Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Inversion-symmetry breaking in the noncollinear magnetic phase of the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet CuFeO2

T. Kimura1,2, J. C. Lashley1, and A. P. Ramirez2

  • 1Los Alamos National Laboratories, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 2Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974, USA

Phys. Rev. B 73, 220401(R) – Published 12 June, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.220401

Abstract

Magnetoelectric and magnetoelastic phenomena have been investigated on a frustrated triangular antiferromagnetic lattice in CuFeO2. Inversion-symmetry breaking, manifested as a finite electric polarization, was observed in noncollinear (helical) magnetic phases and not in collinear magnetic phases. This result demonstrates that the noncollinear spin structure plays an important role in inducing electric polarization. Based on these results we suggest that frustrated magnets (often favoring noncollinear configurations) are favorable candidates for a new class of magnetoelectric materials.

Article Text

References (27)

  1. A. P. Ramirez, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 24, 453 (1994).
  2. M. F. Collins and O. A. Petrenko, Can. J. Phys. 75, 605 (1997).
  3. N. A. Hill, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 6694 (2000).
  4. M. Fiebig, J. Phys. D 38, R123 (2005).
  5. T. Kato, K. Machida, T. Ishii, K. Iio, and T. Mitsui, Phys. Rev. B 50, R13039 (1994).
  6. A. Inomata and K. Kohn, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 2673 (1996).
  7. T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Nature (London) 426, 55 (2003).
  8. G. Lawes, A. B. Harris, T. Kimura, N. Rogado, R. J. Cava, A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, T. Yildrim, M. Kenzelmann, C. Broholm, and A. P. Ramirez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087205 (2005).
  9. M. Kenzelmann, A. B. Harris, S. Jonas, C. Broholm, J. Schefer, S. B. Kim, C. L. Zhang, S.-W. Cheong, O. P. Vajk, and J. W. Lynn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087206 (2005).
  10. H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and A. V. Balatsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 057205 (2005).
  11. C. T. Prewitt, R. D. Shannon, and D. B. Rogers, Inorg. Chem. 10, 791 (1971).
  12. S. Mitsuda, H. Yoshizawa, N. Yamaguchi, and M. Mekata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 1885 (1991).
  13. S. Mitsuda, N. Kasahara, T. Uno, and M. Mase, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 4026 (1998).
  14. Y. Ajiro, T. Asano, T. Takagi, M. Mekata, H. A. Katori, and T. Goto, Physica B 201, 71 (1994).
  15. O. A. Petrenko, M. R. Lees, G. Balakrishnan, S. de Brion, and G. Chouteau, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, 2741 (2005).
  16. S. Mitsuda, M. Mase, K. Prokes, H. Kitazawa, and H. A. Katori, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 3513 (2000).
  17. T. R. Zhao, M. Hasegawa, and H. Takei, J. Cryst. Growth 166, 408 (1996).
  18. We measured the dielectric constant along both the [110] and the [11¯0] directions, but did not observe any substantial difference.

  19. J. Kanamori, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 87 (1959).
  20. J. B. Goodenough, Magnetism and the Chemical Bond (Interscience, New York, 1963).
  21. P. W. Anderson, in Magnetism I, edited by G. Rado and H. Shuhl (Academic Press, New York, 1963), Chapter 2.
  22. We confirmed the sign reversal of P by reversing poling electric fields. We also measured P in magnetic fields, but P is by an order of magnitude smaller than P, which may be caused by P component due to some misalignment of sample axes.

  23. R. Blinc and A. P. Levanyuk, Incommensurate Phases in Dielectrics 1. Fundamentals (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986).
  24. K. Siratori, J. Akimitsu, E. Kita, and M. Nishi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 48, 1111 (1980); K. Siratori and E. Kita, ibid. 48, 1443 (1980).
  25. I. Dzyloshinskii, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958); T. Moriya, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960).
  26. I. A. Sergienko and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B 73, 094434 (2006).
  27. M. Mostovoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 067601 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation