Ekta Singh, Henrik Beccard, Zeeshan H. Amber, Julius Ratzenberger, Clifford W. Hicks, Michael Rüsing, and Lukas M. Eng
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144103 (2022) - Published 19 October, 2022
Although ferroelectrics are electrical insulators, their domain walls (DWs) can be charged and can possess an exceptional large conductivity of an order of magnitude larger than in the bulk crystal. To shed light on the correlation between bound charges and conductivity of ferroelectric DWs, the authors in this work investigate the effect of piezoelectric charging via external uniaxial stress on the directionality of DW conductivity in single crystals of -cut 5% MgO doped lithium niobate by combing a piezodriven stress cell with a scanning probe microscope.
Xiao-Qi Sun, Jing-Yuan Chen, and Steven A. Kivelson
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144111 (2022) - Published 28 October, 2022
From a symmetry perspective, a magnetic field makes a material chiral and thus leads to a nonzero thermal Hall effect. However, recent experiments on a variety of interesting insulators – including a number of cuprates – have uncovered an unexpectedly large field-induced thermal Hall effect, despite the fact that there are no low-energy charge-carrying excitations, i.e., itinerant electrons. The authors propose here a mechanism of coupling a magnetic field to phonons and producing a thermal Hall response of the requisite magnitude through resonant skew scattering of phonons from a certain class of three-level systems.
Satoru Hayami
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144402 (2022) - Published 4 October, 2022
An electric ferroaxial moment is a fundamental dipole moment like the ferroelectric, ferromagnetic, and ferromagnetic-toroidal moments. Nevertheless, its nature has been masked compared to the ferromagnetic and ferroelectric cases. Based on symmetry and microscopic-model analyses, the author reveals when and how such a ferroaxial entity appears in magnetic materials. It is demonstrated that a vortex spin configuration naturally induces a ferroaxial moment. The finding will stimulate future exploration of magnetic ferroaxial materials.
Liu Yang, Alejandro A. Jara, Zheng Duan, Andrew Smith, Brian Youngblood, Rodrigo E. Arias, and Ilya N. Krivorotov
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144410 (2022) - Published 10 October, 2022
Edge magnons play a key role in the magnetization reversal of ferromagnetic nanoelements and may find applications in the field of magnonics. The authors tune the parametric excitation of edge magnons in ferromagnetic nanowires by spin Hall torque in order to probe the magnon ellipticity. The study reveals that the edge magnon ellipticity is significantly lower than that predicted by a simple model of the magnetic edge. This work presents a sensitive probe of magnetic properties at nanoelement edges.
Dmitriy Zusin et al.
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144422 (2022) - Published 19 October, 2022
Ultrafast control of magnetism holds great promise for novel and efficient high-speed microelectronic devices. This includes manipulation of the domain walls that separate magnetic domains. Surprisingly, by use of a free-electron x-ray laser, the authors discover here that femtosecond laser pumping of a multidomain sample causes the domain walls to broaden from 29 to 51 nm in less than 1.6 picoseconds. They also find intriguing evidence of a simultaneous spatial rearrangement of domains. These unexpected results open new avenues for ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetism.
Kexin Feng, Aysel Shiralieva, and Natalia B. Perkins
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144424 (2022) - Published 20 October, 2022
Here, the authors propose that phonon dynamics can be exploited to look for the signatures of fractionalization in three-dimensional Kitaev spin liquids. Motivated by recent studies of the hyperhoneycomb Kitaev material -LiIrO, they compute the sound attenuation in the spin-phonon coupled Kitaev model on the hyperhoneycomb lattice, in which Majorana fermions have nodal-line band structure. They show that at low temperatures its angular dependence displays a characteristic pattern, which opens the possibility of detecting the proximity to the Kitaev spin liquid phase in this compound in ultrasound experiments.
Takuro Sato, Wataru Koshibae, Akiko Kikkawa, Yasujiro Taguchi, Naoto Nagaosa, Yoshinori Tokura, and Fumitaka Kagawa
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144425 (2022) - Published 21 October, 2022
Whether a nonthermodynamic driving force, such as an electric current, can induce a global change like a thermodynamic phase transition of the whole system remains an open question. Here, the authors report on a current-driven skyrmion-to-nonskyrmion transition, detected both experimentally and numerically by targeting microscaled MnSi. This nonequilibrium phase change by current emerges when the system is spatially confined by an open boundary, suggesting that a range of novel nonequilibrium phenomena can be explored with attention to system size.
Reza Rouzegar, Liane Brandt, Lukáš Nádvorník, David A. Reiss, Alexander L. Chekhov, Oliver Gueckstock, Chihun In, Martin Wolf, Tom S. Seifert, Piet W. Brouwer, Georg Woltersdorf, and Tobias Kampfrath
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144427 (2022) - Published 24 October, 2022
The authors observe here that (a) laser-induced ultrafast demagnetization (UDM) of a metallic ferromagnet has the same time evolution as (b) terahertz spin transport (TST) from into an adjacent normal metal . They conclude that UDM in and TST in | samples are driven by the same force: (c) a generalized spin voltage, i.e., an excess magnetization of . One can now apply the vast knowledge of UDM to TST to significantly increase spin-current amplitudes for ultrafast spintronic applications.
A. Zelenskiy, T. L. Monchesky, M. L. Plumer, and B. W. Southern
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144433 (2022) - Published 26 October, 2022
Magnetic compounds that combine the effects of geometric frustration and strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC) often host exotic magnetic phases. In many cases, anisotropic lattice-dependent interactions that originate from the SOC significantly reduce the symmetry of the system and constrain the magnetic moments to specific orientations. Using numerical simulations and symmetry analysis, this study demonstrates that, in compounds with the -stacked kagome layer structure, the anisotropy gives rise to a large number of duality transformations that provide exact mappings between the properties of distinct magnetic phases.
K. L. Seyler, A. Ron, D. Van Beveren, C. R. Rotundu, Y. S. Lee, and D. Hsieh
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140403 (2022) - Published 12 October, 2022
The mesoscopic magnetism of undoped cuprates is not well studied because the antiferromagnetic states and domain walls are difficult to locally detect. The authors overcome this challenge using optical second-harmonic generation on the cuprate SrCuOCl, allowing direct visualization of the antiferromagnetic microstructure. They discover an unusual 90° domain reorientation transition, which enables deterministic antiferromagnetic switching and causes a divergent domain wall susceptibility that generates sample-sized single-domain antiferromagnetic states.
Adolfo del Campo, Fernando Javier Gómez-Ruiz, and Hai-Qing Zhang
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140101 (2022) - Published 11 October, 2022
Zhigang Wu and John W. Lawson
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140102 (2022) - Published 14 October, 2022
José A. Hoyos, R. F. P. Costa, and J. C. Xavier
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140201 (2022) - Published 10 October, 2022
Sergey Syzranov
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140202 (2022) - Published 25 October, 2022
Yucheng Wang, Long Zhang, Wei Sun, Ting-Fung Jeffrey Poon, and Xiong-Jun Liu
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140203 (2022) - Published 27 October, 2022
Sthitadhi Roy
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140204 (2022) - Published 31 October, 2022
Benoît Fauqué, Philippe Bourges, Alaska Subedi, Kamran Behnia, Benoît Baptiste, Bertrand Roessli, Tom Fennell, Stéphane Raymond, and Paul Steffens
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140301 (2022) - Published 10 October, 2022
Shihao Zhuang and Jia-Mian Hu
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140302 (2022) - Published 18 October, 2022
Arnob Kumar Ghosh and Tanay Nag
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140303 (2022) - Published 19 October, 2022
Simon Körber, Lorenzo Privitera, Jan Carl Budich, and Björn Trauzettel
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140304 (2022) - Published 20 October, 2022
Kazuto Yamanoi, Hikari Semizu, and Yukio Nozaki
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140401 (2022) - Published 7 October, 2022
A. S. Sukhanov, V. Ukleev, P. Vir, P. Gargiani, M. Valvidares, J. S. White, C. Felser, and D. S. Inosov
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140402 (2022) - Published 11 October, 2022
K. L. Seyler, A. Ron, D. Van Beveren, C. R. Rotundu, Y. S. Lee, and D. Hsieh
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140403 (2022) - Published 12 October, 2022
The mesoscopic magnetism of undoped cuprates is not well studied because the antiferromagnetic states and domain walls are difficult to locally detect. The authors overcome this challenge using optical second-harmonic generation on the cuprate SrCuOCl, allowing direct visualization of the antiferromagnetic microstructure. They discover an unusual 90° domain reorientation transition, which enables deterministic antiferromagnetic switching and causes a divergent domain wall susceptibility that generates sample-sized single-domain antiferromagnetic states.
Tristan Lugan, Ludovic D. C. Jaubert, Masafumi Udagawa, and Arnaud Ralko
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140404 (2022) - Published 12 October, 2022
Christopher Seibel, Marius Weber, Martin Stiehl, Sebastian T. Weber, Martin Aeschlimann, Hans Christian Schneider, Benjamin Stadtmüller, and Baerbel Rethfeld
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140405 (2022) - Published 17 October, 2022
Kaito Kobayashi and Satoru Hayami
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140406 (2022) - Published 20 October, 2022
Xin Lin, Jingwei Li, Lujun Zhu, Xinyue Xie, Qianbiao Liu, Dahai Wei, Guodong Yuan, and Lijun Zhu
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140407 (2022) - Published 28 October, 2022
Jaechul Shim and Kyung-Jin Lee
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140408 (2022) - Published 31 October, 2022
Mengqin Liu, Tao Han, Xinran Hu, Yubing Tu, Zongyuan Zhang, Mingsheng Long, Xingyuan Hou, Qingge Mu, and Lei Shan
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140501 (2022) - Published 3 October, 2022
S. Mishra, Y. Liu, E. D. Bauer, F. Ronning, and S. M. Thomas
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140502 (2022) - Published 6 October, 2022
Aritra Lahiri, Avraham Klein, and Rafael M. Fernandes
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140503 (2022) - Published 10 October, 2022
Hanbit Oh and Eun-Gook Moon
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140504 (2022) - Published 17 October, 2022
Baoxing Zhai, Bohao Li, Yao Wen, Fengcheng Wu, and Jun He
Phys. Rev. B 106, L140505 (2022) - Published 24 October, 2022
Sjoerd Roorda, Stéphanie Codsi, Amélie Lacroix, Gabrielle G. Long, Fan Zhang, Steven J. Weigand, and Christina Trautmann
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144101 (2022) - Published 4 October, 2022
D. Kral, P. Cejpek, J. Kudrnovsky, V. Drchal, L. Beran, E. Vilanova, G. Jakob, J. Zazvorka, R. Antos, J. Hamrle, and M. Veis
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144102 (2022) - Published 13 October, 2022
Ekta Singh, Henrik Beccard, Zeeshan H. Amber, Julius Ratzenberger, Clifford W. Hicks, Michael Rüsing, and Lukas M. Eng
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144103 (2022) - Published 19 October, 2022
Although ferroelectrics are electrical insulators, their domain walls (DWs) can be charged and can possess an exceptional large conductivity of an order of magnitude larger than in the bulk crystal. To shed light on the correlation between bound charges and conductivity of ferroelectric DWs, the authors in this work investigate the effect of piezoelectric charging via external uniaxial stress on the directionality of DW conductivity in single crystals of -cut 5% MgO doped lithium niobate by combing a piezodriven stress cell with a scanning probe microscope.
Anna N. Morozovska, Eugene A. Eliseev, Salia Cherifi-Hertel, Dean R. Evans, and Riccardo Hertel
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144104 (2022) - Published 20 October, 2022
Guangming Lu, Xiangdong Ding, Jun Sun, and Ekhard K. H. Salje
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144105 (2022) - Published 20 October, 2022
Jiawei Huang, Yihao Hu, and Shi Liu
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144106 (2022) - Published 24 October, 2022
Nicolas di Scala, Nour El Islam Belmouri, Miguel Angel Paez Espejo, and Kamel Boukheddaden
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144107 (2022) - Published 25 October, 2022
I. K. Ocampo, J. M. Winey, Y. Toyoda, and T. S. Duffy
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144108 (2022) - Published 25 October, 2022
Dong Li, Hongwu Zhang, Yonggang Zheng, and Hongfei Ye
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144109 (2022) - Published 26 October, 2022
David Koprivica and Eran Sela
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144110 (2022) - Published 26 October, 2022
Xiao-Qi Sun, Jing-Yuan Chen, and Steven A. Kivelson
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144111 (2022) - Published 28 October, 2022
From a symmetry perspective, a magnetic field makes a material chiral and thus leads to a nonzero thermal Hall effect. However, recent experiments on a variety of interesting insulators – including a number of cuprates – have uncovered an unexpectedly large field-induced thermal Hall effect, despite the fact that there are no low-energy charge-carrying excitations, i.e., itinerant electrons. The authors propose here a mechanism of coupling a magnetic field to phonons and producing a thermal Hall response of the requisite magnitude through resonant skew scattering of phonons from a certain class of three-level systems.
Latham Boyle and Paul J. Steinhardt
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144112 (2022) - Published 31 October, 2022
Latham Boyle and Paul J. Steinhardt
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144113 (2022) - Published 31 October, 2022
Zhengyan Darius Shi, Vedika Khemani, Romain Vasseur, and Sarang Gopalakrishnan
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144201 (2022) - Published 5 October, 2022
Luis Barroso-Luque, Peichen Zhong, Julia H. Yang, Fengyu Xie, Tina Chen, Bin Ouyang, and Gerbrand Ceder
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144202 (2022) - Published 12 October, 2022
David M. Long, Philip J. D. Crowley, and Anushya Chandran
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144203 (2022) - Published 17 October, 2022
Margarita Zakharova, Andrey Mikhaylov, Stefan Reich, Anton Plech, and Danays Kunka
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144204 (2022) - Published 18 October, 2022
Ting Lv, Yu-Bin Liu, Tian-Cheng Yi, Liangsheng Li, Maoxin Liu, and Wen-Long You
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144205 (2022) - Published 18 October, 2022
I. V. Lukin and A. G. Sotnikov
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144206 (2022) - Published 20 October, 2022
C. Stock, B. Roessli, P. M. Gehring, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, N. Giles-Donovan, S. Cochran, G. Xu, P. Manuel, M. J. Gutmann, W. D. Ratcliff, T. Fennell, Y. Su, X. Li, and H. Luo
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144207 (2022) - Published 31 October, 2022
Wen Chen, Shujie Cheng, Ji Lin, Reza Asgari, and Gao Xianlong
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144208 (2022) - Published 31 October, 2022
Y. Braver, C.-h. Fan, G. Žlabys, E. Anisimovas, and K. Sacha
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144301 (2022) - Published 3 October, 2022
Guohuan Xiong, Hao Chen, Dengke Ma, and Lifa Zhang
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144302 (2022) - Published 4 October, 2022
P. K. Verma, Surajit Saha, D. V. S. Muthu, Surjeet Singh, R. Suryanarayanan, A. Revcolevschi, U. V. Waghmare, A. K. Sood, and H. R. Krishnamurthy
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144303 (2022) - Published 7 October, 2022
Jannis Krumland, Matheus Jacobs, and Caterina Cocchi
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144304 (2022) - Published 7 October, 2022
Jonathan Z. Lu, Ziyan Zhu, Mattia Angeli, Daniel T. Larson, and Efthimios Kaxiras
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144305 (2022) - Published 10 October, 2022
Kensuke Tamura and Hosho Katsura
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144306 (2022) - Published 11 October, 2022
Petra Shih and Timothy C. Berkelbach
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144307 (2022) - Published 13 October, 2022
J.-Z. Zhuang, Y.-K. Wu, and L.-M. Duan
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144308 (2022) - Published 20 October, 2022
G. C. Hu, Y. Y. Miao, and C. Timm
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144309 (2022) - Published 21 October, 2022
Enda Xiao, Hao Ma, Matthew S. Bryan, Lyuwen Fu, J. Matthew Mann, Barry Winn, Douglas L. Abernathy, Raphaël P. Hermann, Amey R. Khanolkar, Cody A. Dennett, David H. Hurley, Michael E. Manley, and Chris A. Marianetti
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144310 (2022) - Published 24 October, 2022
Hanchen Liu, Tianci Zhou, and Xiao Chen
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144311 (2022) - Published 25 October, 2022
Hui-Ke Jin, Andrea Pizzi, and Johannes Knolle
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144312 (2022) - Published 26 October, 2022
Xhek Turkeshi
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144313 (2022) - Published 31 October, 2022
Eric M. Kenney, Mitchell M. Bordelon, Chennan Wang, Hubertus Luetkens, Stephen D. Wilson, and Michael J. Graf
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144401 (2022) - Published 3 October, 2022
Satoru Hayami
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144402 (2022) - Published 4 October, 2022
An electric ferroaxial moment is a fundamental dipole moment like the ferroelectric, ferromagnetic, and ferromagnetic-toroidal moments. Nevertheless, its nature has been masked compared to the ferromagnetic and ferroelectric cases. Based on symmetry and microscopic-model analyses, the author reveals when and how such a ferroaxial entity appears in magnetic materials. It is demonstrated that a vortex spin configuration naturally induces a ferroaxial moment. The finding will stimulate future exploration of magnetic ferroaxial materials.
D. I. Gorbunov, R. Hibino, Y. Skourski, T. Yanagisawa, A. V. Andreev, S. Zherlitsyn, and J. Wosnitza
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144403 (2022) - Published 4 October, 2022
F. Schilberth, N. Unglert, L. Prodan, F. Meggle, J. Ebad Allah, C. A. Kuntscher, A. A. Tsirlin, V. Tsurkan, J. Deisenhofer, L. Chioncel, I. Kézsmárki, and S. Bordács
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144404 (2022) - Published 5 October, 2022
Sujit Panigrahy, Sougata Mallick, João Sampaio, and Stanislas Rohart
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144405 (2022) - Published 5 October, 2022
T. Thebault, M. Vališka, G. Lapertot, A. Pourret, D. Aoki, G. Knebel, D. Braithwaite, and W. Knafo
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144406 (2022) - Published 7 October, 2022
I. A. Ado, Gulnaz Rakhmanova, Dmitry A. Zezyulin, Ivan Iorsh, and M. Titov
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144407 (2022) - Published 7 October, 2022
Léo Berges, Eloi Haltz, Sujit Panigrahy, Sougata Mallick, Raphaël Weil, Stanislas Rohart, Alexandra Mougin, and João Sampaio
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144408 (2022) - Published 10 October, 2022
L. Heinze, M. D. Le, O. Janson, S. Nishimoto, A. U. B. Wolter, S. Süllow, and K. C. Rule
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144409 (2022) - Published 10 October, 2022
Liu Yang, Alejandro A. Jara, Zheng Duan, Andrew Smith, Brian Youngblood, Rodrigo E. Arias, and Ilya N. Krivorotov
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144410 (2022) - Published 10 October, 2022
Edge magnons play a key role in the magnetization reversal of ferromagnetic nanoelements and may find applications in the field of magnonics. The authors tune the parametric excitation of edge magnons in ferromagnetic nanowires by spin Hall torque in order to probe the magnon ellipticity. The study reveals that the edge magnon ellipticity is significantly lower than that predicted by a simple model of the magnetic edge. This work presents a sensitive probe of magnetic properties at nanoelement edges.
Morten Amundsen, Irina V. Bobkova, and Akashdeep Kamra
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144411 (2022) - Published 10 October, 2022
M. Rančić, M. Le Dantec, S. Lin, S. Bertaina, T. Chanelière, D. Serrano, P. Goldner, R. B. Liu, E. Flurin, D. Estève, D. Vion, and P. Bertet
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144412 (2022) - Published 11 October, 2022
Xi Shen, Haoran Chen, Dong Shi, Hong Xia, Jia Xu, Fanlong Zeng, and Yizheng Wu
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144413 (2022) - Published 12 October, 2022
Yao Zhang and Simon Granville
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144414 (2022) - Published 12 October, 2022
Amit Rothschild, Nadav Am-Shalom, Nirel Bernstein, Ma'yan Meron, Tal David, Benjamin Assouline, Elichai Frohlich, Jiewen Xiao, Binghai Yan, and Amir Capua
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144415 (2022) - Published 14 October, 2022
O. Šipr, S. Mankovsky, J. Vackář, H. Ebert, and A. Marmodoro
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144416 (2022) - Published 17 October, 2022
Heejun Yang, Xianghan Xu, Jun Han Lee, Yoon Seok Oh, Sang-Wook Cheong, and Je-Geun Park
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144417 (2022) - Published 17 October, 2022
Takumi Funato, Takeo Kato, and Mamoru Matsuo
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144418 (2022) - Published 18 October, 2022
Ye Shao, Lihuai Shu, Fengzhen Huang, Shuo Yan, Xiaomei Lu, and Jinsong Zhu
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144419 (2022) - Published 18 October, 2022
Urban Vernik, Alexey M. Lomonosov, Vladimir S. Vlasov, Leonid N. Kotov, Dmitry A. Kuzmin, Igor V. Bychkov, Paolo Vavassori, and Vasily V. Temnov
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144420 (2022) - Published 18 October, 2022
Dmitriy Zusin et al.
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144422 (2022) - Published 19 October, 2022
Ultrafast control of magnetism holds great promise for novel and efficient high-speed microelectronic devices. This includes manipulation of the domain walls that separate magnetic domains. Surprisingly, by use of a free-electron x-ray laser, the authors discover here that femtosecond laser pumping of a multidomain sample causes the domain walls to broaden from 29 to 51 nm in less than 1.6 picoseconds. They also find intriguing evidence of a simultaneous spatial rearrangement of domains. These unexpected results open new avenues for ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetism.
David A. Reiss and Piet W. Brouwer
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144423 (2022) - Published 20 October, 2022
Kexin Feng, Aysel Shiralieva, and Natalia B. Perkins
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144424 (2022) - Published 20 October, 2022
Here, the authors propose that phonon dynamics can be exploited to look for the signatures of fractionalization in three-dimensional Kitaev spin liquids. Motivated by recent studies of the hyperhoneycomb Kitaev material -LiIrO, they compute the sound attenuation in the spin-phonon coupled Kitaev model on the hyperhoneycomb lattice, in which Majorana fermions have nodal-line band structure. They show that at low temperatures its angular dependence displays a characteristic pattern, which opens the possibility of detecting the proximity to the Kitaev spin liquid phase in this compound in ultrasound experiments.
Takuro Sato, Wataru Koshibae, Akiko Kikkawa, Yasujiro Taguchi, Naoto Nagaosa, Yoshinori Tokura, and Fumitaka Kagawa
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144425 (2022) - Published 21 October, 2022
Whether a nonthermodynamic driving force, such as an electric current, can induce a global change like a thermodynamic phase transition of the whole system remains an open question. Here, the authors report on a current-driven skyrmion-to-nonskyrmion transition, detected both experimentally and numerically by targeting microscaled MnSi. This nonequilibrium phase change by current emerges when the system is spatially confined by an open boundary, suggesting that a range of novel nonequilibrium phenomena can be explored with attention to system size.
Verena Feulner and Michael J. Hartmann
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144426 (2022) - Published 21 October, 2022
Reza Rouzegar, Liane Brandt, Lukáš Nádvorník, David A. Reiss, Alexander L. Chekhov, Oliver Gueckstock, Chihun In, Martin Wolf, Tom S. Seifert, Piet W. Brouwer, Georg Woltersdorf, and Tobias Kampfrath
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144427 (2022) - Published 24 October, 2022
The authors observe here that (a) laser-induced ultrafast demagnetization (UDM) of a metallic ferromagnet has the same time evolution as (b) terahertz spin transport (TST) from into an adjacent normal metal . They conclude that UDM in and TST in | samples are driven by the same force: (c) a generalized spin voltage, i.e., an excess magnetization of . One can now apply the vast knowledge of UDM to TST to significantly increase spin-current amplitudes for ultrafast spintronic applications.
N. Qureshi, R. Morrow, M. Valldor, I. Puente-Orench, and P. Adler
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144428 (2022) - Published 24 October, 2022
Achintya Low, Susanta Ghosh, Susmita Changdar, Sayan Routh, Shubham Purwar, and S. Thirupathaiah
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144429 (2022) - Published 25 October, 2022
Pedro D. S. Silva and Manoel M. Ferreira, Jr.
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144430 (2022) - Published 25 October, 2022
Hikaru Fukuda, Kentaro Ueda, Yoshio Kaneko, Ryosuke Kurihara, Atsushi Miyake, Kosuke Karube, Masashi Tokunaga, Yasujiro Taguchi, and Yoshinori Tokura
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144431 (2022) - Published 26 October, 2022
T. Watanabe, R. Okada, and K. Tomiyasu
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144432 (2022) - Published 26 October, 2022
A. Zelenskiy, T. L. Monchesky, M. L. Plumer, and B. W. Southern
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144433 (2022) - Published 26 October, 2022
Magnetic compounds that combine the effects of geometric frustration and strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC) often host exotic magnetic phases. In many cases, anisotropic lattice-dependent interactions that originate from the SOC significantly reduce the symmetry of the system and constrain the magnetic moments to specific orientations. Using numerical simulations and symmetry analysis, this study demonstrates that, in compounds with the -stacked kagome layer structure, the anisotropy gives rise to a large number of duality transformations that provide exact mappings between the properties of distinct magnetic phases.
Geremia Massarelli, Ilia Khait, and Arun Paramekanti
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144434 (2022) - Published 27 October, 2022
Rudolf Smorka, Pavel Baláž, Michael Thoss, and Martin Žonda
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144435 (2022) - Published 27 October, 2022
Yuichiro Hidaka, Shunsuke C. Furuya, Atsushi Ueda, and Yasuhiro Tada
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144436 (2022) - Published 28 October, 2022
Zhu-Xi Luo, Urban F. P. Seifert, and Leon Balents
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144437 (2022) - Published 28 October, 2022
Tao Yang, Bangming Wang, Peng Song, Rui Wang, and Baigeng Wang
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144438 (2022) - Published 31 October, 2022
Bhilahari Jeevanesan, Claudio Benzoni, and Sergej Moroz
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144501 (2022) - Published 4 October, 2022
A. V. Parafilo, M. V. Boev, V. M. Kovalev, and I. G. Savenko
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144502 (2022) - Published 7 October, 2022
Huai-Xiang Huang, Yu-Qian Cao, and Xin Wan
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144503 (2022) - Published 10 October, 2022
Morten H. Christensen, Turan Birol, Brian M. Andersen, and Rafael M. Fernandes
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144504 (2022) - Published 12 October, 2022
T. Shang, Y. Chen, W. Xie, D. J. Gawryluk, R. Gupta, R. Khasanov, X. Y. Zhu, H. Zhang, Z. X. Zhen, B. C. Yu, Z. Zhou, Y. Xu, Q. F. Zhan, E. Pomjakushina, H. Q. Yuan, and T. Shiroka
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144505 (2022) - Published 13 October, 2022
José Alberto Nava Aquino and Rogério de Sousa
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144506 (2022) - Published 14 October, 2022
Christoph Meingast, Anmol Shukla, Liran Wang, Rolf Heid, Frédéric Hardy, Mehdi Frachet, Kristin Willa, Tom Lacmann, Matthieu Le Tacon, Michael Merz, Amir-Abbas Haghighirad, and Thomas Wolf
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144507 (2022) - Published 19 October, 2022
P.-C. Ho, D. E. MacLaughlin, M. B. Maple, Lei Shu, A. D. Hillier, O. O. Bernal, T. Yanagisawa, P. K. Biswas, Jian Zhang, Cheng Tan, S. D. Hishida, and T. McCullough-Hunter
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144508 (2022) - Published 20 October, 2022
F. Yang and M. W. Wu
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144509 (2022) - Published 21 October, 2022
Alex Khanukov, Itay Mangel, Shai Wissberg, Amit Keren, and Beena Kalisky
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144510 (2022) - Published 24 October, 2022
Kevin Marc Seja and Tomas Löfwander
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144511 (2022) - Published 26 October, 2022
G. A. Bobkov, I. V. Bobkova, A. M. Bobkov, and Akashdeep Kamra
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144512 (2022) - Published 27 October, 2022
Shang-Shun Zhang, Yi-Ming Wu, Artem Abanov, and Andrey V. Chubukov
Phys. Rev. B 106, 144513 (2022) - Published 31 October, 2022
