- Access by Xinjiang University
High-pressure metallic phases of boron
Phys. Rev. B 42, 9033 – Published 15 November, 1990
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.9033
Abstract
First-principles total-energy calculations for solid boron predict a transition from the insulating α-rhombohedral phase first to a metallic body-centered-tetragonal structure at 210 GPa and subsequently to a face-centered-cubic structure at 360 GPa. While the possibility of intervening phases not considered here cannot be ruled out, it is argued that 210 GPa is an upper bound for the onset of a sequence of structural transitions by which boron evolves from a covalent insulator to a trivalent metal more like its neighbor Al.
References (44)
- H. Olijnyk, S. K. Sikka and W. B. Holzapfel, Phys. Lett. 103A, 137 (1984); J. Z. Hu and I. L. Spain, Solid State Commun. 51, 263 (1984).
- Y. K. Vohra, K. E. Brister, S. Desgreniers, A. L. Ruoff, K. J. Chang and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1944 (1986).
- J. C. Jamieson, Science 139, 129 (1963); T. Kikegawa and H. Iwasaki, Acta Crystallogr. B 39, 158 (1983)
- T. Kikegawa and H. Iwasaki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 56, 3417 (1987).
- A. K. McMahan, Physica B+C 139, &140B, 31 (1986).
- M. T. Yin and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 26, 5668 (1982).
- D. Schiferl, Phys. Rev. B 19, 806 (1979); K. J. Chang and M. L. Cohen, ibid. 33, 6177 (1986).
- R. J. Needs, R. M. Martin and O. H. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. B 33, 3778 (1986); L. F. Mattheiss and D. R. Hamann, ibid. 34, 2190 (1986); K. Shindo, T. Sasaki and N. Orita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58, 924 (1989).
- J. Donohue, The Structures of the Elements (Wiley, New York, 1974), p. 48.
- Boron Rich Solids, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 140, edited by D. Emin, T. Aselage, C. L. Beckel, I. A. Howard, and C. Wood (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1986).
- See, e.g., H. L. Yakel, in Ref. 10, p. 97.
- F. H. Horn, J. Appl. Phys. 30, 1611 (1959).
- D. W. Bullett, in Ref. 10, p. 249; , J. Phys. C 15, 415 (1982).
- A. C. Switendick, in Novel Refractory Semiconductors, Vol. 97 of Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, edited by D. Emin, T. L. Aselage, and C. Wood (MRS, Pittsburgh, 1987), p. 45.
- M. T. Yin, Phys. Rev. B 30, 1773 (1984); R. Biswas, R. M. Martin, R. J. Needs and O. H. Nielsen, ibid. 30, 3210 (1984).
- We use the structural data for B given in Table 5 5 of Ref. 9, due to Decker and Kasper. The rhombohedral angle α = 58.06 , while the B atoms are located at pm (xxz), pm (xzx), and pm (zxx). For the six B(1) atoms, x = 0.0104, z = -0.3427; while for the six B(2) atoms, x = 0.2206, z = -0.3677 .
- Note that a face centered tetragonal (fct) structure is identical to a body centered tetragonal (bct) structure with = / and = .
- Monoclinic distortions of the fcc structure were considered for the special case where a = b = c and therefore correspond to body centered orthorhombic structures.
- See, for example, Theory of the Inhomogeneous Electron Gas, edited by S. Lundqvist and N. M. March (Plenum, New York, 1983).
- J. Ihm, A. Zunger and M. L. Cohen, J. Phys. C 12, 4409 (1979).
- O. H. Nielsen and R. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. B 32, 3792 (1985).
- D. R. Hamann, M. Schlüter and C. Chiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1494 (1979).
- G. B. Bachelet, D. R. Hamann and M. Schlüter, Phys. Rev. B 26, 4199 (1982).
- D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980).
- O. H. Nielsen and R. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 697 (1983); Phys. Rev. B 32, 3780 (1985).
- At the equilibrium atomic volume, these kinetic energy cutoffs correspond approximately to the following number of plane waves per atom: 430 (sc), 390 (bcc), 390 (fcc), 540 (diamond), 380 (hcp), 380 (monoclinic), and 400 (bct).
- H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).
- For the metallic structures the following number of special k points were used: 56 (sc), 68 (bcc), 60 (fcc), 60 (diamond), 80 (hcp), 94 (monoclinic), and 56 (bct). For the insulating B structure, 10 special k points were used.
- P. Gomes Dacosta, O. H. Nielsen and K. Kunc, J. Phys. C. 19, 3163 (1986).
- F. D. Murnaghan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 30, 244 (1944).
- The pressure p entering the expression of the enthalpy H = E + pV was calculated independently (1) from the quantum mechanical stress and (2) from the volume derivative of the Murnaghan fit to the energy. Both procedures yield essentially the same transition pressure.
- O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 3060 (1975).
- H. L. Skriver, The LMTO Method (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
- A. K. McMahan, Phys. Rev. B 30, 5835 (1984).
- U. von Barth and L. Hedin, J. Phys. C 5, 1629 (1972).
- Formulations of the LMTO method without shape approximations have recently been developed, e.g., M. Methfessel, C. O. Rodriguez and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2009 (1989); however, we have not yet implemented these capabilities.
- The effect of the combined correction on the virial theorem may be easily demonstrated by carrying out bct calculations without empty spheres as c / a is decreased below unity. In another test, we have examined minimum energy and virial theorem 3pV=0 derived values of as a function of / , where and are radii of empty and atom based spheres for the sc structure. We find the energy derived values to be less sensitive to / and in better agreement with the optimal / = 1 result.
- The present LMTO calculations do predict a c / a approx 0.7 minimum in the high pressure bct energy as a function of c / a, in good agreement with the c / a = 0.65 ab initio pseudopotential minimum.
- J. A. Moriarty, Phys. Lett. 131A, 41 (1988).
- V. Heine and D. Weaire, Solid State Phys. 24, 250 (1970). See Fig. 74.
- J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 10, 4151 (1974).
- LASL Shock Hugoniot Data, edited by S. P. Marsh (University of California, Berkeley, 1980), p. 24.
- R. Hultgren, P. D. Desai, D. T. Hawkins, M. Gleiser, K. K. Kelley, and D. D. Wagman, Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of the Elements (Am. Soc. Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1973), p. 55.
- J. A. Moriarty, Phys. Rev. B 19, 609 (1979). When corrected for spin polarization, the results shown in Table I of this reference suggest that local spin density calculations will underestimate the valence binding energy of the second period atoms B and C by 0.7 and 1.0 eV, respectively, while making errors an order of magnitude smaller for the third period atoms Al and Si. These errors are in the direction to improve local density calculated cohesive energies for second period solids.