Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Orientation dependence of the carbon K edge in graphite measured by reflection electron-energy-loss spectroscopy

T. T. P. Cheung

  • Phillips Research Center, Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74004

Phys. Rev. B 31, 4792 – Published 15 April, 1985

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.31.4792

Abstract

The orientation dependence of the core electron-energy loss of the carbon K edge in highly oriented pyrolytic graphite has been examined as a function of θ, the angle between the incident electron beam and the c axis normal to the basal plane of the graphite. The energy-loss spectra, detected in the reflection mode with a cylindrical mirror analyzer, show two major losses at 284.9 and 291.6 eV, corresponding, respectively, to the transition to the π and σ conduction band. The π loss has an angular dependence of (A+B cos2θ) while the σ loss has a dependence of (C-D cos2θ), where the coefficients A, B, C, and D are all positive. The angular dependence of the σ loss cannot be explained without including the contribution from the monopole transition from the C(1s) level to the 2s component of the sp2 orbitals of the σ band, thus indicating the breakdown of the dipole selection rule. The difference spectrum between two orientations shows that there is a second but weaker transition in the π loss at 287.2 eV. The line shape of the π loss is interpreted in terms of the configuration interaction between the core exciton (at 285 eV) with the π conduction states. The energy loss at 287.2 eV is assigned to the direct transition to the saddle point Q2g in the π band.

References (19)

  1. A. Koma and K. Miki, Appl. Phys. A 34, 35 (1984).
  2. A. Koma and K. Yoshimura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22, L173 (1983).
  3. L. Papagno and L. S. Caputi, Surf. Sci. 125, 530 (1983).
  4. P. G. Lurie and J. M. Wilson, Surf. Sci. 65, 476 (1977).
  5. L. Papagno, L. S. Caputi, M. De Crescenzi and R. Rosei, Phys. Rev. B 26, 2320 (1982).
  6. H. A. Bethe and R. Jackiw, in Intermediate Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1968), Chap. 17.
  7. R. Ludeke and A. Koma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 817 (1975).
  8. F. P. Netzer, G. Strasser and J. A. D. Matthew, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 211 (1983).
  9. J. J. Ritsko, N. O. Lipari, P. C. Gibbons, S. E. Schnatterly, J. R. Fields and R. Devaty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 210 (1976).
  10. J. R. Fields, P. C. Gibbons and S. E. Schnatterly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 430 (1977).
  11. L. A. Grunes and R. D. Leapman, Phys. Rev. B 22, 3778 (1980).
  12. R. D. Leapman and J. Silcox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1361 (1979).
  13. R. F. Willis, B. Fitton and D. K. Skinner, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 4412 (1972).
  14. E. J. Mele and J. J. Ritsko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 68 (1979).
  15. B. M. Kincaid, A. E. Meixner and P. M. Platzman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1296 (1978).
  16. J. Fink, T. Muller-Heinzerling, J. Pfluger, A. Bubenzer, P. Koidl and G. Crecelius, Solid State Commun. 47, 687 (1983).
  17. D. Denley, P. Perfetti, R. S. Williams, D. A. Shirley and J. Stohr, Phys. Rev. B 21, 2267 (1980).
  18. G. S. Painter and D. E. Ellis, Phys. Rev. B 1, 4747 (1970).
  19. U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation