A. M. Guénault, A. Guthrie, R. P. Haley, S. Kafanov, Yu. A. Pashkin, G. R. Pickett, M. Poole, R. Schanen, V. Tsepelin, D. E. Zmeev, E. Collin, O. Maillet, and R. Gazizulin
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020506(R) (2019) - Published 17 July, 2019
Superfluids, such as superfluid He and He, exhibit a broad range of quantum phenomena and excitations, which are unique to these systems. Nanoscale mechanical resonators are highly sensitive force detectors with the ability to operate over many orders of magnitude in damping. Using nanomechanical doubly clamped beams, the authors probe superfluid He from the superfluid transition temperature down to millikelvin temperatures. They demonstrate excellent agreement with a ballistic model, incorporating thermal quasiparticles with acoustic emission limiting performance at the lowest temperatures.
R. J. Koch, T. Konstantinova, M. Abeykoon, A. Wang, C. Petrovic, Y. Zhu, E. S. Bozin, and S. J. L. Billinge
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020501(R) (2019) - Published 3 July, 2019
Electronic nematicity may be crucial for understanding the superconductivity in FeSe but its origin is still controversial. Here, the authors report the unexpected result, from local structural measurements, that nematic fluctuations exist preformed at temperatures far above the transition to the long-range-ordered nematic state. Perhaps even more surprisingly, the amplitude of the local nematicity is always larger than in the long-range ordered nematic state, suggesting that local nematic fluctuations persist even into the ordered state.
Jasmin Jandke, Fang Yang, Patrik Hlobil, Tobias Engelhardt, Dominik Rau, Khalil Zakeri, Chunlei Gao, Jörg Schmalian, and Wulf Wulfhekel
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020503(R) (2019) - Published 11 July, 2019
Superconductivity in single FeSe layers on SrTiO shows a much higher critical temperature than in bulk FeSe, illustrating the potential of interface engineering. Yet the underlying mechanism of boosting is not understood. Both conventional and unconventional pairing mechanisms have been suggested to be responsible for this effect. Here, the authors show experimentally that phonons do not contribute significantly to the high but instead the intrinsic spin fluctuations of the electrons themselves lead to Cooper pairing.
Sayed Ali Akbar Ghorashi, Xiang Hu, Taylor L. Hughes, and Enrico Rossi
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020509(R) (2019) - Published 31 July, 2019
Higher-order topological superconductors (HOTSCs) are a new class of topological materials that in three dimensions are characterized by gapped bulk and surface states and gapless hinge modes. Here, the authors identify two new groups of HOTSCs: (i) second-order Dirac superconductors, which have both topologically protected Dirac cones at the surface and topologically protected dispersionless Majorana states at the hinges; (ii) three-dimensional magnetic field-induced HOTSCs with helical Majorana hinge states, which are located at only two (or one) of the corners. The authors show that, using the sign of the magnetic field and the mirror-diagonal symmetry-breaking perturbation, the Majorana pairs can be tuned to be at a specific corner, leading to a highly tunable setup for realization and detection of helical Majorana states.
Tian Tian, Yongguan Ke, Liang Zhang, Shaochun Lin, Zhifu Shi, Pu Huang, Chaohong Lee, and Jiangfeng Du
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024310 (2019) - Published 25 July, 2019
Here, the authors present a novel scheme to study dynamical phase transitions (DPTs) from topological edge states in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model. They utilize eight coupled nanomechanical oscillators to simulate the quantum quenches and observe DPTs via directly measuring the Pancharatnam geometric phase in the experiment. The robustness of the DPT and its relation to equilibrium phases are explored. This nanomechanical lattice with its multiple modes, high quality factor, and temporal configurability offers unique advantages for research into nonequilibrium phenomena via an artificial solid-state platform.
R. F. Bishop, P. H. Y. Li, O. Götze, and J. Richter
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024401 (2019) - Published 1 July, 2019
The frustrated spin-½ - Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the 2D square lattice is a paradigmatic model of quantum magnetism. Despite extensive investigations over the last 30 years, no consensus has emerged for its zero-temperature quantum phase diagram. The authors explore its bilayer --┴ counterpart by including an exchange coupling ┴ between partner sites on the two layers. As well as being of great interest in its own right, the model provides considerable insight into the single-layer case by expanding to a two-parameter regime that includes the monolayer as a single slice.
L. Peedu, V. Kocsis, D. Szaller, J. Viirok, U. Nagel, T. Rõõm, D. G. Farkas, S. Bordács, D. L. Kamenskyi, U. Zeitler, Y. Tokunaga, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, and I. Kézsmárki
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024406 (2019) - Published 8 July, 2019
In magnetoelectric (ME) materials, magnetic moments and electric polarization are entangled, leading to the static and optical ME effects. This can be used in logical devices or for the manipulation of electromagnetic radiation in the GHz and THz spectral range where the oscillating magnetic moments absorb radiation. The authors use THz spectroscopy to study LiNiPO, a four-spin system known to exhibit the static ME effect. Using linearly polarized THz radiation, they show that beside ordinary magnon resonances excited by the magnetic field of radiation there are electromagnons and ME spin excitations activated by the electric field of radiation, thus demonstrating that spin and charge dynamics are coupled in LiNiPO. They refine the spin Hamiltonian parameters by mapping the spin resonance spectrum over a broad magnetic field range and fitting it with a mean-field spin model.
D. Bossini, S. Dal Conte, G. Cerullo, O. Gomonay, R. V. Pisarev, M. Borovsak, D. Mihailovic, J. Sinova, J. H. Mentink, Th. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024428 (2019) - Published 25 July, 2019
Ultrashort laser pulses can induce picosecond coherent spin precession, described in terms of classical Landau-Lifshitz equations of motion. In antiferromagnets, the optical generation of pairs of high-energy magnons results in coherent 20-THz longitudinal spin oscillations. In a joint theoretical and experimental effort, the authors analyze here this controversial dynamical regime, investigating the dependence of spin dynamics on several parameters, such as temperature, polarization, and fluence. The derivation of an adequate equation of motion requires a quantum mechanical treatment, which predicts also entanglement between the pairs of photogenerated magnons.
S. Klotz, M. Casula, K. Komatsu, S. Machida, and T. Hattori
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020101(R) (2019) - Published 10 July, 2019
Bin Xu, Olle Hellman, and L. Bellaiche
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020102(R) (2019) - Published 17 July, 2019
Kaoru Mizuta, Kazuaki Takasan, and Norio Kawakami
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020301(R) (2019) - Published 15 July, 2019
Shaozhi Li, Philip M. Dee, Ehsan Khatami, and Steven Johnston
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020302(R) (2019) - Published 22 July, 2019
Sander A. Mann, Dimitrios L. Sounas, and Andrea Alù
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020303(R) (2019) - Published 24 July, 2019
M. Kostylev, A. B. Ustinov, A. V. Drozdovskii, B. A. Kalinikos, and E. Ivanov
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020401(R) (2019) - Published 1 July, 2019
Z. Y. Chen, M. H. Qin, and J.-M. Liu
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020402(R) (2019) - Published 3 July, 2019
Masamichi Nishino and Seiji Miyashita
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020403(R) (2019) - Published 16 July, 2019
Paul André Paglan and Jean Pierre Nguenang
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020404(R) (2019) - Published 16 July, 2019
D. Slobinsky, L. Pili, and R. A. Borzi
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020405(R) (2019) - Published 23 July, 2019
Alexander J. E. Kreil, Halyna Yu. Musiienko-Shmarova, Sebastian Eggert, Alexander A. Serga, Burkard Hillebrands, Dmytro A. Bozhko, Anna Pomyalov, and Victor S. L'vov
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020406(R) (2019) - Published 24 July, 2019
Darshan G. Joshi and Andreas P. Schnyder
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020407(R) (2019) - Published 26 July, 2019
R. J. Koch, T. Konstantinova, M. Abeykoon, A. Wang, C. Petrovic, Y. Zhu, E. S. Bozin, and S. J. L. Billinge
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020501(R) (2019) - Published 3 July, 2019
Electronic nematicity may be crucial for understanding the superconductivity in FeSe but its origin is still controversial. Here, the authors report the unexpected result, from local structural measurements, that nematic fluctuations exist preformed at temperatures far above the transition to the long-range-ordered nematic state. Perhaps even more surprisingly, the amplitude of the local nematicity is always larger than in the long-range ordered nematic state, suggesting that local nematic fluctuations persist even into the ordered state.
E. T. Mannila, V. F. Maisi, H. Q. Nguyen, C. M. Marcus, and J. P. Pekola
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020502(R) (2019) - Published 8 July, 2019
Jasmin Jandke, Fang Yang, Patrik Hlobil, Tobias Engelhardt, Dominik Rau, Khalil Zakeri, Chunlei Gao, Jörg Schmalian, and Wulf Wulfhekel
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020503(R) (2019) - Published 11 July, 2019
Superconductivity in single FeSe layers on SrTiO shows a much higher critical temperature than in bulk FeSe, illustrating the potential of interface engineering. Yet the underlying mechanism of boosting is not understood. Both conventional and unconventional pairing mechanisms have been suggested to be responsible for this effect. Here, the authors show experimentally that phonons do not contribute significantly to the high but instead the intrinsic spin fluctuations of the electrons themselves lead to Cooper pairing.
Benjamin A. Frandsen, Qisi Wang, Shan Wu, Jun Zhao, and Robert J. Birgeneau
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020504(R) (2019) - Published 11 July, 2019
R. Stewart, M. G. Flokstra, M. Rogers, N. Satchell, G. Burnell, D. Miller, H. Luetkens, T. Prokscha, A. Suter, E. Morenzoni, and S. L. Lee
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020505(R) (2019) - Published 12 July, 2019
A. M. Guénault, A. Guthrie, R. P. Haley, S. Kafanov, Yu. A. Pashkin, G. R. Pickett, M. Poole, R. Schanen, V. Tsepelin, D. E. Zmeev, E. Collin, O. Maillet, and R. Gazizulin
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020506(R) (2019) - Published 17 July, 2019
Superfluids, such as superfluid He and He, exhibit a broad range of quantum phenomena and excitations, which are unique to these systems. Nanoscale mechanical resonators are highly sensitive force detectors with the ability to operate over many orders of magnitude in damping. Using nanomechanical doubly clamped beams, the authors probe superfluid He from the superfluid transition temperature down to millikelvin temperatures. They demonstrate excellent agreement with a ballistic model, incorporating thermal quasiparticles with acoustic emission limiting performance at the lowest temperatures.
Seiichiro Onari and Hiroshi Kontani
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020507(R) (2019) - Published 29 July, 2019
C. Shang, B. Lei, W. Z. Zhuo, Q. Zhang, C. S. Zhu, J. H. Cui, X. G. Luo, N. Z. Wang, F. B. Meng, L. K. Ma, C. G. Zeng, T. Wu, Z. Sun, F. Q. Huang, and X. H. Chen
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020508(R) (2019) - Published 30 July, 2019
Sayed Ali Akbar Ghorashi, Xiang Hu, Taylor L. Hughes, and Enrico Rossi
Phys. Rev. B 100, 020509(R) (2019) - Published 31 July, 2019
Higher-order topological superconductors (HOTSCs) are a new class of topological materials that in three dimensions are characterized by gapped bulk and surface states and gapless hinge modes. Here, the authors identify two new groups of HOTSCs: (i) second-order Dirac superconductors, which have both topologically protected Dirac cones at the surface and topologically protected dispersionless Majorana states at the hinges; (ii) three-dimensional magnetic field-induced HOTSCs with helical Majorana hinge states, which are located at only two (or one) of the corners. The authors show that, using the sign of the magnetic field and the mirror-diagonal symmetry-breaking perturbation, the Majorana pairs can be tuned to be at a specific corner, leading to a highly tunable setup for realization and detection of helical Majorana states.
H. Yokota, S. Matsumoto, E. K. H. Salje, and Y. Uesu
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024101 (2019) - Published 1 July, 2019
Anyang Cui (崔安阳), Yan Ye (叶艳), Limei Zheng (郑立梅), Kai Jiang (姜凯), Liangqing Zhu (朱亮清), Liyan Shang (商丽燕), Yawei Li (李亚巍), Zhigao Hu (胡志高), and Junhao Chu (褚君浩)
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024102 (2019) - Published 2 July, 2019
Junko Taniguchi, Kizashi Mikami, and Masaru Suzuki
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024103 (2019) - Published 3 July, 2019
Hajime Kimizuka, Shigenobu Ogata, and Motoyuki Shiga
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024104 (2019) - Published 8 July, 2019
Y. Horibe, M. Nomoto, T. Inoshita, K. Watanabe, S.-W. Cheong, Y. Inoue, and Y. Koyama
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024105 (2019) - Published 12 July, 2019
Sunil Upadhyay, Ugne Dargyte, Robert P. Prater, Vsevolod D. Dergachev, Sergey A. Varganov, Timur V. Tscherbul, David Patterson, and Jonathan D. Weinstein
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024106 (2019) - Published 15 July, 2019
M. I. McMahon, S. Finnegan, R. J. Husband, K. A. Munro, E. Plekhanov, N. Bonini, C. Weber, M. Hanfland, U. Schwarz, and S. G. Macleod
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024107 (2019) - Published 22 July, 2019
M. Yagmurcukardes
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024108 (2019) - Published 24 July, 2019
Zhukun Zhou, Hao Wang, and Mo Li
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024109 (2019) - Published 24 July, 2019
Nisarga Paul and Ariel Amir
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024110 (2019) - Published 26 July, 2019
Liang Chen, Li Fan, and Shu-yi Zhang
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024111 (2019) - Published 30 July, 2019
Miguel A. Caro
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024112 (2019) - Published 30 July, 2019
Zhijun Xu, Fei Li, Shujun Zhang, Christopher Stock, Jun Luo, Peter M. Gehring, and Guangyong Xu
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024113 (2019) - Published 30 July, 2019
M. Kingsland, Z. G. Fthenakis, and I. Ponomareva
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024114 (2019) - Published 31 July, 2019
Nina Glebko and Antti J. Karttunen
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024301 (2019) - Published 1 July, 2019
G. Passarelli, V. Cataudella, and P. Lucignano
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024302 (2019) - Published 3 July, 2019
Thomas A. Mellan, Andrew I. Duff, Blazej Grabowski, and Michael W. Finnis
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024303 (2019) - Published 8 July, 2019
M. Miniaci, R. K. Pal, R. Manna, and M. Ruzzene
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024304 (2019) - Published 15 July, 2019
K. L. Zhang, X. M. Yang, and Z. Song
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024305 (2019) - Published 15 July, 2019
Thilo Hahn, Daniel Groll, Tilmann Kuhn, and Daniel Wigger
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024306 (2019) - Published 16 July, 2019
G. D. Mahan
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024307 (2019) - Published 16 July, 2019
Fabienne Michelini and Katawoura Beltako
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024308 (2019) - Published 18 July, 2019
Loredana M. Vasiloiu, Federico Carollo, Matteo Marcuzzi, and Juan P. Garrahan
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024309 (2019) - Published 22 July, 2019
Tian Tian, Yongguan Ke, Liang Zhang, Shaochun Lin, Zhifu Shi, Pu Huang, Chaohong Lee, and Jiangfeng Du
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024310 (2019) - Published 25 July, 2019
Here, the authors present a novel scheme to study dynamical phase transitions (DPTs) from topological edge states in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model. They utilize eight coupled nanomechanical oscillators to simulate the quantum quenches and observe DPTs via directly measuring the Pancharatnam geometric phase in the experiment. The robustness of the DPT and its relation to equilibrium phases are explored. This nanomechanical lattice with its multiple modes, high quality factor, and temporal configurability offers unique advantages for research into nonequilibrium phenomena via an artificial solid-state platform.
Matthias Gerster, Benedikt Haggenmiller, Ferdinand Tschirsich, Pietro Silvi, and Simone Montangero
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024311 (2019) - Published 29 July, 2019
R. F. Bishop, P. H. Y. Li, O. Götze, and J. Richter
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024401 (2019) - Published 1 July, 2019
The frustrated spin-½ - Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the 2D square lattice is a paradigmatic model of quantum magnetism. Despite extensive investigations over the last 30 years, no consensus has emerged for its zero-temperature quantum phase diagram. The authors explore its bilayer --┴ counterpart by including an exchange coupling ┴ between partner sites on the two layers. As well as being of great interest in its own right, the model provides considerable insight into the single-layer case by expanding to a two-parameter regime that includes the monolayer as a single slice.
W. Töws and G. M. Pastor
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024402 (2019) - Published 1 July, 2019
S. J. Xu, J. Y. Shi, Y. S. Hou, Z. Zheng, H. B. Zhao, R. Q. Wu, S. M. Zhou, Z. Shi, and W. J. Fan
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024403 (2019) - Published 2 July, 2019
A. C. Y. Fang, S. R. Dunsiger, A. Pal, K. Akintola, J. E. Sonier, and E. Mun
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024404 (2019) - Published 2 July, 2019
M. G. Kim, B. Winn, S. Chi, A. T. Savici, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, W. C. Chen, X. Xu, Y. Li, J. W. Kim, S.-W. Cheong, and V. Kiryukhin
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024405 (2019) - Published 3 July, 2019
L. Peedu, V. Kocsis, D. Szaller, J. Viirok, U. Nagel, T. Rõõm, D. G. Farkas, S. Bordács, D. L. Kamenskyi, U. Zeitler, Y. Tokunaga, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, and I. Kézsmárki
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024406 (2019) - Published 8 July, 2019
In magnetoelectric (ME) materials, magnetic moments and electric polarization are entangled, leading to the static and optical ME effects. This can be used in logical devices or for the manipulation of electromagnetic radiation in the GHz and THz spectral range where the oscillating magnetic moments absorb radiation. The authors use THz spectroscopy to study LiNiPO, a four-spin system known to exhibit the static ME effect. Using linearly polarized THz radiation, they show that beside ordinary magnon resonances excited by the magnetic field of radiation there are electromagnons and ME spin excitations activated by the electric field of radiation, thus demonstrating that spin and charge dynamics are coupled in LiNiPO. They refine the spin Hamiltonian parameters by mapping the spin resonance spectrum over a broad magnetic field range and fitting it with a mean-field spin model.
Huanhuan Yang, H. Y. Yuan, Ming Yan, H. W. Zhang, and Peng Yan
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024407 (2019) - Published 8 July, 2019
Peter Milde, Erik Neuber, Andreas Bauer, Christian Pfleiderer, and Lukas M. Eng
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024408 (2019) - Published 8 July, 2019
S. C. Das, K. Mandal, P. Dutta, S. Pramanick, and S. Chatterjee
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024409 (2019) - Published 8 July, 2019
Barton L. Brown, Uwe C. Täuber, and Michel Pleimling
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024410 (2019) - Published 9 July, 2019
J. Kishine, Vl. E. Sinitsyn, I. G. Bostrem, Igor Proskurin, F. J. T. Goncalves, Y. Togawa, and A. S. Ovchinnikov
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024411 (2019) - Published 9 July, 2019
Yoshinori Sakamoto
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024412 (2019) - Published 12 July, 2019
A. A. Zvyagin
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024413 (2019) - Published 12 July, 2019
A. Scheie, S. Dasgupta, M. Sanders, A. Sakai, Y. Matsumoto, T. R. Prisk, S. Nakatsuji, R. J. Cava, and C. Broholm
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024414 (2019) - Published 12 July, 2019
Bing Li, Y. Sizyuk, N. S. Sangeetha, J. M. Wilde, P. Das, W. Tian, D. C. Johnston, A. I. Goldman, A. Kreyssig, P. P. Orth, R. J. McQueeney, and B. G. Ueland
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024415 (2019) - Published 15 July, 2019
Y. Henry, D. Stoeffler, J.-V. Kim, and M. Bailleul
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024416 (2019) - Published 15 July, 2019
D. I. Gorbunov, T. Nomura, A. A. Zvyagin, M. S. Henriques, A. V. Andreev, Y. Skourski, G. A. Zvyagina, R. Troć, S. Zherlitsyn, and J. Wosnitza
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024417 (2019) - Published 15 July, 2019
Dong-Sheng Wang
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024418 (2019) - Published 18 July, 2019
Bhaskar Das, Renu Choudhary, Ralph Skomski, Balamurugan Balasubramanian, Arjun K. Pathak, Durga Paudyal, and David J. Sellmyer
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024419 (2019) - Published 18 July, 2019
Grigory Bednik
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024420 (2019) - Published 19 July, 2019
Xiao-Chuan Wu, Anna Keselman, Chao-Ming Jian, Kelly Ann Pawlak, and Cenke Xu
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024421 (2019) - Published 22 July, 2019
Isaías Rodríguez, Renela M. Valladares, David Hinojosa-Romero, Alexander Valladares, and Ariel A. Valladares
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024422 (2019) - Published 22 July, 2019
Tian-Cheng Yi, Wen-Long You, Ning Wu, and Andrzej M. Oleś
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024423 (2019) - Published 23 July, 2019
Patrick Müller, Andre Lohmann, Johannes Richter, and Oleg Derzhko
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024424 (2019) - Published 23 July, 2019
Y. Quessab, M. Deb, J. Gorchon, M. Hehn, G. Malinowski, and S. Mangin
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024425 (2019) - Published 23 July, 2019
C. Stamm, C. Murer, Y. Acremann, M. Baumgartner, R. Gort, S. Däster, A. Kleibert, K. Garello, J. Feng, M. Gabureac, Z. Chen, J. Stöhr, and P. Gambardella
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024426 (2019) - Published 23 July, 2019
B. D. Coles, A. D. Hillier, F. C. Coomer, N. C. Bristowe, S. Ramos, and E. E. McCabe
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024427 (2019) - Published 24 July, 2019
D. Bossini, S. Dal Conte, G. Cerullo, O. Gomonay, R. V. Pisarev, M. Borovsak, D. Mihailovic, J. Sinova, J. H. Mentink, Th. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024428 (2019) - Published 25 July, 2019
Ultrashort laser pulses can induce picosecond coherent spin precession, described in terms of classical Landau-Lifshitz equations of motion. In antiferromagnets, the optical generation of pairs of high-energy magnons results in coherent 20-THz longitudinal spin oscillations. In a joint theoretical and experimental effort, the authors analyze here this controversial dynamical regime, investigating the dependence of spin dynamics on several parameters, such as temperature, polarization, and fluence. The derivation of an adequate equation of motion requires a quantum mechanical treatment, which predicts also entanglement between the pairs of photogenerated magnons.
R. M. Dubrovin, N. V. Siverin, P. P. Syrnikov, N. N. Novikova, K. N. Boldyrev, and R. V. Pisarev
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024429 (2019) - Published 26 July, 2019
N. V. Baranov, N. V. Selezneva, E. M. Sherokalova, Y. A. Baglaeva, A. S. Ovchinnikov, A. A. Tereshchenko, D. I. Gorbunov, A. S. Volegov, and A. A. Sherstobitov
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024430 (2019) - Published 29 July, 2019
Y. Fujita, M. Yamada, M. Tsukahara, T. Naito, S. Yamada, K. Sawano, and K. Hamaya
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024431 (2019) - Published 29 July, 2019
R. A. Stancioli and L. A. S. Mól
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024432 (2019) - Published 29 July, 2019
Wonhyuk Shon, Jong-Soo Rhyee, Yingshi Jin, and Sung-Jin Kim
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024433 (2019) - Published 31 July, 2019
Yihao Wang, Jian Yan, Junbo Li, Shasha Wang, Meng Song, Jiangpeng Song, Zhihao Li, Ke Chen, Yongliang Qin, Langsheng Ling, Haifeng Du, Liang Cao, Xuan Luo, Yimin Xiong, and Yuping Sun
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024434 (2019) - Published 31 July, 2019
O. Šipr, S. Mankovsky, and H. Ebert
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024435 (2019) - Published 31 July, 2019
A. M. Petrzhik, K. Y. Constantinian, G. A. Ovsyannikov, A. V. Zaitsev, A. V. Shadrin, A. S. Grishin, Yu. V. Kislinski, G. Cristiani, and G. Logvenov
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024501 (2019) - Published 8 July, 2019
Rasoul Ghadimi, Mehdi Kargarian, and S. Akbar Jafari
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024502 (2019) - Published 8 July, 2019
Miao Gao, Xun-Wang Yan, Jun Wang, Zhong-Yi Lu, and Tao Xiang
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024503 (2019) - Published 9 July, 2019
V. Narayan, P. C. Verpoort, J. R. A. Dann, D. Backes, C. J. B. Ford, M. Lanius, A. R. Jalil, P. Schüffelgen, G. Mussler, G. J. Conduit, and D. Grützmacher
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024504 (2019) - Published 10 July, 2019
Toby S. Wood, Mae Mesgarnezhad, George W. Stagg, and Carlo F. Barenghi
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024505 (2019) - Published 10 July, 2019
Zhixiang Sun, Pranab Kumar Nag, Steffen Sykora, Jose M. Guevara, Sven Hoffmann, Christian Salazar, Torben Hänke, Rhea Kappenberger, Sabine Wurmehl, Bernd Büchner, and Christian Hess
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024506 (2019) - Published 11 July, 2019
M. Naritsuka, S. Nakamura, Y. Kasahara, T. Terashima, R. Peters, and Y. Matsuda
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024507 (2019) - Published 15 July, 2019
J. Zhang, Z. F. Ding, K. Huang, C. Tan, A. D. Hillier, P. K. Biswas, D. E. MacLaughlin, and L. Shu
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024508 (2019) - Published 16 July, 2019
M. H. Ansari
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024509 (2019) - Published 17 July, 2019
Malte Harland, Sergey Brener, Alexander I. Lichtenstein, and Mikhail I. Katsnelson
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024510 (2019) - Published 17 July, 2019
Shu-Ichiro Suzuki, Alexander A. Golubov, Yasuhiro Asano, and Yukio Tanaka
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024511 (2019) - Published 18 July, 2019
Christopher Triola and Annica M. Black-Schaffer
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024512 (2019) - Published 18 July, 2019
S. Porta, L. Privitera, N. Traverso Ziani, M. Sassetti, F. Cavaliere, and B. Trauzettel
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024513 (2019) - Published 19 July, 2019
Irene P. Zhang, Johanna C. Palmstrom, Hilary Noad, Logan Bishop-Van Horn, Yusuke Iguchi, Zheng Cui, Eli Mueller, John R. Kirtley, Ian R. Fisher, and Kathryn A. Moler
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024514 (2019) - Published 22 July, 2019
Vera N. Smolyaninova, Jeffrey W. Lynn, Nicholas P. Butch, Heather Chen-Mayer, Joseph C. Prestigiacomo, M. S. Osofsky, and Igor I. Smolyaninov
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024515 (2019) - Published 24 July, 2019
M. S. Anwar, M. Kunieda, R. Ishiguro, S. R. Lee, L. A. B. Olde Olthof, J. W. A. Robinson, S. Yonezawa, T. W. Noh, and Y. Maeno
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024516 (2019) - Published 24 July, 2019
Alexander Fedorov, Alexander Yaresko, Erik Haubold, Yevhen Kushnirenko, Timur Kim, Bernd Büchner, Saicharan Aswartham, Sabine Wurmehl, and Sergey Borisenko
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024517 (2019) - Published 24 July, 2019
A. S. Cameron, Y. S. Yerin, Y. V. Tymoshenko, P. Y. Portnichenko, A. S. Sukhanov, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, D. Mc K. Paul, G. Balakrishnan, R. Cubitt, A. Heinemann, and D. S. Inosov
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024518 (2019) - Published 26 July, 2019
Shouvik Sur and Kun Yang
Phys. Rev. B 100, 024519 (2019) - Published 29 July, 2019
