- Rapid Communication
- Access by Xinjiang University
Inversion-symmetry breaking in the noncollinear magnetic phase of the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet
Phys. Rev. B 73, 220401(R) – Published 12 June, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.220401
Abstract
Magnetoelectric and magnetoelastic phenomena have been investigated on a frustrated triangular antiferromagnetic lattice in . Inversion-symmetry breaking, manifested as a finite electric polarization, was observed in noncollinear (helical) magnetic phases and not in collinear magnetic phases. This result demonstrates that the noncollinear spin structure plays an important role in inducing electric polarization. Based on these results we suggest that frustrated magnets (often favoring noncollinear configurations) are favorable candidates for a new class of magnetoelectric materials.
Article Text
References (27)
- A. P. Ramirez, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 24, 453 (1994).
- M. F. Collins and O. A. Petrenko, Can. J. Phys. 75, 605 (1997).
- N. A. Hill, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 6694 (2000).
- M. Fiebig, J. Phys. D 38, R123 (2005).
- T. Kato, K. Machida, T. Ishii, K. Iio, and T. Mitsui, Phys. Rev. B 50, R13039 (1994).
- A. Inomata and K. Kohn, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 2673 (1996).
- T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Nature (London) 426, 55 (2003).
- G. Lawes, A. B. Harris, T. Kimura, N. Rogado, R. J. Cava, A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, T. Yildrim, M. Kenzelmann, C. Broholm, and A. P. Ramirez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087205 (2005).
- M. Kenzelmann, A. B. Harris, S. Jonas, C. Broholm, J. Schefer, S. B. Kim, C. L. Zhang, S.-W. Cheong, O. P. Vajk, and J. W. Lynn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087206 (2005).
- H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and A. V. Balatsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 057205 (2005).
- C. T. Prewitt, R. D. Shannon, and D. B. Rogers, Inorg. Chem. 10, 791 (1971).
- S. Mitsuda, H. Yoshizawa, N. Yamaguchi, and M. Mekata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 1885 (1991).
- S. Mitsuda, N. Kasahara, T. Uno, and M. Mase, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 4026 (1998).
- Y. Ajiro, T. Asano, T. Takagi, M. Mekata, H. A. Katori, and T. Goto, Physica B 201, 71 (1994).
- O. A. Petrenko, M. R. Lees, G. Balakrishnan, S. de Brion, and G. Chouteau, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, 2741 (2005).
- S. Mitsuda, M. Mase, K. Prokes, H. Kitazawa, and H. A. Katori, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 3513 (2000).
- T. R. Zhao, M. Hasegawa, and H. Takei, J. Cryst. Growth 166, 408 (1996).
We measured the dielectric constant along both the [110] and the directions, but did not observe any substantial difference.
- J. Kanamori, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 87 (1959).
- J. B. Goodenough, Magnetism and the Chemical Bond (Interscience, New York, 1963).
- P. W. Anderson, in Magnetism I, edited by G. Rado and H. Shuhl (Academic Press, New York, 1963), Chapter 2.
We confirmed the sign reversal of by reversing poling electric fields. We also measured in magnetic fields, but is by an order of magnitude smaller than , which may be caused by component due to some misalignment of sample axes.
- R. Blinc and A. P. Levanyuk, Incommensurate Phases in Dielectrics 1. Fundamentals (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986).
- K. Siratori, J. Akimitsu, E. Kita, and M. Nishi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 48, 1111 (1980); K. Siratori and E. Kita, ibid. 48, 1443 (1980).
- I. Dzyloshinskii, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958); T. Moriya, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960).
- I. A. Sergienko and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B 73, 094434 (2006).
- M. Mostovoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 067601 (2006).