Macroscopic quantum systems would reach thermodynamic equilibrium if in contact with a bath. If isolated, a subtle argument known as Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis (ETH) would still allow for thermalization despite the strictly unitary evolution of the closed system whereby the latter essentially serves as its own bath. However, if such an isolated system is sufficiently disordered, it won’t obey the ETH. As Anderson demonstrated for a very large class of noninteracting systems in 1958, “absence of diffusion”, aka Anderson localization, sets in if the randomness is sufficiently strong [1]. However, the natural and ubiquitous situation in a system of particles would be that they interact. The fate of localized systems with interactions was probed early on by Fleishman and Anderson, with the conclusion that localization survives in the weak-interaction regime [2].
The huge difficulties in handling disorder and interaction in a many-body system shifted the burden of exploring many-body localization (MBL) - the localization of closed, disordered, interacting systems - to this century. The prototypical system in question would, but need not, be interacting electrons in a random potential where localization corresponds to an insulating phase. In this context, Basko et al. argued convincingly that such electrons would have an insulating (many-body localized) phase even at nonzero temperature [3].
On the pages of Physical Review B, David Huse and collaborators have contributed substantially and repeatedly to the deeper understanding of MBL. Thus, Oganesyan and Huse suggested in 2007 that if there is MBL for strongly disordered and weakly interacting electrons, then MBL will also occur when both disorder and interactions are strong, even if the temperature is effectively infinitely high. In this latter case, they demonstrated that the MBL transition may be studied through exact diagonalization of small systems [4]. The same method was then implemented to study the MBL transition in another paradigmatic system, the random-field spin-½ chain. The localization transition and its finite-size scaling were explored with the highly nontrivial finding that this unusual, finite-temperature quantum phase transition shows infinite-randomness scaling with an infinite dynamical critical exponent. On a physical level, it is the competition between the Thouless energy (Planck constant times relaxation rate) and the level spacing that decides the outcome for ergodicity, if the former is much larger than that latter, or for MBL if the opposite is true [5].
In the PRB Milestone at hand, Huse and collaborators make the stunning prediction that many-body localized quantum systems, which do not equilibrate even if prepared with macroscopic amount of energy above their ground state, may still order in the sense that individual many-body eigenstates can display broken symmetry or topological order – and this at energy densities where the corresponding thermalized system would be disordered. To put it differently, MBL protects order. The authors go on to demonstrate that nonthermodynamic transitions between ordered and disordered phases, seen as transitions in the properties of the many-body eigenstates will occur and may proceed via localized critical points. The analysis is extended beyond one-dimensional systems. The big promise of such a type of MBL is that it may allow experimental manipulation of macroscopic quantum states since it provides protection against decoherence.
[1] P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
[2] L. Fleishman and P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. B 21, 2366 (1980).
[3] D. M. Basko, I. L. Aleiner, and B. L. Altshuler, Ann. Phys. (NY) 321, 1126 (2006).
[4] Vadim Oganesyan and David A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155111 (2007).
[5] Arjeet Pal and David A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 82, 174411 (2010).