- Rapid Communication
- Access by Xinjiang University
Spin torques in ferromagnetic/normal-metal structures
Phys. Rev. B 65, 220401(R) – Published 23 May, 2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.220401
Abstract
Recent theories of spin-current-induced magnetization reversal are formulated in terms of a spin-mixing conductance We evaluate from first principles for a number of (dis)ordered interfaces between magnetic and nonmagnetic materials. We predict that the magnetization direction of a ferromagnetic insulator or of one side of a tunnel junction in a multiterminal device can be switched even though a negligible charge current is passed.
References (22)
- For recent reviews, see M.A.M. Gijs and G.E.W. Bauer, Adv. Phys. 46, 285 (1997); J.-P. Ansermet, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 6027 (1998); A. Barthélémy, A. Fert, and F. Petroff, in Handbook of Magnetic Materials, edited by K. H. J. Buschow (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999), Vol. 12; E.Y. Tsymbal and D.G. Pettifor, Solid State Phys. 56, 113 (2001).
- J.C. Slonczewski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, L1 (1996).
- L. Berger, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9353 (1996).
- K. Inomata, IEICE Trans. Electron. E84-C, 740 (2001).
- M. Tsoi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4281 (1998); J.-E. Wegrowe et al., Europhys. Lett. 45, 626 (1999); J.Z. Sun, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 202, 157 (1999); E.B. Myers et al., Science 285, 867 (1999); J.A. Katine et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3149 (2000); J. Grollier et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3663 (2001).
- K.M. Schep, P.J. Kelly, and G.E.W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 586 (1995).
- P. Zahn, I. Mertig, M. Richter, and H. Eschrig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2996 (1995).
- X. Waintal et al., Phys. Rev. B 62, 12 317 (2000).
- A. Brataas, Yu.V. Nazarov, and G.E.W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2481 (2000); Eur. Phys. J. B 22, 99 (2001).
- K.M. Schep et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, 10 805 (1997)
- M.D. Stiles and D.R. Penn, Phys. Rev. B 61, 3200 (2000).
- K. Xia et al., Phys. Rev. B 63, 064407 (2001).
- S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
- J.S. Moodera et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3273 (1995).
- G.E.W. Bauer et al., Mater. Sci. Eng., B 84, 31 (2001).
- The elements of the transmission matrix t which enter the conductances are the scattering theory transmission amplitudes used in the Landauer-Büttiker formalism to describe electrical transport (Ref. ). In Refs. and where we reported the development of methods for calculating these matrices from first principles, they were used in an application where only the matrix of transmission probabilities T, obtained by squaring the complex amplitudes, , were needed. In the present work we need t, as discussed in Refs. and .
- I. Turek et al., Electronic Structure of Disordered Alloys, Surfaces and Interfaces (Kluwer, Boston, 1997).
- O. K. Andersen, O. Jepsen, and D. Glötzel, in Highlights in Condensed Matter Theory, edited by F. Bassani, F. Fumi, and M. P. Tosi (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985), p. 59. In our calculations we use the atomic spheres approximation (ASA) in which the atomic Wigner-Seitz cells are replaced by atomic spheres. These fill all space so there is no interstitial region. The ASA is superior to the muffin-tin approximation for close-packed metals.
- To determine charge and spin densities one needs a configuration-averaged single Green’s function, a standard procedure using the CPA. Calculation of the conductance requires obtaining a configuration-averaged product of Green’s functions which is much more difficult. By using supercells we obtain virtually exact results without having to compute “vertex” corrections. It has the additional advantage that we can model short-range order, steps, stacking faults, etc.
- D. Huertas-Hernando, Yu.V. Nazarov, A. Brataas, and G.E.W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. B 62, 5700 (2000).
- D. Huertas-Hernando, Yu.V. Nazarov, and W. Belzig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 047003 (2002).
- In the barrier calculations reported here, six layers of empty atomic spheres were used to model the barrier.