindita Bera, Debraj Rakshit, Aditi Sen(De), and Ujjwal Sen
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224441 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
Daniel Destraz, Konstantin Ilin, Michael Siegel, Andreas Schilling, and Johan Chang
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224501 (2017) - Published 2 June, 2017
Pablo Burset, Bo Lu, Shun Tamura, and Yukio Tanaka
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224502 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
Fengcheng Wu and Ivar Martin
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224503 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
E. Razzoli, C. E. Matt, Y. Sassa, M. Månsson, O. Tjernberg, G. Drachuck, M. Monomo, M. Oda, T. Kurosawa, Y. Huang, N. C. Plumb, M. Radovic, A. Keren, L. Patthey, J. Mesot, and M. Shi
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224504 (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
S. Kolenda, C. Sürgers, G. Fischer, and D. Beckmann
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224505 (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
Thermoelectric effects can be surprisingly large in superconductor-ferromagnet tunnel junctions when the superconductor is subject to a spin-splitting field. The spin splitting can be provided by an applied magnetic field, but can also be created by exchange coupling to a ferromagnetic insulator. Here, it is shown that thermoelectric effects in superconductor-ferromagnet tunnel junctions can be enhanced by boosting the spin splitting with an intrinsic exchange field provided by a ferromagnetic insulator. These findings could lead to more precise local electron thermometry or efficient microrefrigerators.
M. N. Wilson, A. M. Hallas, Y. Cai, S. Guo, Z. Gong, R. Sankar, F. C. Chou, Y. J. Uemura, and G. M. Luke
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224506 (2017) - Published 8 June, 2017
G. N. Phan, K. Nakayama, K. Sugawara, T. Sato, T. Urata, Y. Tanabe, K. Tanigaki, F. Nabeshima, Y. Imai, A. Maeda, and T. Takahashi
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224507 (2017) - Published 9 June, 2017
Udhara S. Kaluarachchi, Yuhang Deng, Matthew F. Besser, Kewei Sun, Lin Zhou, Manh Cuong Nguyen, Zhujun Yuan, Chenglong Zhang, James S. Schilling, Matthew J. Kramer, Shuang Jia, Cai-Zhuang Wang, Kai-Ming Ho, Paul C. Canfield, and Sergey L. Bud'ko
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224508 (2017) - Published 9 June, 2017
M. S. Anwar, R. Ishiguro, T. Nakamura, M. Yakabe, S. Yonezawa, H. Takayanagi, and Y. Maeno
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224509 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
J. del Valle, A. Gomez, E. M. Gonzalez, S. Manas-Valero, E. Coronado, and J. L. Vicent
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224510 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
S. Caprara, C. Di Castro, G. Seibold, and M. Grilli
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224511 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
Austen Lamacraft
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224512 (2017) - Published 19 June, 2017
Ken-ichi Hosoya and Ryusuke Ikeda
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224513 (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
Youichi Yanase and Ken Shiozaki
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224514 (2017) - Published 28 June, 2017
Sal J. Bosman, Mario F. Gely, Vibhor Singh, Daniel Bothner, Andres Castellanos-Gomez, and Gary A. Steele
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224515 (2017) - Published 29 June, 2017
Andreas Geißler and Walter Hofstetter
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224516 (2017) - Published 29 June, 2017
C. Collignon, S. Badoux, S. A. A. Afshar, B. Michon, F. Laliberté, O. Cyr-Choinière, J.-S. Zhou, S. Licciardello, S. Wiedmann, N. Doiron-Leyraud, and Louis Taillefer
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224517 (2017) - Published 29 June, 2017
After two decades of intense investigation, the pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors still remains a puzzle. The authors explore it by measuring the electrical resistivity and Hall coefficient of the cuprate Nd-LSCO in high magnetic fields for closely spaced doping rates across the pseudogap critical point. They report two main observations. First, both types of measurement indicate a drop of carrier density from 1+ to upon entering the pseudogap phase; the process is best characterized as a crossover as a function of temperature at fixed doping and as a transition as a function of doping at zero temperature. Second, the mobility is unaffected by the transition. These findings, quantitively consistent with the cases of YBCO and LSCO, appear to be a universal signature of the pseudogap.
Christopher Triola and Alexander V. Balatsky
Phys. Rev. B 95, 224518 (2017) - Published 29 June, 2017