- Access by Xinjiang University
Orientation dependence of the carbon K edge in graphite measured by reflection electron-energy-loss spectroscopy
Phys. Rev. B 31, 4792 – Published 15 April, 1985
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.31.4792
Abstract
The orientation dependence of the core electron-energy loss of the carbon K edge in highly oriented pyrolytic graphite has been examined as a function of θ, the angle between the incident electron beam and the c axis normal to the basal plane of the graphite. The energy-loss spectra, detected in the reflection mode with a cylindrical mirror analyzer, show two major losses at 284.9 and 291.6 eV, corresponding, respectively, to the transition to the π and σ conduction band. The π loss has an angular dependence of (A+B θ) while the σ loss has a dependence of (C-D θ), where the coefficients A, B, C, and D are all positive. The angular dependence of the σ loss cannot be explained without including the contribution from the monopole transition from the C(1s) level to the 2s component of the orbitals of the σ band, thus indicating the breakdown of the dipole selection rule. The difference spectrum between two orientations shows that there is a second but weaker transition in the π loss at 287.2 eV. The line shape of the π loss is interpreted in terms of the configuration interaction between the core exciton (at ∼285 eV) with the π conduction states. The energy loss at 287.2 eV is assigned to the direct transition to the saddle point in the π band.
References (19)
- A. Koma and K. Miki, Appl. Phys. A 34, 35 (1984).
- A. Koma and K. Yoshimura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22, L173 (1983).
- L. Papagno and L. S. Caputi, Surf. Sci. 125, 530 (1983).
- P. G. Lurie and J. M. Wilson, Surf. Sci. 65, 476 (1977).
- L. Papagno, L. S. Caputi, M. De Crescenzi and R. Rosei, Phys. Rev. B 26, 2320 (1982).
- H. A. Bethe and R. Jackiw, in Intermediate Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1968), Chap. 17.
- R. Ludeke and A. Koma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 817 (1975).
- F. P. Netzer, G. Strasser and J. A. D. Matthew, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 211 (1983).
- J. J. Ritsko, N. O. Lipari, P. C. Gibbons, S. E. Schnatterly, J. R. Fields and R. Devaty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 210 (1976).
- J. R. Fields, P. C. Gibbons and S. E. Schnatterly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 430 (1977).
- L. A. Grunes and R. D. Leapman, Phys. Rev. B 22, 3778 (1980).
- R. D. Leapman and J. Silcox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1361 (1979).
- R. F. Willis, B. Fitton and D. K. Skinner, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 4412 (1972).
- E. J. Mele and J. J. Ritsko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 68 (1979).
- B. M. Kincaid, A. E. Meixner and P. M. Platzman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1296 (1978).
- J. Fink, T. Muller-Heinzerling, J. Pfluger, A. Bubenzer, P. Koidl and G. Crecelius, Solid State Commun. 47, 687 (1983).
- D. Denley, P. Perfetti, R. S. Williams, D. A. Shirley and J. Stohr, Phys. Rev. B 21, 2267 (1980).
- G. S. Painter and D. E. Ellis, Phys. Rev. B 1, 4747 (1970).
- U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).